Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In my neck of the woods, we elect our school board and they run the schools. Isn't that democracy?Public education is a socialist monopoly, a real one. - The Late Milton Friedman
I think unregulated capitalism is to economics as natural selection is to biology. While it may make the population stronger, it is brutal and amoral. I personally don't want to live that way and I'd guess millennials don't either. If we did a better job of policing capitalism, other forms might not have such an appeal.November, 2017 A YouGov survey found that more millennials would rather live in a socialist (44%) or communist (7%) country than a capitalist one (42%). America and our once cherished ideals are doomed.
In my neck of the woods, we elect our school board and they run the schools. Isn't that democracy?
I think unregulated capitalism is to economics as natural selection is to biology. While it may make the population stronger, it is brutal and amoral. I personally don't want to live that way and I'd guess millennials don't either. If we did a better job of policing capitalism, other forms might not have such an appeal.
Maybe on USMB... Nassomuch in the real worldBecause evolution is not science...…………….It's religious Darwinist babblingHow is this idiotic thread still in the science section?
Again kid there is no evidence of abiogenesis, you keep saying that there is but never present this evidence.Maybe on USMB... Nassomuch in the real worldBecause evolution is not science...…………….It's religious Darwinist babblingHow is this idiotic thread still in the science section?
I think the evidence is pretty convincing: there is life on this planet.Again kid there is no evidence of abiogenesis, you keep saying that there is but never present this evidence.
That kid is the real world
I think the evidence is pretty convincing: there is life on this planet.
So we agree "There is life on this planet". Can we also agree that the planet existed before there was life on it? If so there are only two possible options for life to appear: it came from elsewhere (which only begs the question of how it came to be there) or it was came to be here from non-living materials, in other words, abiogenesis. I doubt the former so it must have been the later. Too deep?I think the evidence is pretty convincing: there is life on this planet.
Deep! "There is life on this planet."
What else have you to contribute of such a profound and intellectual nature?
So we agree "There is life on this planet". Can we also agree that the planet existed before there was life on it?
If so there are only two possible options for life to appear: it came from elsewhere (which only begs the question of how it came to be there) or it was came to be here from non-living materials, in other words, abiogenesis. I doubt the former so it must have been the later. (sic) Too deep?
I think you've been distracted by the mechanisms of abiogenesis. There is much speculation on that but, probably any evidence is long since gone. Doesn't change the FACT of abiogenesis.So we agree "There is life on this planet". Can we also agree that the planet existed before there was life on it?
You're on a roll. Yes the planet preceded life. Almost as deep as your first Enunciation.
If so there are only two possible options for life to appear: it came from elsewhere (which only begs the question of how it came to be there) or it was came to be here from non-living materials, in other words, abiogenesis. I doubt the former so it must have been the later. (sic) Too deep?
A little learning is a dangerous thing. Drink deeply or taste not the Perian Spring. - Alexander Pope
The Miller-Urey Experiment famously suggested what you are leading up to. The trouble is that the Miller-Urey Experiment was flawed from the beginning. Moreover, it was in a carefully controlled laboratory, with flasks and equipment set up by a PhD and his student. They made erroneous assumptions in the process of synthesizing two or three simple amino acids, in extremely small and utterly useless quantities which constituted racemic mixtures, not the L-isomers we find in our own bodies. Other than that, spell "latter" correctly. "Too deep?"
How is this idiotic thread still in the science section?
No one really knows where we came from, or how we got here.
Anyone who thinks they have The Answer is delusional and egotistical.
Actually, it seems to only be the religious nutballs who claim to know.Except for MAC who knows the truth
Actually, it seems to only be the religious nutballs who claim to know.Except for MAC who knows the truth
I think you've been distracted by the mechanisms of abiogenesis. There is much speculation on that but, probably any evidence is long since gone. Doesn't change the FACT of abiogenesis.
Exactly how life came to be? No. Do you?Actually, it seems to only be the religious nutballs who claim to know.Except for MAC who knows the truth
So you don't know?
A weird reach, since you just quoted me saying that no one knows.Except for MAC who knows the truth.No one really knows where we came from, or how we got here.
Anyone who thinks they have The Answer is delusional and egotistical.
You better not tell or God is going to be pretty upset with you!!
How is this idiotic thread still in the science section?
Evolution is anti-science. This is anti-anti-science. That's real science to the laypeople.
One can do the math and see that abiogenesis, big bang, and macroevolution did not happen. One can do the math and see evolution does not happen. One can do the math and see magic does not happen.
