Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
OR the libertarian party thought someone more "known" would have a better chance of simply siphoning votes and maintaining the status quo (getting less than 5%).I do agree that Austin Petersen was far better, but the LP felt someone known was more important.
Libertarians are largely morons who believe the market is some divinely tuned instrument that will always produce the best outcomes for everybody.
The best one what?I dont think anyone believes capitalism is perfect. Its just the best one.
Economic system, derpy.The best one what?
I want a free market by Americans, for AmericansNo you dumbass, have you ever read libertarian philosophy? Free Market Capitalism has no qalms about replacing a more expensive white work force with a cheaper, browner one.Those are just market forces. Maybe you whites should work for less and compete in the free market.
Asians don't have trouble voting for demcrats, but democrats have troube voting for AsiansI concede that many asians typically vote democrat and support the lib wipe-every-nose big government agenda
But not all of them do
It's about freedom of travel, not wage slavery.Where in that do you read racism you dipshit? That's about who's providing the cheapest labor.
I'm guessing I understand Frédéric Bastiat and the Sophisms of the Protectionists, better than you do.Another lie.
Quit trying to pretend that you know jack shit about libertarian philosophy, because you obviously don't.
For the most part, all Americans know is Democrats and Republicans, which means we know their policies already. Few stray off into the grey area. This is so engrained that you can go to any place to vote and check the box saying party line vote. No need to know the candidates at all. However, candidates with a lot of Charisma such as Bill Clinton and Donald Trump do have a huge advantage as people will go vote for them even if they were to shoot someone in Manhattan. I have to admit that I'm just not going to vote for some Joe or Jane Schmoe who has no experience whatsoever, at least when it comes to the presidency. It's probably alright for just about anything else. In 2016 I refused to vote for Hillary and I didn't want Trump to be president either, so I wrote in who I wanted all along, John Kasich. I just couldn't vote for Johnson, even though he actually was experienced enough to be president. I think the Aleppo moment made me realize he just wasn't up to par on foreign affairs.Which is a major problem in our country. Names mean more than policy
Personal attack out of the gate? What's wrong, no arguments or ideas?That's not what libertarians are after. We want open, but secure, borders. There are legitimate reasons to keep bad actors out of the country. But "they took er jerbs" isn't one.
You are a typical lib who looks down on other Americans if they have the same job you have
Yeah. We should fix that. And we can do that without turning the nation into an exclusive country club.Two million shoeless migrants per year have to be fed, clothed, housed, sent to school, and arrested for crimes all at taxpayer expense
That's just horseshit. There are as many jobs as there are people willing to do them. Jobs are not a finite resource.Some do work, but when they do they take jobs and depress wages for the poorest Americans
I don't disagree with you, but they certainly can't afford the luxury of stupid mistakes.Maybe. I'm not enamored with the party leadership, but blaming libertarians for not being serious enough is like blaming the crippled kid for not trying hard enough at the school track meet.
Not at all. I hate the lesser of two evils bullshit.As I said, anything that drains votes from the duopoly is a win. Your concern over whether it hits Rs or Ds harder is just a confession that you're playing the lesser-of-two-evils game. Enjoy your evil.
At the head of that list is the Golfing GomerThis is the problem with most libertarians. They're not actually libertarians.
Though certainly no Harry Browne, he was a head-and-shoulders a better candidate than the ridiculous clown Gary Johnson.Remember Austin Petersen? He dominated the debates and was a much more polished candidate than Gary Johnson.
Blacks are the chosen pet minority in hollywood films and in Madison avenue advertisingAsians don't have trouble voting for demcrats, but democrats have troube voting for Asians
Heck, just look at Hollywood in regards to Asian actors.
They keep them out.
I don't think you understand what makes capitalism successful or understand that it's success doesn't necessarily translate into adequately shared benefits.Economic system, derpy.
This one puzzles me as a criticism, especially when compared to the never-ending gaff show that Biden and Trump have provided.I just couldn't vote for Johnson, even though he actually was experienced enough to be president. I think the Aleppo moment made me realize he just wasn't up to par on foreign affairs.
He's right....You look down your nose at people with alarming regularity,Personal attack out of the gate? What's wrong, no arguments or ideas?
Strawman argument....Wanting secure borders and an orderly immigration regime isn't turning the nation into a country club.Yeah. We should fix that. And we can do that without turning the nation into an exclusive country club.
Really a neither-here-nor-there argument......The current border crashing is a travesty regardless.That's just horseshit. There are as many jobs as there are people willing to do them. Jobs are not a finite resource.
That's the other side of libertarianism, the faithful belief in righteous liberty.Actually Libertarians do not give a fuck about "best outcomes", they worry about liberty and freedom. As a Libertarian I do not give a fuck about your outcome, just that of me and mine.
That's true. Free markets are just free. They don't ensure "adequately shared" benefits. They let society decide how to share its benefits.I don't think you understand what makes capitalism successful or understand that it's success doesn't necessarily translate into adequately shared benefits.
That phrase right there shows that you know absolutely nothing about economics, nor the free market ethos.I don't think you understand what makes capitalism successful or understand that it's success doesn't necessarily translate into adequately shared benefits.
Exactly. You're just another protectionist. You think the Law should protect Americans from the market forces of cheap foreign labor and so you're not a real libertarian. You're just a poser.I want a free market by Americans, for Americans
Globalists want American workers to engage in a race to the bottom with the poorest of the poor from Latin America and beyond
The only question is why do libs support such stupid policies that make their own country weaker?
