The Answer is blowing in the Wind

Hey bed wetter...

How about some more laws against pipe bombs of maybe even...

FUCKING MURDER!!!

I can not believe how stupid you moonbats truly are.



 
"how many times must the cannonballs fly
Before they’re forever banned?
The answer, my friend, is blowin’ in the wind
The answer is blowin’ in the wind"
LInk: Blowin' In The Wind

Supreme Court Rejects Major 2nd Amendment Case, And Justice Thomas Has A Fit

"The Times They Are A-Changin"

BOB DYLAN LYRICS - The Times They Are A-Changin'

Have we reached the tipping point?

Don't stain your pants. A refusal to take a state/municipal case is not a ruling. Another case is sure to come along that they will accept.

Also, old hippie music changes nothing. Just a thought.
 
Last edited:
California has a similar ban.

Didn't seem to help much last week, did it?

Another numb skull who believes laws prevent crimes. How stupid are those who believe crime can be prevented, and yet laws exist in every social system to have ever existed. Why is that, if they cannot prevent crime why do we have any laws?

I've explained why before, at a level even a dull normal second grader would understand, yet it seems some on this message board are too stupid, or too dishonest to acknowledge the truth in an easy lesson.
 
California has a similar ban.

Didn't seem to help much last week, did it?

Another numb skull who believes laws prevent crimes. How stupid are those who believe crime can be prevented, and yet laws exist in every social system to have ever existed. Why is that, if they cannot prevent crime why do we have any laws?

I've explained why before, at a level even a dull normal second grader would understand, yet it seems some on this message board are too stupid, or too dishonest to acknowledge the truth in an easy lesson.

Laws are not meant to prevent crime. Laws are intended to define crimes and provide a means to punish crimes. Of course, the Democrats have forgotten the punishment part.
 
Hey bed wetter...

How about some more laws against pipe bombs of maybe even...

FUCKING MURDER!!!

I can not believe how stupid you moonbats truly are.



A new forum has been added to the board with the intent of having civil debates or discussions on a wide variety of topics without the flames, name calling, trolling, hijacking, etc.

This forum will be heavily moderated to protect the integrity of the content within.

Warnings, infractions, and bannings will be enforced at the discretion of the moderators. A 3 strike rule will apply. After 3 warnings for failing to follow the guidelines posted below a members privileges will be PERMANENTLY revoked in this forum section. This is done to protect the integrity of this forum.Do NOT respond to a member who violates the guidelines with a like minded post; REPORT IT.


No Name Calling Or Putting Down Posters
No Trolling and/or Troll Threads
No Hijacking
No Personal Attacks
No Neg Repping
 
Another numb skull who believes laws prevent crimes. How stupid are those who believe crime can be prevented, and yet laws exist in every social system to have ever existed. Why is that, if they cannot prevent crime why do we have any laws?

I've explained why before, at a level even a dull normal second grader would understand, yet it seems some on this message board are too stupid, or too dishonest to acknowledge the truth in an easy lesson.

If laws don't prevent crime, then how will your assault on civil rights stop these mass shootings? Are you communists lying about that just to attack the Constitution?
 
Since Bob Dylan was mentioned - I will say this. The guy sucks. He doesn't hold a candle to Lou Reed and he considered him a "rival."
Reed had more talent in his boner than Dylan could muster in his whole anti-American body.
Fact.
Velvet Underground kicked ass under Reed's direction, vocals and musical talent.
 
California has a similar ban.

Didn't seem to help much last week, did it?

Another numb skull who believes laws prevent crimes. How stupid are those who believe crime can be prevented, and yet laws exist in every social system to have ever existed. Why is that, if they cannot prevent crime why do we have any laws?

I've explained why before, at a level even a dull normal second grader would understand, yet it seems some on this message board are too stupid, or too dishonest to acknowledge the truth in an easy lesson.


Just pointing out that banning an item doesn't prevent it from being used.

Like drugs.

Prohibition ruled that booze could not be sold in any venue in the country.

Did you know because of that ruling, drunk driving decreased by almost 50%?

Not a drop to be bought, legally, in the country, and it only stopped half the drunks from drinking and driving.

Lot of people want to do away with, or severely modify, drug laws.

and these same types think banning a firearm will work.

th
 
"how many times must the cannonballs fly
Before they’re forever banned?
The answer, my friend, is blowin’ in the wind
The answer is blowin’ in the wind"
LInk: Blowin' In The Wind

Supreme Court Rejects Major 2nd Amendment Case, And Justice Thomas Has A Fit

"The Times They Are A-Changin"

BOB DYLAN LYRICS - The Times They Are A-Changin'

Have we reached the tipping point?


