The final solution is mixed race marriages.

[AzogtheDefiler]

One out of every eight people, are marrying outside their race. Genetic diversity gives the human population resistance to germs. Humans are very inbred, because of a genetic bottleneck, 80 thousand years ago.

If we can get the races all mixed up, people with high intelligence, will be more likely to thrive, and the people with low intelligence won't know about it, because the races will be all mixed up. Let's say, for argument's sake, that whites and blacks have 100 intelligence in common, and blacks have 50 intelligence genes that whites don't have, and whites have 75 intelligence genes that blacks don't have. If a black person and a white person then have a baby, it will have between 100 and 225 intelligence genes. Good genes spread faster then bad genes, through the population, because they are more fit to survive.

Reverse psychology may the best strategy, so we may want to tell young people not the marry outside their race.

Outside the human race? They are marrying Leftists? Yikes.

 

[22lcidw]

" Philanthropic Donations Grooming Competition For Technocracy Market Share "

* Persistent Scientific Challenge Of Conjectures Based On Contemporaneous And Limited Sample Spaces *

What's your point ?

News & Insights

Articles, interviews, and announcements on topics related to the intersection of neuroscience and society.

dana.org

" By showing the typical IQ levels of people who succeed at different levels of training and employment, the earlier illustration also demonstrates the practical importance of general intelligence. Few occupations are out of reach, on the basis of intelligence, for people above the 90th percentile of general intelligence (IQ 120), but virtually none is within ready reach for those below the 10th (IQ 80). Indeed, the military is forbidden by law to induct anyone below the equivalent of IQ 80 and it currently inducts no one below about IQ 85.

Low literacy is sometimes literally a matter of life and death. The last four pairs of tasks show how other daily tasks vary in complexity. "

No one has ever said that intelligence does not matter. The problem is defining what intelligence actually is.

Can you start a fire without matches ?
Can you look at the sun and use it as a guidance map ?
Can you purify water ?
Can skin a wild animal and the fur as clothing ?
Do you know how preserve food without a fridge ?

No. Well there are many people living in rural parts of the world who can do this with their eyes closed but they wouldn't do well on an IQ test.

So they're dumb. Right ?

Donald Trump inherited a couple hundred million dollars worth of assets from his daddy.

Mark Zuckerberg attended two of the most expensive and prestigious schools in the USA (Harvard, Phillips Exeter Academy).

If Steve Jobs was not put up for adoption and his father returned with him back to Syria, then it is highly unlikely he would founded one of the world’s top computer companies.

Their success was due to his parents bank account and a bit a luck.

That's how it works.

Everyone from Bill Gates to Warren Buffett needed a substantial amount of money to start up their companies.

Take the average drug dealer born in the ghetto. The same type of person that has the personality and skills to run a criminal entrepreneurship can easily run a legal one, but many will never have the opportunity that will allow them to earn the credentials necessary to do so

It boils down to where you are at, what your talent level is, is it the right place at the right time, do you put the time in, and are you persistent. During bad times, people with trades abilities will do quite well. They are doing well now. Most businesses and ideas that succeed also come with hard work. You can read endless stories on people who do that. Most did not have a lot of money.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

One out of every eight people, are marrying outside their race. Genetic diversity gives the human population resistance to germs. Humans are very inbred, because of a genetic bottleneck, 80 thousand years ago.

If we can get the races all mixed up, people with high intelligence, will be more likely to thrive, and the people with low intelligence won't know about it, because the races will be all mixed up. Let's say, for argument's sake, that whites and blacks have 100 intelligence in common, and blacks have 50 intelligence genes that whites don't have, and whites have 75 intelligence genes that blacks don't have. If a black person and a white person then have a baby, it will have between 100 and 225 intelligence genes. Good genes spread faster then bad genes, through the population, because they are more fit to survive.

Reverse psychology may the best strategy, so we may want to tell young people not the marry outside their race.

