The big question about life on other planets: 1000000000000000000000 planets in the universe

The mass consists of the hydrogen and other trace elements that eventually made up the solar system.
What does that have to do with scattered mass gravitating itself
You're spouting meaningless babble. All matter possesses the quality of gravitational attraction.
Nope, not random matter in outer space not attached to a gravitational field

Try again
All matter possesses the quality of gravitational attraction - every last proton and electron.
Not in interstellar space with no logical gravitational field to influence the mass
Any particle that has mass has its own gravitational field.

You should quit posting before you demonstrate your complete ignorance of physics.
 
Sure it does you are just too dumb to know that the Voyage 1 craft is in interstellar space which is not affected by any gravitational field.
False. It is still affected by the gravity of all mass in the universe.


It is effected by nothing except the stored momentum it possesses which is infinite because there is no gravity to slow it down, so the craft will begin speeding to an attractive gravitational in it's direction of travel or be slowed by a gravitational force outside of that plane

You really are a special kind of stupid
 
What does that have to do with scattered mass gravitating itself
You're spouting meaningless babble. All matter possesses the quality of gravitational attraction.
Nope, not random matter in outer space not attached to a gravitational field

Try again
All matter possesses the quality of gravitational attraction - every last proton and electron.
Not in interstellar space with no logical gravitational field to influence the mass
Any particle that has mass has its own gravitational field.

You should quit posting before you demonstrate your complete ignorance of physics.
Not true, particles are bonded by electrical charges not gravitational ones
 
It is effected by nothing except the stored momentum it possesses which is infinite because there is no gravity to slow it down
False. It is affected by the gravity of all mass in the universe.
Nope, things are separated by larger lengths then gravity reaches. This is why Voyager 1 is no longer effected by the Suns gravity

Is your head on right because your brain is backwards
 
not if he created time at the same time he created matter and space,,,
"At the same time" presumes that time already exists.


no it doesnt,,

which came first time, space or matter??
We're discussing when time existed, not just space and matter.
all of them are interconnected if you look at it from an evolution POV they all had to happen at the same time

but if you look at it from a creation POV then thats spelled out in genesis

god created time then space them matter
Why would I look at them from the creation point of view? That's a fairy tale.
so is evolution,,,thats why no one can prove it happened

back to the topic,,under evolution and the big bang it all happened at the very same moment
 
Nope, things are separated by larger lengths then gravity reaches
False. All mass in the universe is affected by the gravity of all other mass in the universe.
That is actually funny because you just said that something billions of light years away even if the object is a single atom effects everything else

Dude the universe is not attached together, it is spreading into oblivion the question at this point is what is causing the increased rate of expansion observed. Gravity fails this test, no one can prove that gravity is causing anything as far as expansion

You must be a Harvard professor because your stupid is special
 
The Sun predates the Earth by at least a million years.
"A million years?" The Sun and the Earth are 4.5 billion years old. A million years is virtually an instant when measured against that. The Earth took a while to take it's final form, but that process began at the same time the Sun formed.





The Sun formed first, the planetary disc came later. How long it took for the disc to form planets is still open to conjecture.
I would love to see the proof of that,,,






The Sun had to form first for our current theory of planetary formation to work.
so its a theory not fact,,,got it

you might want to add that into your answers because there are some that take what they see on the internet as fact





Everything is theory. No one was around 5 billion years ago to record what they saw.
 
That is actually funny because you just said that something billions of light years away even if the object is a single atom effects everything else
Correct. It does. Well, it "A"ffects all other mass, as we say in English.
No it does not, this is why the cosmological constant math fails...………….

Gravity can not be proven to be causing expansion

Were you left back often
 
"At the same time" presumes that time already exists.


no it doesnt,,

which came first time, space or matter??
We're discussing when time existed, not just space and matter.
all of them are interconnected if you look at it from an evolution POV they all had to happen at the same time

but if you look at it from a creation POV then thats spelled out in genesis

god created time then space them matter
Why would I look at them from the creation point of view? That's a fairy tale.
so is evolution,,,thats why no one can prove it happened

back to the topic,,under evolution and the big bang it all happened at the very same moment
No, evolution is not a fairy tale. There is a massive amount of evidence to support it.

What do you consider to be "proof?"
 
That is actually funny because you just said that something billions of light years away even if the object is a single atom effects everything else
Correct. It does. Well, it "A"ffects all other mass, as we say in English.
No it does not, this is why the cosmological constant math fails...………….

Gravity can not be proven to be causing expansion

Were you left back often
You have no understanding of any astrophysics, so just give up now.
 

Forum List

Back
Top