- Oct 6, 2008
- 125,093
- 60,646
1. What need be explained is how so many seemingly intelligent, educated folks....college grads....are such, well- why sugarcoat it- fools when it comes to their understanding of history, economics, and politics.
Answer: As they say in the computer business....GIGO.....'garbage in-garbage out.'
Dennis Prager puts it this way:
The more years one has spent in a university studying the social sciences, the less wise an individual is.
The 'experts' paid to 'instruct' their captive audience largely owe their careers to one particular political perspective, and behave in accordance with that fact.
2. The Left protects, and advances, its own.
"Academic feminists who received tenure, promotion, and funding, tended to be pro-abortion, pro-pornography (anti-censorship), pro-prostitution (pro-sex workers), pro-surrogacy, and anti-colonialist, anti-imperialist, and anti-American…proponents of simplistic gender-neutrality (women and men are exactly the same) or essentialist: men and women are completely different, and women are better. They are loyal to their careers and their cliques, not to the truth."
“The Death of Feminism,” by Phyllis Chesler
This truth applies to the broadest spectrum of the purveyors of knowledge in the social sciences: they 'teach' their ideological predilections as opposed to the truth.
3. No doubt, many who have graduated college as Liberals will demand proof of the above. My pleasure.
a. First, there is John Kenneth Galbraith, considered a saint and Liberal icon, who, in 1984, offered his considered opinion of the future of communism:
"That the Soviet system has made great material progress in recent years is evident both from the statistics and from the general urban scene. . . . One sees it in the appearance of solid well-being of the people on the streets . . . and the general aspect of restaurants, theatres and shops. . . . Partly, the Russian system succeeds because, in contrast with the Western industrial economies, it makes full use of its manpower." FACTS FROM THE U.S.S.R.
a. See the year in which that was stated?
b. Against whom do you suppose it was meant as an attack?
c. And....in actually....what was the condition of the Soviet economy at that moment?
In 1984 the Soviet economy was near comatose. Why? Because communism, socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism are all frauds and failures that only appear to succeed in combination with slaughter, coercion, and corruption.
But the Left's elites/intellectuals are all about hiding that fact and supporting Leftism at all costs.
Actually...at very little cost, because their careers continue to be finances and advanced simply because they are Leftists, not because they are correct or accurate.....or honest.
So....Ronald Reagan was smarter than the 'best and the brightest' of the Left's academicians.
Know what happened in 1991?
Lots more to come.
Answer: As they say in the computer business....GIGO.....'garbage in-garbage out.'
Dennis Prager puts it this way:
The more years one has spent in a university studying the social sciences, the less wise an individual is.
The 'experts' paid to 'instruct' their captive audience largely owe their careers to one particular political perspective, and behave in accordance with that fact.
2. The Left protects, and advances, its own.
"Academic feminists who received tenure, promotion, and funding, tended to be pro-abortion, pro-pornography (anti-censorship), pro-prostitution (pro-sex workers), pro-surrogacy, and anti-colonialist, anti-imperialist, and anti-American…proponents of simplistic gender-neutrality (women and men are exactly the same) or essentialist: men and women are completely different, and women are better. They are loyal to their careers and their cliques, not to the truth."
“The Death of Feminism,” by Phyllis Chesler
This truth applies to the broadest spectrum of the purveyors of knowledge in the social sciences: they 'teach' their ideological predilections as opposed to the truth.
3. No doubt, many who have graduated college as Liberals will demand proof of the above. My pleasure.
a. First, there is John Kenneth Galbraith, considered a saint and Liberal icon, who, in 1984, offered his considered opinion of the future of communism:
"That the Soviet system has made great material progress in recent years is evident both from the statistics and from the general urban scene. . . . One sees it in the appearance of solid well-being of the people on the streets . . . and the general aspect of restaurants, theatres and shops. . . . Partly, the Russian system succeeds because, in contrast with the Western industrial economies, it makes full use of its manpower." FACTS FROM THE U.S.S.R.
a. See the year in which that was stated?
b. Against whom do you suppose it was meant as an attack?
c. And....in actually....what was the condition of the Soviet economy at that moment?
In 1984 the Soviet economy was near comatose. Why? Because communism, socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism are all frauds and failures that only appear to succeed in combination with slaughter, coercion, and corruption.
But the Left's elites/intellectuals are all about hiding that fact and supporting Leftism at all costs.
Actually...at very little cost, because their careers continue to be finances and advanced simply because they are Leftists, not because they are correct or accurate.....or honest.
So....Ronald Reagan was smarter than the 'best and the brightest' of the Left's academicians.
Know what happened in 1991?
Lots more to come.
Last edited: