Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually, The Giver is just another tiresome Hunger Games ripoff.
Because no one in Hollywood has an original idea.
Oh, 30% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.com.
It sucked.
Actually, The Giver is just another tiresome Hunger Games ripoff.
Because no one in Hollywood has an original idea.
Oh, 30% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.com.
It sucked.
the left believes in concentrating more and more,power in the hands of a central government...for the good of society...
Communism, and fascism are simply two sides of the socialist coin...and examples,of left wing governance...
the American Right (conservatives, libertarians, tea party) believes in limiting the power of the central government as much as possible so that individuals can make decisions for their own good, and as a side benefit, all of society prospers...
Wherever the lefts,beliefs about centralizing power gain control, horrors follow...see Germany 1930s, Russia 1917...and any modern American city where democrats have been in total control for decades...
this,recent column explains this quite well...
Who Lost the Cities? | National Review Online
The right wing seems to celebrate one or two corporations controlling an entire industry, like communications. A monopoly is good word for it and it guarantees higher prices and less dissemination of information other than the info that particular media wants us to hear. The right wing is in favor of privatized prisons where the prisons are guaranteed a certain occupation rate of inmates or the taxpayers pony up the difference. This is a guarantee that more young men will be rounded up and sent to prison. Look at our rate of concentration of prisoners compared to the rest of the world. I myself think that both sides of the political aisle ultimately lead to a more powerful state with less rights for the individual.
ROFLMNAO! That is HYSTERICAL. (In every sense of the word)
Actually, The Giver is just another tiresome Hunger Games ripoff.
Because no one in Hollywood has an original idea.
Oh, 30% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.com.
It sucked.
The Giver was published in 1993, Hunger Games was published in 2008.
I don't doubt that the movie sucked, though.
Actually, The Giver is just another tiresome Hunger Games ripoff.
Because no one in Hollywood has an original idea.
Oh, 30% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.com.
It sucked.
A "ripoff" published more than a decade before?
Another brilliant comment by JoeNobody.
How? Conservatives are the ones demanding that all abortion clinics be shut down by the government, so that women can't make a choice - besides drowning babies in back alleys like in the 'good old' medieval church times.It isn't the role of government to decide what a woman can't do with her body
Sure it is. You want it to be.
How? Conservatives are the ones demanding that all abortion clinics be shut down by the government, so that women can't make a choice - besides drowning babies in back alleys like in the 'good old' medieval church times.It isn't the role of government to decide what a woman can't do with her body
Sure it is. You want it to be.
Abortions have being going on since the beginning of mankind, just these days they are a lot safer if carried out by modern medicine.
Conservatives are the ones demanding that all abortion clinics be shut down by the government, so that women can't make a choice - besides drowning babies in back alleys like in the 'good old' medieval church times.
I think Lois Lowry would be very surprised to hear that you think her dystopian society was "left wing".
The fetus (at the stage of development allowed in America for an abortion) is not a fully grown human being, and does not count as a 'human life'. Women have the right to their own body, and if they want to have an abortion in guidance of their doctor, they have that right, as the right of the already existing human transcends the 'right' of a fetus in development to existence. But your argument relies on this absurd straw-man/woman argument that women that have an abortion are the moral equivalent of serial killers, that cry 'bring me another lover' so they can 'kill more babies'.How? Conservatives are the ones demanding that all abortion clinics be shut down by the government, so that women can't make a choice - besides drowning babies in back alleys like in the 'good old' medieval church times.Sure it is. You want it to be.
Abortions have being going on since the beginning of mankind, just these days they are a lot safer if carried out by modern medicine.
LOL!
The issue here is very simple. Does a woman have any responsibility for conceiving a human life she conceives, due to her decisions to allow a man to enter her reproductive organs with his reproductive organs?
All human rights are sustained by responsibilities; and absent the responsibilities, there is no potential for the right. The first of these responsibilities is that one cannot exercise their rights to the detriment of another to exercise their own right(s).
Using NOTHING more than the tortured nature of your premise:
Conservatives are the ones demanding that all abortion clinics be shut down by the government, so that women can't make a choice - besides drowning babies in back alleys like in the 'good old' medieval church times.
Your use of the word 'choice', attempts to justify the taking of a human life, to satisfy the convenience of the individual who willfully engaged in the behavior designed for mo other purpose except the conception of human life, who conceived human life due to her have MADE THE CHOICE TO ENGAGE IN THE BEHAVIOR.
Demonstrating that you are a liar. Meaning that you knowingly adjusted your speech, so as to deceitfully advance a fraudulent premise, toward the goal of influencing those who are ignorant of your treachery.
You have abused the trust of honest people... . Proving that you are manifestly evil.
I think Lois Lowry would be very surprised to hear that you think her dystopian society was "left wing".
The fetus (at the stage of development allowed in America for an abortion) is not a fully grown human being, and does not count as a 'human life'. Women have the right to their own body, and if they want to have an abortion in guidance of their doctor, they have that right, as the right of the already existing human transcends the 'right' of a fetus in development to existence. But your argument relies on this absurd straw-man/woman argument that women that have an abortion are the moral equivalent of serial killers, that cry 'bring me another lover' so they can 'kill more babies'.How? Conservatives are the ones demanding that all abortion clinics be shut down by the government, so that women can't make a choice - besides drowning babies in back alleys like in the 'good old' medieval church times.
