The end of white America is now clearly in sight

[rightwinger]

Anti-Racists say "Diversity is strength"
But, they fight to "Blend diverse peoples into a swath"

Anti-Racists say "Diverse cultures have much to contribute for being diferent"
But, they fight to "Make such diverse cultures eradicated"

Am I missing something, or are anti-Racists retarded on the whole?

You don't get a more diverse culture than the United States

Worked pretty damned well

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

An informative story at the BBC....

How young Americans are set to change the US forever - BBC News
Non-whites are the major source of population increase for the US for some time now.
The Hispanic population will become the predominant ethnic group within 50 years at the current rate.
Even the Asian rate of population growth exceeds the growth rate of the white ethnic group.

The white population median age is now 43 and growing older. It's simply a matter of time.

And with the decline in white people from rural America and traditionalists regions who historically have been Patriots, so will go the inclination to preserve the framework of the USA as founded.

It won't matter to most of us since we'll be gone......but in 200 years I would venture a guess that the USA will be dramatically different than it has been for the last 200 or so. Whether that's a good thing or a bad thing probably depends on your point of view.

I think that we are all meant to mingle with different race. That we shouldn't be trying to keep a solid pure race. That doesn't make any sense that we still has people that still get burn from the sun rays.after being on this planet for centuries. Our bodies supposedly adapt to the environment. And then there are races that has been here over centuries that doesn't sun burn at all. But the original Egyptians were blacks, but the wealthy Egyptians has always worn wigs or added hair to their hair so that it can look long. But I believes that the poor Egyptians had worn dreadlocks But they were trying to make their hairs on their heads to look like the other tribes. But when you mixes these groups together, that it will solve their problems. Even there are Asians that are going under the knife to have their eyes big and round. But I thinks that it is meant for us all to be mixed, instead of going under the knife.

My grandfather told me that this powerful man, Edgar, was his second cousin, and was passing for white. If we talked about this, he was so powerful he could have us all killed. I grew up terrified about all this.” Was J. Edgar Hoover black?


According to Wikipedia, J. Edgar Hoover was a black man passing as a white man, and murdered his black relatives to intimidate the others into keeping quiet. OR Why you don't use Wikipedia for anything other than a summary of its sources. • r/badhistory

NAACP Leader Rachel Dolezal Allegedly Faked Being A Black Woman For Years | HuffPost

Julie Chen Reveals 'Asian Eyes' Surgery on 'The Talk' (Video)

Is Jessica Alba part black

.
French Creoles | Creole Experience

Simply and utterly not true. Somebody wasn't paying attention in class.

 

[Correll]

Anti-Racists say "Diversity is strength"
But, they fight to "Blend diverse peoples into a swath"

Anti-Racists say "Diverse cultures have much to contribute for being diferent"
But, they fight to "Make such diverse cultures eradicated"

Am I missing something, or are anti-Racists retarded on the whole?

You don't get a more diverse culture than the United States

Worked pretty damned well

I thought that minorities and women were prevented from contributing. According to you.

If that's true, than our current policy of encouraging their contribution is a radical break and undermines your assumption of success based on past performance.

 

[rightwinger]

Anti-Racists say "Diversity is strength"
But, they fight to "Blend diverse peoples into a swath"

Anti-Racists say "Diverse cultures have much to contribute for being diferent"
But, they fight to "Make such diverse cultures eradicated"

Am I missing something, or are anti-Racists retarded on the whole?

You don't get a more diverse culture than the United States

Worked pretty damned well

I thought that minorities and women were prevented from contributing. According to you.

If that's true, than our current policy of encouraging their contribution is a radical break and undermines your assumption of success based on past performance.

Well it depends on what you call contributing

If you consider music, language, food, the arts, movies, labor and raising strong families contributing, then yes all cultures have contributed to our society

However, when you ask......Why aren't more women and more minorities represented as CEO's, Governors, Senators and Congresmen ? You get to the crux of the problem. White males continue to dominate those positions of power

 

[Correll]

Anti-Racists say "Diversity is strength"
But, they fight to "Blend diverse peoples into a swath"

Anti-Racists say "Diverse cultures have much to contribute for being diferent"
But, they fight to "Make such diverse cultures eradicated"

Am I missing something, or are anti-Racists retarded on the whole?

You don't get a more diverse culture than the United States

Worked pretty damned well

I thought that minorities and women were prevented from contributing. According to you.

