The Dems hate that our underclass continues to expand yet they continue to recruit Mexico’s worse?

[BrokeLoser]

How does that make sense?
They campaign on and bitch nonstop about wealth and income inequality, poor healthcare, poor education...etc etc....Meanwhile they fight to expand the underclass at a much faster rate than we can improve pay and create jobs. With all that considered shouldn’t their concern be viewed as disingenuous?
Aren’t they clearly demonstrating that their relevance relies on a forever growing underclass?
Am I missing something?

 

[B. Kidd]

Commies love their lumpenproletariats!

 

[BrokeLoser]

It’s just so weird that Democrats have become so transparent in their anti American agenda and yet they are able to retain so many American voters....HOW?

 

[Mac1958]

It’s just so weird that Democrats have become so transparent in their anti American agenda and yet they are able to retain so many American voters....HOW?

Their competition.

Obviously.

Is this a trick question?
.

 

[bodecea]

How does that make sense?
They campaign on and bitch nonstop about wealth and income inequality, poor healthcare, poor education...etc etc....Meanwhile they fight to expand the underclass at a much faster rate than we can improve pay and create jobs. With all that considered shouldn’t their concern be viewed as disingenuous?
Aren’t they clearly demonstrating that their relevance relies on a forever growing underclass?
Am I missing something?

How is it possible for our underclass to be expanding under the orange god's wonderful economy?

 

[BrokeLoser]

It’s just so weird that Democrats have become so transparent in their anti American agenda and yet they are able to retain so many American voters....HOW?

Their competition.

Obviously.

Is this a trick question?
.

What anti American agenda is their competition peddling?

 

[Mac1958]

It’s just so weird that Democrats have become so transparent in their anti American agenda and yet they are able to retain so many American voters....HOW?

Their competition.

Obviously.

Is this a trick question?
.

What anti American agenda is their competition peddling?

Hard to say if it's anti-American, but it's not very attractive.

Fairly repugnant, actually.

So whether it's pro-American or anti-American, it's ugly and helps the Democrats. By contrast.
.

 

[BrokeLoser]

How does that make sense?
They campaign on and bitch nonstop about wealth and income inequality, poor healthcare, poor education...etc etc....Meanwhile they fight to expand the underclass at a much faster rate than we can improve pay and create jobs. With all that considered shouldn’t their concern be viewed as disingenuous?
Aren’t they clearly demonstrating that their relevance relies on a forever growing underclass?
Am I missing something?

How is it possible for our underclass to be expanding under the orange god's wonderful economy?

You tell me...aren’t ‘inequalities’ the nucleus of nearly all Mexicrat talking points?

 

[BrokeLoser]

It’s just so weird that Democrats have become so transparent in their anti American agenda and yet they are able to retain so many American voters....HOW?

Their competition.

Obviously.

Is this a trick question?
.

What anti American agenda is their competition peddling?

Hard to say if it's anti-American, but it's not very attractive.

Fairly repugnant, actually.

So whether it's pro-American or anti-American, it's ugly and helps the Democrats. By contrast.
.

What about Americans first, fuck Mexico and defend the 2nd to name a few is unattractive for REAL Americans?

 

[Mac1958]

It’s just so weird that Democrats have become so transparent in their anti American agenda and yet they are able to retain so many American voters....HOW?

Their competition.

Obviously.

Is this a trick question?
.

What anti American agenda is their competition peddling?

Hard to say if it's anti-American, but it's not very attractive.

Fairly repugnant, actually.

So whether it's pro-American or anti-American, it's ugly and helps the Democrats. By contrast.
.

What about Americans first, fuck Mexico and defend the 2nd to name a few is unattractive for REAL Americans?

By your definitions, nothing.

So you have nothing to worry about.
.

 

[BrokeLoser]

It’s just so weird that Democrats have become so transparent in their anti American agenda and yet they are able to retain so many American voters....HOW?

Their competition.

Obviously.

Is this a trick question?
.

What anti American agenda is their competition peddling?

Hard to say if it's anti-American, but it's not very attractive.

Fairly repugnant, actually.

So whether it's pro-American or anti-American, it's ugly and helps the Democrats. By contrast.
.

