The fascists are at it again

[regent]

Thank goodness the fascists are so easy to defeat...

Apparently Antifa day was a complete failure, just like their lives.

]

Thank goodness the fascists are so easy to defeat...

Apparently Antifa day was a complete failure, just like their lives.

Antifa Planned to 'End the Trump Regime' on Nov. 4th — ONE Picture Tells You Everything

Sort of reminds Americans of the folding up of the tents of the first few Conservative political parties. Gone forever is the Antifederalist party as America defeated that first conservative party, and America rejoiced as it entered the ERA OF Good Feelings. Of course the Democratic party just kept rolling along as Jefferson had intended.

 

[P@triot]

Thankfully, the best thing we got going for us is Trumps sheer incompetence. Nine months in, and no significant legislation passed.

Talk about “incompetence”...President Trump doesn’t write nor pass legislation. Only the legislative branch can do that. The president is part of the executive branch.

I seriously don’t know whether to laugh or cry at your extraordinary ignorance of basic government.

 

[P@triot]

the people spoke and clearly said "NO". By about 3 million votes.

A. Hitlery got her ass obliterated in the election. It was a beat down.

B. We were talking about votes to amend the U.S. Constitution chief, not votes to elect a U.S. President. If you’re going to butt in on a discussion, at least follow along to know what is being discussed.

 

[P@triot]

Thank goodness the fascists are so easy to defeat...

Apparently Antifa day was a complete failure, just like their lives.

]

Thank goodness the fascists are so easy to defeat...

Apparently Antifa day was a complete failure, just like their lives.

Antifa Planned to 'End the Trump Regime' on Nov. 4th — ONE Picture Tells You Everything

Sort of reminds Americans of the folding up of the tents of the first few Conservative political parties. Gone forever is the Antifederalist party as America defeated that first conservative party, and America rejoiced as it entered the ERA OF Good Feelings. Of course the Democratic party just kept rolling along as Jefferson had intended.

Would someone please show Regent how to use a basic website so that he doesn’t make his idiotic and historically inaccurate ramblings look like my words?!? Good grief...

 

[JoeB131]

Talk about “incompetence”...President Trump doesn’t write nor pass legislation. Only the legislative branch can do that. The president is part of the executive branch.

Are you some kind of fucking moron, Poodle. Seriously, you do realize that a President is the one who pushes an agenda and goes to congress to get it passed.

Which Trump has accomplished NOTHING with his party in control of both chambers.

 

[JoeB131]

A. Hitlery got her ass obliterated in the election. It was a beat down.

B. We were talking about votes to amend the U.S. Constitution chief, not votes to elect a U.S. President. If you’re going to butt in on a discussion, at least follow along to know what is being discussed.

Uh, no, you made the claim the "people had spoken". But the system designed by the Founding Slave Rapists was specifically designed to ignore the will of the people.

which is what happened here.

 

[iceberg]

Do you have any idea what Fascism is, pat?
From the Wikipedia page:
"Fascism is an authoritarian or totalitarian nationalist political ideology. Fascists seek to organize a nation according to corporatist perspectives, values, and systems, including the political system and the economy."
This, of course, is a pretty good description of the Republican dogma, and has nothing 'progressive' about it.
You should find some other epithet to hang on those with whom you disagree.

then what to do you call the asshurt fucktards that want to shut down any thought they don't approve ot?

that certainly is NOT a conservative thing. liberals own that shit.

 

[bripat9643]

A. Hitlery got her ass obliterated in the election. It was a beat down.

B. We were talking about votes to amend the U.S. Constitution chief, not votes to elect a U.S. President. If you’re going to butt in on a discussion, at least follow along to know what is being discussed.

Uh, no, you made the claim the "people had spoken". But the system designed by the Founding Slave Rapists was specifically designed to ignore the will of the people.

which is what happened here.

"The will of the people" is a euphemism that means "mob rule." Yes, the Founding Fathers deliberately setup a system to prevent that.

