The Anti-White Party

[protectionist]

If you believe that the repubs of of today are not the result of the southern strategy then you are too stupid to breath without a life vest, hard hat, and adult supervision.

Truth hurts don't it bitch? Democrats own the Blacks and keep them on their plantation by promising them
paradise and delivering them welfare for their reward. Maybe you need the supervision.
idiot

Unfortunately many dumb repubs think by repeating this often enough Blacks will vote for repubs. Sorry but it simply doesnt work. We know which party currently houses the most racists and it certainly isnt the one that put a Black man with a beautiful Black family in office.

Yes, it certainly IS that racist Democratic party, that advocates Affirmative Action, open admissions, watered down college classes, etc, etc.

 

[protectionist]

Markle, shut the fuck up. Do that until your white ass turns black and tries living that way.

White racism= Psychosis in action because of a weak mind.

WHAT white racism ? There hasn't been any for 60 years. It's all Black Privilege racism against whites, and you're a perfect example.

 

[Markle]

Wrong answer junior. And Brandon Gaille is not Health and Human services.

Now while you want to talk shit, you don't want to talk about how poverty impacts race.

3 times the number of blacks live in poverty than whites. 1 out of every 3 blacks people live at or below poverty in this country. 1 out of every 9 whites. And why is that? Not because blacks don't want to work, your white asses are telling us that black unemploymemnt is the lowest in history and at 6 percent, that means 94 percent of all blacks are working. So if 9 out of 10 blacks are working why is it that 6 out of those 10 working blacks live in poverty?

You want to argue stats chump, so now you're going to get taught a lesson.

In 2011, DEMOS did a study named “The Racial Wealth Gap, Why Policy Matters”, which discussed the racial wealth gap, the problems associated with it along with solutions and outcomes if the gap did not exist. In this study DEMOS determined that the racial wealth gap was primarily driven by policy decisions.

“The U.S. racial wealth gap is substantial and is driven by public policy decisions. According to our analysis of the SIPP data, in 2011 the median white household had $111,146 in wealth holdings, compared to just $7,113 for the median Black household and $8,348 for the median Latino household. From the continuing impact of redlining on American homeownership to the retreat from desegregation in public education, public policy has shaped these disparities, leaving them impossible to overcome without racially-aware policy change.”

So here we have it. White racist public policy is why so many blacks are in poverty. That means blacks are on welfare because of racist public policy. Why are so many whites getting food stamps and assistance junior. Public policy has not hampered whites near as much. Whites live below the national poverty rate and their unemployment is below the national average. White median income is above the national average, yet more whites get food stamps. Use credible sources if you want to take me on. Using other racists isn't going to get the job done boy.

Your first chart is a decade old. It also shows that the percentage of white receiving welfare is 48.5%.

Mine, from two years ago shows:

Welfare Demographics
The following percentages are recipients of welfare based on race.

• White – 38.8%
• Black – 39.8%
• Hispanic – 15.7%
• Asian – 2.4%
• Other – 3.3%

So once again you're wrong. Quit lying, your life will be a lot easier.

 

[Zorro!]

I've offered this up before and, to my knowledge, IM2 nor anyone else has dared take the test for racism. I do not wish for anyone to post their results if, indeed, they take the test. In my opinion, anyone could edit the results to show them in a better light than the test actually reveals.

It’s NATURAL to discriminate and be prejudiced; almost exclusively we all grew up with people like very much like ourselves. It is natural to trust those people more than people who are not like us. Obviously, we also pick up racist attitudes and beliefs from our parents too. We discriminate and use prejudice every day. There is nothing wrong with those feelings. It is what we learn and what is in someone’s heart, and what we DO with those feelings that matters.

If you are curious about yourself, take this test. The test does NOT use questions, which you could answer the way you THINK you should. Actually, it is fun. You can chose from a number of different tests but they only take about 15 minutes.

This web site presents a method that demonstrates the conscious-unconscious divergences much more convincingly than has been possible with previous methods. This new method is called the Implicit Association Test or IAT for short.

WARNING!

It does carry this disclaimer:

I am aware of the possibility of encountering interpretations of my IAT test performance with which I may not agree. Knowing this, I wish to proceed.