The final solution is mixed race marriages.
NEGATIVE....bust you asses keeping your race pure and free of diversity. Multiculturalism fucks everything up.

We can be different races but have the same culture. You and I agree on a lot here and I am a Jew from Boston. I enjoy watching football, eating burgers and listening to Guns n Roses. Meanwhile Islamists do not. Don’t conflate the two. Not the same thing.

 

[22lcidw]

https://www1.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/30years/Rushton-Jensen30years.pdf
Overall, MRI studies show that brain size is related to IQ differences within race. Moreover, the three-way pattern of group differences in average brain size is detectable at birth. By adulthood, East Asians average 1 cubic inch more cranial capacity than Whites, and Whites average 5 cubic inches more cranial capacity than Blacks. These findings on group differences in average brain size have been replicated using MRI, endocranial volume from empty skulls, wet brain weight at autopsy, and external head size measures .

If bigger brains was the key to intelligence then why don't whales rule the planet ?

A Chihuahua and a Rottweiler are able to learn the same tricks although their brain sizes differ considerably. On the other hand, the cognitive capabilities of a Rottweiler are not superior to the Chihuahua proportionally to its brain size.

Why is that ?

The question then is, what is the rest of the Rottweiler’s brain matter doing if it can’t learn more than its tiny species mate ? A plausible conclusion would be that there must be something else at work and that a given cognitive performance is independent of the brain mass of an individual within a given species, (and also brain-to-body mass cross-species.)

And this why in neurology no one takes IQ seriously.

It is archaic and only really useful to social scientists.

Neurologists who have a better understanding of how the brain works because they spend decades of their lives studying it have little to no use for it, but to the public at large it is so important.

By the way neuroscientists have already found a few answers to the Chihuahua and Rottweiler question. Once again, the keyword is plasticity, ie. rewiring of synapses. Directly observable and experimentally reproducible, synaptic rewiring has a strong environmental component.

Apart from that, there are also other parts involved in cognitive processes such as the cerebellum. Neuronal density is also thought to play a big role.

However the precise physiological mechanisms are not yet fully understood. Full stop. A bunch of cooked up stats by a handful of quacks will certainly not contribute anything productive to the serious research of neuroscientists.

I have read that one of the reasons humans are at the top of species list is that we have opposable thumbs.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Data Confirming Faculties Conducive To Challenging Learning Curves "

* Pretending There Are More Than Is Available *

No one has ever said that intelligence does not matter. The problem is defining what intelligence actually is.

Defining intelligence is not as relevant as the incidence of intelligence within a demographic , for here may be those from a demographic with intelligence above the average while the average intelligence of the demographic may be at a level not considered conducive for acquiring particular skill sets .

 

[Paul Essien]

Defining intelligence is not as relevant as the incidence of intelligence within a demographic , for here may be those from a demographic with intelligence above the average while the average intelligence of the demographic may be at a level not considered conducive for acquiring particular skill sets .

You can't say a certain group are not intelligent but then unable to define what intelligence is.

Intelligence is not something quantifiable (not sure if that is a word) you can’t measure how intelligent someone is, because to begin with you would have to be able to define intelligence very specifically and that can’t be done because intelligence, like many words that define brain functions is an umbrella term that describes several properties of thought (communication, reasoning, understanding) working in tandem.

You still think there is some "Dumb Gene" "Violent Gene" that black people may have ? The science community — the people who spend their whole lives talking about this and, y’know, get PhD’s in it — have proved, time and again you are wrong.

Humans from a certain geographical region are not genetically distinguishable. They may be phenotypically distinguishable (which is where everyone talking about race gets hung up on at some point) but the variation is too small to designate subspecies or species.

But you know that as long as you can act civilized and talk about “science” and "genes" you can still sneak around the halls of Academia and be safe. In fact, you can slip it into a conversation at the cocktail parties, “By the way, I am a race realist” unlike “by the way, I'm a racist”.

