The Bolton Bombshell (from his book)

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Was he called during the inquiry?

Yes. He was a no-show.

ever heard of legal remedies to fix that? Why didn't he show up? he didn't work for the white house why the sudden change?
To sell books maybe?

Yes. The legal remedy is to call his as a witness during the Senate trial.

Good luck with that. I am going to laugh my ass off when you dipshits call him and he agrees with Trump that there was no quid pro quo..

What do we expect?.
Deferment cowards stick together

Deferments? Why are you hung up on something that hasn't existed in over 40 years?

When and where did you serve, or is your lack of service an embarrassment for you that you project on others?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Your stupid replies have been smashed by TWO Ukraine Presidents, going to call them a liar?

Liar? No. Under duress? Yes. Their statements are out of court which technically makes them hearsay. This is weak evidence given the nature of their positions and their continued dependence on Trump’s good graces.

Statements made out of court are not hearsay you fucking moron! I suggest you learn the meaning of the word lest you embarrass yourself further. On second thought, that is not possible as you are an embarrassment to the human race.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Your stupid replies have been smashed by TWO Ukraine Presidents, going to call them a liar?

Liar? No. Under duress? Yes. Their statements are out of court which technically makes them hearsay. This is weak evidence given the nature of their positions and their continued dependence on Trump’s good graces.

Ha ha ha,

You had at most 4 minutes to read a 15+ minute to read post (with around 7 kinks you ignored), your unsupported rationalizations on what the Ukraine presidents states is stupid and insulting to them. You have no argument to offer, just ignore what they say, you have NOTHING but partisan bullcrap apologies/rationalizations to offer.

ph3iron same amount of time makes a dead on arrival post with ZERO counterpoints, it is clear NEITHER of you have a rational argument to offer, just unsupported bullshit.

You two lawfree thinkers ignore Professor Dershowitz argument completely:

Let me repeat: nothing in the Bolton revelations – even if true – would rise to the level of an abuse of power or impeachable offense. That is clear from the history. That is clear from the language of the Constitution – you cannot turn conduct that is not impeachable into impeachable conduct simply by using words like "quid pro quo" and "personal benefit."

I read your post. Its mostly a copy/paste of other articles. Your entire argument relies on the statements of two people who are dependent on the president’s good graces. They have a lot of interest to not be fully honest. That’s why it’s weak evidence.

Now, can you provide a rebuttal? Or are you just going to call me names.

Your tiny rebuttal evidence/free post is dead on arrival, you are now stupid #3:

From my post you barely read:

This how stupid you two are, Both Ukraine Presidents made their statements AFTER they got all of the Military aid sent to them, if you bothered to read the links I gave you..........., but noooo you are tooooo lazy to think on your own, who feeds you the leftist crap, your stuffed Teddy Bear?

======

Your silly "good graces" argument is down in a heap of flames.......,, do you think on your own, or suck Schiffs thumb for more programmed replies?

Yes, the statements came after aid was released, but don’t get short sighted.

What about next time funding for Ukraine comes up? This isn’t one time aid. These are annual appropriations. Pissing off Trump might impact future aid packages. It’s in their best interests to stay in his good graces, especially given how personal Trump can be when it comes with how he conducts foreign policy.

It’s a good rebuttal, but I think my argument is still very strong.

The next time? Democrats will vote against it like they did before, and now castigate Trump for delaying aid they never wanted sent in the first place. That sort of destroys the national security aspect mentioned in the impeachment articles, now doesn't it?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Your stupid replies have been smashed by TWO Ukraine Presidents, going to call them a liar?

Liar? No. Under duress? Yes. Their statements are out of court which technically makes them hearsay. This is weak evidence given the nature of their positions and their continued dependence on Trump’s good graces.

again, you know what they're thinking huh? old magic eight ball for you huh?

How do you assess the credibility of statements?

Why would they lie?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Claim endless witnesses are out there, although none discovered when ball was in your court, and thus endless impeachment seeking the never ending mystery “witnesses”

Well the witnesses were discovered but wouldn't testify without court orders that would have taken months. But it's clear that the gop senate isn't gonna do anything even if Trump shoots someone on 5th ave.

Four Gop senators may want some show of witnesses to try and claim they had open minds to an already foregone vote.

And it doesn't matter to the polling. The only actual effect may be if this stretches out into the SOTU speech and Trump loses it on TV and goes into a rage for all to see

Those months would now be over had they chosen to do it right the first time!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Can you cite in US Code what law was broken?
Or will you continue to lie, and spout off propaganda and falsehoods?
When you face your Creator, will you be able to tell Him that you are a man of truth?
Or will you hang your head in shame as a condemned and unrepentant man?

