The Bolton Bombshell (from his book)

[Butch_Coolidge]

Fake news


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[charwin95]

But Joe Biden is a good person.

Good grief!!!!

Do you have any proof that Joe is a bad person?

Or do you want me to prove it to you how bad and corrupted Trump is?

WANNA try bud?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

So...No you can't?

Should I repeat that Trump didn't want administration members testifying in Schiff's farce so they didn't.
To a normal thinking human that would seem like empirical proof that Trump exercised his right to executive privilege...but you don't seem like a normal thinking human being.
I feel sorry for stupid people. Life must be hard for you.

If Trump isn't claiming the right to withhold his underling's participation in a farce but democrats
are not stopping him anyway that's on those dimwits.

No one contested? WTF, dude.
He was impeached for it, dope.

If the democrats want to claim Donald Trump cannot exercise the same privileges and rights that all other presidents have then good luck to them.
It wouldn't be the stupidest thing they've ever done but it is illustrative of the farce the democrats have wrapped themselves up in. Let's see if he gets removed from office for exercising his constitutional rights.

A "normal thinking person" would actually find out. They might even take the time to actually understand how executive privilege works. You apparently are not in that demographic.

They have not invoked executive privilege on subpoenad witnesses and documents. Had they, they would have to have declared to which specific documents and witnesses the privilege is being applied as there is no such thing as a blanket privilege that covers everything. All others not covered by privilege would have to have been released.
That never happened.

If Trump isn't claiming the right to withhold his underling's participation in a farce but democrats
are not stopping him anyway that's on those dimwits.

They impeached him for obstruction, dope.

 

[skews13]

Drafts of the book outline the potential testimony of the former national security adviser if he were called as a witness in the president’s impeachment trial.

WASHINGTON — President Trump told his national security adviser in August that he wanted to continue freezing $391 million in security assistance to Ukraine until officials there helped with investigations into Democrats including the Bidens, according to an unpublished manuscript by the former adviser, John R. Bolton.

NYT: Trump Tied Ukraine Aid to Demands for Inquiries, Bolton Book Says

John Bolton Reportedly Recalls Trump Tying Ukraine Aid To Biden Investigation

How can Republicans not vote for witnesses after this? By Maggie Haberman and Michael S. Schmidt. They are two of the Times best and most credible reporters.

The board went from Bolton who just yesterday, to Bolton just a leftist tool today.

The spin of a magat is truly amazing.

Rudy is calling him a back stabber in an interview.

In other words, it's really getting to them.

 

[protectionist]

Omg you have evidence of bribery!?

solicitation, with a quid pro quo for personal gain.... government corruption, corrupt use of govt power or position..... still looking for the Statute number,

but found those other two in my search!

There is nothing "for personal gain"

Honestly, I don't see how anyone could say that President Trump did this for anything other than personal reasons.

It's spelled out clear as day, with every action he has taken..

From all of his administration to simple listeners to the phone call, to diplomats and Ambassadors like Sondland who beloved president Trump, Giuliani and Trump himself knew Trump was doing this for his own political gain and NOT for fighting corruption in the Ukraine....

that's why they took the responsibility of disbursing the military aid away from the Pentegon and away form the civil servants who usually handles it at the OMB away from them and put it in to the hands of Politicos, hired by Trump.

and that's why the President never notified congress, PER LAW that he was holding these congressionally passed aid funds back....

(when with all other countries where he had corruption problems and other problems and he held their aid back, HE DID NOTIFY CONGRESS)

And when he took the power of the Ukrainian Ambassadorship as running the show and away from the Actual Ukrain Ambassador and gove the responsibility to his million dollar donor, Ambassador Sondland, the ambassador of the EU.

Or when he deified the law and failed to pass the urgent whistle blower complaint to congress, ACCORDING TO the LAW.....

and when he had Giuliani his campaign operative, running the show with the Ukraine govt with the two accused felons, Igor fruman and Lev Parnas and Firtash a felon awaiting extradition who paid Shokin for his new testimony, to do the job of fighting corruption in the Ukraine....

And NOT following the law on how to investigate corruption and other crimes in the Ukraine according to our law enforcement TREATY THAT WE HAVE signed AND RATIFIED with them....


Article 2 provides for the establishment of Central
Authorities and defines Central Authorities for purposes of the
Treaty. For the United States, the Central Authority shall be
the Attorney General or a person designated by the Attorney
General. For Ukraine, the Central Authority shall be the
Ministry of Justice and the Office of the Prosecutor General.
The article provides that the Central Authorities shall
communicate directly with one another for the purposes of the
Treaty.