Project Implicit
https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/

This 20+ years old test is supposed to reveal to test-takers a deep, dark secret about who they are: They may not feel racist, but in fact, the test shows that in a variety of intergroup settings, they will act racist. This notion, and the data surrounding it, have fed into a very neat narrative explaining bias and racial justice in modern America. Sure, explicit measures of racism have been in decline for a while in the United States. It’s less socially acceptable than ever to say that black people and white people shouldn’t get married, or that black people are less intelligent than white people (though, to be sure, a solid minority of Americans still endorses such views). And yet, more than a half-century after the end of Jim Crow, all sorts of racial discrepancies persist: On average, darker-skinned people have less access to solid education, housing, and health care than lighter-skinned ones, and face various other forms of discrimination. The test suggests that, having addressed many of the most outrageous and explicit forms of public discrimination, our progress toward genuine racial equality may be continually stalled or undone by implicit bias.

This test's proponents argue that if people who don’t feel like they discriminate do, in fact, discriminate, that this explains the disparate outcomes. White cops who claim racial empathy are still more likely to pull the trigger in an ambiguous situation involving a black suspect than a white one. White real-estate agents who are proud Obama voters conjure up thin excuses that feel legitimate to them to avoid renting nice units to black families. The test co-creators of the test have written,

“given the relatively small proportion of people who are overtly prejudiced and how clearly it is established that automatic race preference as measured by the test predicts discrimination, it is reasonable to conclude not only that implicit bias is a cause of Black disadvantage but also that it plausibly plays a greater role than does explicit bias in explaining the discrimination that contributes to Black disadvantage.”​

They claim that 90–95 percent of Americans harbored the “roots of unconscious prejudice.” The test has been mostly treated as a revolutionary, revelatory piece of technology, garnering overwhelmingly positive media coverage.

Unfortunately, a growing pile of scholarly work, some of it published in top psychology journals and most of it ignored by the media, suggests that the test falls far short of the quality-control standards normally expected of psychological instruments. The test is a noisy, unreliable measure that correlates far too weakly with any real-world outcomes to be used to predict individuals’ behavior — even the test’s creators have now admitted as such. The history of the test suggests it was released to the public and excitedly publicized long before it had been fully validated in the rigorous, careful way normally demanded by the field of psychology. In fact, there’s a case to be made that Harvard shouldn’t be administering the test in its current form, in light of its shortcomings and its potential to mislead people about their own biases. There’s also a case to be made that the test went viral not for solid scientific reasons, but simply because it tells us such a simple, pat story about how racism works and can be fixed: that deep down, we’re all a little — or a lot — racist, and that if we measure and study this individual-level racism enough, progress toward equality will ensue.

Psychology’s Favorite Tool for Measuring Racism Isn’t Up to the Job

Wow, in all the years I have suggested folks might want to look at this simple test, only those who, as the test cautions, get a result that shouts out their racist view, come out with such vehement opposition.

Your source, Jesse Singal, has a questionable reputation at best. He is also a far-left journalist. So you have a far-left radical who has a reputation of being loose with the facts and I have a research project, from Harvard with a 20-year record. Got it! The test really must have smoked you out!

We warned The Atlantic about Jesse Singal, but they ignored us

Dawn Ennis
Jun 19, 2018 · 6 min read

We warned The Atlantic about Jesse Singal, but they ignored us

###

Journalist Jesse Singal says he ‘goofed’ on interpreting trans study—and activists are infuriated
Ana Valens— 2018-03-29 09:31 pm | Last updated 2018-03-29 09:38 pm

Journalist Jesse Singal says he 'goofed' on interpreting trans study—and activists are infuriated

###

Why take a test fails the repeatabiliy standard and has shown no predictive value of real world effects? I might as well stare at the entrails of a goat.

Some studies show that IAT appears to be measuring something other than implicit bias; that is, appeared to demonstrate the existence of a “stereotype threat”-style effect in the IAT — whites who were more concerned about appearing racist were scored as more “biased” by the test. In the initial version of the IAT’s scoring algorithm, there was even a correlation between cognitive-processing speed and IAT score, the researchers Sam G. McFarland and Zachary Crouch found: Those who were a bit cognitively slower got higher IAT scores, meaning they were told they were more biased than faster test-takers.

“An older person is going to possibly be told they’re more racist than a younger person,” said Blanton, “or a person who does crossword puzzles or plays computer games will possibly be told they’re less racist compared to someone who doesn’t.”​

So, embarrassed about this and other errors, in 2007 the test’s architects adopted a new algorithm. But when Blanton and his colleagues popped that algorithm’s hood and poked around, they found that it contained a very weird quirk of its own — a potentially serious one.

