- Thread starter
- #21
And now, for your listening and viewing enjoyment.....Republican Peter King spanking Liberal/Democrat Bzezinski
Where's his evidence? We can't take his word for it.
"(CNSNews.com) ā John Bolton, former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations,.... ... the U.S. can refuse to allow Syrian refugees entry āwithout in any way violating our humanitarian obligations.ā
Bolton also dismissed White House Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodesā statement Sunday that the refugees are being vetted in Iraq before they are brought to the U.S.
āI donāt know who else believes this other than the White House,ā Bolton said in response to Rhodesā assertion that the U.S. has āvery robust vetting procedures for those refugees.ā
The U.N.ās 1951 Convention and Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, which was amended in 1967, defines a refugee as āsomeone who is unable or unwilling to return to their country of origin owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion.ā
... the signers of the convention are not required to offer them asylum in their own countries.
āThe refugee convention imposes on the country of first asylum an obligation to provide food, shelter, sanitation, and medicine in refugee campsā with the main goal of repatriating them back to their country of origin as soon as possible, ...."
Former Ambassador to UN: US Has āNo Obligationā to Accept Syrian Refugees
"...dismissed White House Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodesā statement Sunday that the refugees are being vetted..."
Obama knows this.....yet insists on bringing them, en masse, to the US.
Now....why?