If that's true, than our current policy of encouraging their contribution is a radical break and undermines your assumption of success based on past performance.

Well it depends on what you call contributing

If you consider music, language, food, the arts, movies, labor and raising strong families contributing, then yes all cultures have contributed to our society

However, when you ask......Why aren't more women and more minorities represented as CEO's, Governors, Senators and Congresmen ? You get to the crux of the problem. White males continue to dominate those positions of power

So, historically and even today, minorities were/are supposedly prevented from contributing on the macro level.

Thus, your claim that it will work in the future because it worked in the past, is debunked by your own words.


Are you prepared to discuss the issue seriously and honestly now?

 

[rightwinger]

Anti-Racists say "Diversity is strength"
But, they fight to "Blend diverse peoples into a swath"

Anti-Racists say "Diverse cultures have much to contribute for being diferent"
But, they fight to "Make such diverse cultures eradicated"

Am I missing something, or are anti-Racists retarded on the whole?

You don't get a more diverse culture than the United States

Worked pretty damned well

I thought that minorities and women were prevented from contributing. According to you.

If that's true, than our current policy of encouraging their contribution is a radical break and undermines your assumption of success based on past performance.

Well it depends on what you call contributing

If you consider music, language, food, the arts, movies, labor and raising strong families contributing, then yes all cultures have contributed to our society

However, when you ask......Why aren't more women and more minorities represented as CEO's, Governors, Senators and Congresmen ? You get to the crux of the problem. White males continue to dominate those positions of power

So, historically and even today, minorities were/are supposedly prevented from contributing on the macro level.

Thus, your claim that it will work in the future because it worked in the past, is debunked by your own words.


Are you prepared to discuss the issue seriously and honestly now?

Once again......you are making no sense at either the micro or macro level

 

[Correll]

Anti-Racists say "Diversity is strength"
But, they fight to "Blend diverse peoples into a swath"

Anti-Racists say "Diverse cultures have much to contribute for being diferent"
But, they fight to "Make such diverse cultures eradicated"

Am I missing something, or are anti-Racists retarded on the whole?

You don't get a more diverse culture than the United States

Worked pretty damned well

I thought that minorities and women were prevented from contributing. According to you.

If that's true, than our current policy of encouraging their contribution is a radical break and undermines your assumption of success based on past performance.

Well it depends on what you call contributing

If you consider music, language, food, the arts, movies, labor and raising strong families contributing, then yes all cultures have contributed to our society

However, when you ask......Why aren't more women and more minorities represented as CEO's, Governors, Senators and Congresmen ? You get to the crux of the problem. White males continue to dominate those positions of power

So, historically and even today, minorities were/are supposedly prevented from contributing on the macro level.

Thus, your claim that it will work in the future because it worked in the past, is debunked by your own words.


Are you prepared to discuss the issue seriously and honestly now?

Once again......you are making no sense at either the micro or macro level

You talk about how excluded minorities and women were from positions of power and then claim that since our diversity worked in the past it will work in the future,


but of past success was built by white guys who excluded minorities and women from contributing on their level. As you said.


You are the one that is contradicting yourself.


All to avoid discussing the ramifications of this change seriously and honestly.

 

[bitter clinging swiftie]

mixed relationships produce good things for society....the most common mixed relationships in America for serveral generations now are white men with asian women......that has produced asian women with big breasts....AND WHO DONT LOVE A BIG TITTIED ASIAN BROAD???????????

 

[bitter clinging swiftie]

An informative story at the BBC....

How young Americans are set to change the US forever - BBC News
Non-whites are the major source of population increase for the US for some time now.
The Hispanic population will become the predominant ethnic group within 50 years at the current rate.
Even the Asian rate of population growth exceeds the growth rate of the white ethnic group.

The white population median age is now 43 and growing older. It's simply a matter of time.

And with the decline in white people from rural America and traditionalists regions who historically have been Patriots, so will go the inclination to preserve the framework of the USA as founded.

It won't matter to most of us since we'll be gone......but in 200 years I would venture a guess that the USA will be dramatically different than it has been for the last 200 or so. Whether that's a good thing or a bad thing probably depends on your point of view.

I think that we are all meant to mingle with different race. That we shouldn't be trying to keep a solid pure race. That doesn't make any sense that we still has people that still get burn from the sun rays.after being on this planet for centuries. Our bodies supposedly adapt to the environment. And then there are races that has been here over centuries that doesn't sun burn at all. But the original Egyptians were blacks, but the wealthy Egyptians has always worn wigs or added hair to their hair so that it can look long. But I believes that the poor Egyptians had worn dreadlocks But they were trying to make their hairs on their heads to look like the other tribes. But when you mixes these groups together, that it will solve their problems. Even there are Asians that are going under the knife to have their eyes big and round. But I thinks that it is meant for us all to be mixed, instead of going under the knife.

My grandfather told me that this powerful man, Edgar, was his second cousin, and was passing for white. If we talked about this, he was so powerful he could have us all killed. I grew up terrified about all this.” Was J. Edgar Hoover black?


According to Wikipedia, J. Edgar Hoover was a black man passing as a white man, and murdered his black relatives to intimidate the others into keeping quiet. OR Why you don't use Wikipedia for anything other than a summary of its sources. • r/badhistory

NAACP Leader Rachel Dolezal Allegedly Faked Being A Black Woman For Years | HuffPost

Julie Chen Reveals 'Asian Eyes' Surgery on 'The Talk' (Video)

Is Jessica Alba part black

.
French Creoles | Creole Experience

I LOVE me some julie Chen

 

[Freewill]

No doubt, but it was still whites that made the greatest nation in the world.

Yes they did. They did it by blocking any other race from contributing

Do you mean blacks and orientals have not contributed to America. Don't tell that to descendants of slaves.

They contributed back breaking labor

I was referring to contributing from a leadership perspective

They were not "blocked from contributing"

Didn't see many Senators, Judges or CEOs from the ranks of Blacks, Hispanics, Asians or women did you?

You have to take this line of argument, even though it goes against your very inner racism. Maybe you do it to try and 'make up' for what you really believe.

Look at societies in the world. Look at the societies that whites created, then look at societies that minorities created, no comparison. So instead of blaming it on obvious inferiority you argue that they were held back by the superior white race. What a crock of racist mishmash of BS.

 

[Rustic]

It's a fact that it will happen. We can either whine about it, or adjust so we won't be left behind as the world moves forward.

Extinction is a fact of life, Indians like myself Have known that for quite some time.

 

[bitter clinging swiftie]

why is this even a fucking discussion? Everyone has a special someone out there for them, and sometimes that special someone might have different ethnic characteristics than you.
no one wants to FORCE you to marry outside your race, most people marry their own race.
mixed marriages ARE NOT GOOD
mixed marriages are NOT BAD
they are a PERSONAL CHOICE

 

[bitter clinging swiftie]

White folks created the greatest nation in history. They can't be all-bad, no? Why is the OP and others hatin on em so much?

Source of hate is envy.

That's why.

Because no one in their right mind could hate a people for being inferior, and causing issues for their country.
LOLOL
It must all be envy, sure.

"racism is just another ugly form of collectivism"---ayn rand

I am a collectivist.

I think individualism is pretty sub-Human, it seems to be about "Me, and mine" it doesn't grasp that as individuals we belong to a greater culture.
The Individualist simply thinks of themselves, not about greater society.

Furthermore Individualism is pretty weak, an extreme Individualist would go so far to say "Treat an invading army as individuals"

you aint no different than those "we was Kangz and sheeit" ass black dudes

 

[Rustic]

why is this even a fucking discussion? Everyone has a special someone out there for them, and sometimes that special someone might have different ethnic characteristics than you.
no one wants to FORCE you to marry outside your race, most people marry their own race.
mixed marriages ARE NOT GOOD
mixed marriages are NOT BAD
they are a PERSONAL CHOICE

...

 

[ptbw forever]

White folks created the greatest nation in history. They can't be all-bad, no? Why is the OP and others hatin on em so much?

Source of hate is envy.

That's why.

Because no one in their right mind could hate a people for being inferior, and causing issues for their country.
LOLOL
It must all be envy, sure.

"racism is just another ugly form of collectivism"---ayn rand

I am a collectivist.

I think individualism is pretty sub-Human, it seems to be about "Me, and mine" it doesn't grasp that as individuals we belong to a greater culture.
The Individualist simply thinks of themselves, not about greater society.

