The Left Loses Ground...

[Derideo_Te]

So you are only interested in a pissing contest to see who has the longer list?

Using degrading language doesn't constitute an effective dodge. Yeah, I'm interested in seeing who has the longer list of right AND left on air personalities, that's right. That's what makes BALANCE in a cable news show.. So, longer list. You got one ?

Thanks for tacitly admitting that all you are interested in is a pissing contest.

If you were genuinely interested there would be absolutely nothing stopping you from doing your own research into the guest lists on MSNBC.

But I suspect that isn't your honest intention at all.

Anyone who starts out trumpeting FauxNoise obviously has an agenda.

And there is absolutely nothing "balanced" about the mindless entertainment on FauxNoise. It is there purely to incite the emotions of it's gullible viewers.

Oh, and research has established that FauxNoise viewers are the most ignorant and misinformed.

Have a nice day.

I'm already having a nice day watching you squirming to dodge my challenge to you to come up with a list of conservatives on MSNBC or any liberal media. Looks like all you can do is utter a laughble LIE that Fox News isn't balanced, after I just proved (with your help) that not only is it very balanced, with a lengthy list of liberals on its shows, creating serious DIalogue, but it is extremely balanced, relative to the pathetically UNbalanced MSNBC and many other liberal laughingstocks, and the MONOlogues they present.

As for research, you just got it, and your lack of words contributed to it. Thanks, man.

Great job shooting down your own credibility.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

So you are only interested in a pissing contest to see who has the longer list?

Using degrading language doesn't constitute an effective dodge. Yeah, I'm interested in seeing who has the longer list of right AND left on air personalities, that's right. That's what makes BALANCE in a cable news show.. So, longer list. You got one ?

Thanks for tacitly admitting that all you are interested in is a pissing contest.

If you were genuinely interested there would be absolutely nothing stopping you from doing your own research into the guest lists on MSNBC.

But I suspect that isn't your honest intention at all.

Anyone who starts out trumpeting FauxNoise obviously has an agenda.

And there is absolutely nothing "balanced" about the mindless entertainment on FauxNoise. It is there purely to incite the emotions of it's gullible viewers.

Oh, and research has established that FauxNoise viewers are the most ignorant and misinformed.

Have a nice day.

I'm already having a nice day watching you squirming to dodge my challenge to you to come up with a list of conservatives on MSNBC or any liberal media. Looks like all you can do is utter a laughble LIE that Fox News isn't balanced, after I just proved (with your help) that not only is it very balanced, with a lengthy list of liberals on its shows, creating serious DIalogue, but it is extremely balanced, relative to the pathetically UNbalanced MSNBC and many other liberal laughingstocks, and the MONOlogues they present.

As for research, you just got it, and your lack of words contributed to it. Thanks, man.

Great job shooting down your own credibility.

ROFLMNAO!

I SO adore the sweeter Irony.

But hey... a Concession is a concession.

And Dorito's concession is duly noted and summarily accepted!

 

[NYcarbineer]

So you are only interested in a pissing contest to see who has the longer list?

Using degrading language doesn't constitute an effective dodge. Yeah, I'm interested in seeing who has the longer list of right AND left on air personalities, that's right. That's what makes BALANCE in a cable news show.. So, longer list. You got one ?

Thanks for tacitly admitting that all you are interested in is a pissing contest.

If you were genuinely interested there would be absolutely nothing stopping you from doing your own research into the guest lists on MSNBC.

But I suspect that isn't your honest intention at all.

Anyone who starts out trumpeting FauxNoise obviously has an agenda.

And there is absolutely nothing "balanced" about the mindless entertainment on FauxNoise. It is there purely to incite the emotions of it's gullible viewers.

Oh, and research has established that FauxNoise viewers are the most ignorant and misinformed.

Have a nice day.

I'm already having a nice day watching you squirming to dodge my challenge to you to come up with a list of conservatives on MSNBC or any liberal media. Looks like all you can do is utter a laughble LIE that Fox News isn't balanced, after I just proved (with your help) that not only is it very balanced, with a lengthy list of liberals on its shows, creating serious DIalogue, but it is extremely balanced, relative to the pathetically UNbalanced MSNBC and many other liberal laughingstocks, and the MONOlogues they present.

As for research, you just got it, and your lack of words contributed to it. Thanks, man.

Joe Scarborough has a 3 hour show in MSNBC. He is a conservative.

What liberal has a 3 hour show on Foxnews?

