Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
www.zerohedge.com
So you believe all evidence of this prior civilization was destroyed by some sort of "global reset". What sort of event are you picturing? Impacts leave evidence.The last catastrophe literally melted granite in the middle east. What man made structures do you suppose would survive that?
The Richat Structure was formed by volcanic uplift a hundred million years ago and then collapse and erosion since then. It was not formed by an impact. See: Eye Of The Sahara or Richat Structure » Geology ScienceThen look at the eye of the Sahara desert. Look at the ripples leading thousands of miles away from it to the ocean.(satellite photos). There is NOTHING on this earth that would survive a flood that big. And we have those same ripples here in America that stretch for miles upon miles.
I think our discussions have shown quite the opposite; that this charge of yours is pure projection.You're uninformed and close minded
I don’t see it as debunked at all. I think we need an independent survey of temperature monitoring stations. Otherwise the data we are basing critical concoctions on is likely garbage. The data from monitoring stations is “adjusted” to make it more accurate. Add the right fudge factor and the data will show anything you want it to. When you mix politics and science you can bet the fudge factor added favors politics and the end result is junk science.No, it doesn't. Rural stations show the same trend as urban statinos, so your "It's all about station citing" conspiracy theory is debunked.
climate.nasa.gov
observer.com
www.investors.com
www.forbes.com
When you mix politics and science the usual result is junk science.Or, it’s just all made up nonsense
Climate Reanalyzer
climatereanalyzer.org
The hottest day in history just occurred. The global average temperature was 17.18C, the hottest in the historical record.
Discuss.
Does this mean global warming is very real, and the rational people have been spot-on correct for the past 40 years? Yes.
Does this mean the denier cultists have been laughably wrong for the past decade? Yes.
If you want to put forth a "DERP! DERP! ALL THE DATA IS FAKED! DEEEEERRRRRRP!" conspiracy as a way to run from the hard data, you have to back it up, with something more than a link to a kook conspiracy website. Explain it in your own words, then link to primary data sources. If you won't, that's an admission you're making it all up.
If you'd like to claim the warming is all-natural, provide evidence for that. Don't just claim it. Back it up.
Needless to say, trolls will be instantly reported. Mods, please don't reward trolls by moving a thread to the Rubber Room after trolls overwhelm it, as the trolls always attempt to do.
What are happens at 2,400 ppm280 ppm is the natural level, per ice core data ... it's the extra 150 ppm that makes tornadoes spin upside-down ... or whatever the latest claims are ... test it in a blimp hanger ...
So why do food producers use co2 levels of 1,100 ppm in greenhouses to grow food quicker, if increased co2 does nothing?No, it wouldn't. The increase in greening on earth stopped in the 1990s. A little more CO2 initially helped, but that effect was saturated long ago, and more CO2 now does nothing.
Scientists discovered that the summers in the Roman and Egyptian times were on average 2c warmer than today."in History", no. Since records began in 1979, yes. We've had much hotter than this before.
He never answers. He’s still reading from a 50 year old CIA playbook that thinks mockery is an effective response.You gave no answer
He is not the brightest bulb on the Christmas tree . He would be frst choice for the post of an Official Denier of Anything and Everything that disagrees with what I have been told to believe in . Our Mr Gullible .You gave an “answer” an answer that would fail you in any science class. Did you try to flub your way through science and still have nightmares about the how mean the teacher was???
Never mentioned what created it. Having said that lava does not leave ripples in its wake like flowing waters does.So you believe all evidence of this prior civilization was destroyed by some sort of "global reset". What sort of event are you picturing? Impacts leave evidence.
The Richat Structure was formed by volcanic uplift a hundred million years ago and then collapse and erosion since then. It was not formed by an impact. See: Eye Of The Sahara or Richat Structure » Geology Science
I think our discussions have shown quite the opposite; that this charge of yours is pure projection.
The world has been warming since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution. The primary cause of that warming has been CO2 and methane produced by human activities, primarily the combustion of fossil fuels in the transportation and energy sectors. That has been established by absolute mountains of evidence developed by degreed scientists in tens of thousands of published, peer-reviewed studies. Read the Summary for Policy Makers at the link I provided you for some condensed science. If you have more questions about the science, explore the Technical Summary in the same volume.
www.thearchaeologist.org
Watch as he literally debunks "historians" with FACTS.
A fantastic video that is just one tiny piece of evidence that our "known" history is foggy at best.
NoDid you know there is a mathematical relationship between the velocity and period of liquid movement and the wavelength of ripples and/or dunes in the desert. Sand dunes in the desert are formed by wind. If they'd been formed by water, they'd be a tiny fraction of their size.
Are you telling me you're a Bible literalist? You believe in Noah's Flood?
Yes. Have you ever looked at how the Black Sea was formed? See: Black Sea deluge hypothesis - Wikipedia.No
I don't do ANY religion.
Having said that EVERY culture has a reference to a catastrophic flood and they all reference the same time period.
And on what evidence do you base that belief?Personally I believe, based on what I've researched, that approximately 11 to 12k years ago there was an impact or multiple impacts on the ice sheets that essentially reset most life because of the flood it caused.
I've already offered a partial list of some of the sources I've used over the years in this or one of the other threads we've been conversing in.Yes. Have you ever looked at how the Black Sea was formed? See: Black Sea deluge hypothesis - Wikipedia.
And on what evidence do you base that belief?
