The T
George S. Patton Party
ahhh, the 'proving a negative argument'. Nice try, Hairnet.how many bugs or rat feces is tolerable in your can of beans?
Defect Levels Handbook
I don't have a problem with reasonable safety regs on any industry. It keeps me healthy happy and hale. What I have a problem is when people want levels of regulation with NO DISCERNABLE IMPROVEMENT over the previous standard with increased costs.
You want pure air and water? Live in a biosphere and drink distilled water. Don't live on Earth.
Hmmm, you can prove that right? Because you're a "scientist"? Oh, right wingers don't like science. I forgot. Then how do they "prove" things? Short answer? "They don't".
No, I'm saying that if someone wants to change the standards, they must PROVE there is both a need and benefit for it that outweighs the cost.
Now get back to your fries. You've hungry liberal drones waiting.
![lol :lol: :lol:](/styles/smilies/lol.gif)