BY LAW, President Trump was suppose to follow the treaty, and the parameters of the treaty, which involves our Attorney General, and the Ukraine's prosecutor general, working together....

NOT A Rudy Giuliani, who is OUTSIDE of the LAW, and Outlaw.

And then you have the President not answering to any document subpoenas or Witnesses being told by the president, not to even show up to congress... without ever even ASSERTING executive privilege in a legal manner.... so to hide or coverup, what he did...

-----------------------------------------------------


I mean, there are a lot of things going on here, and I haven't listed a quarter of them.... but with just the key things I've listed, it ALL POINTS in one direction.... and that is consciousness of GUILT.

Anyone, and I mean anyone, can see this....surely they can see this....?

Would you be so blind and forgiving, if it were Obama that did this....? Seriously?

Lol omg! Haha joe Biden can’t even cross the street he’s so old and falling apart, you really think he is a threat to trump? Really?

i don't think Joe is a threat, but Trump thinks he is, and this is why he has focused on him, and Elizabeth Warren, and others when he has seen their rise in polls....

He may have begun his quest a year before Joe announced with Rudy and the previous Ukraine administration, but he did not begin his and Rudy's relentless quest to smear Biden with Fox News and his son and Solomon and Hannity until the polling of Joe, showed he'd beat Trump by a big margin, right before Joe announced his run, that the full court press, including tweets....

There is a graph out there when the Trump attack began and shows how it increased, starting right before Joe announced.

Polls showing Bidem beating Trump are a laughingstock. Only Democrats answer those polls.

Rudy did not smear Biden. Biden smeared Biden.

 

[easyt65]

No crime, no evidence, no witnesses...

Presented by an admitted classified leaking, lying, fake evidence manufacturing, Seditious, treasonous, partisan tool who took money from a Russian-born arms dealer and corrupt Ukraine officials....

Nothing has changed in 4 years ... except Democrats and snowflakes have gotten more desperate....


.

 

[Jitss617]

And we’re investigating the greatest president in the history of America

 

[protectionist]

So, the NaziCons want to trade a relevant witness for an irrelevant witness. No thanks.

Your hypocrisy is off the scale. If Hunter Biden is an "irrelevant witness," then

WHY DOES YOUR SIDE REJECT THE HUNTER FOR BOLTON DEAL???????


Too obvious

ALL DEMS KNOW HUNTER BIDEN IS 100% GUILTY, which is WHY they REFUSE the Bolton for Hunter deal....

Hunter Biden is a private citizen and you have no business using him as a political prop

Oh, I'd like to see Jared's dealing with the Saudis and UAE investigated. And Ivanka's china dealings need a good vetting too.

Hunter's pretty much a slime, and so is Joe's little brother. Of course McConnell's wife needs deporting, Jodi Earnst needed jail time BEFORE she was elected, LOL. Pat Roberts' son is a lobbyist, and Pat supports legislation for the son. Senators get rich.

And no one can claim Biden personally cashed in until his senate and VP terms were done. But he's saying he's holier than Trump, and that wouldn't require a stretch, but Hunter's pretty much a loser.

I agree with you about Hunter. He seems like a colossal failure.

But Joe Biden is a good person. I don’t for one second think he would go along with any kind of scheme to protect a corrupt oligarch.

No scheme. Just Biden's corrupt extortion of the Ukranians, forcing them meet his personal demand, and bragging about it on video afterward. You don't know this ?

 

[charwin95]

Mitt Romney told reporters Monday that other fellow Republicans are increasingly likely to support hearing testimony from Bolton but not from the Bidens

There is a seriously flawed "logic" here. Dems tell us that Hunter Biden is "irrelevant" and Bolton is not. Yet, when offered to have both testify, Dems refused. Why? If Hunter Biden is really "irrelevant," why not let the GOP waste its time while your side gets Bolton???


Answer = Democrats KNOW that HUNTER BIDEN received $16 million of KICKBACK from the US FOREIGN AID, and are TERRIFIED of that TRUTH coming out

I’m shocked that people like you can say something like this about kick backs. You make it sounds that Hunter works directly in a bank vault.

You don’t even know how a foreign aid are distributed and audited. That is why we have embassies.

In order to get kick backs from foreign aid....... You have to be connected from the time money it landed in a foreign bank to all the people that works there and to US embassies.

You cannot say $16m went to Hunter.
Then you have to move that money to US banks. Do you know how tough that is?


Of course you can do all that if you talk to Guilliani or Solomon. Like MAGIC and conspiracies.