“The new problem is that anyone who concentrates and is really consistent in their responses is going to come across as extremely biased,” explained Blanton. In a 2014 article in the journal Assessment, Blanton, James Jaccard, and Christopher N. Burrows reported that since the algorithm changed, the less statistically “noisy” a given IAT test session is — think someone taking the test in a loud room, or with a bad hangover, or when their mind is elsewhere — the more the test will report the test-taker is biased against the out-group!​

It's rather novel for a psychological instrument in which less statistical noise predictably biases the results upward or downward.

“What should happen is that as you remove random noise, you just get a better estimate of the thing being measured.” he explained.​

Blanton provided a surprising example of how this plays out in test sessions, according to his team’s math: If an IAT test-taker is exactly 1 millisecond faster on each and every white/good as compared to black/bad trial, they “will get the most extreme label. That is, the test will tell them they are extremely implicitly biased despite their having exhibited almost zero bias in their actual performance.

Psychology’s Favorite Tool for Measuring Racism Isn’t Up to the Job

 

[protectionist]

Please show us the policies which are designed to hold back blacks today.

You can't because there are none.

That's not what these guys say.

On October 24, 2013, the Kellogg Foundation sent out a press release about a report they had done entitled, “The Business Case for Racial Equity”. This was a study done by the Kellogg Foundation, using information it had studied and assessed from the Center for American Progress, National Urban League Policy Institute, Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies and the U.S. Department of Justice.

“Striving for racial equity – a world where race is no longer a factor in the distribution of opportunity – is a matter of social justice. But moving toward racial equity can generate significant economic returns as well. When people face barriers to achieving their full potential, the loss of talent, creativity, energy, and productivity is a burden not only for those disadvantaged, but for communities, businesses, governments, and the economy as a whole. Initial research on the magnitude of this burden in the United States (U.S.), as highlighted in this brief, reveals impacts in the trillions of dollars in lost earnings, avoidable public expenditures, and lost economic output.”

The Kellogg Foundation and Altarum Institute

In 2011, DEMOS did a study named “The Racial Wealth Gap, Why Policy Matters”, which discussed the racial wealth gap, the problems associated with it along with solutions and outcomes if the gap did not exist. In this study DEMOS determined that the racial wealth gap was primarily driven by policy decisions.

“The U.S. racial wealth gap is substantial and is driven by public policy decisions. According to our analysis of the SIPP data, in 2011 the median white household had $111,146 in wealth holdings, compared to just $7,113 for the median Black household and $8,348 for the median Latino household. From the continuing impact of redlining on American homeownership to the retreat from desegregation in public education, public policy has shaped these disparities, leaving them impossible to overcome without racially-aware policy change.”

“Eliminating disparities in homeownership rates and returns would substantially reduce the racial wealth gap. While 73 percent of white households owned their own homes in 2011, only 47 percent of Latinos and 45 percent of Blacks were homeowners. In addition, Black and Latino homeowners saw less return in wealth on their investment in homeownership: for every $1 in wealth that accrues to median Black households as a result of homeownership, median white households accrue $1.34; meanwhile for every $1 in wealth that accrues to median Latino households as a result of homeownership, median white households accrue $1.54.”

“If public policy successfully eliminated racial disparities in homeownership rates, so that Blacks and Latinos were as likely as white households to own their homes, median Black wealth would grow $32,113 and the wealth gap between Black and white households would shrink 31 percent. Median Latino wealth would grow $29,213 and the wealth gap with white households would shrink 28 percent.”

“If public policy successfully equalized the return on homeownership, so that Blacks and Latinos saw the same financial gains as whites as a result of being homeowners, median Black wealth would grow $17,113 and the wealth gap between Black and white households would shrink 16 percent. Median Latino wealth would grow $41,652 and the wealth gap with white households would shrink 41 percent.”

“Eliminating disparities in college graduation and the return on a college degree would have a modest direct impact on the racial wealth gap. In 2011, 34 percent of whites had completed four-year college degrees compared to just 20 percent of Blacks and 13 percent of Latinos. In addition, Black and Latino college graduates saw a lower return on their degrees than white graduates: for every $1 in wealth that accrues to median Black households associated with a college degree, median white households accrue $11.49. Meanwhile for every $1 in wealth that accrues to median Latino households associated with a college degree, median white households accrue $13.33.”

“If public policy successfully eliminated racial disparities in college graduation rates, median Black wealth would grow $1,313 and the wealth gap between Black and white households would shrink 1 percent. Median Latino wealth would grow $3,528 and the wealth gap with white households would shrink 3 percent. “

“If public policy successfully equalized the return to college graduation, median Black wealth would grow $10,786 and the wealth gap between Black and white households would shrink 10 percent. Median Latino wealth would grow $5,878 and the wealth gap with white households would shrink 6 percent.”

“Eliminating disparities in income—and even more so, the wealth return on income—would substantially reduce the racial wealth gap. Yet in 2011, the median white household had an income of $50,400 a year compared to just $32,028 for Blacks and $36,840 for Latinos. Black and Latino households also see less of a return than white households on the income they earn: for every $1 in wealth that accrues to median Black households associated with a higher income, median white households accrue $4.06. Meanwhile, for every $1 in wealth that accrues to median Latino households associated with higher income, median white households accrue $5.37.”

“If public policy successfully eliminated racial disparities in income, median Black wealth would grow $11,488 and the wealth gap between Black and white households would shrink 11 percent. Median Latino wealth would grow $8,765 and the wealth gap with white households would shrink 9 percent.”

“If public policy successfully equalized the return to income, so that each additional dollar of income going to Black and Latino households was converted to wealth at the same rate as white households, median Black wealth would grow $44,963 and median Latino wealth would grow $51,552. This would shrink the wealth gap with white households by 43 and 50 percent respectively.”

I'm only going to waste time on one of the things you posted although none are policies.

Yes, there is a differential between homeownership between blacks and whites. The problem comes from the FACT that when compared, regardless of race and only by the merits of the loans, credit scores, steady employment, etc, there was a negligible difference, well within the statistical margin of error.

Look, all you have are your old tired worn hysterical rants and diatribes claiming that the reason for your failures. Curious because we have already determined that you are white, your wife black and you have a mixed-race child.

Grow up.

I've done better than you. And you have determined incorrectly. So get help for your psychosis bitch.

Weak white people join forums like this because they get to talk shit they never would say to a black persons face.

1. I've kicked about a 2 dozen guy's asses in my life. Most of them were blacks, who were too confident for their own good. Never pick a fight with an ex-Army construction worker, who grew up in a tough neighborhood in New York City.

2. Most undefeated boxers have been white. Most of the guys they beat were black.

The Only Boxing Champions in History to Retire Undefeated

 

[protectionist]

I DON'T LIKE these annoying advertisements intruding inside our posts, and I wrote a message to the forum telling them so.

The damn things are too disruptive of the communication. I don't mind the advertising. They just should be outside of the posts, not in them.

 

[bluzman61]

I DON'T LIKE these annoying advertisements intruding inside our posts, and I wrote a message to the forum telling them so.

The damn things are too disruptive of the communication. I don't mind the advertising. They just should be outside of the posts, not in them.

Use Adblock Plus, this blocks EVERY ad.

 

[protectionist]

I DON'T LIKE these annoying advertisements intruding inside our posts, and I wrote a message to the forum telling them so.

The damn things are too disruptive of the communication. I don't mind the advertising. They just should be outside of the posts, not in them.

Use Adblock Plus, this blocks EVERY ad.

Wow. I'll have to look into that. Hope it's not expensive. Problem still is though that not everybody has that, so they still are seeing our posts all broken up by the ads.

The forum should know better than to cheapen itself like this.

 

[bluzman61]

I DON'T LIKE these annoying advertisements intruding inside our posts, and I wrote a message to the forum telling them so.

The damn things are too disruptive of the communication. I don't mind the advertising. They just should be outside of the posts, not in them.

Use Adblock Plus, this blocks EVERY ad.

Wow. I'll have to look into that. Hope it's not expensive. Problem still is though that not everybody has that, so they still are seeing our posts all broken up by the ads.

The forum should know better than to cheapen itself like this.

I got it free with my computer, a 2016-17 Dell. And it runs on Windows 10. I didn't buy my computer new, Adblock and Adblock Plus were already in the system. And I pay nothing for them.

 

[protectionist]

I DON'T LIKE these annoying advertisements intruding inside our posts, and I wrote a message to the forum telling them so.

The damn things are too disruptive of the communication. I don't mind the advertising. They just should be outside of the posts, not in them.

Use Adblock Plus, this blocks EVERY ad.

Wow. I'll have to look into that. Hope it's not expensive. Problem still is though that not everybody has that, so they still are seeing our posts all broken up by the ads.

The forum should know better than to cheapen itself like this.

I got it free with my computer, a 2016-17 Dell. And it runs on Windows 10. I didn't buy my computer new, Adblock and Adblock Plus were already in the system. And I pay nothing for them.

I think Adblock might be in mine too, a late model notebook laptop, my Android cell phone, but I went to the Settings and couldn't find it.
I'm not too good with computers.

 

[bluzman61]

I DON'T LIKE these annoying advertisements intruding inside our posts, and I wrote a message to the forum telling them so.

The damn things are too disruptive of the communication. I don't mind the advertising. They just should be outside of the posts, not in them.

Use Adblock Plus, this blocks EVERY ad.

Wow. I'll have to look into that. Hope it's not expensive. Problem still is though that not everybody has that, so they still are seeing our posts all broken up by the ads.

The forum should know better than to cheapen itself like this.

I got it free with my computer, a 2016-17 Dell. And it runs on Windows 10. I didn't buy my computer new, Adblock and Adblock Plus were already in the system. And I pay nothing for them.

I think Adblock might be in mine too, a late model notebook laptop, my Android cell phone, but I went to the Settings and couldn't find it.
I'm not too good with computers.

Neither am I. I'm lucky the adblockers were already in the system.

 

[IM2]

Wrong answer junior. And Brandon Gaille is not Health and Human services.

Now while you want to talk shit, you don't want to talk about how poverty impacts race.

3 times the number of blacks live in poverty than whites. 1 out of every 3 blacks people live at or below poverty in this country. 1 out of every 9 whites. And why is that? Not because blacks don't want to work, your white asses are telling us that black unemploymemnt is the lowest in history and at 6 percent, that means 94 percent of all blacks are working. So if 9 out of 10 blacks are working why is it that 6 out of those 10 working blacks live in poverty?

You want to argue stats chump, so now you're going to get taught a lesson.

In 2011, DEMOS did a study named “The Racial Wealth Gap, Why Policy Matters”, which discussed the racial wealth gap, the problems associated with it along with solutions and outcomes if the gap did not exist. In this study DEMOS determined that the racial wealth gap was primarily driven by policy decisions.

“The U.S. racial wealth gap is substantial and is driven by public policy decisions. According to our analysis of the SIPP data, in 2011 the median white household had $111,146 in wealth holdings, compared to just $7,113 for the median Black household and $8,348 for the median Latino household. From the continuing impact of redlining on American homeownership to the retreat from desegregation in public education, public policy has shaped these disparities, leaving them impossible to overcome without racially-aware policy change.”

So here we have it. White racist public policy is why so many blacks are in poverty. That means blacks are on welfare because of racist public policy. Why are so many whites getting food stamps and assistance junior. Public policy has not hampered whites near as much. Whites live below the national poverty rate and their unemployment is below the national average. White median income is above the national average, yet more whites get food stamps. Use credible sources if you want to take me on. Using other racists isn't going to get the job done boy.

Your first chart is a decade old. It also shows that the percentage of white receiving welfare is 48.5%.

Mine, from two years ago shows:

Welfare Demographics
The following percentages are recipients of welfare based on race.

• White – 38.8%
• Black – 39.8%
• Hispanic – 15.7%
• Asian – 2.4%
• Other – 3.3%

So once again you're wrong. Quit lying, your life will be a lot easier.

Not wrong. So you are the one lying to yourself and the sooner you stop, the better off you'll be. Because as I said when you add farm and corporate welfare, which is welfare, more whites are getting government assistance.

 

[protectionist]

Wrong answer junior. And Brandon Gaille is not Health and Human services.

Now while you want to talk shit, you don't want to talk about how poverty impacts race.

3 times the number of blacks live in poverty than whites. 1 out of every 3 blacks people live at or below poverty in this country. 1 out of every 9 whites. And why is that? Not because blacks don't want to work, your white asses are telling us that black unemploymemnt is the lowest in history and at 6 percent, that means 94 percent of all blacks are working. So if 9 out of 10 blacks are working why is it that 6 out of those 10 working blacks live in poverty?

You want to argue stats chump, so now you're going to get taught a lesson.

In 2011, DEMOS did a study named “The Racial Wealth Gap, Why Policy Matters”, which discussed the racial wealth gap, the problems associated with it along with solutions and outcomes if the gap did not exist. In this study DEMOS determined that the racial wealth gap was primarily driven by policy decisions.

“The U.S. racial wealth gap is substantial and is driven by public policy decisions. According to our analysis of the SIPP data, in 2011 the median white household had $111,146 in wealth holdings, compared to just $7,113 for the median Black household and $8,348 for the median Latino household. From the continuing impact of redlining on American homeownership to the retreat from desegregation in public education, public policy has shaped these disparities, leaving them impossible to overcome without racially-aware policy change.”

So here we have it. White racist public policy is why so many blacks are in poverty. That means blacks are on welfare because of racist public policy. Why are so many whites getting food stamps and assistance junior. Public policy has not hampered whites near as much. Whites live below the national poverty rate and their unemployment is below the national average. White median income is above the national average, yet more whites get food stamps. Use credible sources if you want to take me on. Using other racists isn't going to get the job done boy.

Your first chart is a decade old. It also shows that the percentage of white receiving welfare is 48.5%.

Mine, from two years ago shows:

Welfare Demographics
The following percentages are recipients of welfare based on race.

• White – 38.8%
• Black – 39.8%
• Hispanic – 15.7%
• Asian – 2.4%
• Other – 3.3%

So once again you're wrong. Quit lying, your life will be a lot easier.

Not wrong. So you are the one lying to yourself and the sooner you stop, the better off you'll be. Because as I said when you add farm and corporate welfare, which is welfare, more whites are getting government assistance.

YOU got government assistance from me, when I spent 5 years of my life in the Army, protecting your ungrateful, racist ass.

Now you need to come up with some way to pay me back for that, which was a long tough ordeal.

YOU OWE ME!

 

[Correll]

There is no anti white party. And what you racists don't get is that loving your race is not the problem. It is when you exclude other races that it becomes a problem. And that what you racists want to do.

You just KNEW THE most racist, anti-white member on this site would chime in!

I am not anti white. Anti racist is not anti white. Unless you believe that whites are inherently racist.

No one believes you.

 

[Correll]

The Anti-White Party
William S. Lind
Dec 02,2019

An outtake in an article in the November 14 New York Times about the Iowa caucuses caused me to do a double take: “Democrats question the status of a state that’s 90% white.”

Imagine that the Times had instead said, “Republicans question the status of a state that’s heavily black,” or “GOP questions the status of a state that’s largely Hispanic.” The crises of outrage would reach to the heavens. Every Establishment organ would demand the Republicans pee all over themselves, grovel in the dust, and kiss the feet of so-called black and Hispanic “leaders”, most of whom are con artists. But when the Democrats dismiss a state because it’s largely white? Not a murmur of protest arose from any quarter.

Along with a growing number of other white Americans, I find myself saying, “Wait a minute, whites built this country. We took a vast wilderness inhabited by a few million howling savages (who unlike their cousins in Mexico and Central America had built no civilizations) and turned it into what was, as recently as the 1950s, the best country on earth of all time. The contribution of other races was mostly muscle, not brains. In that respect, they stand well back from the ox, mule, and horse. And now we are to stand mute as Democrats make us a despised minority in our own country? I don’t think so.”

The Democratic Party’s hostility toward whites is a product of the broader ideology that party has embraced, the ideology of cultural Marxism, which is commonly known as “political correctness” or “multiculturalism”. Like Moscow’s old Marxism-Leninism, cultural Marxism says certain kinds of people are a priori good and others evil, regardless of what individuals do. In Marxism-Leninism, workers and peasants are good while landlords, capitalists and members of the middle class, the bourgeoisie, are evil. The latter are fit only to be “liquidated”, which Soviet Communism did on a scale that put Hitler to shame: not six million dead, but sixty million. (Ever notice how people on the Left swoon at the sight of a swastika but find the hammer and sickle gently amusing?)

Cultural Marxism says whites are inherently evil “oppressors” who must constantly beg blacks, Indians, immigrants, etc. to forgive their “white privilege”. The average white family living paycheck-to-paycheck doesn’t see a lot of privilege ......

Read the rest whitey @
The Anti-White Party – traditionalRIGHT

View attachment 293752

only white supremacist trash think protecting everyone, as the constitution requires, somehow hurts you.

losers

Only an anti-white racist would pretend that what is going on now, is about "protecting everyone".

There is no such thing as anti white racism.

A nonsensical statement from an anti-white racist.

 

[Meister]

You're full of shit as usual, IM2. More whites use welfare than blacks because there are more whites than blacks.
Try using a percentage when comparing the two next time...show some honesty for once in your life.
What have the democrats given you other than lip service....show some honesty when you answer that.
What was the president's party who said that we'll have those N+++++++ voting democrat for the next 100 years?
It wasn't a republican, was it?
Seems that the Black unemployment is the lowest it been in 70 years, IM2. That damn racist Trump.
You are shameful, IM2.

You white boys use percentage only when it supports your arguments. How many Blacks are denied jobs by white peopel and what percentage of businesses are white owned?

"White boys"? II see the racist posters have taken off their gloves and exposing just who they really are. Good to know. Carry on with your racists remarks.

We aren't racists. We're just tired of your racism.

You see, IM2....I'm not racist....but you seem to have to broad brush everyone. Calling me a white boy, is racist...now you know.

