Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Speaking of jury nullification, would a guilty verdict for Zimmerman effectively nullify the stand your ground law?
How about the SCOTUS and judicial review? Are those 9 people representative of the entire country?
No, they're not, but they are also not intended to be.
I'm still not sure what your beef is with the concept of jury nullification. Are you saying you don't believe jurors should be allowed to vote their conscience? Do you realize that even if a jury 'nullifies' a law with a verdict in a particular case that it doesn't actually repeal the law?
I "swore" that?
I said if he won he would be much more amenable to the other side. Let's see if that happens.
And let's see if you can tell the truth.
Wrong.
Absolutely correct
No, it actually means Congress cannot favor one group over another, everything they do is supposed to benefit all citizens equally.
Wrong.
Absolutely correct
No, it actually means Congress cannot favor one group over another, everything they do is supposed to benefit all citizens equally.
I "swore" that?
Yep, and the entire forum saw it. Your union buddies were going to "drive Walker out."
I said if he won he would be much more amenable to the other side. Let's see if that happens.
ROFL
Bullshit, you were just like Chris, swearing Walker was gone.
And let's see if you can tell the truth.
Irony.
Nah, you are wrong as usual. But truth telling is not your forte. Going to vote for my man, Romney?
Speaking of jury nullification, would a guilty verdict for Zimmerman effectively nullify the stand your ground law?
Speaking of jury nullification, would a guilty verdict for Zimmerman effectively nullify the stand your ground law?
Speaking of jury nullification, would a guilty verdict for Zimmerman effectively nullify the stand your ground law?
Speaking of jury nullification, would a guilty verdict for Zimmerman effectively nullify the stand your ground law?
Nah, you are wrong as usual. But truth telling is not your forte. Going to vote for my man, Romney?
Jake, the reason that you're a leftist is that you're stupid. {Amelia, the objective facts are very clear. Walker pwnd himself in WI by promising and carrying out threats against the Wisconsin working man and woman. How in heaven's name did you think they would react? The used the legitimate tools of democracy to tell him and the minority with him, "No, you are not, and when we get done, you are going home for good. Not in my state you aren't."} http://www.usmessageboard.com/the-r...r-is-going-to-be-recalled-21.html#post4444153 Fakey Jake, an utter fraud and moron...
I told you since then, some months ago, as Walker looked weakened, that if he survived, he would be more amenable to his enemies. Better look it up, Uncensored.
Speaking of jury nullification, would a guilty verdict for Zimmerman effectively nullify the stand your ground law?
No, they're not, but they are also not intended to be.
I'm still not sure what your beef is with the concept of jury nullification. Are you saying you don't believe jurors should be allowed to vote their conscience? Do you realize that even if a jury 'nullifies' a law with a verdict in a particular case that it doesn't actually repeal the law?
Jurors can vote their conscience by acquitting the defendant. A group of 12 unelected, unaccountable people should not be able to change the law on a whim, even when their change only applies in a single case.
Absolutely correct
No, it actually means Congress cannot favor one group over another, everything they do is supposed to benefit all citizens equally.
Sounds ridiculous. How can one possibly ensure that all citizens are benefited equally? It's simply a libertarian fairy tale that "proves" the government isn't allowed to do anything.
Absolutely correct
No, it actually means Congress cannot favor one group over another, everything they do is supposed to benefit all citizens equally.
No, that's what the equal protection clause does.
No, it actually means Congress cannot favor one group over another, everything they do is supposed to benefit all citizens equally.
Sounds ridiculous. How can one possibly ensure that all citizens are benefited equally? It's simply a libertarian fairy tale that "proves" the government isn't allowed to do anything.
That is your rational for ignoring it?
It is supposed to prevent laws that are designed to give one group more power than others. The problem is people like you thought that was impossible, so we ended up with affirmative action and Jim Crow laws.
Sounds ridiculous. How can one possibly ensure that all citizens are benefited equally? It's simply a libertarian fairy tale that "proves" the government isn't allowed to do anything.
That is your rational for ignoring it?
It is supposed to prevent laws that are designed to give one group more power than others. The problem is people like you thought that was impossible, so we ended up with affirmative action and Jim Crow laws.
Jury Nullification is a fact, period. Nothing will change that fact.
From November 2011. Have you checked on what I have written since then.
And have you checked that with what I have written above. Better do it, or I am going to make you look even more stupid than you normally do, Uncensored.
Go for it, sonny.