What about Americans first, fuck Mexico and defend the 2nd to name a few is unattractive for REAL Americans?

By your definitions, nothing.

So you have nothing to worry about.
.

I’m asking you.
What exactly are Republicans pushing that is so unattractive and unAmerican to Americans? Stay engaged, don’t get scared and start with the deflection tactics.

 

[Third Party]

How does that make sense?
They campaign on and bitch nonstop about wealth and income inequality, poor healthcare, poor education...etc etc....Meanwhile they fight to expand the underclass at a much faster rate than we can improve pay and create jobs. With all that considered shouldn’t their concern be viewed as disingenuous?
Aren’t they clearly demonstrating that their relevance relies on a forever growing underclass?
Am I missing something?

Since the rule of law has been suspended for impeachment purposes, lets use this opportunity to hunt down and shoot illegal aliens-after all they are foreign invaders! Dollar a head bounty!

 

[Bush92]

Democrats need a “victim class” in order to perpetuate their socialist aims for our country.

 

[Mac1958]

Their competition.

Obviously.

Is this a trick question?
.

What anti American agenda is their competition peddling?

Hard to say if it's anti-American, but it's not very attractive.

Fairly repugnant, actually.

So whether it's pro-American or anti-American, it's ugly and helps the Democrats. By contrast.
.

What about Americans first, fuck Mexico and defend the 2nd to name a few is unattractive for REAL Americans?

By your definitions, nothing.

So you have nothing to worry about.
.

I’m asking you.
What exactly are Republicans pushing that is so unattractive and unAmerican to Americans? Stay engaged, don’t get scared and start with the deflection tactics.

I give up quickly because you never seem to understand what I'm saying.

Just now, I sat here and tried four ways to answer your question. I backspaced over all of them. I can't make it simple enough.

I don't know what to tell you.
.

 

[BrokeLoser]

What anti American agenda is their competition peddling?

Hard to say if it's anti-American, but it's not very attractive.

Fairly repugnant, actually.

So whether it's pro-American or anti-American, it's ugly and helps the Democrats. By contrast.
.

What about Americans first, fuck Mexico and defend the 2nd to name a few is unattractive for REAL Americans?

By your definitions, nothing.

So you have nothing to worry about.
.

I’m asking you.
What exactly are Republicans pushing that is so unattractive and unAmerican to Americans? Stay engaged, don’t get scared and start with the deflection tactics.

I give up quickly because you never seem to understand what I'm saying.

Just now, I sat here and tried four ways to answer your question. I backspaced over all of them. I can't make it simple enough.

I don't know what to tell you.
.

Mac, this is why we can’t communicate efficiently...you stay very blurry and ambiguous, you are very cautious and do not say what you mean...this prevents any clarity in your position which I believe you intend to do.
You said that Republicans are pushing something “unattractive”, “repugnant” and “ugly”...those are your words yet you refuse to tell us EXACTLY what it is that is unattractive, repugnant and ugly.
Get out of that gray area you love and feel comfortable in...say shit with total clarity, be concise, get out of that ambiguous safe space you’re in and own your positions.

 

[Mac1958]

Hard to say if it's anti-American, but it's not very attractive.

Fairly repugnant, actually.

So whether it's pro-American or anti-American, it's ugly and helps the Democrats. By contrast.
.

What about Americans first, fuck Mexico and defend the 2nd to name a few is unattractive for REAL Americans?

By your definitions, nothing.

So you have nothing to worry about.
.

I’m asking you.
What exactly are Republicans pushing that is so unattractive and unAmerican to Americans? Stay engaged, don’t get scared and start with the deflection tactics.

I give up quickly because you never seem to understand what I'm saying.

Just now, I sat here and tried four ways to answer your question. I backspaced over all of them. I can't make it simple enough.

I don't know what to tell you.
.

Mac, this is why we can’t communicate efficiently...you stay very blurry and ambiguous, you are very cautious and do not say what you mean...this prevents any clarity in your position which I believe you intend to do.
You said that Republicans are pushing something “unattractive”, “repugnant” and “ugly”...those are your words yet you refuse to tell us EXACTLY what it is that is unattractive, repugnant and ugly.
Get out of that gray area you love and feel comfortable in...say shit with total clarity, be concise, get out of that ambiguous safe space you’re in and own your positions.