 

[charwin95]

solicitation, with a quid pro quo for personal gain.... government corruption, corrupt use of govt power or position..... still looking for the Statute number,

but found those other two in my search!

There is nothing "for personal gain"

Honestly, I don't see how anyone could say that President Trump did this for anything other than personal reasons.

It's spelled out clear as day, with every action he has taken..

From all of his administration to simple listeners to the phone call, to diplomats and Ambassadors like Sondland who beloved president Trump, Giuliani and Trump himself knew Trump was doing this for his own political gain and NOT for fighting corruption in the Ukraine....

that's why they took the responsibility of disbursing the military aid away from the Pentegon and away form the civil servants who usually handles it at the OMB away from them and put it in to the hands of Politicos, hired by Trump.

and that's why the President never notified congress, PER LAW that he was holding these congressionally passed aid funds back....

(when with all other countries where he had corruption problems and other problems and he held their aid back, HE DID NOTIFY CONGRESS)

And when he took the power of the Ukrainian Ambassadorship as running the show and away from the Actual Ukrain Ambassador and gove the responsibility to his million dollar donor, Ambassador Sondland, the ambassador of the EU.

Or when he deified the law and failed to pass the urgent whistle blower complaint to congress, ACCORDING TO the LAW.....

and when he had Giuliani his campaign operative, running the show with the Ukraine govt with the two accused felons, Igor fruman and Lev Parnas and Firtash a felon awaiting extradition who paid Shokin for his new testimony, to do the job of fighting corruption in the Ukraine....

And NOT following the law on how to investigate corruption and other crimes in the Ukraine according to our law enforcement TREATY THAT WE HAVE signed AND RATIFIED with them....


Article 2 provides for the establishment of Central
Authorities and defines Central Authorities for purposes of the
Treaty. For the United States, the Central Authority shall be
the Attorney General or a person designated by the Attorney
General. For Ukraine, the Central Authority shall be the
Ministry of Justice and the Office of the Prosecutor General.
The article provides that the Central Authorities shall
communicate directly with one another for the purposes of the
Treaty.


BY LAW, President Trump was suppose to follow the treaty, and the parameters of the treaty, which involves our Attorney General, and the Ukraine's prosecutor general, working together....

NOT A Rudy Giuliani, who is OUTSIDE of the LAW, and Outlaw.

And then you have the President not answering to any document subpoenas or Witnesses being told by the president, not to even show up to congress... without ever even ASSERTING executive privilege in a legal manner.... so to hide or coverup, what he did...

-----------------------------------------------------


I mean, there are a lot of things going on here, and I haven't listed a quarter of them.... but with just the key things I've listed, it ALL POINTS in one direction.... and that is consciousness of GUILT.

Anyone, and I mean anyone, can see this....surely they can see this....?

Would you be so blind and forgiving, if it were Obama that did this....? Seriously?

Lol omg! Haha joe Biden can’t even cross the street he’s so old and falling apart, you really think he is a threat to trump? Really?

i don't think Joe is a threat, but Trump thinks he is, and this is why he has focused on him, and Elizabeth Warren, and others when he has seen their rise in polls....

He may have begun his quest a year before Joe announced with Rudy and the previous Ukraine administration, but he did not begin his and Rudy's relentless quest to smear Biden with Fox News and his son and Solomon and Hannity until the polling of Joe, showed he'd beat Trump by a big margin, right before Joe announced his run, that the full court press, including tweets....

There is a graph out there when the Trump attack began and shows how it increased, starting right before Joe announced.

Polls showing Bidem beating Trump are a laughingstock. Only Democrats answer those polls.

Rudy did not smear Biden. Biden smeared Biden.

Oh we know Biden can easily beat Trump.

Ask your self. Why do you think you are doing all these garbages and fakes about Biden?

That is why you and the rest of snow flakes, Trump and his gangsters are working so hard and scared to smear Biden.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

A "normal thinking person" would actually find out. They might even take the time to actually understand how executive privilege works. You apparently are not in that demographic.

They have not invoked executive privilege on subpoenad witnesses and documents. Had they, they would have to have declared to which specific documents and witnesses the privilege is being applied as there is no such thing as a blanket privilege that covers everything. All others not covered by privilege would have to have been released.
That never happened.

Yeah...all members of Trump's administration wanted by Schiff to appear in front of his inquisition were covered
by Trump Executive Privilege. Hence, they did not appear.

Funny, you act so condescendingly superior yet you are really quite average in reality, if that even.

They impeached him for obstruction, dope.