 

[JoeB131]

"The will of the people" is a euphemism that means "mob rule." Yes, the Founding Fathers deliberately setup a system to prevent that.

By letting a minority decide who the president was going to be and giving white people a disproportionate amount of the vote?

 

[bripat9643]

"The will of the people" is a euphemism that means "mob rule." Yes, the Founding Fathers deliberately setup a system to prevent that.

By letting a minority decide who the president was going to be and giving white people a disproportionate amount of the vote?

Where does the Constitution say white people shall have a disproportionate amount of the vote?

 

[iceberg]

"The will of the people" is a euphemism that means "mob rule." Yes, the Founding Fathers deliberately setup a system to prevent that.

By letting a minority decide who the president was going to be and giving white people a disproportionate amount of the vote?

and tell me again how you'd fight this if the situation was reversed and hillary won the EC and trump the popular vote.

you'd just be happy in your own shit and defend the system to your death.

 

[JoeB131]

Where does the Constitution say white people shall have a disproportionate amount of the vote?

When you let little states with no minorities in them have disproportionate representation.

 

[JoeB131]

and tell me again how you'd fight this if the situation was reversed and hillary won the EC and trump the popular vote.

you'd just be happy in your own shit and defend the system to your death.

Not really. the EC is a bad system beyond just the awful results in 2000 and 2016.

It essentially disenfranchises all but a dozen states.

 

[The Derp]

and tell me again how you'd fight this if the situation was reversed and hillary won the EC and trump the popular vote.you'd just be happy in your own shit and defend the system to your death.

Twice in 16 years this country elected a mentally challenged person President despite not getting the majority of the popular vote.

If that's not reason enough to get rid of the Electoral College, what is?

 

[bripat9643]

Where does the Constitution say white people shall have a disproportionate amount of the vote?

When you let little states with no minorities in them have disproportionate representation.

ROFL. So any system that doesn't produce a result exactly proportional to the representation of blacks in the country is the same as mandating that blacks shall not have equal representation?

 

[JoeB131]

ROFL. So any system that doesn't produce a result exactly proportional to the representation of blacks in the country is the same as mandating that blacks shall not have equal representation?

Are you some kind of a retard?

One Person. One vote. That's how it should work.

 

[bripat9643]

ROFL. So any system that doesn't produce a result exactly proportional to the representation of blacks in the country is the same as mandating that blacks shall not have equal representation?

Are you some kind of a retard?

One Person. One vote. That's how it should work.

I disagree. There are large swathes of the population that have no business being in a voting booth. They are morons who aren't qualified to choose our leaders and laws. These are the kinds of numskulls that want to set the minimum wage at $15/hr.

 

[JoeB131]

I disagree. There are large swathes of the population that have no business being in a voting booth. They are morons who aren't qualified to choose our leaders and laws. These are the kinds of numskulls that want to set the minimum wage at $15/hr.

Right. How dare people expect to work and still be able to put food on the table!

Here's the thing. When the Min Wage had some teeth, we had our greatest prosperity.

 

[bripat9643]

I disagree. There are large swathes of the population that have no business being in a voting booth. They are morons who aren't qualified to choose our leaders and laws. These are the kinds of numskulls that want to set the minimum wage at $15/hr.

Right. How dare people expect to work and still be able to put food on the table!

Here's the thing. When the Min Wage had some teeth, we had our greatest prosperity.

Somehow they are managing to do that right now without the $15/hr minimum wage. There seems to be a flaw in your theory.

Passing laws the fly in the face of the laws of economics is pure insanity. Anyone who would vote for such a scheme has identified himself as not intellectually qualifed.

 

[JoeB131]

Somehow they are managing to do that right now without the $15/hr minimum wage. There seems to be a flaw in your theory.

Yeah, because they get food stamps and medicaid and Section 8.

So essentially, the rest of us are subsidzing the cheap labor of the one percent.

Feeling good about that?