I don't broad brush shit. I specifically point out whites who are racists. That's not every white person here. But it is you. And the term white boy does not have a history of racist connotations behind it. Again, you white boys used that term since day 0one to denote your racial superiority. Now that you have been unable to freely call somebody the n word, you want to create a false equivalence by claiming white boy is racist. I know what is and is not racist. I don't need you to tell me.

Let me show you the difference between the n word and white boy.

At no time in the history of this nation has the word ****** as used by whites ever implied anything positive. It is one of the most derogatory descriptors of a human that has ever been created.

Historically the N word has been used by whites to describe blacks as lazy, dumb, uneducated, worthless, scum, less than human and parasites. It has stood for nothing coming out of the mouth of whites but insults and to denigrate black people. For over 240 years this has been the primary use of the word by whites. The word coming from whites has carried a belief of superiority. It was them saying they are better than us just because they exist. The pre school age white child could freely call elderly black men or women who had lived a full life and had wisdom that child may never receive that word and it’s parents said nothing about respecting your elders. The term coming from whites simply means no respect. In addition the word has meant:

• ******, v. To wear out, spoil or destroy.
  
  
• Niggerish, adj. Acting in an indolent and irresponsible manner.
  
  
• Niggerlipping, v. Wetting the end of a cigarette while smoking it.
  
  
• Niggerlover, n. Derogatory term aimed at whites lacking in the necessary loathing of blacks.
  
  
• ****** luck, n. Exceptionally good luck, emphasis on undeserved.
  
  
• ******-flicker, n. A small knife or razor with one side heavily taped to preserve the user's fingers.
  
  
• ****** heaven, n. a designated place, usually the balcony, where blacks were forced to sit, for example, in an integrated movie theater or church.
  
  
• ****** knocker, n. axe handle or weapon made from an axe handle.
  
  
• ****** rich, adj, Deeply in debt but ostentatious.
  
  
• ****** shooter, n. A slingshot.
  
  
• ****** steak, n. a slice of liver or a cheap piece of meat.
  
  
• ****** stick, n. police officer's baton.
  
  
• ****** tip, n. leaving a small tip or no tip in a restaurant.
  
  
• ****** in the woodpile, n. a concealed motive or unknown factor affecting a situation in an adverse way.
  
  
• ****** work, n. Demeaning, menial tasks.(Green, 1984, p. 190)
  
  Dr. David Pilgrim and Dr. Phillip Middleton, “****** and Caricature”

Now show me the equivalent for white boy.

Honesty and YOU have never crossed paths....very sad

 

[Markle]

Wrong answer junior. And Brandon Gaille is not Health and Human services.

Now while you want to talk shit, you don't want to talk about how poverty impacts race.

3 times the number of blacks live in poverty than whites. 1 out of every 3 blacks people live at or below poverty in this country. 1 out of every 9 whites. And why is that? Not because blacks don't want to work, your white asses are telling us that black unemploymemnt is the lowest in history and at 6 percent, that means 94 percent of all blacks are working. So if 9 out of 10 blacks are working why is it that 6 out of those 10 working blacks live in poverty?

You want to argue stats chump, so now you're going to get taught a lesson.

In 2011, DEMOS did a study named “The Racial Wealth Gap, Why Policy Matters”, which discussed the racial wealth gap, the problems associated with it along with solutions and outcomes if the gap did not exist. In this study DEMOS determined that the racial wealth gap was primarily driven by policy decisions.

“The U.S. racial wealth gap is substantial and is driven by public policy decisions. According to our analysis of the SIPP data, in 2011 the median white household had $111,146 in wealth holdings, compared to just $7,113 for the median Black household and $8,348 for the median Latino household. From the continuing impact of redlining on American homeownership to the retreat from desegregation in public education, public policy has shaped these disparities, leaving them impossible to overcome without racially-aware policy change.”

So here we have it. White racist public policy is why so many blacks are in poverty. That means blacks are on welfare because of racist public policy. Why are so many whites getting food stamps and assistance junior. Public policy has not hampered whites near as much. Whites live below the national poverty rate and their unemployment is below the national average. White median income is above the national average, yet more whites get food stamps. Use credible sources if you want to take me on. Using other racists isn't going to get the job done boy.

Your first chart is a decade old. It also shows that the percentage of white receiving welfare is 48.5%.

Mine, from two years ago shows:

Welfare Demographics
The following percentages are recipients of welfare based on race.

• White – 38.8%
• Black – 39.8%
• Hispanic – 15.7%
• Asian – 2.4%
• Other – 3.3%

So once again you're wrong. Quit lying, your life will be a lot easier.

