Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Yep, she LITERALLY does have balls, you're right about that. Though probably NOT quite as big as those sported by Michelle 'Big Mike" Obama.Dershowitz has a habit of defending guilty people like Donald Trump, OJ Simpson, and Jeffrey Epstein. The pay is better for getting the guilty acquitted.
LMAO, Racheal Maddow??
Rachel Maddow has more balls than the whole Trump family, including Jared, no-balls, Kushner.
Madcow DOES have balls, you're finally right about something, 3D!
She has more balls than s Senate-full of GOP Senators.
fake newsChaos defines the first three years of the Trump Administration, it has now infected the members of the Trump's Lawyers, from Rudy to the current crop of lawyers now putting all watchers to sleep.
In wake of Bolton book news, White House allies say Trump lawyers bungled defense
Reports that John Bolton has written a firsthand account of the president’s direct involvement in withholding aid to Ukraine has left some Republicans confused and angry over the legal strategy by the president’s defense team — which has devoted much of its arguments in the Senate impeachment trial to arguing that no such firsthand evidence existed.
One Republican operative who advises the White House said he was “flabbergasted at how stupidly they have handled this.”
Trump attorney Mike Purpura argued Saturday that “not a single witness testified that the president himself said that there was any connection between any investigations and security assistance, a presidential meeting or anything else.”
yep you are right and its another leak by somebody about something somebody believes who is mad at the president .......so what !! if all Boltons got is his opinion it means nothing .and even if the president delayed funds thats within his power to do for whatever reason he deems fit ! it may not look good but there is no way republicans are going to remove him for something as trivial as that ... leave it to dems to scream quid pro quo when the president wants to investigate a quid pro quo !Some book written by a fired DC swamp creature was leaked to the NY Times...got it.
Doesn't even matter Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz obliterated the Bolton nonsense. Even if true its not an impeachable offense. He gave an example, if a president told Israel U.S. aid would be withheld unless Israel agreed to stop building settlements a clear quid pro quo that's not an impeachable offense. In fact presidents have long exercised that authority.
Not sure how Israel not building settlements would personally help Trump in the coming election. Demanding that Ukraine announce an investigation of Trump's main political opponent obviously would.
Politicians do this all the time, just relax.
Stalled in the courts by Trump for nearly a year now, just to get the first witness for congress.No whistleblower? Better tell the ICIG.I think "being kind" better describes itWell, yeah. Cries wolf is a stretch.
So far the case against Trump is going almost exactly like the whistleblower claimed.
there is no whistleblower
wolf wolf wolfThe real crying wolf is 30 years of conservatives whining about imagined corruption. They took the practice and applied it to Biden.
Here I thought y’all were going to lock Clinton up. Whatever happened to that?
It got buried under Russiagate.
What happened to that.
Sure.Trump has the authority to investigate corruption by US government officialsDrafts of the book outline the potential testimony of the former national security adviser if he were called as a witness in the president’s impeachment trial.
WASHINGTON — President Trump told his national security adviser in August that he wanted to continue freezing $391 million in security assistance to Ukraine until officials there helped with investigations into Democrats including the Bidens, according to an unpublished manuscript by the former adviser, John R. Bolton.
NYT: Trump Tied Ukraine Aid to Demands for Inquiries, Bolton Book Says
John Bolton Reportedly Recalls Trump Tying Ukraine Aid To Biden Investigation
How can Republicans not vote for witnesses after this? By Maggie Haberman and Michael S. Schmidt. They are two of the Times best and most credible reporters.
biden was dirty and is now hiding behind his election campaign
I think he is saying, that if Bolton never wrote what the NYT said he did, then Bolton could comment on what the NYTimes wrote.... It's his free speech rights...???? As example, he could say, "the NYTs article is not true", and it wouldn't break confidentiality agreements or executive privilege??As I said, if Bolton didn't write it, he can comment on it, just he can on an OP-ED or a newspaper story, or somebody elses book.If Bolton didn't write it, he can comment on it. That's the law.
WTF?? What does THAT mean? He cannot publicly comment on the work period...
It's called the 1st amendment.
You are saying he can comment on things he signed innumerable confidentialty agreements not to disclose ?
Does the name fast and the furious and executive privilege ring a bell? If so do you recall who used it and whom it was given to?Take him to court! The Dems refused to do so. So much for your feckless leadership!
They already took Don McGahn to court, and won at every level.
Funny thing is you are one of the biggest wingers aroundSo many "bombshells" over the last ten years or so.
We've got 'em now! This is the big one! All the wingers running around with their hair on fire.
What a circus. The new national pastime.
.
Then you don't know my politics. That's okay, most of you don't.Funny thing is you are one of the biggest wingers aroundSo many "bombshells" over the last ten years or so.
We've got 'em now! This is the big one! All the wingers running around with their hair on fire.
What a circus. The new national pastime.
.
ROTFLMAOAYIs that what Bolton said or are you just hoping and praying?No news agency has yet put Bolton's sentence in quotations....he is being misquoted....
No one knows!
Bolton knows. Bolton's lawyer knows. And neither is refuting it.
I know your fucking politicsThen you don't know my politics. That's okay, most of you don't.Funny thing is you are one of the biggest wingers aroundSo many "bombshells" over the last ten years or so.
We've got 'em now! This is the big one! All the wingers running around with their hair on fire.
What a circus. The new national pastime.
.
.
Okay!I know your fucking politicsThen you don't know my politics. That's okay, most of you don't.Funny thing is you are one of the biggest wingers aroundSo many "bombshells" over the last ten years or so.