18 US Code 201
18 U.S. Code § 201 - Bribery of public officials and witnesses
(B) being a public official, former public official, or person selected to be a public official, otherwise than as provided by law for the proper discharge of official duty, directly or indirectly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally for or because of any official act performed or to be performed by such official or person;

Omg you have evidence of bribery!?

solicitation, with a quid pro quo for personal gain.... government corruption, corrupt use of govt power or position..... still looking for the Statute number,

but found those other two in my search!

There is nothing "for personal gain"

He’s trying to steal the election.

Steal it from who? Bernie Sanders?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Claim endless witnesses are out there, although none discovered when ball was in your court, and thus endless impeachment seeking the never ending mystery “witnesses”

Well the witnesses were discovered but wouldn't testify without court orders that would have taken months. But it's clear that the gop senate isn't gonna do anything even if Trump shoots someone on 5th ave.

Four Gop senators may want some show of witnesses to try and claim they had open minds to an already foregone vote.

And it doesn't matter to the polling. The only actual effect may be if this stretches out into the SOTU speech and Trump loses it on TV and goes into a rage for all to see

all legal, they chose not to wait, it's on them, no one else.

Incorrect. Guess what would happen if you ignored a subpoena?

If it is deemed Executive Privilege, not a damn thing, dumbass!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

If you break the law you break the law.. it is 1776,, you will never change the bill of rights

You mean like due process? That was denied to Joe Biden.

Investigation continues,, he will get his time to answer for his crimes

Biden has constitutional protections against meritless investigations. Those protections are being ignored.

What's great is they got caught trying to smear Joe Biden's good name and they got caught. And rather than admit it or change the subject, these mother fuckers are going to double down and try to make this about Biden's son getting a job because of who his father is. As if a man like Trump gives a fuck about that. A guy who got where he is because of his father and his sons are where they are because of their father.

What hypocrites.

In a nutshell, Hunter's no different really than Ivanka or any of the 3 Trump boychinkins. BUT Biden's reason to run is him being some kind of tonic to the spite and incivility of Trump. Biden's actually less about issues than was Trump in 16.

What are Hunter's qualifications?

Let's see:

Cokehead.
Kicked out of the Navy for drugs.
Deadbeat Dad to a stripper he knocked up.
Dated his brother's widow.
No experience in finance.
No experience in gas industry
Knows nothing about Ukraine.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Every time Democrats say they need witnesses in Senate .. I say they failed miserably in the House of TDS Democrat morons..

They failed because Trump obstructed. The Senate doesn’t even want to try. Why wouldn’t they want to even try?

Nope, Democrats failed to make the case so now it's TDS crybaby time again and again and again and again and again etc.etc etc....

Now the Senate is failing to hold a fair trial.

What is good for the goose is good for the gander?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Claim endless witnesses are out there, although none discovered when ball was in your court, and thus endless impeachment seeking the never ending mystery “witnesses”

Well the witnesses were discovered but wouldn't testify without court orders that would have taken months. But it's clear that the gop senate isn't gonna do anything even if Trump shoots someone on 5th ave.

Four Gop senators may want some show of witnesses to try and claim they had open minds to an already foregone vote.

And it doesn't matter to the polling. The only actual effect may be if this stretches out into the SOTU speech and Trump loses it on TV and goes into a rage for all to see

all legal, they chose not to wait, it's on them, no one else.

Incorrect. Guess what would happen if you ignored a subpoena?

It would take 6 mos minimum for a subpoena to work its way throught the courts. And that assumes the gop Sup Ct would say Trump cannot keep Bolton's testimony a secret because of Exec Privilege.

The dems didn't have a way to force testimony. all taht's just more TRumpanzee LIES. It's like "the dems leaked boltons' book." ummm, no it was not the dems. LOL

But again, any testimony isn't going to change the result. It may though Trump into a orange-red mushrooming rage on TV, which would be way cool. LOL

How do you know that it would take that long? I know! It's a fucking wild ass guess on your part, dumbass!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

He will show that there was reason for concern over corruption. Hell, the Heinz kid distanced himself and his employer
from what Biden Jr. was doing and emailed the State Dept of his concerns, wry.

Where do you get your information?

For the Readers, see:

What Hunter Biden did on the board of Ukrainian energy company Burisma

Hunter Biden says taking a job at a Ukrainian energy company was "poor judgment"

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...adff70-dfd9-11e9-8fd3-d943b4ed57e0_story.html

It was brought into evidence by Bondi yesterday, actually, showed the documents, wry.

Bondi failed to show any rational basis that could be consider a basis for an investigation.

If Hunter exercised bad judgement, so be it. But bad judgement isn’t a crime.

According to you, colfax. I will take that for what it's worth.