Science moves from facts to conclusions. You move from conclusions to facts. So crime statistics and IQ scores gives you a moral cover for what you were going to believe anyway.

 

[Turtlesoup]

Ted Bundy was a psychopath-----and he was very very intelligent

But what is intelligence ?

which made him more dangerous as a psychopath increasing his kill numbers.. To claim that he was evil preventing him from being intelligent is nonsense. Most true psychopaths score high on the intelligence scale-------they are known to plot and plan as adults even IF more clumsy as children. Sociopaths tend to be more impulsive and dumber

But what is intelligence ?

Let’s say you have two people studying the sea.

1. University professor. An expert on oceanography;
2. An old-fashioned fisherman.

The professor learned at most prestigious of universities (Cambridge, Oxford, Harvard, Yale, Princeton etc). He has an above high IQ and aced all exams put in front of him.

The fisherman took over from his father, tending to the waters that surrounded them, just as his own father had taken over from his father before him. He barely finished school and has a lower than average IQ,

These men studied exactly the same domain but from different points and purposes.

The professor spent a lot of time studying sea, but little time in the sea.

The fisherman has all of his life in the sea, but little time studying the sea.

So my question to you is :

Who out of these men is more intelligent in how the sea works — the professor or the fisherman ?

The professor if you are looking for how the sea works---------the fisherman can only tell you where the best place to fish is at.

Ted Bundy was a psychopath-----and he was very very intelligent

But what is intelligence ?

which made him more dangerous as a psychopath increasing his kill numbers.. To claim that he was evil preventing him from being intelligent is nonsense. Most true psychopaths score high on the intelligence scale-------they are known to plot and plan as adults even IF more clumsy as children. Sociopaths tend to be more impulsive and dumber

But what is intelligence ?

Let’s say you have two people studying the sea.

1. University professor. An expert on oceanography;
2. An old-fashioned fisherman.

The professor learned at most prestigious of universities (Cambridge, Oxford, Harvard, Yale, Princeton etc). He has an above high IQ and aced all exams put in front of him.

The fisherman took over from his father, tending to the waters that surrounded them, just as his own father had taken over from his father before him. He barely finished school and has a lower than average IQ,

These men studied exactly the same domain but from different points and purposes.

The professor spent a lot of time studying sea, but little time in the sea.

The fisherman has all of his life in the sea, but little time studying the sea.

So my question to you is :

Who out of these men is more intelligent in how the sea works — the professor or the fisherman ?

Oh brother, why would anyone be out in a boat with a man who has a lower than average iq? Sounds dangerous and stupid. Since Iq is the ability to acquire and apply knowledge (not necessarily have that knowledge already btw) you absolutely do not want to be taking any advice from anyone who has a below average iq----even if he spent his entire life on the sea--the fisherman still would not understand how the sea works and would be only able to mimick what others have told him but not know why.

 

[Turtlesoup]

You've never conquered all Blacks.

Wakanda, right?

No Haiti

The French never conquered Haiti?

If the French beating anyone would be the real surprise here.

 

[Paul Essien]

Oh brother, why would anyone be out in a boat with a man who has a lower than average iq? Sounds dangerous and stupid. Since Iq is the ability to acquire and apply knowledge (not necessarily have that knowledge already btw) you absolutely do not want to be taking any advice from anyone who has a below average iq----even if he spent his entire life on the sea--the fisherman still would not understand how the sea works and would be only able to mimick what others have told him but not know why.

It's kinda of trick question. Because your first question should have been to clarify what is meant by “more intelligent,”

You went for Professor but if the professor went out into the sea, yeah sure he’d have an easier time than someone who was completely blank, but he wouldn't have the intuition that tells him how to survive a storm or how to respond to the currents in the right way or even how to catch fish.

When a fisherman is out in the sea, he moves with the waves and the fish, without thought. These experiences in his brain and is based on prior experience, which has been earned by prior mistakes and lessons, and it tells him exactly what to do without actually telling him anything at all.