A band of imbeciles like Nadler, Schiff etc. can impeach Trump for eating ice cream in the White House for all the good it does them. Their actual chances of removing Trump from office are so close to zero they are virtually assured of failure.
Have you followed the arguments put forward by Nancy's ninnies?

It's absurd. No crimes have been committed. None! Wake up, jackass.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Oh we know Biden can easily beat Trump.

Ask your self. Why do you think you are doing all these garbages and fakes about Biden?

That is why you and the rest of snow flakes, Trump and his gangsters are working so hard and scared to smear Biden.

LOL
Have you seen Biden's support lately? Neither has he. Biden support slips below 30 percent in new poll

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

investigating the greatest president in the history of America

You meant crook....right?

 

[basquebromance]

Steele’s sources for his Dossier were Russia disinformation specialists Sirkov and Tribnikov according to Kathleen Kavalek’s notes taken from an interview with Steele. The Dems welcomed that interference to be used against Trump

we need to subpoena Steele, Sirkov and Tribnikov, if we're gonna subpoena Bolton my friends

 

[Jitss617]

investigating the greatest president in the history of America

You meant crook....right?

No

 

[Jackson]

View attachment 303102 And we’re investigating the greatest president in the history of America

Read the book, Profiles in Corruption to learn about the Biden FAMILY.

 

[Lakhota]

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Trumps conversation still isn’t impeachable lol
And the aid went out. Gotta move on

Seems like an awfully strange thing to lie about then.

Awfully strange you think private conversations with his cabinet is impeachable lol

Ask Richard Nixon.

Nixon was not impeached. How many time have you been told that in just this thread alone.

Just stop. I don’t have time for this.

We don't have time for you to be a moron, but there's nothing we can do about that.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Drafts of the book outline the potential testimony of the former national security adviser if he were called as a witness in the president’s impeachment trial.

WASHINGTON — President Trump told his national security adviser in August that he wanted to continue freezing $391 million in security assistance to Ukraine until officials there helped with investigations into Democrats including the Bidens, according to an unpublished manuscript by the former adviser, John R. Bolton.

Trump Tied Ukraine Aid to Demands for Inquiries, Bolton Book Says

John Bolton Reportedly Recalls Trump Tying Ukraine Aid To Biden Investigation

How can Republicans not vote for witnesses after this? Apparently this information was provided to both The Washington Post and The New York Times.

Oh yeah, a possible alledged discruntled official telling the truth ?? Sure he is... Chuckle, chuckle, chuckle.

Without physical facts to present, then it is just all bullcrap. He won't be called anyways, because he has been compromised as a fact toting witness due to the conflicts of interest being heavily involved.

Why should we read anything a WWII deferment guy has as his pic?

How old was John Wayne in 1941?

You can't answer that, can you?

Was he married? How many kids did he have? Was he under contract to a motion picture studio who would have sued him had he volunteered?

You can't answer those either, can you?

Omg he would have been sued if he volunteered for his country?
The ultimate reason?
Almost as good a reason as bone spurs
He was a coward admit it, posing in military clothes

Yes, he was under contract for his movie studio.

Calling him a coward just proves you are a spineless bastard yourself. Fuck you and the horse you rode in on!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Drafts of the book outline the potential testimony of the former national security adviser if he were called as a witness in the president’s impeachment trial.

WASHINGTON — President Trump told his national security adviser in August that he wanted to continue freezing $391 million in security assistance to Ukraine until officials there helped with investigations into Democrats including the Bidens, according to an unpublished manuscript by the former adviser, John R. Bolton.

Trump Tied Ukraine Aid to Demands for Inquiries, Bolton Book Says

John Bolton Reportedly Recalls Trump Tying Ukraine Aid To Biden Investigation

How can Republicans not vote for witnesses after this? Apparently this information was provided to both The Washington Post and The New York Times.

Oh yeah, a possible alledged discruntled official telling the truth ?? Sure he is... Chuckle, chuckle, chuckle.

Without physical facts to present, then it is just all bullcrap. He won't be called anyways, because he has been compromised as a fact toting witness due to the conflicts of interest being heavily involved.

Why should we read anything a WWII deferment guy has as his pic?

How old was John Wayne in 1941?

You can't answer that, can you?

Was he married? How many kids did he have? Was he under contract to a motion picture studio who would have sued him had he volunteered?

You can't answer those either, can you?

34?
5?
A real old randy man.
Ask john ford, Jimmie Stewart and thousands of others who served.
I guess you think our 5 deferment con Pres is a hero too?

You do realize that Marion Morrison applied for the US Naval Academy when he was in high school but was not selected.

Why didn't Obama serve? He could have volunteered during peace time like I did!