I watched Bondi. She provided the case for why Biden needed to be investigated. However, as we know, law enforcement is not allowed to ignore exculpatory evidence when making that decision. Bondi ignored mountains of exculpatory evidence. Her case was weak.

You don't even know what hearsay is, much less exculpatory. STFU you legal moron!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

And your deranged

LOL!!!!



There is a 100% correlation between

CHRISTIAN and MORON

Your ignorant commentary is not appreciated. Also, correlation is not causation. Look it up, because there is no way you know what those terms mean.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Every time Democrats say they need witnesses in Senate .. I say they failed miserably in the House of TDS Democrat morons..

They failed because Trump obstructed. The Senate doesn’t even want to try. Why wouldn’t they want to even try?

Nope, Democrats failed to make the case so now it's TDS crybaby time again and again and again and again and again etc.etc etc....

Now the Senate is failing to hold a fair trial.

The Democrat House Managers failed and they lied to you... enjoy..

The House managers tried but were obstructed.
The Senate hasn’t tried, therefore they are failing the American people and violating their oath.

They had a remedy if they felt they were obstructed. They failed to do due diligence.

I thought the House manager's case was air tight? What happened?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

how anyone could say that President Trump did this for anything other than personal reasons

LMFAO!!!


President Trump tried to find out what happened to the last Ukrainian foreign aid package, and whether Hunter Biden and others received KICKBACKS from it. There is no personal benefit. The benefit would be to the American taxpayer. But there the Dems were halting any investigation because Dems KNOW THE BIDENS DID STEAL and CHEER IT and HATE ANYONE INVESTIGATING IT

This is exactly why we need Trump’s tax returns to see how much taxpayer money he’s getting in kickbacks.

How would a tax return show that, you fucking moron?

You must be at least 12 years old to be that stupid. You have never filed a tax return so you would not know what is on it.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

This is exactly why we need Trump’s tax returns to see how much taxpayer money he’s getting in kickbacks

a TAX LOSS CARRYFORWARD is not a KICKBACK

It is a perfectly legal accounting issue

If you don't like it, push Congress to change the law


Donald Trump's taxes were audited by Cocksucker Obama's IRS all 8 years, and nothing wrong was found....

The IRS works for Trump and is corrupt. We need his taxes because he’s been getting kickbacks the last 3 years. I’m not talking about tax loss carry forward. Im talking about him getting taxpayer money for nothing. Laundered through his golf course.

Why would Trump need money? He takes no salary as it is!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Nope, Democrats failed to make the case so now it's TDS crybaby time again and again and again and again and again etc.etc etc....

Now the Senate is failing to hold a fair trial.

The Democrat House Managers failed and they lied to you... enjoy..

The House managers tried but were obstructed.
The Senate hasn’t tried, therefore they are failing the American people and violating their oath.

Obstructed by their own stupidity, they could have made their case in the House impeachment process using the courts but they failed to do so.

That makes them losers and now merely crybabies.. These people you support are stupid, accept responsibility for them making a fool out of you and move along, grow up and quit making excuses for your lack of critical thought.

View attachment 303061

How long would it have taken to get their case through the courts. Any idea?

You don't know either, so why did they choose not to try?

Overconfidence, incompetence or outright stupidity?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

So, the NaziCons want to trade a relevant witness for an irrelevant witness. No thanks.

Your hypocrisy is off the scale. If Hunter Biden is an "irrelevant witness," then

WHY DOES YOUR SIDE REJECT THE HUNTER FOR BOLTON DEAL???????


Too obvious

ALL DEMS KNOW HUNTER BIDEN IS 100% GUILTY, which is WHY they REFUSE the Bolton for Hunter deal....

Hunter Biden is a private citizen and you have no business using him as a political prop

He was a private citizen flying to Ukraine and China on AF2 with dear old Quid pro Joe Biden?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

"New Quinnipiac poll: Registered voters say 75–20% that witnesses should be allowed to testify in the impeachment trial

Support for witness testimony includes 49% of Republicans, 95% of Democrats, and 75% of independents."

They watch too much "Law and Order" on TV!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

So, the NaziCons want to trade a relevant witness for an irrelevant witness. No thanks.

Your hypocrisy is off the scale. If Hunter Biden is an "irrelevant witness," then

WHY DOES YOUR SIDE REJECT THE HUNTER FOR BOLTON DEAL???????


Too obvious

ALL DEMS KNOW HUNTER BIDEN IS 100% GUILTY, which is WHY they REFUSE the Bolton for Hunter deal....

Hunter Biden is a private citizen and you have no business using him as a political prop

Oh, I'd like to see Jared's dealing with the Saudis and UAE investigated. And Ivanka's china dealings need a good vetting too.