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Joe Scarborough has a 3 hour show in MSNBC. He is a conservative.

ROFLMNAO!​

Oh GOD!

Now how precious is THAT?

Imagine a world SO pitifully feminized, that Joe Scarborough is an American.

LOL!

.

.

.

OOhhh Gilligan, THAT was HYSTERICAL! (In every sense of the word...)

 

[protectionist]

Great job shooting down your own credibility.

No need to again confirm you got no answer, no list, nothing. We already know that. But we sincerely appreciate your consideration. It's the thought that counts.

 

[protectionist]

So you are only interested in a pissing contest to see who has the longer list?

Using degrading language doesn't constitute an effective dodge. Yeah, I'm interested in seeing who has the longer list of right AND left on air personalities, that's right. That's what makes BALANCE in a cable news show.. So, longer list. You got one ?

Thanks for tacitly admitting that all you are interested in is a pissing contest.

If you were genuinely interested there would be absolutely nothing stopping you from doing your own research into the guest lists on MSNBC.

But I suspect that isn't your honest intention at all.

Anyone who starts out trumpeting FauxNoise obviously has an agenda.

And there is absolutely nothing "balanced" about the mindless entertainment on FauxNoise. It is there purely to incite the emotions of it's gullible viewers.

Oh, and research has established that FauxNoise viewers are the most ignorant and misinformed.

Have a nice day.

I'm already having a nice day watching you squirming to dodge my challenge to you to come up with a list of conservatives on MSNBC or any liberal media. Looks like all you can do is utter a laughble LIE that Fox News isn't balanced, after I just proved (with your help) that not only is it very balanced, with a lengthy list of liberals on its shows, creating serious DIalogue, but it is extremely balanced, relative to the pathetically UNbalanced MSNBC and many other liberal laughingstocks, and the MONOlogues they present.

As for research, you just got it, and your lack of words contributed to it. Thanks, man.

Joe Scarborough has a 3 hour show in MSNBC. He is a conservative.

What liberal has a 3 hour show on Foxnews?

Geraldo Rivera and Shepard Smith (who's gay) both have their own shows, plus liberals appear regularly on a dozen or more shows. Not so with MSNBC.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

So you are only interested in a pissing contest to see who has the longer list?

Using degrading language doesn't constitute an effective dodge. Yeah, I'm interested in seeing who has the longer list of right AND left on air personalities, that's right. That's what makes BALANCE in a cable news show.. So, longer list. You got one ?

Thanks for tacitly admitting that all you are interested in is a pissing contest.

If you were genuinely interested there would be absolutely nothing stopping you from doing your own research into the guest lists on MSNBC.

But I suspect that isn't your honest intention at all.

Anyone who starts out trumpeting FauxNoise obviously has an agenda.

And there is absolutely nothing "balanced" about the mindless entertainment on FauxNoise. It is there purely to incite the emotions of it's gullible viewers.

Oh, and research has established that FauxNoise viewers are the most ignorant and misinformed.

Have a nice day.

I'm already having a nice day watching you squirming to dodge my challenge to you to come up with a list of conservatives on MSNBC or any liberal media. Looks like all you can do is utter a laughble LIE that Fox News isn't balanced, after I just proved (with your help) that not only is it very balanced, with a lengthy list of liberals on its shows, creating serious DIalogue, but it is extremely balanced, relative to the pathetically UNbalanced MSNBC and many other liberal laughingstocks, and the MONOlogues they present.

As for research, you just got it, and your lack of words contributed to it. Thanks, man.

Joe Scarborough has a 3 hour show in MSNBC. He is a conservative.

What liberal has a 3 hour show on Foxnews?

There are plenty of lefties who regularly appear on Fox... Juan Williams, Allan Colmes and Bob Beckel to name a few....

 

[Derideo_Te]

So you are only interested in a pissing contest to see who has the longer list?

Using degrading language doesn't constitute an effective dodge. Yeah, I'm interested in seeing who has the longer list of right AND left on air personalities, that's right. That's what makes BALANCE in a cable news show.. So, longer list. You got one ?

Thanks for tacitly admitting that all you are interested in is a pissing contest.

If you were genuinely interested there would be absolutely nothing stopping you from doing your own research into the guest lists on MSNBC.

But I suspect that isn't your honest intention at all.

Anyone who starts out trumpeting FauxNoise obviously has an agenda.

And there is absolutely nothing "balanced" about the mindless entertainment on FauxNoise. It is there purely to incite the emotions of it's gullible viewers.

Oh, and research has established that FauxNoise viewers are the most ignorant and misinformed.

Have a nice day.

I'm already having a nice day watching you squirming to dodge my challenge to you to come up with a list of conservatives on MSNBC or any liberal media. Looks like all you can do is utter a laughble LIE that Fox News isn't balanced, after I just proved (with your help) that not only is it very balanced, with a lengthy list of liberals on its shows, creating serious DIalogue, but it is extremely balanced, relative to the pathetically UNbalanced MSNBC and many other liberal laughingstocks, and the MONOlogues they present.

As for research, you just got it, and your lack of words contributed to it. Thanks, man.

Joe Scarborough has a 3 hour show in MSNBC. He is a conservative.

What liberal has a 3 hour show on Foxnews?

Geraldo Rivera and Shepard Smith (who's gay) both have their own shows, plus liberals appear regularly on a dozen or more shows. Not so with MSNBC.

Your falsehoods are typical of an ignorant FauxNoise sycophant.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

So you are only interested in a pissing contest to see who has the longer list?

Using degrading language doesn't constitute an effective dodge. Yeah, I'm interested in seeing who has the longer list of right AND left on air personalities, that's right. That's what makes BALANCE in a cable news show.. So, longer list. You got one ?

Thanks for tacitly admitting that all you are interested in is a pissing contest.

If you were genuinely interested there would be absolutely nothing stopping you from doing your own research into the guest lists on MSNBC.

But I suspect that isn't your honest intention at all.

Anyone who starts out trumpeting FauxNoise obviously has an agenda.

And there is absolutely nothing "balanced" about the mindless entertainment on FauxNoise. It is there purely to incite the emotions of it's gullible viewers.

Oh, and research has established that FauxNoise viewers are the most ignorant and misinformed.

Have a nice day.

I'm already having a nice day watching you squirming to dodge my challenge to you to come up with a list of conservatives on MSNBC or any liberal media. Looks like all you can do is utter a laughble LIE that Fox News isn't balanced, after I just proved (with your help) that not only is it very balanced, with a lengthy list of liberals on its shows, creating serious DIalogue, but it is extremely balanced, relative to the pathetically UNbalanced MSNBC and many other liberal laughingstocks, and the MONOlogues they present.

As for research, you just got it, and your lack of words contributed to it. Thanks, man.

Joe Scarborough has a 3 hour show in MSNBC. He is a conservative.

What liberal has a 3 hour show on Foxnews?

There are plenty of lefties who regularly appear on Fox... Juan Williams, Allan Colmes and Bob Beckel to name a few.... not to mention, why would anyone want to even be associated with MSNBC? That's nutjob central.

 

[NYcarbineer]

So you are only interested in a pissing contest to see who has the longer list?

Using degrading language doesn't constitute an effective dodge. Yeah, I'm interested in seeing who has the longer list of right AND left on air personalities, that's right. That's what makes BALANCE in a cable news show.. So, longer list. You got one ?

Thanks for tacitly admitting that all you are interested in is a pissing contest.

If you were genuinely interested there would be absolutely nothing stopping you from doing your own research into the guest lists on MSNBC.

But I suspect that isn't your honest intention at all.

Anyone who starts out trumpeting FauxNoise obviously has an agenda.

And there is absolutely nothing "balanced" about the mindless entertainment on FauxNoise. It is there purely to incite the emotions of it's gullible viewers.

Oh, and research has established that FauxNoise viewers are the most ignorant and misinformed.

Have a nice day.

I'm already having a nice day watching you squirming to dodge my challenge to you to come up with a list of conservatives on MSNBC or any liberal media. Looks like all you can do is utter a laughble LIE that Fox News isn't balanced, after I just proved (with your help) that not only is it very balanced, with a lengthy list of liberals on its shows, creating serious DIalogue, but it is extremely balanced, relative to the pathetically UNbalanced MSNBC and many other liberal laughingstocks, and the MONOlogues they present.

As for research, you just got it, and your lack of words contributed to it. Thanks, man.

Joe Scarborough has a 3 hour show in MSNBC. He is a conservative.

What liberal has a 3 hour show on Foxnews?

There are plenty of lefties who regularly appear on Fox... Juan Williams, Allan Colmes and Bob Beckel to name a few....

lol, the question was, which liberal has his own 3 hour show on Fox?

 

[NYcarbineer]

So you are only interested in a pissing contest to see who has the longer list?

