Looks like UPS employees make more than USPS employees. Next whine...No one's talking about efficiency. We're talking strictly costs. And I'm not surprised the concept of comparable costs eludes you.I never denied they are subsidized with tax dollars. What the fuck is wrong with you that you're incapable of arguing what I actually say?So you've chosen to present the Post Office as an example of how the government does things "cheaper" than the Private Sector...but you don't take into account that the only reason the Post Office is able to survive with the prices they have is that they are given "loans" from the Treasury that everyone KNOWS will never be repaid? Are you REALLY that stupid, Faun?
Take two companies providing the same service. One is a non-profit organization while the other is a for-profit organization. Both have comparable costs to provide their services only the for-profit company charges more so they can make a profit.
Which one is cheaper?
depends on which one is more efficient. "comparable costs" is a meaningless phrase.
Would you like to discuss what the average Postal worker makes in salary and benefits compared to the average Fed Ex worker? Labor cost is the biggest cost that most businesses face. In the Postal Services case...it's retirement benefits alone for it's employees would never allow it to be profitable.
average salary ups - Google Search
average salary usps - Google Search
I said salary and benefits...god, you're pathetic!