Agit8r
Gold Member
- Dec 4, 2010
- 12,141
- 2,209
- 245
No, I admit your math is bunk, and that you're a liar when you deliberately misrepresent what was said. But you know that. Or you don't.It isn't any sort of math. She takes a figure of 42% (which as noted earlier, is NOWHERE in the data cited) which if true would amount to 11.34 total police officers (!!!) and subtracts 13% of US population, or 42,108,000 total persons (!!!) and somehow comes to the conclusion that the difference between 11.34 and 42,108,000 somehow equals 29% (!!!!!)
Either she is completely mentally challenged, OR she is deliberately trying to deceive an obviously gullible readership.
In actuality, there were 14 high-profile shootings of unarmed African Americans in 2014 alone, which is 2.66 total persons more than the figure 11.34 total persons cited (perhaps erroneously) in the OP for number of police killed by African Americans.
Unarmed People of Color Killed by Police 1999-2014
Lol...progressive math. It's funny to even think of it.
So, are you going to tell me that you believe that the difference between 11 and 42,108,000 equals 29%? You are actually going to stick to that?
Edited to add: and that assumes that the 42% figure is accurate, for the sake of discussion
I never said that, silly.
But carry on, lol.
So you admit that the math in the article was complete bunk?
Are we at least able to agree that 14 is greater than 11?