SC Patriot
Diamond Member
- Aug 31, 2020
- 2,990
- 2,442
- 1,938
He has no argument to shoot in the ass.Hillary wasn't president. Clear enough for you?So you had no issue with the Mark Rich pardon?Dude, get a fucking clue. What Ford did was nothing more than covering for his own lawless ass. Nothing in the Constitution protects anyone from committing crimes in the commission of a pardon. Uncanny return of Agnew's politics the basis of 'Bag Man' podcastlol. How naive.If it were given for any reason, any president could do the same for one's self, therefore making him or her above the law. If, for example, which is likely the case with Trump, he pardoned his buddies to stay quiet about him, and they lost their fifth amendment rights after words, told on Trump to save their own skins, and you still couldn't prosecute Trump, them Trump is immune to the law. You can't have it both ways. Get a clue.What's being ignored?![]()
Harvard Law professor: ‘Donald Trump’s pardons must not obstruct justice’
Laurence Tribe argues that Trump’s pardons to absolve the crimes of his friends might be crimes themselves if they’re issued to obstruct justice. Tribe explains to Lawrence O’Donnell why it’s important for the next administration to investigate and prosecute those abuses of power: “We can only...www.msnbc.com
Laurence Tribe, the foremost authority on Constitutional law, makes the case, that if the Biden administration does not pursue Trump and his associates activities, along with family members for crimes they most surely committed right in front of us, it opens the door for future lawless presidents, their family members, and associates, to participate in multiple criminal activities, sitting right in the oval office, with no consequences. This will definitely have to be the number one priority for the next administration to pursue, and if not, we will most assuredly be viewing this Constitutional Republic in the rear view mirror from now on.
So a constitutional scholar wants to ignore the constitution?
Typical prog.
If Ford was able to Pardon Nixon out of being prosecuted, a Pardon can be pretty much be given for any reason.
Making up some "obstruction of justice" excuse is just that, an excuse for what progs like you really want to do, punish ThoughtCrime.
Lets take a look.
Nixon resigned before he was removed from office. Therefore Ford had to pardon him.
Trump was impeached and not removed from office, he did not resign, he had no charges levied against him....just accusations.
If he needed to be pardoned he would have resigned and have pence pardon him.
You are naive and acting silly with this thread.
If you did, why would you ever consider Hillary a viable candidate?
Or do you know nothing about the Mark Rich pardon..
My guess is you dont....dude.
It's like me trying to blame Trump for Melania being a prostitute. Your analogy is too weak and silly.It's like me trying to blame Trump for Melania being a prostitute.
Congratulations.
you just shot your argument in the ass.
All he has i unfounded rhetoric.