Abortions have being going on since the beginning of mankind, just these days they are a lot safer if carried out by modern medicine.
LOL!
The issue here is very simple. Does a woman have any responsibility for conceiving a human life she conceives, due to her decisions to allow a man to enter her reproductive organs with his reproductive organs?
All human rights are sustained by responsibilities; and absent the responsibilities, there is no potential for the right. The first of these responsibilities is that one cannot exercise their rights to the detriment of another to exercise their own right(s).
Using NOTHING more than the tortured nature of your premise:
Conservatives are the ones demanding that all abortion clinics be shut down by the government, so that women can't make a choice - besides drowning babies in back alleys like in the 'good old' medieval church times.
Your use of the word 'choice', attempts to justify the taking of a human life, to satisfy the convenience of the individual who willfully engaged in the behavior designed for mo other purpose except the conception of human life, who conceived human life due to her have MADE THE CHOICE TO ENGAGE IN THE BEHAVIOR.
Demonstrating that you are a liar. Meaning that you knowingly adjusted your speech, so as to deceitfully advance a fraudulent premise, toward the goal of influencing those who are ignorant of your treachery.
You have abused the trust of honest people... . Proving that you are manifestly evil.
Calling someone a 'liar' requires that someone be purposely deceiving (in knowledge that their evidence is fallacious), and presenting mistruth as factual reality to be a correct use of the term. As I am presenting what I know to be true, as opposed to emotional outburst decrying my opponent as 'evil', that is not the case. I am not a 'liar'.
I would have liked to be at this McCarthyist trial of pro-choice supporters by straw-man/woman - if just to point out how ridiculous paranoia over abortion really is these days.![]()
Actually, The Giver is just another tiresome Hunger Games ripoff.
Because no one in Hollywood has an original idea.
Oh, 30% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.com.
It sucked.
A "ripoff" published more than a decade before?
Another brilliant comment by JoeNobody.
The fetus (at the stage of development allowed in America for an abortion) is not a fully grown human being, and does not count as a 'human life'.How? Conservatives are the ones demanding that all abortion clinics be shut down by the government, so that women can't make a choice - besides drowning babies in back alleys like in the 'good old' medieval church times.
Abortions have being going on since the beginning of mankind, just these days they are a lot safer if carried out by modern medicine.
LOL!
The issue here is very simple. Does a woman have any responsibility for conceiving a human life she conceives, due to her decisions to allow a man to enter her reproductive organs with his reproductive organs?
All human rights are sustained by responsibilities; and absent the responsibilities, there is no potential for the right. The first of these responsibilities is that one cannot exercise their rights to the detriment of another to exercise their own right(s).
Using NOTHING more than the tortured nature of your premise:
Conservatives are the ones demanding that all abortion clinics be shut down by the government, so that women can't make a choice - besides drowning babies in back alleys like in the 'good old' medieval church times.
Your use of the word 'choice', attempts to justify the taking of a human life, to satisfy the convenience of the individual who willfully engaged in the behavior designed for mo other purpose except the conception of human life, who conceived human life due to her have MADE THE CHOICE TO ENGAGE IN THE BEHAVIOR.
Demonstrating that you are a liar. Meaning that you knowingly adjusted your speech, so as to deceitfully advance a fraudulent premise, toward the goal of influencing those who are ignorant of your treachery.
You have abused the trust of honest people... . Proving that you are manifestly evil.
I think Lois Lowry would be very surprised to hear that you think her dystopian society was "left wing".
I have a very vague recollection of the plot, so excuse me if I'm missing something but isn't the central governing principle here that of a ruling elite making the best decisions for the masses because the masses can't be trusted to make the best decisions in their own lives?
This is exactly what drives modern liberalism - take a smart liberal, put him in a position of power, give him legal and governmental tools to use and he'll make the best decisions for society.
A top aide to Liberal Leader Paul Martin apologized on Sunday shortly after suggesting on national television that Canadians might spend child-care money on beer and popcorn.
Scott Reid, Martin's director of communications, was attacking a Conservative plan to give families of young children $1,200 a year for child care.
"Don't give people 25 bucks a week to blow on beer and popcorn," Reid said during a panel discussion on CBC News: Sunday. "Give them child-care spaces that work. Stephen Harper's plan has nothing to do with child care."
The Conservative on the panel called the comment "an insult," and said it proves that the Liberals don't trust families to make their own choices about what's best for their children.
Abortions have being going on since the beginning of mankind...
Abortions have being going on since the beginning of mankind...
People have been taking human lives in all sorts of ways "since the beginning of mankind." When someone else's 'choice' to end a life is directed toward you, well you sure as hell want the government to control that person's use of their own body for such a purpose.
Abortions have being going on since the beginning of mankind...
People have been taking human lives in all sorts of ways "since the beginning of mankind." When someone else's 'choice' to end a life is directed toward you, well you sure as hell want the government to control that person's use of their own body for such a purpose.
Good point.
As soon as a fetus objects to abortion, we'll get right on that.