Using degrading language doesn't constitute an effective dodge. Yeah, I'm interested in seeing who has the longer list of right AND left on air personalities, that's right. That's what makes BALANCE in a cable news show.. So, longer list. You got one ?

Thanks for tacitly admitting that all you are interested in is a pissing contest.

If you were genuinely interested there would be absolutely nothing stopping you from doing your own research into the guest lists on MSNBC.

But I suspect that isn't your honest intention at all.

Anyone who starts out trumpeting FauxNoise obviously has an agenda.

And there is absolutely nothing "balanced" about the mindless entertainment on FauxNoise. It is there purely to incite the emotions of it's gullible viewers.

Oh, and research has established that FauxNoise viewers are the most ignorant and misinformed.

Have a nice day.

I'm already having a nice day watching you squirming to dodge my challenge to you to come up with a list of conservatives on MSNBC or any liberal media. Looks like all you can do is utter a laughble LIE that Fox News isn't balanced, after I just proved (with your help) that not only is it very balanced, with a lengthy list of liberals on its shows, creating serious DIalogue, but it is extremely balanced, relative to the pathetically UNbalanced MSNBC and many other liberal laughingstocks, and the MONOlogues they present.

As for research, you just got it, and your lack of words contributed to it. Thanks, man.

Joe Scarborough has a 3 hour show in MSNBC. He is a conservative.

What liberal has a 3 hour show on Foxnews?

Geraldo Rivera and Shepard Smith (who's gay) both have their own shows, plus liberals appear regularly on a dozen or more shows. Not so with MSNBC.

They're only liberals to you.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Anyone figure out yet where liberals are losing ground on gay rights?

 

[protectionist]

There are plenty of lefties who regularly appear on Fox... Juan Williams, Allan Colmes and Bob Beckel to name a few....

I just named 19 of them a few posts ago. He knows it.

 

[protectionist]

Your falsehoods are typical of an ignorant FauxNoise sycophant.

FALSEHOODS!! Oh yeah ? And just what "falsehoods" are those, Mr, Islamization Quiz Zero ?

 

[protectionist]

lol, the question was, which liberal has his own 3 hour show on Fox?

Oh, that was the question was it ? Well that question (Post # 583) came AFTER my question (Post # 571) - for how many liberals are on MSNBC. So when you answer my question which came first, then maybe I'll consider answering your much less important question that came secondly. Got it ?

"Now let's see anyone name the conservatives on MSNBC, or is it conservative (singular) - Michael Steele ?"

And maybe you can also try your hand at the Islamization Quiz, and discover that mountain of information that MSNBC has not been reporting to you, all these years. Are you game ?

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Anyone figure out yet where liberals are losing ground on gay rights?

60 Pages in and Gilligan NEEDS to pretend that the whole thing NEVER HAPPENED!

ROFL! Classic Gilligan.

Whatta douche...

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

lol, the question was, which liberal has his own 3 hour show on Fox?

Oh, that was the question was it ? Well that question (Post # 583) came AFTER my question (Post # 571) - for how many liberals are on MSNBC. So when you answer my question which came first, then maybe I'll consider answering your much less important question that came secondly. Got it ?

"Now let's see anyone name the conservatives on MSNBC, or is it conservative (singular) - Michael Steele ?"

And maybe you can also try your hand at the Islamization Quiz, and discover that mountain of information that MSNBC has not been reporting to you, all these years. Are you game ?

First There is nothing Conservative About Scarborough. He's an opportunity PROG.

Second, Alan Combs has his own show on Fox News Radio and is a regular Contributor.

What's more The Most Highly Rated Program on Fix News Cable, is Bill O'Reilly, ALSO an OPPORTUNIST PROG. (O'Reilly has stated many times that "Left-wing Relativism is a Legitimate form of Reasoning, just because you disagree with it, doesn't mean that they don't have a right to say it."

Which is true... disagreeing with it doesn't mean that they don't have a right to say it. What means that they do not have a right to say it, is that it's a lie... Deceit, FRAUDULENTLY advanced as a means to mislead those Ignorant of the deception.

There is no potential right to deceive people through public speech.

THE RIGHT TO SPEAK FREELY is sustained through the RESPONSIBILITY to NOT EXERCISE THE RIGHT TO SPEAK FREELY, IN SUCH A WAY THAT IT INFRINGES UPON THE MEANS OF OTHERS TO EXERCISE THEIR OWN RIGHTS.

Where one misleads others, they injure the means of those people to make sound choices.