It's not the message that's repugnant and ugly. It's the messengers and the messaging.

Look at your President and how childish and vulgar he is. Look at your own posts, and how you regularly treat minorities as subhuman.

You guys just don't get this. It's not just the message. It's not just the issues. It's what is perceived.

I already know you're not going to get this. Then you'll complain when I get tired of beating a dead horse.
.

 

[BrokeLoser]

What about Americans first, fuck Mexico and defend the 2nd to name a few is unattractive for REAL Americans?

By your definitions, nothing.

So you have nothing to worry about.
.

I’m asking you.
What exactly are Republicans pushing that is so unattractive and unAmerican to Americans? Stay engaged, don’t get scared and start with the deflection tactics.

I give up quickly because you never seem to understand what I'm saying.

Just now, I sat here and tried four ways to answer your question. I backspaced over all of them. I can't make it simple enough.

I don't know what to tell you.
.

Mac, this is why we can’t communicate efficiently...you stay very blurry and ambiguous, you are very cautious and do not say what you mean...this prevents any clarity in your position which I believe you intend to do.
You said that Republicans are pushing something “unattractive”, “repugnant” and “ugly”...those are your words yet you refuse to tell us EXACTLY what it is that is unattractive, repugnant and ugly.
Get out of that gray area you love and feel comfortable in...say shit with total clarity, be concise, get out of that ambiguous safe space you’re in and own your positions.

It's not the message that's repugnant and ugly. It's the messengers and the messaging.

Look at your President and how childish and vulgar he is. Look at your own posts, and how you regularly treat minorities as subhuman.

You guys just don't get this. It's not just the message. It's not just the issues. It's what is perceived.

I already know you're not going to get this. Then you'll complain when I get tired of beating a dead horse.
.

There you go...we’re making some headway, that was easy right?
So, for you, the delivery of the message negates the functions within the message and you believe many others vote on message delivery and not the message itself...am I understanding you correctly?

 

[Slade3200]

How does that make sense?
They campaign on and bitch nonstop about wealth and income inequality, poor healthcare, poor education...etc etc....Meanwhile they fight to expand the underclass at a much faster rate than we can improve pay and create jobs. With all that considered shouldn’t their concern be viewed as disingenuous?
Aren’t they clearly demonstrating that their relevance relies on a forever growing underclass?
Am I missing something?

Recruit?? You’re such an idiot

 

[Mac1958]

By your definitions, nothing.

So you have nothing to worry about.
.

I’m asking you.
What exactly are Republicans pushing that is so unattractive and unAmerican to Americans? Stay engaged, don’t get scared and start with the deflection tactics.

I give up quickly because you never seem to understand what I'm saying.

Just now, I sat here and tried four ways to answer your question. I backspaced over all of them. I can't make it simple enough.

I don't know what to tell you.
.

Mac, this is why we can’t communicate efficiently...you stay very blurry and ambiguous, you are very cautious and do not say what you mean...this prevents any clarity in your position which I believe you intend to do.
You said that Republicans are pushing something “unattractive”, “repugnant” and “ugly”...those are your words yet you refuse to tell us EXACTLY what it is that is unattractive, repugnant and ugly.
Get out of that gray area you love and feel comfortable in...say shit with total clarity, be concise, get out of that ambiguous safe space you’re in and own your positions.

It's not the message that's repugnant and ugly. It's the messengers and the messaging.

Look at your President and how childish and vulgar he is. Look at your own posts, and how you regularly treat minorities as subhuman.

You guys just don't get this. It's not just the message. It's not just the issues. It's what is perceived.

I already know you're not going to get this. Then you'll complain when I get tired of beating a dead horse.
.

There you go...we’re making some headway, that was easy right?
So, for you, the delivery of the message negates the functions within the message and you believe many others vote on message delivery and not the message itself...am I understanding you correctly?

Negates, no. Negatively affects, yes, particularly when it's reinforcing preexisting perceptions. That's human nature.
.

 

[Slade3200]

It’s just so weird that Democrats have become so transparent in their anti American agenda and yet they are able to retain so many American voters....HOW?

Anti-America?? Another idiotic accusation