The Belief That Life Was the Result of an Accident Is Unscientific

[Fort Fun Indiana]

it musta been a sky daddy

Apparently men who say that the sky daddy did not do it also say that it happened by accident....only.....they never observe it happening nor can they replicate it.

That's not science

No they don't, and you have no idea what you are talking about.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The order of events in Genesis is astoundingly similar to what modern scientists posit.....

If it is not evidence for the God, then the author of Genesis 1, or Moses, perhaps, must have understood that the universe formed first, then the seas appeared on earth, and that life forms were photosynthetic...
The Old Testament was written, although not compiled, almost three millennia ago. It is extraordinary that the writer of the creation account in Genesis, chapter one, got it right in his exposition of the series of events: his sequence turns out to be scientifically accurate in terms of contemporary knowledge.

Sure, light and the day and night cycle formed on day one and vegetation formed on day three BEFORE the sun was formed on day four.

So glad you'd slithered in for the education you so sorely require.....and not a minute too soon!

Let's go over the events:

1. God’s first command in Genesis is “Let there be light.” Nor is this the only introduction of light in the Genesis creation account, but it is the first, it represents the beginning of the formation of our solar system. And that was ‘The Big Bang’…some 13,700 million years ago. Quite an event…it lasted just 10 to the minus 35th seconds, beginning the universe, generating time and space, as well as all the matter and energy that the universe would ever, ever, contain! Big Bang…explosion….energy….light. But no atoms to form the sun for some time. Light…but no sun? So says science. And so says Genesis. Parker, “The Genesis Enigma,” chapter two.

a. For reference, Genesis 1, verses 1-4: In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness.

Your own quote continues showing day and night without the sun, “And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.”

So you continue to ignore the astounding similarity between the modern version of evolution and the Biblical recounting of same?

I've got the new symbol for your party right here:

There is no Biblical recounting of evolution. the Bible was written by barely literate people who were writing down the legends handed down by even less literate goat herders. they didn't even know the freaking Earth was round. Give me a break.

 

[Votto]

The order of events in Genesis is astoundingly similar to what modern scientists posit.....

If it is not evidence for the God, then the author of Genesis 1, or Moses, perhaps, must have understood that the universe formed first, then the seas appeared on earth, and that life forms were photosynthetic...
The Old Testament was written, although not compiled, almost three millennia ago. It is extraordinary that the writer of the creation account in Genesis, chapter one, got it right in his exposition of the series of events: his sequence turns out to be scientifically accurate in terms of contemporary knowledge.

Sure, light and the day and night cycle formed on day one and vegetation formed on day three BEFORE the sun was formed on day four.

I was told in school that life could not survive without the sun in my science class. Scientists, ya got ta love them.

That was before they found life at the bottom of the ocean that gets no sun.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The order of events in Genesis is astoundingly similar to what modern scientists posit.....

If it is not evidence for the God, then the author of Genesis 1, or Moses, perhaps, must have understood that the universe formed first, then the seas appeared on earth, and that life forms were photosynthetic...
The Old Testament was written, although not compiled, almost three millennia ago. It is extraordinary that the writer of the creation account in Genesis, chapter one, got it right in his exposition of the series of events: his sequence turns out to be scientifically accurate in terms of contemporary knowledge.

Sure, light and the day and night cycle formed on day one and vegetation formed on day three BEFORE the sun was formed on day four.

I was told in school that life could not survive without the sun.

That was before they found life at the bottom of the ocean that gets no sun.

It's liquid water, not ice, because of the Sun. So your teacher was right.

 

[Votto]

it musta been a sky daddy

Apparently men who say that the sky daddy did not do it also say that it happened by accident....only.....they never observe it happening nor can they replicate it.

That's not science

No they don't, and you have no idea what you are talking about.

Yes, thanks for clearing that up.

 

[Votto]

The order of events in Genesis is astoundingly similar to what modern scientists posit.....

If it is not evidence for the God, then the author of Genesis 1, or Moses, perhaps, must have understood that the universe formed first, then the seas appeared on earth, and that life forms were photosynthetic...
The Old Testament was written, although not compiled, almost three millennia ago. It is extraordinary that the writer of the creation account in Genesis, chapter one, got it right in his exposition of the series of events: his sequence turns out to be scientifically accurate in terms of contemporary knowledge.

