The Hoax of Record Temperatures

[jwoodie]

Almost daily, we are treated to climate propaganda regarding "record" temperatures at various locations around the world. But if looked at closely, these records are normal statistical occurrences. Accurate temperature recordings rarely go back more than 100 years. Since there are 365 days in a year, it is normal for an average of 3.65 days per year to equal or exceed the highest recorded temperature for a particular date.

"Heat islands" in major metropolitan areas are an exception to this average, but that is due to construction and development, not global weather patterns.

P.S. If you need a "link" to understand this, you are not capable of posting an intelligent reply. So don't bother trying.

 

[Votto]

 

[Donald H]

Almost daily, we are treated to climate propaganda regarding "record" temperatures at various locations around the world. But if looked at closely, these records are normal statistical occurrences. Accurate temperature recordings rarely go back more than 100 years. Since there are 365 days in a year, it is normal for an average of 3.65 days per year to equal or exceed the highest recorded temperature for a particular date.

"Heat islands" in major metropolitan areas are an exception to this average, but that is due to construction and development, not global weather patterns.

P.S. If you need a "link" to understand this, you are not capable of posting an intelligent reply. So don't bother.

Yes, a reliable link is required. You've made up your own set of facts to suit your denialist agenda.

 

[Votto]

Yes, a reliable link is required. You've made up your own set of facts to suit your denialist agenda.

Mr. Science man, I'm not a denialist

Where do we send our checks and should we make it out to you?

Never mind him, he is probably an insurrectionist as well and believes democracy can survive with an opposition party against the DNC when we all know the only way for democracy to survive is only having one party to vote for.


Fools!!

 

[okfine]

Almost daily, we are treated to climate propaganda regarding "record" temperatures at various locations around the world. But if looked at closely, these records are normal statistical occurrences. Accurate temperature recordings rarely go back more than 100 years. Since there are 365 days in a year, it is normal for an average of 3.65 days per year to equal or exceed the highest recorded temperature for a particular date.

"Heat islands" in major metropolitan areas are an exception to this average, but that is due to construction and development, not global weather patterns.

P.S. If you need a "link" to understand this, you are not capable of posting an intelligent reply. So don't bother trying.

130 in Furnace Creek is the hottest recorded there. 129 last year.

 

[jwoodie]

Yes, a reliable link is required. You've made up your own set of facts to suit your denialist agenda.

If you were intellectually honest, you would specify the facts with which you disagree.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

130 in Furnace Creek is the hottest recorded there. 129 last year.

How many windmills to drop it to 128 degrees?
$1 trillion?
$2 trillion?
More?

 

[mamooth]

I can see why the deniers here act liek they do. If all the data said I was a brainwashed cult loon, I'd make up a conspiracy theory too.

Actually, _I_ wouldn't do it, because I have ethics, but if someone was an ethics-free denier, they'd definitely do it.

Anyways, rural areas show the same warming as urban areas, which means this denier pisshead conspiracy theory is debunked. Not that TheFaithful will care. TheParty has issued talking points, and they don't dare disobey.

jwoodie, just why did you fall for such a stupid conspiracy theory? Did you even think about looking outside of your cult for info? Apparently not.

Oh, there's also the consilience thing, meaning that multiple lines of independent data all converge on the same result. Even if we didn't measure temperatures at all, we'd still observe that the world is warming fast. Sea level rise, glacier retreat, sea ice loss, changes in growing seasons, changes in insect life cycles, changes in animal miagrations ... every single thing points to how the fast warming is happening.

 

[Flash]

130 in Furnace Creek is the hottest recorded there. 129 last year.

...and if we raise taxes and run up the cost of fossil fuels and make everybody use solar or windmills then the temperature may drop to 128 according to the Moon Bats.

 

[Crick]

...and if we raise taxes and run up the cost of fossil fuels and make everybody use solar or windmills then the temperature may drop to 128 according to the Moon Bats.

The idea is to prevent it from climbing to 135 and staying there for the next two centuries.

 

[Flash]

The idea is to prevent it from climbing to 135 and staying there for the next two centuries.

Bullshit. The idea is to have a Leftest scam. It has been going on for a coupke of decades now and it unscientific and this world renowned scientist knows bullshit when he see it.

It is only you uneducated gullible Moon Bat idiots that believe in the sllly ass scam.

