Thank you for your new law Mr. President

[HenryBHough]

How did we EVER live without the Dear wonderful Obama and his fascist administration?

and people are bowing down to this

we are hopeless and gone as a free self reliant people and have now become SUBJECTS to this government and politicians

Why, after 20Jan17, when President Obama hands the baton to President Clinton, we will do just fine.

The Repubs main issue is that they don't have anybody to run who can get votes from the center.

You're onto something.

So far Republicans have managed to run candidates far enough left that they have caused what should have been the base to stay home but not sufficiently far left to attract Democrats. Republicans gotta start offering a choice - not an echo.

 

[Old Rocks]

Yep. just as they all said that he would create an even worse economic situation than did the prior GOP administration. Really hard to explain the record Wall Street numbers. Seems they missed on that one too.

 

[Old Rocks]

Why, after 20Jan17, when President Obama hands the baton to President Clinton, we will do just fine.

The Repubs main issue is that they don't have anybody to run who can get votes from the center.

You're onto something.

So far Republicans have managed to run candidates far enough left that they have caused what should have been the base to stay home but not sufficiently far left to attract Democrats. Republicans gotta start offering a choice - not an echo.

Hell yes, run David Duke, for God's sake.

 

[Synthaholic]

So, when did you begin to favor doing away with the legislature and promoting the President to Monarch?

They are called Signing Statements and Executive Orders.

Look up how many Bush issued. He pioneered the practice. And wingnuts were silent. Just like the accumulation of power in the Executive Branch.

Now you have to live with the results of that power-grab with a Democratic President exercising the power.

Just wait until the Clinton money machine gets ramped up. Citizen's United won't look so good to Right-Wingers then.

 

[Dot Com]

People like Rove know that you can't win national elections w/ candidates who can only attract eXtreme rw reactionaries like HenryBHough to the polls You need > 25% of the vote to win a Presidential election.

 

[Synthaholic]

This is awful.
More Job losses, utility costs going up for the poor and lower middle class.
Needless high costs on law suits.
Just terrific.
Thank you Mr. Dictator in Chief.

House Republicans have the power to fix both of those. Will you tell them to do it?

 

[HenryBHough]

So, when did you begin to favor doing away with the legislature and promoting the President to Monarch?

They are called Signing Statements and Executive Orders.

Look up how many Bush issued. He pioneered the practice. And wingnuts were silent. Just like the accumulation of power in the Executive Branch.

Now you have to live with the results of that power-grab with a Democratic President exercising the power.

Just wait until the Clinton money machine gets ramped up. Citizen's United won't look so good to Right-Wingers then.

The next Clinton likely to be president isn't old enough yet.

 

[boedicca]

Yep. just as they all said that he would create an even worse economic situation than did the prior GOP administration. Really hard to explain the record Wall Street numbers. Seems they missed on that one too.

The Dow is made up of 30 Mega Corps that are mostly Big Government Cronies.

Companies like McDonalds and Exxon will always do well because poor fat people will keep driving to get junk food no matter how bad the economy is.

Most of the economy is made up of Main Street, which is doing quite poorly.

Oh, and you might try reading up on QE2 and contemplate its impact on asset inflation.

 

[Synthaholic]

How do you expect seniors living on fixed income to pay their heating bills?

You are going to get people killed!

NOW Republicans care about the poor and the elderly?

 

[hortysir]

How about reading and learning instead of blindly following

[EPA’s new Clean Air Act proposed rule on carbon emissions from existing power plants is expensive, controversial, and intrusive for households and small businesses. It will not decrease or address global warming, and may even worsen public health and electric reliability. ERCC poses seven important questions regarding the new proposals, and some of the answers may surprise you.QUOTE]

ERCC Answers Seven Questions You Should Have About EPA's Proposed Rule on Carbon Emissions from Existing Power Plants | ERCC ? Electric Reliability Coordinating Council

Ahem

 

[Dot Com]

this guy does a good impression of [MENTION=19448]CrusaderFrank[/MENTION] in re: climate change

The Word - F**k It - The Colbert Report - Video Clip | Comedy Central

 

[Kosh]

Once again the far left/AGW cult has no clue about anything beyond their programming.

 

[Dot Com]

Once again the far left/AGW cult has no clue about anything beyond their programming.

post on-topic or GTFO of the thread TROLLtard

 

[hortysir]

Once again the far left/AGW cult has no clue about anything beyond their programming.

post on-topic or GTFO of the thread TROLLtard

Or what? You'll tattle?

How about addressing the big pink elephant-sized fact sheet in the room?

For the past ten years, American carbon emissions have held steady or declined. Meanwhile China has increased by 160percent and India by 80percent.
Do you think they'll follow suit?

Do you disagree that prices will soar?

 

[Kosh]

Once again the far left/AGW cult has no clue about anything beyond their programming.

post on-topic or GTFO of the thread TROLLtard

Says the one from under the bridge that started a far left Obama drone trolling thread..

 

[Dot Com]

Once again the far left/AGW cult has no clue about anything beyond their programming.

post on-topic or GTFO of the thread TROLLtard

Or what? You'll tattle?

How about addressing the big pink elephant-sized fact sheet in the room?

For the past ten years, American carbon emissions have held steady or declined. Meanwhile China has increased by 160percent and India by 80percent.
Do you think they'll follow suit?

Do you disagree that prices will soar?

link?

and in answer to your query: certainly not if we don't set an example.

BTW- its an untapped market to be exploited

 

[hortysir]

Linked it twice dumbass....read and learn, Lemming

 

[whitehall]

The best defense is a good offense. Notice all the radical environmental junk that comes out of the White House when a new scandal erupts? Russia just entered into a 30 year treaty to supply fossil fuel to China and Hussein tightens the screws to guarantee another spike in gas prices.

 

[Crick]

For the past ten years, American carbon emissions have held steady or declined.

Meanwhile China has increased by 160percent and India by 80percent.
Do you think they'll follow suit?

That US emissions are not increasing is a good thing but that are emissions are still the second highest on the planet is not. Keep in mind the effective lifespan of carbon dioxide. Our emissions are still raising atmospheric CO2 levels and need to be cut.

Meanwhile, what we CAN do to get other nations to reduce their emissions, we WILL do. What would you suggest? War? That we NOT reduce our emissions till they reduce theirs - like a couple of grade schoolers? Brilliant. But really, when you bring up India and China, what IS your point?

Do you disagree that prices will soar?

No. As you noted, they have been decreasing for the last seven years and the effort to make that happen while still meeting US power and transportation needs has not cost anyone much of anything. Getting them to drop further and faster may well cost us something, but the prices will not "soar". Besides, the true cost - to us - of those emissions is most certainly not reflected in current fuel costs being paid by US consumers.

 

[Crick]

The best defense is a good offense. Notice all the radical environmental junk that comes out of the White House when a new scandal erupts? Russia just entered into a 30 year treaty to supply fossil fuel to China and Hussein tightens the screws to guarantee another spike in gas prices.

Hussein?