McRocket
Gold Member
- Apr 4, 2018
- 5,031
- 707
- 275
- Banned
- #381
Interesting idea. It would end a lot of debt and funding issues
Consider
US wealth inequality - top 0.1% worth as much as the bottom 90%
The top 1/10 of one per cent own almost 25% of the nation's wealth
That's the same amount of wealth as the bottom NINETY PER CENT of the county
In that light a 2% wealth tax isn't that outrageous
I haven't checked the numbers but I have read that it could provide 30 trillion dollars over 10 years.
Health care
Education
Green New Deal
Where are you getting that number?
Her own people have said - at most - $275 billion per year.
'It's an important debate, because Warren's counting on her tax to raise a lot of money for social programs: $2.75 trillion over 10 years, according to an estimate by Emmanuel Saez and Gabriel Zucman, two economists advising her campaign.'
Elizabeth Warren's plan to tax the super-rich has been tried before. Here's what happened.
And I strongly doubt it would be anywhere near that.
If you tax rich people 40% (in essence) of their wealth over 20 years (2% X 20 years) - they will leave the country before you can. Or, at least move their assets offshore. Guaranteed.
The tax is unfair (a fair tax is taxing everyone the same), will do little to help the budget and is clearly little more than a way for her to get votes from an 'anger tax'.