Text began coming in to Meadows on January 6th, begging trump to stop the Capitol attack

[Faun]

With what, hollow aluminum flag poles? They certainly weren't armed with guns.

Guns, you fucking moron.

 

[bripat9643]

More hearsay. That's all you got.

 

[bripat9643]

Guns, you fucking moron.

Where are the guns?

 

[Faun]

agreed....that's why the DOJ charged the President, and why the DOJ hasnt changed anyone else since

This is still under investigation.

 

[Faun]

Which has a big sheet of bulletproof glass separating the driver from the passenger compartment. So her hearsay testimony turns out to to be impossible.

Fucking moron, Trump wasn't in the Beast.

 

[Faun]

More hearsay. That's all you got.

Are you ever not a fucking moron?

Ever??

How is that hearsay?

 

[bripat9643]

Fucking moron, Trump wasn't in the Beast.

Then her hearsay evidence is false.

 

[bripat9643]

Are you ever not a fucking moron?

Ever??

How is that hearsay?

She's testifying about what someone supposedly told her. You can't get anymore hearsay than that.

 

[bripat9643]

This is still under investigation.

You mean Schiff for Brains and Pisslosi are still conspiring about how to generate more fake evidence.

 

[Faun]

Then her hearsay evidence is false.

Nope, that doesn't prove it was false. To prove it was false requires both Ornato and Engel to testify under oath that she wasn't told what she claimed she was told.

 

[Faun]

You mean Schiff for Brains and Pisslosi are still conspiring about how to generate more fake evidence.

No, I'm talking about the Department of Justice.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Her testimony is regarding her direct conversations with the two who were there. They related the story to her. Not hearsay but straight from the horses mouth.

No. Straight from the horse's mouth would be if the agents themselves were being questioned. Hutchinson was testifying to hearsay.

 

[struth]

This is still under investigation.

hahahhaa yeah....the DOJ isn't investigating Trump.

 

[bripat9643]

Nope, that doesn't prove it was false. To prove it was false requires both Ornato and Engel to testify under oath that she wasn't told what she claimed she was told.

Nothing is required to prove that hearsay evidence is false, By definition, it's false.

 

[bripat9643]

No, I'm talking about the Department of Justice.

Which does the bidding or Schiff for Brains and Pisslosi.

 

[Faun]

She's testifying about what someone supposedly told her. You can't get anymore hearsay than that.

LOLOL

All you just did was prove you didn't bother to play the video I posted. It's not hearsay. Nor does it become hearsay simply because you're too scared to watch any of the hearing and choose to remain ignorant.

Still that video proves 2 things...

1 ... there were people there armed with firearms.

2 ... you're a fucking moron.

 

[Faun]

Which does the bidding or Schiff for Brains and Pisslosi.

Are you ever not a fucking moron?

Ever??

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Nope, that doesn't prove it was false. To prove it was false requires both Ornato and Engel to testify under oath that she wasn't told what she claimed she was told.

That's why they are demanding to take the stand. Cheney and Pelosi won't allow it.

 

[Faun]

hahahhaa yeah....the DOJ isn't investigating Trump.

Then why did they confiscate John Eastman's cell phone last week?

 

[Faun]

That's why they are demanding to take the stand. Cheney and Pelosi won't allow it.

Prove Cheney and Pelosi denied them the opportunity to come back to testify...