bendog
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #61
I'm gonna go WAY out on a limb here, and I'm gonna guess that, after this fabulous plan is introduced, we're STILL going to have SEVEN (7) different delivery/payment systems in place, NONE of which coordinate or communicate directly with each other:
1. Group
2. Individual
3. Medicare
4. Medicaid
5. VA
6. Worker's Comp
7. Indigent
Because having a bunch of different systems within ONE system is ALWAYS gonna be efficient and cost effective!!!!
Wheeeeeeeeeeeeee!
.
So long as some of are getting HC insurance via our employers who get a tax break to do so, there's not going to be a transparent market where we shop for the most efficient product. That was the ultimate "fac" that Obamacare ran up against. Hillarycare was possibly better if it assumed everyone had the exact same economic ability to access treatment, and everyone's "plan" was equally administered by an HMO whose profit % was capped.
But I think your post assumes the GOP's plan rests on a goal of making healthcare access "better." I'm not sure that's a correct assumption. It's certainly not true of the House bill that even Donald no longer likes. But the Senate plan may just be a repeal and tax cut, that the Turtle and his secret select few think can get 50 votes, so they can tell voters "we repealed Obamacare." And, I'm not at all convinced that is a politically wise idea. LOL