The Left has really, completely, lost its shit.

[NYcarbineer]

Look at the threads in Politics right now.

Conspiracy theory after conspiracy theory, charge after charge with no solid evidence.

These are THE SAME PEOPLE who were mocking the right wingers here, not months ago, for conspiracy theories and baseless charges.

It's the fuckin' Twilight Zone in here. What happened to these people?
.

There is no conspiracy theories.

He's pretty proven that by refusing to name them, let alone show they qualify as conspiracy theories.

REMEMBER, it was TRUMP who created and repeated the 'theory' that the election was rigged. (Assuming that might be what the OP is talking about).

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Republicans are so scared their new messiah is illegitimate, they are willing to let foreign governments attack this country's democratic process and then pretend it never happened. Or else they are treasonous and are glad it happened.

See?
.

Is it a conspiracy theory when every US intelligence agency has confirmed this?

Is it a conspiracy when the congressional leadership has been briefed on this very subject multiple times over the last year?

Is it a conspiracy that congressional leadership is now on board with convening hearings on the subject?


I admire your efforts to remain in the center but you're missing the boat on this issue.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Republicans are so scared their new messiah is illegitimate, they are willing to let foreign governments attack this country's democratic process and then pretend it never happened. Or else they are treasonous and are glad it happened.

Typical idiot. The DNC and Clinton commit crimes and cheat in elections (screwed Sanders), they get exposed and they blame the messenger.

What does that have to do with liberal conspiracy theories?

 

[Mac1958]

There is no conspiracy theories.

All you have to do is look at post 6 on this very thread for a vivid example.
.

 

[Mac1958]

Look at the threads in Politics right now.

Conspiracy theory after conspiracy theory, charge after charge with no solid evidence.

These are THE SAME PEOPLE who were mocking the right wingers here, not months ago, for conspiracy theories and baseless charges.

It's the fuckin' Twilight Zone in here. What happened to these people?
.

There is no conspiracy theories.

He's pretty proven that by refusing to name them, let alone show they qualify as conspiracy theories.

REMEMBER, it was TRUMP who created and repeated the 'theory' that the election was rigged. (Assuming that might be what the OP is talking about).

Please stop losing your shit.


.

 

[PredFan]

Did Putin tell Hillary to collapse after a rally?
Did Putin tell the DNC to give Sanders the shaft?
Did Putin tell Hillary to call half of the country "Deplorable"?
Did Putin tell Hillary to ignore states she thought she had in the bag?
Did Putin tell Hillary to take a month off of the campaign trail?
Did Putin tell Weiner to keep his e-mails and get caught?
Did Putin tell Hillary supporters to stay away from her rallies?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Republicans are so scared their new messiah is illegitimate, they are willing to let foreign governments attack this country's democratic process and then pretend it never happened. Or else they are treasonous and are glad it happened.

See?
.

Is it a conspiracy theory when every US intelligence agency has confirmed this?

Is it a conspiracy when the congressional leadership has been briefed on this very subject multiple times over the last year?

Is it a conspiracy that congressional leadership is now on board with convening hearings on the subject?


I admire your efforts to remain in the center but you're missing the boat on this issue.

The OP is a perfect example of centrist elitism. While ironically attacking 'intolerance' on a regular basis,
Mac is viciously intolerant of anyone who won't conform in lockstep to his centrist mandate.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

One candidate, and only one candidate, invited the Russians to hack our electoral process. That candidate was Trump. If we find that the process was hacked beyond just the e-mails, then who is working for whom?

Trump did no such thing, you lying douche bag.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Look at the threads in Politics right now.

Conspiracy theory after conspiracy theory, charge after charge with no solid evidence.

These are THE SAME PEOPLE who were mocking the right wingers here, not months ago, for conspiracy theories and baseless charges.

It's the fuckin' Twilight Zone in here. What happened to these people?
.

There is no conspiracy theories.

He's pretty proven that by refusing to name them, let alone show they qualify as conspiracy theories.

REMEMBER, it was TRUMP who created and repeated the 'theory' that the election was rigged. (Assuming that might be what the OP is talking about).

Please stop losing your shit.


.

See? As always, he ends up in PoliticalChic mode. No debate, just childish insults.

 

[PredFan]

One candidate, and only one candidate, invited the Russians to hack our electoral process. That candidate was Trump. If we find that the process was hacked beyond just the e-mails, then who is working for whom?

That is a complete lie moron.

Trump was remarking on Hillary's e-mails that she, against the law, erased. He said jokingly that the Russians should try to look for those e-mails. That isn't anywhere close to inviting them to hack the election.

 

[NYcarbineer]

You really think the GOP 'takeover' of the government is going to stop and roll back progress in this country. You think 'social democracy' is dead now?

lol. Did you think that when Bush 'won' in 2001?

Progress?? Not fucking hardly bucko. Its anything but progress.

America didn't like the direction the country was taking, that progress you speak of, so they voted in Trump.

Get over it. Or not. LOL

To be fair, there's more to it than just direction.

These people are really, really unlikable.

So it was personal, too.
.

Oh I'm sure there is more to it.

Hell. Hillary wasn't liked by a lot of Dems.

I have Dem and liberal friends who flat out told me they were voting for Trump because they couldn't stand Hillary and thought she was dishonest and had no business in the WH.

Unlikable?? You bet and she's not the only one.

And yet she won the vote by almost 3 million.

OMG Who is the President elect??

A big hint. Its not Hillary.

You injected the popular vote, not me.

 

[Mac1958]

Republicans are so scared their new messiah is illegitimate, they are willing to let foreign governments attack this country's democratic process and then pretend it never happened. Or else they are treasonous and are glad it happened.

See?
.

Is it a conspiracy theory when every US intelligence agency has confirmed this?

Is it a conspiracy when the congressional leadership has been briefed on this very subject multiple times over the last year?

Is it a conspiracy that congressional leadership is now on board with convening hearings on the subject?


I admire your efforts to remain in the center but you're missing the boat on this issue.

The OP is a perfect example of centrist elitism. While ironically attacking 'intolerance' on a regular basis,
Mac is viciously intolerant of anyone who won't conform in lockstep to his centrist mandate.

I've already told you.

You can't "prove" anything to a hardcore partisan ideologue.

The fact that you just can't let this go is funny, though.
.

 

[PredFan]

The choice of Tillierson as Secretary of State is an indication of the ties that Trump apparently has with Russia. A personal buddy of Putin for Secretary of State? No conflict of interest there, right?

So what? Russia is not our enemy. Trump knows that.

 

[NYcarbineer]

One candidate, and only one candidate, invited the Russians to hack our electoral process. That candidate was Trump. If we find that the process was hacked beyond just the e-mails, then who is working for whom?

That is a complete lie moron.

Trump was remarking on Hillary's e-mails that she, against the law, erased. He said jokingly that the Russians should try to look for those e-mails. That isn't anywhere close to inviting them to hack the election.

If she broke the law, why has Trump now decided not to pursue prosecution of her?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

One candidate, and only one candidate, invited the Russians to hack our electoral process. That candidate was Trump. If we find that the process was hacked beyond just the e-mails, then who is working for whom?

So what you're saying is that Russia would not have hacked our elections unless they got permission from Trump?

No, what they're saying is that Trump isn't the legitimate president because the Russians hacked Podesta's emails and revealed the truth about Hillary. They want to use that to obstruct Trump from getting his agenda passed. Too bad Trump's supporters don't give a fuck.

No one has said that, dope.
It's a serious issue when foreign interests interfere with our electoral process. That should in no way be tolerated.

 

[Mac1958]

For the zillionth time, I make a point, and they've just gotta jump in and illustrate it for me.

 

[PredFan]

One candidate, and only one candidate, invited the Russians to hack our electoral process. That candidate was Trump. If we find that the process was hacked beyond just the e-mails, then who is working for whom?

Agasin, run us through the details. Inquiring minds want to know.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/28/us/politics/donald-trump-russia-clinton-emails.html?_r=0

Right there.

Do you have the honesty or the intellectual ability to see that that is not the same as hacking the election?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Republicans are so scared their new messiah is illegitimate, they are willing to let foreign governments attack this country's democratic process and then pretend it never happened. Or else they are treasonous and are glad it happened.

See?
.

Is it a conspiracy theory when every US intelligence agency has confirmed this?

Is it a conspiracy when the congressional leadership has been briefed on this very subject multiple times over the last year?

Is it a conspiracy that congressional leadership is now on board with convening hearings on the subject?


I admire your efforts to remain in the center but you're missing the boat on this issue.

The OP is a perfect example of centrist elitism. While ironically attacking 'intolerance' on a regular basis,
Mac is viciously intolerant of anyone who won't conform in lockstep to his centrist mandate.

I've already told you.

You can't "prove" anything to a hardcore partisan ideologue.

The fact that you just can't let this go is funny, though.
.

I want to debate you on whether the conspiracy theories you claim in the OP are really conspiracy theories.

So list them and you and I can debate that one by one.

 

[PredFan]

Look at the threads in Politics right now.

Conspiracy theory after conspiracy theory, charge after charge with no solid evidence.

These are THE SAME PEOPLE who were mocking the right wingers here, not months ago, for conspiracy theories and baseless charges.

It's the fuckin' Twilight Zone in here. What happened to these people?
.

There is no conspiracy theories.

He's pretty proven that by refusing to name them, let alone show they qualify as conspiracy theories.

REMEMBER, it was TRUMP who created and repeated the 'theory' that the election was rigged. (Assuming that might be what the OP is talking about).

Please stop losing your shit.


.

See? As always, he ends up in PoliticalChic mode. No debate, just childish insults.

Lol, he's right and you keep proving it.

 

[NYcarbineer]

For the zillionth time, I make a point, and they've just gotta jump in and illustrate it for me.

Another classic Mac-ism. Lie about what others have said and then claim those lies prove him right.