The fall of Trumpism continues



1645560041443.png
 
So you do not have evidence as you originally claimed. You have a conspiracy theory.
If you were informed you would know there is more than enough evidence to decertify the AZ. and GA. elections. PA. and WI. too. The MSM will not report it and the people trying to get it out are intimidated and bankrupted. Why is that if there was no fraud?
 
If you were informed you would know there is more than enough evidence to decertify the AZ. and GA. elections. PA. and WI. too. The MSM will not report it and the people trying to get it out are intimidated and bankrupted. Why is that if there was no fraud?
The best you'll get at this point in time is politically embarrassing the people behind the fraud and possible convictions. Biden is here to stay.

That's probably more important than anything.
 
Real Americans are usually acknowledged by the court. In this case they were not. I wonder why.

What was this last May?

In his one-page order, Amero's order said the county election officials must allow plaintiff Garland Favorito and his group called Voters Organized for Trusted Election Results in Georgia to review the ballots "at a time and place to be determined later," according to The Wall Street Journal.
 
What was this last May?

In his one-page order, Amero's order said the county election officials must allow plaintiff Garland Favorito and his group called Voters Organized for Trusted Election Results in Georgia to review the ballots "at a time and place to be determined later," according to The Wall Street Journal.
And that has not been done.
 
don’t you want an explanation why he raised money to fight election fraud but doesn’t use it to fight election fraud.

You referring to the “Official Election Defense Fund”?

I don't think He legally can put it towards a recount effort.

And if you contributed, there was nothing hidden. Media spin.

Much of the money raised by Stepien and the Trump campaign won’t go towards challenging election results, however, but to help set the stage for the president’s next act. The Trump campaign has a recount fund, but the money won’t go to it unless someone gives more than $8,333. Rather, 60 percent of a donation up to that amount for Trump’s “Official Election Defense Fund” is routed to a new PAC started this week by the president that can pay for a wide range of activities — but is likely legally barred from spending on recounts, lawyers say. The remaining 40 percent goes to the Republican National Committee, which is allowed — but not required to — spend on the recount. Prior to Tuesday, the majority of a donation went to helping Trump’s campaign cover its debt.

Trump’s insistence that there was voter fraud and demands for recounts are helping create post-election unity among his base, and raise money the president can use to keep his political career afloat after January, political fundraisers and campaign finance experts told POLITICO.

Where Trump’s recount fundraising dollars are really going
 
Because the SOS of GA. is fighting it in court.
That’s where you fight these things. He must have legal grounds if he continues to succeed.

He must know what he’s doing because he knows there’s an investigation into when Trump called him and pressured him to find enough votes to overturn the election. If Trump gets indicted who knows what needs to go on since Trump could be the first former president donning an orange jumpsuit and will need Secret Service protection while in prison. I just can’t see Rathsburger thinking he can hide something knowing that there could be a trial of the ages coming up regarding the 2020 election.
 
That’s where you fight these things. He must have legal grounds if he continues to succeed.

He must know what he’s doing because he knows there’s an investigation into when Trump called him and pressured him to find enough votes to overturn the election. If Trump gets indicted who knows what needs to go on since Trump could be the first former president donning an orange jumpsuit and will need Secret Service protection while in prison. I just can’t see Rathsburger thinking he can hide something knowing that there could be a trial of the ages coming up regarding the 2020 election.
Legal grounds to hide what should be transparent? Why?
 
That’s where you fight these things. He must have legal grounds if he continues to succeed.

He must know what he’s doing because he knows there’s an investigation into when Trump called him and pressured him to find enough votes to overturn the election. If Trump gets indicted who knows what needs to go on since Trump could be the first former president donning an orange jumpsuit and will need Secret Service protection while in prison. I just can’t see Rathsburger thinking he can hide something knowing that there could be a trial of the ages coming up regarding the 2020 election.
Indictments are not convictions.

Raffensperger is investigating reports of documented ballot box harvesting.

You probably missed it on MSM.

Georgia opens investigation into ballot harvesting claims
 

Forum List

Back
Top