The professor has knowledge about the sea, whereas the fisherman is wise in regards to how act in harmony with the sea.

So the professor is more intelligent about the sea in a classroom. The fisherman is more intelligent about the sea if you are on boat in the sea.

 

[Turtlesoup]

Oh brother, why would anyone be out in a boat with a man who has a lower than average iq? Sounds dangerous and stupid. Since Iq is the ability to acquire and apply knowledge (not necessarily have that knowledge already btw) you absolutely do not want to be taking any advice from anyone who has a below average iq----even if he spent his entire life on the sea--the fisherman still would not understand how the sea works and would be only able to mimick what others have told him but not know why.

It's kinda of trick question. Because your first question should have been to clarify what is meant by “more intelligent,”

You went for Professor but if the professor went out into the sea, yeah sure he’d have an easier time than someone who was completely blank, but he wouldn't have the intuition that tells him how to survive a storm or how to respond to the currents in the right way or even how to catch fish.

When a fisherman is out in the sea, he moves with the waves and the fish, without thought. These experiences in his brain and is based on prior experience, which has been earned by prior mistakes and lessons, and it tells him exactly what to do without actually telling him anything at all.

The professor has knowledge about the sea, whereas the fisherman is wise in regards to how act in harmony with the sea.

So the professor is more intelligent about the sea in a classroom. The fisherman is more intelligent about the sea if you are on boat in the sea.

No you specifically stated that the fisherman was below average in IQ-------while the professor was above average in IQ. I know what having a low and High IQ implies. An ability to acquire knowledge and apply it. The Low IQ fisherman would be a threat in a storm...his low iq means that he would be slow to learn from the past and slow to apply new knowledge in a situation. The professor having a high IQ would be smart enough to stay off the water when a storm is approaching...or atleast should be. I have seen plenty of idiotic professors. There is no TRICK in your poorly laid out question. I do not assume a professor is smarter than anyone else because he is a professor-----many I know are flatout stupid--like omg how stupid can you be types----and typically I give credit to the working man for often being smarter than professors but in this case you specifically stated that the professor had the higher iq which means he would be far more intelligent than the RETARDED fisherman with the lower than average IQ. I would never put myself in a situation where I had to rely on someone with a below average iq to keep me safe. The fisherman with his lower iq would never ever be considered more intelligent not even on the sea.

 

[Turtlesoup]

Yeah let’s reproduce with races that have IQs lower then dirt

IQ is not a valid measurement of intelligence since it only tells how good one is at completing an IQ-test. Furthermore, races do not even have IQ:s, individuals do and no one has asked anyone to reproduce with every single person of other races. Finally, the person who picks his romantic partner based on their IQ-score is a highly materialistic airhead - You are picking a partner, not a computer!

Yes, you are picking a partner-- a life partner who will pass down their genes to your offspring. You don't want to pick an airhead to be that partner.......or mate.

 

[Turtlesoup]

I don't need such a system...

The system of white supremacy is there for you whether you like it or not and without that system white people would not be able to compete with black people.

It’s hard for white supremacists to admit they live in a socialist system called white supremacy, where whiteness offers them a welfare system of racial guarantees and benefits

I would submit that it's the negro community which wants a social system which handicaps them. Then they get to suck off the government tit and, instead of going to work and being productive, they sit around all day drinking Colt .45 and bitching about how shitty their lot in life is...

Then why is the welfare capital of America a place that is an all white town in Kentucky and is 99% white ? The place is Owsley County and they are never told to “pull themselves up by their boot straps” like Black people who have had a history of systematic economic deprivation, are told to do ?
Thus is literally an entire town that 99% white and every single person there is on welfare. You won't find a Black city where 99% of the people are on welfare NO PLACE in this country

You're one stupid colored boy, you know that?

I'm not throwing out any insults. Nor am I attacking you personally. I'm focusing entirely on your argument. So if you have the self control then you do the same.

