The Death of a Presidency

Obviously, you don't understand what pro-choice is.

Pro choice is, I think it should be the WOMAN'S decision.

But I can always tell when you are losing an argument is when you bring up abortion.. in a non-abortion thread.

So you're for pro-choice in some matters but not in others. If a woman can choose what to do with her body, why can't she choose what insurance she wants?

-Geaux

No, she can totally have whatever insurance she wants... as long as it meets a legal standard.

Just like she can totally have an abortion as long as it is performed by a certified provider. (Who doesn't necessarily need to be a doctor.)

So, she indeed does not have a choice to do with her body what she wants. Only can do what the FEDS want. More like Pro- Limited Choice

-Geaux
 
So you're for pro-choice in some matters but not in others. If a woman can choose what to do with her body, why can't she choose what insurance she wants?

-Geaux

No, she can totally have whatever insurance she wants... as long as it meets a legal standard.

Just like she can totally have an abortion as long as it is performed by a certified provider. (Who doesn't necessarily need to be a doctor.)

So, she indeed does not have a choice to do with her body what she wants. Only can do what the FEDS want. More like Pro- Limited Choice

-Geaux

If the Insurance Industry wasn't hell-bent on ripping off their customers, this wouldn't be an issue.
 
No, she can totally have whatever insurance she wants... as long as it meets a legal standard.

Just like she can totally have an abortion as long as it is performed by a certified provider. (Who doesn't necessarily need to be a doctor.)

So, she indeed does not have a choice to do with her body what she wants. Only can do what the FEDS want. More like Pro- Limited Choice

-Geaux

If the Insurance Industry wasn't hell-bent on ripping off their customers, this wouldn't be an issue.

Instead, now I have the government ripping me off to pay for the poor. Sorry, I would rather contribute in promoting capitalism than socialism

-Geaux
 
So, she indeed does not have a choice to do with her body what she wants. Only can do what the FEDS want. More like Pro- Limited Choice

-Geaux

If the Insurance Industry wasn't hell-bent on ripping off their customers, this wouldn't be an issue.

Instead, now I have the government ripping me off to pay for the poor. Sorry, I would rather contribute in promoting capitalism than socialism

-Geaux

I'm sure you would. Thankfully, your kind of selfishiness is on its way out in the world, and we are going to be better off for it.
 
If the Insurance Industry wasn't hell-bent on ripping off their customers, this wouldn't be an issue.

Instead, now I have the government ripping me off to pay for the poor. Sorry, I would rather contribute in promoting capitalism than socialism

-Geaux

I'm sure you would. Thankfully, your kind of selfishiness is on its way out in the world, and we are going to be better off for it.

Yes people looking out for their own is on its way out.
 
Instead, now I have the government ripping me off to pay for the poor. Sorry, I would rather contribute in promoting capitalism than socialism

-Geaux

I'm sure you would. Thankfully, your kind of selfishiness is on its way out in the world, and we are going to be better off for it.

Yes people looking out for their own is on its way out.

That isn't what the GOP stands for.

What it stands for is, "I got mine, fuck you!!!"
 
So, she indeed does not have a choice to do with her body what she wants. Only can do what the FEDS want. More like Pro- Limited Choice

-Geaux

If the Insurance Industry wasn't hell-bent on ripping off their customers, this wouldn't be an issue.

Instead, now I have the government ripping me off to pay for the poor. Sorry, I would rather contribute in promoting capitalism than socialism

-Geaux

Actually, that's not ObamaCare.

That's Reagan's EMTALA.
 
If the Insurance Industry wasn't hell-bent on ripping off their customers, this wouldn't be an issue.

Instead, now I have the government ripping me off to pay for the poor. Sorry, I would rather contribute in promoting capitalism than socialism

-Geaux

Actually, that's not ObamaCare.

That's Reagan's EMTALA.

Wrong often? As a result of ACA, my premium has gone up 76% for $168 a month. And for the increase, I get raised doctor and hospital co-pay. Oh, and maternity coverage..

-Geaux
 
Instead, now I have the government ripping me off to pay for the poor. Sorry, I would rather contribute in promoting capitalism than socialism

-Geaux

Actually, that's not ObamaCare.

That's Reagan's EMTALA.

Wrong often? As a result of ACA, my premium has gone up 76% for $168 a month. And for the increase, I get raised doctor and hospital co-pay. Oh, and maternity coverage..

-Geaux

Again, $168 a month is pretty good. I have to wonder what kind of shitty insurance you were getting before that with CleetusCare.

"If you get something stuck in your gizzard, they'll give you some snake oil!"
 
By Templar Kormac

I remember the night when Obama got elected 5 years ago. I was a hard right Republican just two years out of high school. My knowledge of politics was limited. I couldn't help but hope with the rest of those Americans that there would be a positive change in this country. I wanted so badly to be swept along with the rest of them, join in the euphoria of the election of the first black man to the White House. But I held myself back. As the first 100 days went by, I knew Obama would be no ordinary president. I never thought that one day, this self proclaimed savior of America would be the instrument of his own destruction.

In those 100 days, Democrats had garnered majorities in both houses of Congress, and finally after the electoral euphoria wore off, the discussion turned to healthcare insurance and economic recovery. Obama proposed a plan that he purported would provide the millions of uninsured Americans access to affordable healthcare. I thought to myself, 'hey this is cool, maybe he won't be such a bad president after all. Maybe I can get insurance!' But as I began to learn how to investigate and do research, I found out how little of this law was going to work.

Republicans repeatedly and without fail warned that millions of Americans would lose their insurance and that premiums would skyrocket, while the newly elected president continued to assert that if they liked their plans and doctors they could keep them. Despite the objections of millions upon millions of Americans against this new proposal, on Christmas Eve that same year, Democrats passed what would be now known as Obamacare. Republicans could do little else to stop it's passage, other than to unanimously vote no. Little did I know just how loud those objections would become.

In 2010, the backlash was tremendous. Throughout the year, millions of Americans assailed their Representatives and Senators during the congressional recess, the question most asked was "Why? Why would you ignore the will of we the people to pass a law we didn't consent to?" On election night that year, the Democrats paid dearly for their unwillingness to heed to the will of their constituents. They were swiftly rendered a minority in the house, and though miraculously, kept control of the Senate.

The next year and a half didn't see much debate on the law, since the inevitability of the ACA's implementation was almost certain. In 2011 and 2012 we saw Obama campaign on his promises, amidst the Arab Spring, the Benghazi Scandal and Superstorm Sandy. The previous four years saw him do little to fix a broken economy, but yet he was put back in the White House for a second term. Republicans would try in futility to repeal Obamacare, only to be vilified successfully by their opponents.

This year, all hell broke out for Obama, as it was made known that people under him had been targeting Tea Party organizations unfairly during the previous election. Then it got even worse, it was discovered that the NSA had been spying on millions of Americans. Scandal after scandal broke out in Washington, damaging a once proud presidency.

Still, Obama remained undeterred, unblemished. He had the entire media behind him, he could do no wrong. There was so much momentum from the passage of the law that it seemed as if Obama would be the proverbial Democratic version of Ronald Reagan. Obama appeared to be invincible. Nobody could stop him. But after all those years of broken promises and scandals, it would be the signature law that supposedly defined Obama's presidency which would be responsible for undoing it. Millions of people began losing their healthcare, and premiums began rising exponentially.

The death blow came as Obama admitted that he lied to America about keeping their insurance plans and paying lower premiums. He tried to make it right by issuing an executive order allowing those millions adversely affected to keep their insurance, to no avail. In five years, I have watched myself metamorphose into someone who departed from the two party world, as I watched the presidency of a self anointed savior evaporate into the thinness of the air. The death of a presidency has come swiftly and the aura of hope and change has faded.

Well written. I have a recommendation for you.


[ame=http://www.amazon.com/Writing-Well-30th-Anniversary-Nonfiction-ebook/dp/B0090RVGW0/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1384612941&sr=8-1&keywords=william+zinsser+on+writing+well]Amazon.com: On Writing Well, 30th Anniversary Edition: An Informal Guide to Writing Nonfiction eBook: William Zinsser: Kindle Store[/ame]


Brevity isn't the issue. Tight writing is more effective and lends to an active writing style.

Again, well done.
 
Some of us strive for something higher.

You know, like that Jesus guy said we should.

Joe invokes Jesus.

OODA carves another notch in grip.

Yeah, I knew that would make you guys nuts...

Here's the thing, if Jesus were alive today, two things he'd never be.

A Republican or a Christian.

So you can communicate with 2000 year old dead people? That is quite amazing actually....
 
I honestly have to ask, have any of you guys actually READ the Gospels?




Luke 16:13 ESV / 28 helpful votes

No servant can serve two masters, for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and money.”




1 Timothy 6:17-18 ESV / 22 helpful votes

As for the rich in this present age, charge them not to be haughty, nor to set their hopes on the uncertainty of riches, but on God, who richly provides us with everything to enjoy. They are to do good, to be rich in good works, to be generous and ready to share,




Mark 8:36 ESV / 21 helpful votes

For what does it profit a man to gain the whole world and forfeit his soul?


HelpfulNot Helpful

Luke 6:38 ESV / 20 helpful votes

Give, and it will be given to you. Good measure, pressed down, shaken together, running over, will be put into your lap. For with the measure you use it will be measured back to you.”
 
Survival of the fittest. You're either with us or against us. Get in step our move out of the way

-Geaux
 
Instead, now I have the government ripping me off to pay for the poor. Sorry, I would rather contribute in promoting capitalism than socialism

-Geaux

I'm sure you would. Thankfully, your kind of selfishiness is on its way out in the world, and we are going to be better off for it.

Yes people looking out for their own is on its way out.
Only in THAT generation is Freedom considered 'selfishness'.
 

Forum List

Back
Top