Furthermore Individualism is pretty weak, an extreme Individualist would go so far to say "Treat an invading army as individuals"

LOL, thats pretty weak sauce. This country was founded on the belief of individualism, the creativity, the work ethic, the dreams and willingness to chase them of the INDIVIDUAL. Our founders fell short of those goals, but they still exist, and as long as the belief in one man or wamn's ability to overcome, to achieve, and the willingness to defend that ideal exist, then America will be a great nation always, no matter what the hue of its inhabitants.

This country was founded on establishing individualism where none existed before.

Destroying collectivism and tribalism is not what the founders had in mind.

 

[bitter clinging swiftie]

Source of hate is envy.

That's why.

Because no one in their right mind could hate a people for being inferior, and causing issues for their country.
LOLOL
It must all be envy, sure.

"racism is just another ugly form of collectivism"---ayn rand

I am a collectivist.

I think individualism is pretty sub-Human, it seems to be about "Me, and mine" it doesn't grasp that as individuals we belong to a greater culture.
The Individualist simply thinks of themselves, not about greater society.

Furthermore Individualism is pretty weak, an extreme Individualist would go so far to say "Treat an invading army as individuals"

LOL, thats pretty weak sauce. This country was founded on the belief of individualism, the creativity, the work ethic, the dreams and willingness to chase them of the INDIVIDUAL. Our founders fell short of those goals, but they still exist, and as long as the belief in one man or wamn's ability to overcome, to achieve, and the willingness to defend that ideal exist, then America will be a great nation always, no matter what the hue of its inhabitants.

This country was founded on establishing individualism where none existed before.

Destroying collectivism and tribalism is not what the founders had in mind.

they championed the rights of the individual. period. every person has the right to live their life as they see fit, within the confines of not violating anyone else's rights.

 

[bitter clinging swiftie]

LMAO.......race mixing will not end the white race, black race or any other race. thats why the "muh white genocide" argument is stupid. Example, chuck norris's parents are both 1/2 irish american and 1/2 indian...would you describe him as anything other than white? aned hispanicas come in all colors. Felix trinidad is hispanic, but he is black. Canelo Alverez is hispanic, but would anyone say he aint white?

At one point they will all become so mixed, they won't look, or have much different backgrounds.
That is if we tolerate it.
Which unfortunately is pretty common to tolerate eradicating unique, and diverse peoples from the face of the Earth.

what are you gonna do to NOT tolerate it..... you gonna try to use physical force to break up IR couples. to paraphrase billy jack " I wish you would, bernard, I really wish you would"

 

[ptbw forever]

LMAO.......race mixing will not end the white race, black race or any other race. thats why the "muh white genocide" argument is stupid. Example, chuck norris's parents are both 1/2 irish american and 1/2 indian...would you describe him as anything other than white? aned hispanicas come in all colors. Felix trinidad is hispanic, but he is black. Canelo Alverez is hispanic, but would anyone say he aint white?

At one point they will all become so mixed, they won't look, or have much different backgrounds.
That is if we tolerate it.
Which unfortunately is pretty common to tolerate eradicating unique, and diverse peoples from the face of the Earth.

The law of natural selection

The klan was saying the same thing in pre-1960s America....

 

[bitter clinging swiftie]

all I got to say is that if some asshole starts giving me static about my dating preferences or my kids, we arent gonna put up with that shit

 

[ptbw forever]

Because no one in their right mind could hate a people for being inferior, and causing issues for their country.
LOLOL
It must all be envy, sure.

"racism is just another ugly form of collectivism"---ayn rand

I am a collectivist.

I think individualism is pretty sub-Human, it seems to be about "Me, and mine" it doesn't grasp that as individuals we belong to a greater culture.
The Individualist simply thinks of themselves, not about greater society.

Furthermore Individualism is pretty weak, an extreme Individualist would go so far to say "Treat an invading army as individuals"

LOL, thats pretty weak sauce. This country was founded on the belief of individualism, the creativity, the work ethic, the dreams and willingness to chase them of the INDIVIDUAL. Our founders fell short of those goals, but they still exist, and as long as the belief in one man or wamn's ability to overcome, to achieve, and the willingness to defend that ideal exist, then America will be a great nation always, no matter what the hue of its inhabitants.

This country was founded on establishing individualism where none existed before.

Destroying collectivism and tribalism is not what the founders had in mind.

they championed the rights of the individual. period. every person has the right to live their life as they see fit, within the confines of not violating anyone else's rights.

None of the founders would agree with you.

There is a huge difference between rebeling against being a servant to the king and trying to destroy racial differences because multiculturalism/multi-racialism is a total failure.