There will be a civil war before you succeed in revoking all civil rights.

No one, well some do want to suppress voting rights, but no one wants to revoke all civil rights. We have courts to decide on such issues and simply because a court made a decision you didn't like is not reason to talk civil war.

First of all war is not civil. Second is you have no idea what war is or its consequences.

I suggest you take a stroll through some of our National Cemeteries; read the tombstones and pay close attention to the age of those who died, the date they died and the place they died. On one course of graves at Camp Rosecrans National Cemetery are a dozen or more graves of Marines, not yet 21 years of age who lost their life on the same day on a landing on one of the Japanese held Islands in WW II.

I also recommend you walk the field of battle at Gettysburg and read the names if known and the age if known of those noted on flat stones which mark where they fell.
 
California has a similar ban.

Didn't seem to help much last week, did it?

Another numb skull who believes laws prevent crimes. How stupid are those who believe crime can be prevented, and yet laws exist in every social system to have ever existed. Why is that, if they cannot prevent crime why do we have any laws?

I've explained why before, at a level even a dull normal second grader would understand, yet it seems some on this message board are too stupid, or too dishonest to acknowledge the truth in an easy lesson.


Just pointing out that banning an item doesn't prevent it from being used.

Like drugs.

Prohibition ruled that booze could not be sold in any venue in the country.

Did you know because of that ruling, drunk driving decreased by almost 50%?

Not a drop to be bought, legally, in the country, and it only stopped half the drunks from drinking and driving.

Lot of people want to do away with, or severely modify, drug laws.

and these same types think banning a firearm will work.

th

Wrong. MADD increased awareness of Drunk Driving and every few years the penalty for doing so rose and DD arrests diminished.

But, your analogy is not instructive, since only a type of weapon is prohibited - Heller and McDonald are not repealed.
 
No one, well some do want to suppress voting rights, but no one wants to revoke all civil rights. We have courts to decide on such issues and simply because a court made a decision you didn't like is not reason to talk civil war.

You of the democratic - socialist party have engaged in open, frontal assaults on the freedom speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, right to defend oneself with arms, ect.

You of the demagogue - sociopath party are engaged in full scale war to end civil rights.

First of all war is not civil. Second is you have no idea what war is or its consequences.

I suggest you take a stroll through some of our National Cemeteries; read the tombstones and pay close attention to the age of those who died, the date they died and the place they died. On one course of graves at Camp Rosecrans National Cemetery are a dozen or more graves of Marines, not yet 21 years of age who lost their life on the same day on a landing on one of the Japanese held Islands in WW II.

I also recommend you walk the field of battle at Gettysburg and read the names if known and the age if known of those noted on flat stones which mark where they fell.

The ones seeking civil war are you demagogue - sociopaths. You are engaged on attacking the Constitutional Republic. We don't want a war, but we will fight to defend our nation from you.
 
California has a similar ban.

Didn't seem to help much last week, did it?


And France has the California laws x1000…they don't have any gun stores that sell any fully automatic rifles……….and that saved those people in the concert hall and cafes how?
 
California has a similar ban.

Didn't seem to help much last week, did it?

Another numb skull who believes laws prevent crimes. How stupid are those who believe crime can be prevented, and yet laws exist in every social system to have ever existed. Why is that, if they cannot prevent crime why do we have any laws?

I've explained why before, at a level even a dull normal second grader would understand, yet it seems some on this message board are too stupid, or too dishonest to acknowledge the truth in an easy lesson.


Just pointing out that banning an item doesn't prevent it from being used.

Like drugs.

Prohibition ruled that booze could not be sold in any venue in the country.

Did you know because of that ruling, drunk driving decreased by almost 50%?

Not a drop to be bought, legally, in the country, and it only stopped half the drunks from drinking and driving.

Lot of people want to do away with, or severely modify, drug laws.

and these same types think banning a firearm will work.

th

Wrong. MADD increased awareness of Drunk Driving and every few years the penalty for doing so rose and DD arrests diminished.

But, your analogy is not instructive, since only a type of weapon is prohibited - Heller and McDonald are not repealed.


And this is why we shouldn't let 9 lawyers decide what is constitutional for 320 million people…….they made decisions in Heller and McDonald, and now they don't back them up…...
 

Forum List

Back
Top