Hunter's pretty much a slime, and so is Joe's little brother. Of course McConnell's wife needs deporting, Jodi Earnst needed jail time BEFORE she was elected, LOL. Pat Roberts' son is a lobbyist, and Pat supports legislation for the son. Senators get rich.

And no one can claim Biden personally cashed in until his senate and VP terms were done. But he's saying he's holier than Trump, and that wouldn't require a stretch, but Hunter's pretty much a loser.

What crimes are you accusing Jared and Ivanka of doing? You cannot investigate unless you have suspicion of a crime, which is why you libtards will always lose.

You cannot deport McConnell's wife because she is an American citizen, dumbass!

What did Jodi Ernst (you spelled it incorrectly) do to you to deserve jail time?

Who the fuck is Pat Robert's?

Your post is a testimony to you being a dumbass.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

There is nothing "for personal gain"

Honestly, I don't see how anyone could say that President Trump did this for anything other than personal reasons.

It's spelled out clear as day, with every action he has taken..

From all of his administration to simple listeners to the phone call, to diplomats and Ambassadors like Sondland who beloved president Trump, Giuliani and Trump himself knew Trump was doing this for his own political gain and NOT for fighting corruption in the Ukraine....

that's why they took the responsibility of disbursing the military aid away from the Pentegon and away form the civil servants who usually handles it at the OMB away from them and put it in to the hands of Politicos, hired by Trump.

and that's why the President never notified congress, PER LAW that he was holding these congressionally passed aid funds back....

(when with all other countries where he had corruption problems and other problems and he held their aid back, HE DID NOTIFY CONGRESS)

And when he took the power of the Ukrainian Ambassadorship as running the show and away from the Actual Ukrain Ambassador and gove the responsibility to his million dollar donor, Ambassador Sondland, the ambassador of the EU.

Or when he deified the law and failed to pass the urgent whistle blower complaint to congress, ACCORDING TO the LAW.....

and when he had Giuliani his campaign operative, running the show with the Ukraine govt with the two accused felons, Igor fruman and Lev Parnas and Firtash a felon awaiting extradition who paid Shokin for his new testimony, to do the job of fighting corruption in the Ukraine....

And NOT following the law on how to investigate corruption and other crimes in the Ukraine according to our law enforcement TREATY THAT WE HAVE signed AND RATIFIED with them....


Article 2 provides for the establishment of Central
Authorities and defines Central Authorities for purposes of the
Treaty. For the United States, the Central Authority shall be
the Attorney General or a person designated by the Attorney
General. For Ukraine, the Central Authority shall be the
Ministry of Justice and the Office of the Prosecutor General.
The article provides that the Central Authorities shall
communicate directly with one another for the purposes of the
Treaty.


BY LAW, President Trump was suppose to follow the treaty, and the parameters of the treaty, which involves our Attorney General, and the Ukraine's prosecutor general, working together....

NOT A Rudy Giuliani, who is OUTSIDE of the LAW, and Outlaw.

And then you have the President not answering to any document subpoenas or Witnesses being told by the president, not to even show up to congress... without ever even ASSERTING executive privilege in a legal manner.... so to hide or coverup, what he did...

-----------------------------------------------------


I mean, there are a lot of things going on here, and I haven't listed a quarter of them.... but with just the key things I've listed, it ALL POINTS in one direction.... and that is consciousness of GUILT.

Anyone, and I mean anyone, can see this....surely they can see this....?

Would you be so blind and forgiving, if it were Obama that did this....? Seriously?

Lol omg! Haha joe Biden can’t even cross the street he’s so old and falling apart, you really think he is a threat to trump? Really?

i don't think Joe is a threat, but Trump thinks he is, and this is why he has focused on him, and Elizabeth Warren, and others when he has seen their rise in polls....

He may have begun his quest a year before Joe announced with Rudy and the previous Ukraine administration, but he did not begin his and Rudy's relentless quest to smear Biden with Fox News and his son and Solomon and Hannity until the polling of Joe, showed he'd beat Trump by a big margin, right before Joe announced his run, that the full court press, including tweets....

There is a graph out there when the Trump attack began and shows how it increased, starting right before Joe announced.

Polls showing Bidem beating Trump are a laughingstock. Only Democrats answer those polls.

Rudy did not smear Biden. Biden smeared Biden.

Oh we know Biden can easily beat Trump.

Ask your self. Why do you think you are doing all these garbages and fakes about Biden?

That is why you and the rest of snow flakes, Trump and his gangsters are working so hard and scared to smear Biden.

lol, Snowflake, how many people can Biden get to a rally? There is no one in the democrat clown car that can beat the president.
A snowflake that supports Biden well isn't that precious