It's not unjust. Get off your dead ass and go to work, boy...

So how do explain the fact that white men with a criminal record have more of a chance at getting the job than a black man that is clean ?

Sure they can. And I applaud those who work hard and become successful.

And blk ppl are are told, "just do the best with what’s around you" which is usually next to nothing and it’s their fault if they don’t make it.

Sure, there are people who have done it, but why should anyone have to and why in the world would anyone think every child, or even most would be able to do this, who are in a similar situation….? Unrealistic.

But here's the kicker.

No other group of Americans has pulled themselves up by the bootstraps the way African Americans have.

Just 147 years ago most African Americans were held in bondage. Blk ppl owned nothing, no property, no assets of any kind and most were not educated.

And just 1 and a half lifetimes since blk ppl are collectively are worth billions of dollars. Many are working or middle-class. This despite Jim Crow and other examples of outrageous racism and bigotry.

We are a very special group of people

Your ignorance is unbelievable...........absolutely clueless about Blacks who aren't welfare hos and criminals aren't you. There was before, during, and after the civil war many extremely wealthy black business people.....damn shame that you have bought into the dem propaganda about how helpless and clueless all blacks are. Not all are failures---in fact, since again IQ is genetic----there are several black families where many members have been very successful throughout life. And yet you have no clue about any of them------none.

 

[AZrailwhale]

And multiculturalism failed even here.

You still haven't explained how the most powerful and successful nation in the history of the world "failed." We have always been a land of many peoples, cultures, languages, religions, etc. and it has only made us stronger. If you imagine some "failure," does that mean you oppose certain relationships/marriages?

No the most multicultural cites are all failing , the assimilated communities are keeping America strong

Immigrants today are assimilating just as they have throughout American history.

Legal immigrants are, illegal immigrants aren’t.

 

[Turtlesoup]

One out of every eight people, are marrying outside their race. Genetic diversity gives the human population resistance to germs. Humans are very inbred, because of a genetic bottleneck, 80 thousand years ago.

If we can get the races all mixed up, people with high intelligence, will be more likely to thrive, and the people with low intelligence won't know about it, because the races will be all mixed up. Let's say, for argument's sake, that whites and blacks have 100 intelligence in common, and blacks have 50 intelligence genes that whites don't have, and whites have 75 intelligence genes that blacks don't have. If a black person and a white person then have a baby, it will have between 100 and 225 intelligence genes. Good genes spread faster then bad genes, through the population, because they are more fit to survive.

Reverse psychology may the best strategy, so we may want to tell young people not the marry outside their race.

Its not the human race that is inbred. Its mostly the european races that are inbred. Africans and African Americans have more genetic diversity than all the other humans put together. Basically if all Black people were to disappear the rest of the humans would soon follow. Turn that around and say get rid of all whites and the human race would go on.

Ummm...no and besides without white people most of the black people in africa and in the west would starve to death again........lost without all that donated relief and welfare checks.

 

[AZrailwhale]

I don't need such a system...

The system of white supremacy is there for you whether you like it or not and without that system white people would not be able to compete with black people.

It’s hard for white supremacists to admit they live in a socialist system called white supremacy, where whiteness offers them a welfare system of racial guarantees and benefits

I would submit that it's the negro community which wants a social system which handicaps them. Then they get to suck off the government tit and, instead of going to work and being productive, they sit around all day drinking Colt .45 and bitching about how shitty their lot in life is...

Then why is the welfare capital of America a place that is an all white town in Kentucky and is 99% white ? The place is Owsley County and they are never told to “pull themselves up by their boot straps” like Black people who have had a history of systematic economic deprivation, are told to do ?
Thus is literally an entire town that 99% white and every single person there is on welfare. You won't find a Black city where 99% of the people are on welfare NO PLACE in this country

You're one stupid colored boy, you know that?

