Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Put my thread in the dungeon where no one can see it because two other people started flaming each other here.
Clever. I will protest that move with the moderators of course.
Don't think I haven't seen y'all pull that one before.
Sorry Silhouette -If that's me you are referring to - It's just my nature - I have a hard time being Civil to subhuman trash.
You are talking to the mirror again, greenbean.
I would say than somebody as obsessed with other people's sexual habits as you are, shouldn't be tampering with normal. But that is of course considering that you could. Being that normal is a rather subjective term, it would be very difficult to tamper with it.This isn't really germane to your point. I find my self scratching my head when you post this.
Jeeze..its like I have to post this on every thread to remind people..
Exactly. The people who cannot deduce the obvious shouldn't be tampering with "normal"...
I like to call him Sillhy. It's a play on words you see. I'm a pretty clever guy
Behave.
So you like the 12 steps or not?
Sorry Silhouette -If that's me you are referring to - It's just my nature - I have a hard time being Civil to subhuman trash.
You are talking to the mirror again, greenbean.
It's best not to respond to people that say very little but use such language. Some people want a legitimate argument so bad but aren't capable of producing one. The only thing to do is force them to come up with a valid argument byletting them know their argument isn't valid. The only way to do that is to simply not validate their argument with a response.
I would say than somebody as obsessed with other people's sexual habits as you are, shouldn't be tampering with normal. But that is of course considering that you could. Being that normal is a rather subjective term, it would be very difficult to tamper with it.This isn't really germane to your point. I find my self scratching my head when you post this.
Exactly. The people who cannot deduce the obvious shouldn't be tampering with "normal"...
If you don't think it's normal to be homosexual, and your definitionof normal is that important to you, don't. Simple as that. It's normal to me so it seems like your definition is rather subjective and thus invalid in the grander meaning.
Tough toenails bub.
I would say than somebody as obsessed with other people's sexual habits as you are, shouldn't be tampering with normal. But that is of course considering that you could. Being that normal is a rather subjective term, it would be very difficult to tamper with it.Exactly. The people who cannot deduce the obvious shouldn't be tampering with "normal"...
If you don't think it's normal to be homosexual, and your definitionof normal is that important to you, don't. Simple as that. It's normal to me so it seems like your definition is rather subjective and thus invalid in the grander meaning.
Tough toenails bub.
It may be normal to you , but it is contrary to natural Law, and unhealthy physically, mentally and spritually.
Behave.
So you like the 12 steps or not?
Could care less. No one can blackmail me.
I would say than somebody as obsessed with other people's sexual habits as you are, shouldn't be tampering with normal. But that is of course considering that you could. Being that normal is a rather subjective term, it would be very difficult to tamper with it.
If you don't think it's normal to be homosexual, and your definitionof normal is that important to you, don't. Simple as that. It's normal to me so it seems like your definition is rather subjective and thus invalid in the grander meaning.
Tough toenails bub.
It may be normal to you , but it is contrary to natural Law, and unhealthy physically, mentally and spritually.
Actually, no it is not.
You are talking to the mirror again, greenbean.
It's best not to respond to people that say very little but use such language. Some people want a legitimate argument so bad but aren't capable of producing one. The only thing to do is force them to come up with a valid argument byletting them know their argument isn't valid. The only way to do that is to simply not validate their argument with a response.
What you just described is your modus operandi for deflecting - you seem to believe that by repeating something often enough it will become true. Sorry little fag - but no matter how many times you click your heels together you're never going to get to Kansas that way.
I would say than somebody as obsessed with other people's sexual habits as you are, shouldn't be tampering with normal. But that is of course considering that you could. Being that normal is a rather subjective term, it would be very difficult to tamper with it.
If you don't think it's normal to be homosexual, and your definitionof normal is that important to you, don't. Simple as that. It's normal to me so it seems like your definition is rather subjective and thus invalid in the grander meaning.
Tough toenails bub.
It may be normal to you , but it is contrary to natural Law, and unhealthy physically, mentally and spritually.
Actually, no it is not.
It may be normal to you , but it is contrary to natural Law, and unhealthy physically, mentally and spritually.
Actually, no it is not.
This from somebody who encouraqes ignorant Gay people to eat feces - do you consider your shit eating to be natural also ?
It may be normal to you , but it is contrary to natural Law, and unhealthy physically, mentally and spritually.
Actually, no it is not.
This from somebody who encouraqes ignorant Gay people to eat feces - do you consider your shit eating to be natural also ?
Actually, no it is not.
This from somebody who encouraqes ignorant Gay people to eat feces - do you consider your shit eating to be natural also ?
I have never encouraged that. That would be disgusting. You are making things up now.
Actually, no it is not.
This from somebody who encouraqes ignorant Gay people to eat feces - do you consider your shit eating to be natural also ?
roflmao
Not that I doubt you at all, but can you post a link to this piece of shyte/advice?
I hope this conflict in interpretation between the parties can be resolved without warfare, or increased taxes.
These people are domestic terrorist. They force there agenda on the American public and call it "civil rights."
Actually, no it is not.
This from somebody who encouraqes ignorant Gay people to eat feces - do you consider your shit eating to be natural also ?
roflmao
Not that I doubt you at all, but can you post a link to this piece of shyte/advice?
He is hilarious. I can't wait to see what he posts next. I am glad the moderators aren't very strict here, I get a good laugh at these lunatics.This from somebody who encouraqes ignorant Gay people to eat feces - do you consider your shit eating to be natural also ?
roflmao
Not that I doubt you at all, but can you post a link to this piece of shyte/advice?
Earlier in this thread, I gave some advice on how heterosexuals, bisexuals, and homosexuals can prepare to receive anal intercourse. Then I said I like getting rimmed and he blew it out of proportion.
These people are domestic terrorist. They force there agenda on the American public and call it "civil rights."
wondering how two people getting married is an "agenda"?
rightwingnuts are hysterically funny.