Where you injure the means of people to make sound choices YOU INFRINGE UPON THEIR MEANS TO EXERCISE THEIR OWN RIGHTS, by causing them to injure OTHERS... through the effect that their poor choices.

Now... RELATIVISM REJECTS THE OBJECTIVITY THATIS REQUIRED TO EVEN RECOGNIZE ONE'S OWN RESPONSIBILITIES.

See how that works?

 

[Jroc]

You dont understand socialism. Or Nazism. Or a dozen other things. But that doesnt mean you can't spout an opinion about them.
It's what makes America great--idiots sounding off about shit they know nothing about.

Let's see..I provided proof, and you provided emotes and insults...

You claim Hitler was a 'progressive'...and bripat claims Hitler was a socialist...

Yet in 1927 Hitler wrote a pamphlet entitled The Road to Resurgence only meant for the eyes of the top industrialists in Germany to argue that "capitalists had worked their way to the top through their capacity, and on the basis of this selection they have the right to lead." Hitler claimed that national socialism meant all people doing their best for society and posed no threat to the wealth of the rich.

Hitler expressly attacked Marxists, socialism and 'progressives', called for a 'meritocracy' and exalts 'individual personality'


excerpts:

The survival and the future of the various folk groups on this earth depend on:

1. The merit of their own race;

2. The extent to which they accord significance to the role of the individual personality;

3. Recognition of the fact that life in this universe is synonymous with struggle. It is, however, precisely the repudiation of these three great laws to which I attribute our present-day decline rather than to all the petty failures of our current political leadership.

Instead of raising aloft the merits of race and folk, millions of our folk pay homage to the idea of internationality.


The strength and genius of the individual personality are, in line with the absurd nature of democracy, being set aside in favor of majority rule, which amounts to nothing more than weakness and stupidity.

And rather than recognize and affirm the necessity of struggle, people are preaching theories of pacifism, reconciliation among nations, and eternal peace.

...


The National Socialist movement is no parliamentary party. It does not expect that questions involving the fate of the German nation could ever be resolved by majority rule. It is convinced that the spirit it advocates will one day become the spirit of that institution which is all that remains of the old army and, at the same time, the school for the future. The organisation of the military might of a folk, be it large or small, is always intimately connected with a doctrine of the value of individual personality, struggle, and patriotism. Unintentionally and unconsciously, to the extent that the official state becomes more and more corrupt in its folkish content, discredited by its personnel, and filled with pacifistic cowardice, the movement and the army will draw ever closer together.


In these seven years of progressive deformation of the German national body, a state within the state has slowly evolved which ideologically as well as politically will be the Prussia of the coming era.

Stalin preached international socialism.
Hitler preached national socialism.
There was little difference between them.
Hitler's Germany provided a social safety net with cradle to grave benefits (granted, a lot of that he inherited from Bismark). His unions worked hand in hand with industry and government, creating a tight relationship among the three entities. He believed in state planning of the economy.
Hitler was popular with progressives in the US when he started out. Even the Blue Eagle of the NRA was taken from the Nazis.

Hitler preached ULTRA-nationalism, not socialism. He DESPISED Marxists. Hitler BANNED trade unions and union leaders were arrested.

Socialism is NOT a dictatorship...it is a social and economic system characterized by social ownership of the means of production and co-operative management of the economy, as well as a political theory and movement that aims at the establishment of such a system.

You clearly don't understand the difference between socialism, communism and fascism.

They are all big government tyrannies. What you leftist love

Liberals don't support government tyrannies...conservatives do...

Conservatives have NEVER GIVEN US LESS GOVERNMENT...EVER...

I will REPEAT...

Conservatives have NEVER GIVEN US LESS GOVERNMENT...EVER...

Conservatives have given us MORE government and MORE citizens in jails and MORE government tyranny.

They gave us :THE DECIDER"

The Liberty of the individual is today's conservationism or classic liberalism if you prefer. You leftist are tyrants who force people to conform to your leftist ideology. Why is you want more and more government? It certainly isn't to promote individual liberty. Your'e delusional actually, take your medication

 

[ScienceRocks]

Paving our roads, building our bridges, and paying for our police force is something we been doing for hundreds of years. Sounds like common sense!

 

[Bfgrn]

Let's see..I provided proof, and you provided emotes and insults...

You claim Hitler was a 'progressive'...and bripat claims Hitler was a socialist...