Not wrong. So you are the one lying to yourself and the sooner you stop, the better off you'll be. Because as I said when you add farm and corporate welfare, which is welfare, more whites are getting government assistance.

You can't bring yourself to admit you were wrong, you could only say that I'm "not wrong". That's true, I am right, so how am I lying to myself?

Specifically, what is corporate welfare? Again with your ignorant statement, "more whites are getting government assistance". Well, boohoo. There are more than five times as many whites as there are blacks.

You think it is a contest as to who gets the MOST taxpayer money, whites or blacks. Why do you not push for blacks receiving LESS of other peoples money rather than the more?

 

[DGS49]

The PROBLEM (for Black folks) is that the policies that are purportedly for the benefit of Black Folks end up working to their detriment. Consider the percentage of Blacks who are admitted via "diversity" initiatives into elite universities and end up with either a worthless degree in Ethnic Studies or no degree at all.

A government handout is not necessarily a good thing, in the long run.

 

[IM2]

There is no anti white party. And what you racists don't get is that loving your race is not the problem. It is when you exclude other races that it becomes a problem. And that what you racists want to do.

You just KNEW THE most racist, anti-white member on this site would chime in!

I am not anti white. Anti racist is not anti white. Unless you believe that whites are inherently racist.

No one believes you.

No one gives a fuck what you think faggot.

 

[IM2]

Wrong answer junior. And Brandon Gaille is not Health and Human services.

Now while you want to talk shit, you don't want to talk about how poverty impacts race.

3 times the number of blacks live in poverty than whites. 1 out of every 3 blacks people live at or below poverty in this country. 1 out of every 9 whites. And why is that? Not because blacks don't want to work, your white asses are telling us that black unemploymemnt is the lowest in history and at 6 percent, that means 94 percent of all blacks are working. So if 9 out of 10 blacks are working why is it that 6 out of those 10 working blacks live in poverty?

You want to argue stats chump, so now you're going to get taught a lesson.

In 2011, DEMOS did a study named “The Racial Wealth Gap, Why Policy Matters”, which discussed the racial wealth gap, the problems associated with it along with solutions and outcomes if the gap did not exist. In this study DEMOS determined that the racial wealth gap was primarily driven by policy decisions.

“The U.S. racial wealth gap is substantial and is driven by public policy decisions. According to our analysis of the SIPP data, in 2011 the median white household had $111,146 in wealth holdings, compared to just $7,113 for the median Black household and $8,348 for the median Latino household. From the continuing impact of redlining on American homeownership to the retreat from desegregation in public education, public policy has shaped these disparities, leaving them impossible to overcome without racially-aware policy change.”

So here we have it. White racist public policy is why so many blacks are in poverty. That means blacks are on welfare because of racist public policy. Why are so many whites getting food stamps and assistance junior. Public policy has not hampered whites near as much. Whites live below the national poverty rate and their unemployment is below the national average. White median income is above the national average, yet more whites get food stamps. Use credible sources if you want to take me on. Using other racists isn't going to get the job done boy.

Your first chart is a decade old. It also shows that the percentage of white receiving welfare is 48.5%.

Mine, from two years ago shows:

Welfare Demographics
The following percentages are recipients of welfare based on race.

• White – 38.8%
• Black – 39.8%
• Hispanic – 15.7%
• Asian – 2.4%
• Other – 3.3%

So once again you're wrong. Quit lying, your life will be a lot easier.

Not wrong. So you are the one lying to yourself and the sooner you stop, the better off you'll be. Because as I said when you add farm and corporate welfare, which is welfare, more whites are getting government assistance.

You can't bring yourself to admit you were wrong, you could only say that I'm "not wrong". That's true, I am right, so how am I lying to myself?

Specifically, what is corporate welfare? Again with your ignorant statement, "more whites are getting government assistance". Well, boohoo. There are more than five times as many whites as there are blacks.

You think it is a contest as to who gets the MOST taxpayer money, whites or blacks. Why do you not push for blacks receiving LESS of other peoples money rather than the more?

Because I am not wrong. We have paid for everything you have white boy. Our taxes have gone to improving white communities, whites schools and white businesses. We pay for white farm subsidies and white corporate welfare. So then time for you to get out of your little white delusion of grandeur and face that face that whites continue to get more handed to them by the government than anyone else and don't give me that excuse about how thee is five times more of you. You support trump because he promises to give whites more. So you need to be quiet dumb ass, because you only prove how deep the psychosis runs especially in white males.