I'm not throwing out any insults. Nor am I attacking you personally. I'm focusing entirely on your argument. So if you have the self control then you do the same.

It's not unjust. Get off your dead ass and go to work, boy...

So how do explain the fact that white men with a criminal record have more of a chance at getting the job than a black man that is clean ?

Sure they can. And I applaud those who work hard and become successful.

And blk ppl are are told, "just do the best with what’s around you" which is usually next to nothing and it’s their fault if they don’t make it.

Sure, there are people who have done it, but why should anyone have to and why in the world would anyone think every child, or even most would be able to do this, who are in a similar situation….? Unrealistic.

But here's the kicker.

No other group of Americans has pulled themselves up by the bootstraps the way African Americans have.

Just 147 years ago most African Americans were held in bondage. Blk ppl owned nothing, no property, no assets of any kind and most were not educated.

And just 1 and a half lifetimes since blk ppl are collectively are worth billions of dollars. Many are working or middle-class. This despite Jim Crow and other examples of outrageous racism and bigotry.

We are a very special group of people

They did not pull[ themselves up by "Their" bootstraps.
Blacks been given more than any other group. Yet the are still at the below Asians and Hispanics even with all the government programs

What is the old saying, “give a man a fish and he will be fed for a day, teach him to fish and he will be fed forever”. Black Americans have been given fish since LBJ’s great society began. Back then black Americans had a thriving middle class, the out of wedlock rate was at least as low as any other race’s and most black Americans aspired to be judged on the content of their character, not the color of their skin. Today, the black middle class is shrinking, two parent households are rare and blacks insist that everyone judge them on the color of their skin. None of that looks like progress to me.

 

[Turtlesoup]

Turns out it was just a recessive mutation combined with centuries of inbreeding during the ice age.

Turns out smarter people inbreeding works better than dumber people outbreeding, eh?

If that were true white people would not have been last to civilization.

The Africans who left Africa had lower levels of civilization than the Africans who stayed?

Once Africans left Africa they regressed and turned white up in europe. They did this during the ice age and also during the dark ages. They had to be taught civilization twice because they are slower.

Once Africans left Africa they regressed and turned white up in europe.

Regressed?

They did this during the ice age and also during the dark ages.

You mean they survived the ice age.
I wonder if Africans had to survive an ice age if you guys would smarten up like we did?

Colder climates are harder to survive in---------it takes more planning and more knowledge to survive cold winters and an ability to adapt quickly--------generations of colder climates would have repetedly killed off dumber members leaving a bit smarter population to breed and pass on their genes. But shhhhhhh....don't tell you know who because he would get his feelings hurt. Plus larger amounts of protein in the diet and cooler temperature for the brain are known factors in evolution.

 

[AZrailwhale]

I don't need such a system...

The system of white supremacy is there for you whether you like it or not and without that system white people would not be able to compete with black people.

It’s hard for white supremacists to admit they live in a socialist system called white supremacy, where whiteness offers them a welfare system of racial guarantees and benefits

I would submit that it's the negro community which wants a social system which handicaps them. Then they get to suck off the government tit and, instead of going to work and being productive, they sit around all day drinking Colt .45 and bitching about how shitty their lot in life is...

Then why is the welfare capital of America a place that is an all white town in Kentucky and is 99% white ? The place is Owsley County and they are never told to “pull themselves up by their boot straps” like Black people who have had a history of systematic economic deprivation, are told to do ?
Thus is literally an entire town that 99% white and every single person there is on welfare. You won't find a Black city where 99% of the people are on welfare NO PLACE in this country

You're one stupid colored boy, you know that?

I'm not throwing out any insults. Nor am I attacking you personally. I'm focusing entirely on your argument. So if you have the self control then you do the same.

It's not unjust. Get off your dead ass and go to work, boy...

So how do explain the fact that white men with a criminal record have more of a chance at getting the job than a black man that is clean ?

Sure they can. And I applaud those who work hard and become successful.