Sure, light and the day and night cycle formed on day one and vegetation formed on day three BEFORE the sun was formed on day four.

I was told in school that life could not survive without the sun.

That was before they found life at the bottom of the ocean that gets no sun.

It's liquid water, not ice, because of the Sun. So your teacher was right.

Is that why they think there might be life on one of Saturn's moons?

You dolt, the center of the earth has plenty of heat that is coming up with or without the sun.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The order of events in Genesis is astoundingly similar to what modern scientists posit.....

If it is not evidence for the God, then the author of Genesis 1, or Moses, perhaps, must have understood that the universe formed first, then the seas appeared on earth, and that life forms were photosynthetic...
The Old Testament was written, although not compiled, almost three millennia ago. It is extraordinary that the writer of the creation account in Genesis, chapter one, got it right in his exposition of the series of events: his sequence turns out to be scientifically accurate in terms of contemporary knowledge.

Sure, light and the day and night cycle formed on day one and vegetation formed on day three BEFORE the sun was formed on day four.

I was told in school that life could not survive without the sun.

That was before they found life at the bottom of the ocean that gets no sun.

It's liquid water, not ice, because of the Sun. So your teacher was right.

Is that why they think there might be life on one of Saturn's moons?

"Is that fact that the Sun keeps our planet from freezing the reason why they think there is life on one of Saturn's Moons?"..... is that gibberish? English, please!

 

[Votto]

The order of events in Genesis is astoundingly similar to what modern scientists posit.....

If it is not evidence for the God, then the author of Genesis 1, or Moses, perhaps, must have understood that the universe formed first, then the seas appeared on earth, and that life forms were photosynthetic...
The Old Testament was written, although not compiled, almost three millennia ago. It is extraordinary that the writer of the creation account in Genesis, chapter one, got it right in his exposition of the series of events: his sequence turns out to be scientifically accurate in terms of contemporary knowledge.

Sure, light and the day and night cycle formed on day one and vegetation formed on day three BEFORE the sun was formed on day four.

I was told in school that life could not survive without the sun.

That was before they found life at the bottom of the ocean that gets no sun.

It's liquid water, not ice, because of the Sun. So your teacher was right.

Is that why they think there might be life on one of Saturn's moons?

"Is that fact that the Sun keeps our planet from freezing the reason why they think there is life on one of Saturn's Moons?"..... is that gibberish? English, please!

So the deep sea volcanic activity would cease without the sun or would the heat not be enough to melt the ice?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Sure, light and the day and night cycle formed on day one and vegetation formed on day three BEFORE the sun was formed on day four.

I was told in school that life could not survive without the sun.

That was before they found life at the bottom of the ocean that gets no sun.

It's liquid water, not ice, because of the Sun. So your teacher was right.

Is that why they think there might be life on one of Saturn's moons?

"Is that fact that the Sun keeps our planet from freezing the reason why they think there is life on one of Saturn's Moons?"..... is that gibberish? English, please!

So the deep sea volcanic activity would cease without the sun or would the heat not be enough to melt the ice?

Correct, it would not be enough. Not in our oceans, as they look today. They would freeze solid. It would take a little while, but they would freeze entirely.

 

[Weatherman2020]

If you want to call an oxygen atom bonding to 2 hydrogen atoms order, we are talking at two kinds of things.

Maybe you need to define 'order' for us?

Mine is below and seems to define crystals quite well:

or·der
ˈôrdər/
noun
noun: order; plural noun: orders; noun: Order
1.
the arrangement or disposition of people or things in relation to each other according to a particular sequence, pattern, or method.

Find any apple computers on the moon? No? You just claimed an explosion resulted in order. Let's make it simple. Find any square shapes on the moon? No? What's that? Everything is eroded? Uh. Who woulda thunk in the universe chemical compounds ultimately break apart into simpler materials; they do not ultimately become more complex.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

If you want to call an oxygen atom bonding to 2 hydrogen atoms order, we are talking at two kinds of things.

Maybe you need to define 'order' for us?

