Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Like Trump did when he tried to coerced state officials to disregard their final vote and install a bogus bunch of electors. How many crimes is this ? Oh 91.
Why did Trump have to impanel "fake" electors. When the republican party already chose the dozen "real" electors. All Trump had to do, was to get the real electors to swear to his victory. But as you can see, they would not do such a thing. So he needed people with so little integrity, not only would they claim to be electors, when they weren't, but that Trump won, when he didn't.More to it than that.
So foolish. Are you denying trump is on trial in several venues that include 91/ indictments ?Is that what the voices in your head are telling you?
Yeah, what do you think they will say when another state’s Supreme Court tells you to fking pound sand? HahahaMeans nothing till the US SC rules…nothing. You really are naive.
It’s been that way since the first dayWhy did Trump have to impanel "fake" electors. When the republican party already chose the dozen "real" electors. All Trump had to do, was to get the real electors to swear to his victory. But as you can see, they would not do such a thing. So he needed people with so little integrity, not only would they claim to be electors, when they weren't, but that Trump won, when he didn't.
Correct, which is why there are no grounds to disqual him.Doesn't matter since Trump isn't being charged with it.
The Colorado supreme based it judgment on that he engaged in insurrection. it is not a conviction of insurrection. This is what the 14th amendment says engage which is not the same as a conviction. It does not mention anything about a conviction.
That is correct
Section 3 Disqualification from Holding Office
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
This is disqualification from the office
That is all they can do based on what was presented to them.
Criminal conduct may be addressed at lower courts under different criminal laws that may apply if they were interested in putting Trump in jail but it is not the focus of the Section or of the ruling by the Colorado Supreme Court.
I
Still means nothing…Yeah, what do you think they will say when another state’s Supreme Court tells you to fking pound sand? Hahaha
Keep telling yourself that. I know betterStill means nothing…
If you knew better you wouldn’t vote for trump and be a denier of everything fix News tells you.,Keep telling yourself that. I know better
The only candidate for Americans! HahahaIf you knew better you wouldn’t vote for trump and be a denier of everything fix News tells you.,
No, it's not what you said. And yes, you did alter the meaning. You said, "CONGRESS shall enforce." That would Congress has to enforce it. What it really says is what you posted now. That Congress shall have the power to enforce it. Which means they don't have to. It also means they don't have the sole power to enforce it.
www.merriam-webster.com
3
a
—used to express a command or exhortation
you shall go
b
—used in laws, regulations, or directives to express what is mandatory
it shall be unlawful to carry firearms
Civilly, there are no other penalties.
Criminally, potential prison time and/or fine.
Same in Colorado, right?Means nothing till the US SC rules…nothing. You really are naive.
You didn’t finish the statement. Shall: have the power to do what ? It means nothing till you provide the entire provision.Congress “shall” have the power..
ah no shit.Same in Colorado, right?
Right…so what are we arguing for? Until he is charged with it, you can’t disqualify him..Why? No one said he was.
Why did Trump have to impanel "fake" electors. When the republican party already chose the dozen "real" electors. All Trump had to do, was to get the real electors to swear to his victory. But as you can see, they would not do such a thing. So he needed people with so little integrity, not only would they claim to be electors, when they weren't, but that Trump won, when he didn't.
Wrong. It’s a political/ civil determination. Like any civil case with no trial , the courts decide if the offenses and punishment is warranted. Geesus,it’s all spelled out in the 14 amendment.Right…so what are we arguing for? Until he is charged with it, you can’t disqualify him..
Well, if we’re being “technical”…he only has 4 indictments, with 91 underlying charges…just sayin…So foolish. Are you denying trump is on trial in several venues that include 91/ indictments ?
Why don’t you read the charges. We know fix News won’t provide them and you’re not allowed to think for yourself….wtf.But when did Trump impanel ANY electors? He was simply trying to send the election back to those states for reconsideration.
“shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.”You didn’t finish the statement. Shall: have the power to do what ? It means nothing till you provide the entire provision.
ah no shit.