And blk ppl are are told, "just do the best with what’s around you" which is usually next to nothing and it’s their fault if they don’t make it.

Sure, there are people who have done it, but why should anyone have to and why in the world would anyone think every child, or even most would be able to do this, who are in a similar situation….? Unrealistic.

But here's the kicker.

No other group of Americans has pulled themselves up by the bootstraps the way African Americans have.

Just 147 years ago most African Americans were held in bondage. Blk ppl owned nothing, no property, no assets of any kind and most were not educated.

And just 1 and a half lifetimes since blk ppl are collectively are worth billions of dollars. Many are working or middle-class. This despite Jim Crow and other examples of outrageous racism and bigotry.

We are a very special group of people

You have made a claim that there is a 'system of White supremacy' in place in America without which Whites would not be able to compete against Blacks. Can you cite a couple of examples of this system and how it enables White people to compete against Blacks?

I've done post on USMB over 100 pages long with 100's of examples of white supremacy

No you haven’t. You’ve posted your racist fantasies

 

[Turtlesoup]

Turns out it was just a recessive mutation combined with centuries of inbreeding during the ice age.

Turns out smarter people inbreeding works better than dumber people outbreeding, eh?

If that were true white people would not have been last to civilization.

The Africans who left Africa had lower levels of civilization than the Africans who stayed?

Once Africans left Africa they regressed and turned white up in europe. They did this during the ice age and also during the dark ages. They had to be taught civilization twice because they are slower.

Oh hell, I will get into. Two things are credited with higher brain function as far as evolution goes..............cooler temperatures for the brain (which Europe provided) (walking upright helped cool too) and more protein.

You are delusional----for one, intelligent people have intelligent children.

But what is intelligence ?

After all serial killer Ted Bundy apparently had an IQ in the 140 which would make him genius level.

But would it be right to say a man who used slit women from throat to vagina as intelligent ?

And intelligent people SELF EDUCATE and EDUCATE their kids--if your kids are failing---it ain't the schools sweetheart----------its the parents raising ability and genetic material.

But what is intelligence ?

The problem is intelligence is not something quantifiable (not sure if that is a word) you can’t measure how intelligent someone is, because to begin with you would have to be able to define intelligence very specifically and that can’t be done because intelligence, like many words that define brain functions is an umbrella term that describes several properties of thought (communication, reasoning, understanding) working in tandem.

You can exhibit greater proficiency or ability in certain areas of it than others, but that's about it. So if Einstein was in the same room as Floyd Mayweather and discussing about the theory of relativity in that context Einstein would be more knowledgeable but in the boxing ring Mayweather would be more knowledgeable about boxing than Einstein

So what is intelligence ?

Ted Bundy was a psychopath-----and he was very very intelligent which made him more dangerous as a psychopath increasing his kill numbers.. To claim that he was evil preventing him from being intelligent is nonsense. Most true psychopaths score high on the intelligence scale-------they are known to plot and plan as adults even IF more clumsy as children. Sociopaths tend to be more impulsive and dumber.

Don't get me wrong, most criminals are very stupid. Stupid people have the extra drawback of often not being able to overcome life's issues from an intellectual standpoint meaning they are less likely to escape the life that they are born into. They are also prone to impulse control issues which means they act out without thought of right or wrong or with the ability to avoid punishment as well for their misdeeds so they are caught sooner. Bundy committed his crimes because he was addicted to the feelings power and control (psychopaths always have "addiction" issues which usually includes control issues)-----he had no desire to stop himself from raping and killing but he did take extraordinary means to avoid being detected even though serial killers were then not suspected or even a though in many cases and then to escape to continue his compulsion to rape and kill.

Quantifiable is a word and sorry Intelligence is quantifiable. It can be measured and tested and recorded. It can be seen and used. In most everything even Einstein who I think was grossly overrated, would be easily the winner. The FBI was at one time, the only group that had a true IQ test-------but this is likely no longer the case given how long ago I read about this.