Yet in 1927 Hitler wrote a pamphlet entitled The Road to Resurgence only meant for the eyes of the top industrialists in Germany to argue that "capitalists had worked their way to the top through their capacity, and on the basis of this selection they have the right to lead." Hitler claimed that national socialism meant all people doing their best for society and posed no threat to the wealth of the rich.

Hitler expressly attacked Marxists, socialism and 'progressives', called for a 'meritocracy' and exalts 'individual personality'


excerpts:

The survival and the future of the various folk groups on this earth depend on:

1. The merit of their own race;

2. The extent to which they accord significance to the role of the individual personality;

3. Recognition of the fact that life in this universe is synonymous with struggle. It is, however, precisely the repudiation of these three great laws to which I attribute our present-day decline rather than to all the petty failures of our current political leadership.

Instead of raising aloft the merits of race and folk, millions of our folk pay homage to the idea of internationality.


The strength and genius of the individual personality are, in line with the absurd nature of democracy, being set aside in favor of majority rule, which amounts to nothing more than weakness and stupidity.

And rather than recognize and affirm the necessity of struggle, people are preaching theories of pacifism, reconciliation among nations, and eternal peace.

...


The National Socialist movement is no parliamentary party. It does not expect that questions involving the fate of the German nation could ever be resolved by majority rule. It is convinced that the spirit it advocates will one day become the spirit of that institution which is all that remains of the old army and, at the same time, the school for the future. The organisation of the military might of a folk, be it large or small, is always intimately connected with a doctrine of the value of individual personality, struggle, and patriotism. Unintentionally and unconsciously, to the extent that the official state becomes more and more corrupt in its folkish content, discredited by its personnel, and filled with pacifistic cowardice, the movement and the army will draw ever closer together.


In these seven years of progressive deformation of the German national body, a state within the state has slowly evolved which ideologically as well as politically will be the Prussia of the coming era.

Stalin preached international socialism.
Hitler preached national socialism.
There was little difference between them.
Hitler's Germany provided a social safety net with cradle to grave benefits (granted, a lot of that he inherited from Bismark). His unions worked hand in hand with industry and government, creating a tight relationship among the three entities. He believed in state planning of the economy.
Hitler was popular with progressives in the US when he started out. Even the Blue Eagle of the NRA was taken from the Nazis.

Hitler preached ULTRA-nationalism, not socialism. He DESPISED Marxists. Hitler BANNED trade unions and union leaders were arrested.

Socialism is NOT a dictatorship...it is a social and economic system characterized by social ownership of the means of production and co-operative management of the economy, as well as a political theory and movement that aims at the establishment of such a system.

You clearly don't understand the difference between socialism, communism and fascism.

What you dont know would fill the internet.
Hitler banned unions that were not the official approved one, the Nazi Party one.
I dont know what "ultra nationalism" is. Neither do you. His socialism was a national socialism, that socialism should be implemented in each country, rather than the Soviet kind which envisioned an international socialist regime. (Bonus question: What was the anthem of the Communism?)
Co operative management of the economy is exactly what Nazism was. You got that part right.
If anyone does not understand the differences, it is you.

NONE of that is socialism...

You are right comparing Hitler and Stalin...both were right wing dictators...

Socialism is liberal. More people (preferably everyone) have some say in how the economy works. Democracy is liberal. More people (preferably everyone) have some say in how the government works. "Democracy," said Marx, "is the road to socialism." He was wrong about how economics and politics interact, but he did see their similar underpinnings.

Communism is conservative. Fewer and fewer people (preferably just the Party Secretary) have any say in how the economy works. Republicans are conservative. Fewer and fewer people (preferably just people controlling the Party figurehead) have any say in how the government works. The conservatives in the US are in the same position as the communists in the 30s, and for the same reason: Their revolutions failed spectacularly but they refuse to admit what went wrong.


What is so hard to understand about ULTRA -nationalism...Hitler promoted a German racially homogeneous population : a state having ethnic purity.

Socialism is not liberal. Liberalism means private property rights, laissez faire economic policies,and individual liberty. Milton Friedman described himself as a liberal. William F Buckley did too.
Socialism is about state control over the economy. Socialism is about dictating what individuals can and cannot do. Socialism is all about government control.
By your reasoning Japan is an ultra nationalist society. Hint: It isnt.

THIS Milton Friedman?

THIS William F. Buckley?

COMMUNISM is about state control over the economy. COMMUNISM is about dictating what individuals can and cannot do. COMMUNISM is all about government control.

You ARE an idiot.