We've got 'em now! This is the big one! All the wingers running around with their hair on fire.
What a circus. The new national pastime.
.
.
Anyone who has been here as long as you have knows your politics. You are an easy book to read even easier then see Spot run.
that's right obama lied and said the protest was motivated by a movie that not many have seenlike Obama denial about Bengahzi was motivated by a video? lolDude. The DoJ can investigate Biden anytime. So can the Senate. You’re not doing anything.
Is first hand witness testimony no longer good enough for you? Now you’re demanding written evidence?
See:
Lindsey Graham Launches Senate Investigation Into Bidens and Ukraine
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-SC) sent a letter to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Thursday requesting documents related to Joe Biden’s communications with Ukrainian officials. Graham’s inquiry focuses on any calls Biden may have had with former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko about the firing of the country’s top prosecutor, or any calls that referenced Burisma, the Ukrainian gas company where Biden’s son Hunter sat on the board. The Washington Post reports that Graham’s letter appears to begin an investigation into Trump’s widely debunked claim that Biden, who at the time was vice president, put pressure on Ukraine to fire its top prosecutor in an attempt to protect his son. Taylor Reidy, a spokeswoman for Graham, told the Post that the senator is now seeking the documents because “[Rep.] Adam Schiff and the House Intel Committee have made it clear they will not look into the issues about Hunter Biden and Burisma.” “Graham is requesting documents which could shed additional light on that issue and hopes they will be able to answer some of the outstanding questions,” Reidy said.
So, just as I thought. Trump could have made the same call to the State dept rather than asking a foreign govt. That makes his call look even more like a personal political move.
Not in any way.
Run along Spot run alongOkay!I know your fucking politicsThen you don't know my politics. That's okay, most of you don't.Funny thing is you are one of the biggest wingers aroundSo many "bombshells" over the last ten years or so.
We've got 'em now! This is the big one! All the wingers running around with their hair on fire.
What a circus. The new national pastime.
.
.
Anyone who has been here as long as you have knows your politics. You are an easy book to read even easier then see Spot run.
.
Yes. Obama ASSERTED the Privlege thru Eric Holder in the Congressional inquisition, when asked specific question involved with executive privilege.Does the name fast and the furious and executive privilege ring a bell? If so do you recall who used it and whom it was given to?Take him to court! The Dems refused to do so. So much for your feckless leadership!
They already took Don McGahn to court, and won at every level.
Drafts of the book outline the potential testimony of the former national security adviser if he were called as a witness in the president’s impeachment trial.
WASHINGTON — President Trump told his national security adviser in August that he wanted to continue freezing $391 million in security assistance to Ukraine until officials there helped with investigations into Democrats including the Bidens, according to an unpublished manuscript by the former adviser, John R. Bolton.
NYT: Trump Tied Ukraine Aid to Demands for Inquiries, Bolton Book Says
John Bolton Reportedly Recalls Trump Tying Ukraine Aid To Biden Investigation
How can Republicans not vote for witnesses after this? By Maggie Haberman and Michael S. Schmidt. They are two of the Times best and most credible reporters.
Got it orange man badYes. Obama ASSERTED the Privlege thru Eric Holder in the Congressional inquisition, when asked specific question involved with executive privilege.Does the name fast and the furious and executive privilege ring a bell? If so do you recall who used it and whom it was given to?Take him to court! The Dems refused to do so. So much for your feckless leadership!
They already took Don McGahn to court, and won at every level.
That is how executive privilege is LEGALLY done.
Trump did no such thing.
He ordered all white house staff and administration, not to show up in Congress and not to turn anything at all over to Congress.
Which is illegal, obstruction of Congress....
Congress represents "we the people", and Trump simply SPAT in our faces.
Trump never ASSERTED executive privilege, it's a LIE to say he did.Got it orange man badYes. Obama ASSERTED the Privlege thru Eric Holder in the Congressional inquisition, when asked specific question involved with executive privilege.Does the name fast and the furious and executive privilege ring a bell? If so do you recall who used it and whom it was given to?Take him to court! The Dems refused to do so. So much for your feckless leadership!
They already took Don McGahn to court, and won at every level.
That is how executive privilege is LEGALLY done.
Trump did no such thing.
He ordered all white house staff and administration, not to show up in Congress and not to turn anything at all over to Congress.
Which is illegal, obstruction of Congress....
Congress represents "we the people", and Trump simply SPAT in our faces.
You're so racist against orange
Of course you did, liar.You loons are bipolar as fuck and wouldn't have believed any other shit that Bolton has to say, but jump all over this like a pack of rabid dogs.Drafts of the book outline the potential testimony of the former national security adviser if he were called as a witness in the president’s impeachment trial.
WASHINGTON — President Trump told his national security adviser in August that he wanted to continue freezing $391 million in security assistance to Ukraine until officials there helped with investigations into Democrats including the Bidens, according to an unpublished manuscript by the former adviser, John R. Bolton.
NYT: Trump Tied Ukraine Aid to Demands for Inquiries, Bolton Book Says
John Bolton Reportedly Recalls Trump Tying Ukraine Aid To Biden Investigation
How can Republicans not vote for witnesses after this? By Maggie Haberman and Michael S. Schmidt. They are two of the Times best and most credible reporters.
I've always thought of Bolton as pompous NaziCon asshole - but I've never thought of him as a liar. Therefore, I want to hear what he has to say.