Boxing takes no real intelligence (stamina, strength, coordination, practice, skill are not signs of intelligence)---in fact, partaking in it is very likely to result in lowering one's iq.

".. and sorry Intelligence is quantifiable. It can be measured and tested and recorded. "

False. This has been definitively proven to be false. They havent even documented all the different types of intelligence. White people never have been and never will be smart enough to measure intelligence. This is simply because its beyond their intellectual capacity. People that are actually intelligent know that intelligence takes many forms.

Ahhh...the stick head in the sand and pretend the facts aren't there comeback. Hun, pull your head out of the sand or wherever else you have shoved it and stop trying to hide from the facts. They have iq tests-and sorry black males from infancy on up score lower than everyone else. This is just the facts---someone had to be on the bottom---This is why so many black females date outside their race......

(This isn't to say all black men are idiots---but there are some definately some real issues going on.)

Lying to yourself about IQ being a real thing is just goofy.......

" Oh hell, I will get into. Two things are credited with higher brain function as far as evolution goes..............cooler temperatures for the brain (which Europe provided) (walking upright helped cool too) and more protein. "

If cooler temperatures were a prerequisite then whites would have invented civilization. They didnt but people in a fucking desert did so that pretty much kills your claim. Whites didnt have much protein which is why they supplemented their diet by snacking on each other. Whites bred with neanderthals and lived in caves. They rarely walked upright after leaving Africa.

Define civilization and define who you think invented it. Remember dear------way way way back then---the Earth was a far different place and people were not the color they are now in many areas. And you may want to note that Neanderthal DNA is found in two races of people---------asian and caucasian.............more so in ASian who score the highest on IQ tests and then in whites who score 2nd highest ------------I suspect that Neanderthals weren't a different species but different race given all the cross breeding with offspring that was able to survive and thrive------------- You should also note that although at one time Neanderthals were thought to be dumb-----that recent finds clearly show that they were far from it. Again living in cooler climates such as they did, would require a higher iq to survive the long cold winters----------than say the africas in their always warmer climates and no Neanderthal DNA and poor test scores.

 

[Turtlesoup]

What would be the nature of your blubbering given that white people were the ones successful in setting a standard that peoples be emancipated from slavery ?

Blubbering ? I'm disagreeing with you, Can you handle that ?

As to your statement. So once slavery ended - Racism just stopped - Right ?

Tell us black man , where were you and yours , along with the pretentious supremacy for arab cultural hegemony of fictional ishmaelism that institutionalizes the bonds of slavery upon your kindred , ever capable of the convictions to emancipate anyone including yourselves ?

No other group of Americans has emancipated themselves and pulled themselves up by the bootstraps the way African Americans have.

Just 147 years ago most African Americans were held in bondage. Blk ppl owned nothing, no property, no assets of any kind and most were not educated.

And just 1 and a half lifetimes blk ppl are collectively are worth billions of dollars. Many are working or middle-class. This despite Jim Crow and other examples of outrageous racism and bigotry.

We are a very special group of people

Omg, did you just claim that Africans emancipated themselves? Dippy, africans fought on the southern side and without whites putting an end to slavery both here in the US and in most of Africa, most africans would still be slaves. It was and is still the African way and has been for thousands of years long before the US was even a thought.

 

[AZrailwhale]

You've never conquered all Blacks.

Wakanda, right?

No Haiti

The French never conquered Haiti?

Haiti was the sole example of a successful slave uprising. The only reason it succeeded was that the white French had their hands full fighting the white British. The color of the slaves skins had nothing to do with their success. That was the high point of Haitian society. Compare Haiti to the Dominican Republic on the other half of the island. Haiti’s GDP is 9.695 billion, the Dominican Republic’s GDP is 85.65 billion. That’s $868.34 versus $8,050.63 per capita. If blacks were so superior to other races the figures should be reversed. No race is inherently superior or inferior to any other race.