Mine is below and seems to define crystals quite well:

or·der
ˈôrdər/
noun
noun: order; plural noun: orders; noun: Order
1.
the arrangement or disposition of people or things in relation to each other according to a particular sequence, pattern, or method.

Find any apple computers on the moon? No? You just claimed an explosion resulted in order. Let's make it simple. Find any square shapes on the moon? No? What's that? Everything is eroded? Uh. Who woulda thunk in the universe chemical compounds ultimately break apart into simpler materials; they do not ultimately become more complex.

Yet another concept you are mangling. Yes, a body in space represents "order". Every celestial body is an example of local ordering. Every atom, every molecule, every chunk of anything is "order". And yes, there are square shapes in the Moon. We Earthlings call them "crystals".

Yes, molecules form and become more complex. You are 100% wrong and should just stop right now.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Wait. Who exactly is it that believes atoms have sentient life?

Anyone who believes life is an accidental byproduct of an explosion long ago is saying atoms have sentient life.

no, theyre saying that atoms can lead to sentient life.

which they can

We know what ratio of elements we are.
Mix away and make yourself a new friend.

I'd have to mix for a few billion years.

I'd have to mix for a few billion years.

Many say the earth is older than a few billion years. So you've got your mixing completed. All these elements required for a human are all mixed up.

So do we see new species popping up out of the ground around us? Why not? All of the elements are there and have been mixing for billions of years.
Oh wait. The claim is life only started at one single point in time. The rest is just mutations (mutations becoming more and more complex, ah!). There are no new life forms starting since that one single blip in time. Why is that?

 

[Weatherman2020]

If you want to call an oxygen atom bonding to 2 hydrogen atoms order, we are talking at two kinds of things.

Maybe you need to define 'order' for us?

Mine is below and seems to define crystals quite well:

or·der
ˈôrdər/
noun
noun: order; plural noun: orders; noun: Order
1.
the arrangement or disposition of people or things in relation to each other according to a particular sequence, pattern, or method.

Find any apple computers on the moon? No? You just claimed an explosion resulted in order. Let's make it simple. Find any square shapes on the moon? No? What's that? Everything is eroded? Uh. Who woulda thunk in the universe chemical compounds ultimately break apart into simpler materials; they do not ultimately become more complex.

Yet another concept you are mangling. Yes, a body in space represents "order". Every celestial body is an example of local ordering. Every atom, every molecule, every chunk of anything is "order". And yes, there are square shapes in the Moon. We Earthlings call them "crystals".

Yes, molecules form and become more complex. You are 100% wrong and should just stop right now.

Do show us your picture of a lunar square!

And no, atomic bonding does not diverge from the Periodic table.

 

[JimBowie1958]

No, you seem to know little about either. Granite is a mixture of quartz and other grains. If you remove all the quartz you don't have granite, you may still have a rock but it is not granite. Likewise with splitting uranium. Once split you still have atoms but you no longer have uranium. In theory you have rock and atoms but in practice you have very different things.

But his post did not say you get rid of the uranium-ness of the atom.

He simply said you killed the atom which is impossible since atoms are not living things.

 

[Weatherman2020]

If you want to call an oxygen atom bonding to 2 hydrogen atoms order, we are talking at two kinds of things.

Maybe you need to define 'order' for us?

Mine is below and seems to define crystals quite well:

or·der
ˈôrdər/
noun
noun: order; plural noun: orders; noun: Order
1.
the arrangement or disposition of people or things in relation to each other according to a particular sequence, pattern, or method.

Find any apple computers on the moon? No? You just claimed an explosion resulted in order. Let's make it simple. Find any square shapes on the moon? No? What's that? Everything is eroded? Uh. Who woulda thunk in the universe chemical compounds ultimately break apart into simpler materials; they do not ultimately become more complex.

Yet another concept you are mangling. Yes, a body in space represents "order". Every celestial body is an example of local ordering. Every atom, every molecule, every chunk of anything is "order". And yes, there are square shapes in the Moon. We Earthlings call them "crystals".

Yes, molecules form and become more complex. You are 100% wrong and should just stop right now.

Stop what? Asking why you believe atoms create music and like funny cat videos? No, it will always intrigue me.

The laws of nature dictate chemical reactions. And everything eventually erodes, and nothing becomes more orderly once equilibrium is established.

Or do you sit in your room in a panic fearful all of the Oxygen will assemble themselves in one corner of the room?

Nope, you don't. Because you know in nature chaos rules the day, not order.

 

[fncceo]

Or do you sit in your room in a panic fearful all of the Oxygen will assemble themselves in one corner of the room?

No. Because I understand Brownian Motion and convection.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Wait. Who exactly is it that believes atoms have sentient life?

Anyone who believes life is an accidental byproduct of an explosion long ago is saying atoms have sentient life.

no, theyre saying that atoms can lead to sentient life.

which they can

We know what ratio of elements we are.
Mix away and make yourself a new friend.

I'd have to mix for a few billion years.

I'd have to mix for a few billion years.

Many say the earth is older than a few billion years. So you've got your mixing completed. All these elements required for a human are all mixed up.
View attachment 152431

So do we see new species popping up out of the ground around us? Why not? All of the elements are there and have been mixing for billions of years.
Oh wait. The claim is life only started at one single point in time. The rest is just mutations (mutations becoming more and more complex, ah!). There are no new life forms starting since that one single blip in time. Why is that?
View attachment 152432

"Many say the earth is older than a few billion years. "

No they don't. Shameless lie. We know the Earth is 4.54 billion years old.

 

[fncceo]

We know the Earth is 4.54 billion years old.

But doesn't look a day over 4.53.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

If you want to call an oxygen atom bonding to 2 hydrogen atoms order, we are talking at two kinds of things.

Maybe you need to define 'order' for us?

Mine is below and seems to define crystals quite well:

or·der
ˈôrdər/
noun
noun: order; plural noun: orders; noun: Order
1.
the arrangement or disposition of people or things in relation to each other according to a particular sequence, pattern, or method.

Find any apple computers on the moon? No? You just claimed an explosion resulted in order. Let's make it simple. Find any square shapes on the moon? No? What's that? Everything is eroded? Uh. Who woulda thunk in the universe chemical compounds ultimately break apart into simpler materials; they do not ultimately become more complex.

Yet another concept you are mangling. Yes, a body in space represents "order". Every celestial body is an example of local ordering. Every atom, every molecule, every chunk of anything is "order". And yes, there are square shapes in the Moon. We Earthlings call them "crystals".

Yes, molecules form and become more complex. You are 100% wrong and should just stop right now.

Do show us your picture of a lunar square!

And no, atomic bonding does not diverge from the Periodic table.

Show you a pistire of a crystal? Is your Google broken?

"Atomic bonding does not diverge from the periodic table"

I don't even know what to make of this utterly nonsensical statement.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

If you want to call an oxygen atom bonding to 2 hydrogen atoms order, we are talking at two kinds of things.

Maybe you need to define 'order' for us?

Mine is below and seems to define crystals quite well:

or·der
ˈôrdər/
noun
noun: order; plural noun: orders; noun: Order
1.
the arrangement or disposition of people or things in relation to each other according to a particular sequence, pattern, or method.

Find any apple computers on the moon? No? You just claimed an explosion resulted in order. Let's make it simple. Find any square shapes on the moon? No? What's that? Everything is eroded? Uh. Who woulda thunk in the universe chemical compounds ultimately break apart into simpler materials; they do not ultimately become more complex.

Yet another concept you are mangling. Yes, a body in space represents "order". Every celestial body is an example of local ordering. Every atom, every molecule, every chunk of anything is "order". And yes, there are square shapes in the Moon. We Earthlings call them "crystals".

Yes, molecules form and become more complex. You are 100% wrong and should just stop right now.

Stop what? Asking why you believe atoms create music and like funny cat videos? No, it will always intrigue me.

The laws of nature dictate chemical reactions. And everything eventually erodes, and nothing becomes more orderly once equilibrium is established.

Or do you sit in your room in a panic fearful all of the Oxygen will assemble themselves in one corner of the room?

Nope, you don't. Because you know in nature chaos rules the day, not order.

"Stop what? Asking why you believe atoms create music and like funny cat videos?"

No, stop making stupid, false statements that any 6-year old can look up and find they are stupid and false, and also stop trying to argue from them. I thought I was pretty clear.