 

[Crick]

Bullshit. The idea is to have a Leftest[sic] scam. It has been going on for a coupke[sic] of decades now and it unscientific[sic] and this world renowned scientist knows bullshit when he see it.

There is nothing intrinsically leftist about this issue. It was politicized by the fossil fuel PR machine in response to it being identified with Al Gore after "Inconvenient Truth" and based on their determination that devout right wingers have a very strong tendency to disengage their brains if you make up a story just like the one here into which you've all bought.

It is only you uneducated gullible Moon Bat idiots that believe in the sllly ass scam.

Us and all the world's scientists.

 

[leftwinger]

I was in Tempe AZ during this event. There is nothing new going on these days?

High & Low Weather Summary for July 2020​

	Temperature	Humidity	Pressure
High	117 °F (Jul 30, 4:51 pm)	62% (Jul 24, 8:26 pm)	29.90 "Hg (Jul 24, 8:26 pm)
Low	77 °F (Jul 1, 4:51 am)	7% (Jul 6, 12:51 pm)	29.57 "Hg (Jul 28, 5:51 pm)
Average	99 °F	21%	29.72 "Hg
* Reported Jul 1 12:51 am — Jul 31 11:51 pm, Tempe. Weather by CustomWeather, © 2023

 

[Matted Joybeard]

If it were either free and/or non-disruptive to decarbonize and move to alternate energy sources, then AGW totally wouldn't be a scam, but because it's neither free nor non-disruptive to decarbonize, due to how we approach policy matters combined with the foundations upon which our modern technological civilization, then it logically follows that AGW must be a scam.

 

[petro]

The constant Fear Porn is rather tiresome.
Apparently Truth by Repetition works rather well on the masses.

 

[Dagosa]

Almost daily, we are treated to climate propaganda regarding "record" temperatures at various locations around the world. But if looked at closely, these records are normal statistical occurrences. Accurate temperature recordings rarely go back more than 100 years. Since there are 365 days in a year, it is normal for an average of 3.65 days per year to equal or exceed the highest recorded temperature for a particular date.

"Heat islands" in major metropolitan areas are an exception to this average, but that is due to construction and development, not global weather patterns.

P.S. If you need a "link" to understand this, you are not capable of posting an intelligent reply. So don't bother trying.

A lot of made up shit in this post.

 

[ding]

Almost daily, we are treated to climate propaganda regarding "record" temperatures at various locations around the world. But if looked at closely, these records are normal statistical occurrences. Accurate temperature recordings rarely go back more than 100 years. Since there are 365 days in a year, it is normal for an average of 3.65 days per year to equal or exceed the highest recorded temperature for a particular date.

"Heat islands" in major metropolitan areas are an exception to this average, but that is due to construction and development, not global weather patterns.

P.S. If you need a "link" to understand this, you are not capable of posting an intelligent reply. So don't bother trying.

The models the IPCC rely upon include urban temperature station data and use the low variability solar output dataset. So you are correct that they cherry pick the data to get the model results they want.

 

[ding]

A lot of made up shit in this post.

Not really the UHI effect is real and does skew the data to the hot side.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

The actual temperature in Furnace Creek is no different than it always is.

Furnace Creek, CA Weather Forecast and Conditions - The Weather Channel | Weather.com

Today’s and tonight’s Furnace Creek, CA weather forecast, weather conditions and Doppler radar from The Weather Channel and Weather.com

weather.com

Why is the reported temperature in Phoenix so different from that given by people who live there who describe it warm but pleasant?

What is being given is not ambient temperature but ground temperature. The temp of the asphalt or concrete in the blazing sun. In other words, feeding the hoax.

 

[Crick]

The actual temperature in Furnace Creek is no different than it always is.

Furnace Creek, CA Weather Forecast and Conditions - The Weather Channel | Weather.com

Today’s and tonight’s Furnace Creek, CA weather forecast, weather conditions and Doppler radar from The Weather Channel and Weather.com

weather.com

Why is the reported temperature in Phoenix so different from that given by people who live there who describe it warm but pleasant?

What is being given is not ambient temperature but ground temperature. The temp of the asphalt or concrete in the blazing sun. In other words, feeding the hoax.

Your local weather folks are not giving you the temperature of the asphalt.