RandallFlagg
PROUD Tea Party Member
- Dec 5, 2012
- 8,578
- 2,333
So why is it okay to "come out" but not profess the faith?
![]()
Just one more example of the "fundamental transformation".
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So why is it okay to "come out" but not profess the faith?
![]()
So if heterosexuals engage in unprotected anonymous sex does that make whatever gays do OK?
See, the question is irrelevant. Just like your posts.
"The faith" isn't real. Homosexuality is. News organizations should focus on real issues.
Who are you to tell me my faith isn't real? Who is the media to tell me my faith isn't real? Are you nuts?
So if heterosexuals engage in unprotected anonymous sex does that make whatever gays do OK?
See, the question is irrelevant. Just like your posts.
Straight people engage in unprotected sex with folks they barely know, just like Gays.
How is that any of your business?
So if heterosexuals engage in unprotected anonymous sex does that make whatever gays do OK?
See, the question is irrelevant. Just like your posts.
Straight people engage in unprotected sex with folks they barely know, just like Gays.
How is that any of your business?
All you can do is inform and hope some make the correct choice...SAVE the savable."The faith" isn't real. Homosexuality is. News organizations should focus on real issues.
if you don't accept jesus before you die, it will be too late when you find out my faith is real.
Homosexuality would not exist without humans.Homosexuality is less real than religion.
Religion has no biochemical causes or properties.
Homosexuality does. That makes it much more real than religion.
Faith would not exist without humans.
You have no concept of reality because you are incapable of critical thought.
So why is it okay to "come out" but not profess the faith?
![]()
They've been keeping Christians out of professional sports since, when?
Uhh, never. But their views on the other hand are a different story.
So if heterosexuals engage in unprotected anonymous sex does that make whatever gays do OK?
See, the question is irrelevant. Just like your posts.
Straight people engage in unprotected sex with folks they barely know, just like Gays.
How is that any of your business?
Gay people engage in it far more often than straight people and consequently suffer many more diseases. Which is a public health hazard. Which is certainly my business.
So why is it okay to "come out" but not profess the faith?
![]()
They've been keeping Christians out of professional sports since, when?
Uhh, never. But their views on the other hand are a different story.
Straight people engage in unprotected sex with folks they barely know, just like Gays.
How is that any of your business?
Gay people engage in it far more often than straight people and consequently suffer many more diseases. Which is a public health hazard. Which is certainly my business.
Plan on having sex with a gay man?
Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.
Your "faith" is in a fairy tale of an invisible man in the sky whose perfect creation was ruined by a talking snake. Your "faith" isn't real because there isn't an invisible man in the sky nor was there ever a talking snake.Who are you to tell me my faith isn't real? Who is the media to tell me my faith isn't real? Are you nuts?"The faith" isn't real. Homosexuality is. News organizations should focus on real issues.
So if heterosexuals engage in unprotected anonymous sex does that make whatever gays do OK?
See, the question is irrelevant. Just like your posts.
Straight people engage in unprotected sex with folks they barely know, just like Gays.
How is that any of your business?
Gay people engage in it far more often than straight people and consequently suffer many more diseases. Which is a public health hazard. Which is certainly my business.
Straight people engage in unprotected sex with folks they barely know, just like Gays.
How is that any of your business?
Gay people engage in it far more often than straight people and consequently suffer many more diseases. Which is a public health hazard. Which is certainly my business.
I guarantee you that is an incorrect observation.
Uh no. I am correct.Straight people engage in unprotected sex with folks they barely know, just like Gays.
How is that any of your business?
Gay people engage in it far more often than straight people and consequently suffer many more diseases. Which is a public health hazard. Which is certainly my business.
I guarantee you that is an incorrect observation.
Gay people engage in it far more often than straight people and consequently suffer many more diseases. Which is a public health hazard. Which is certainly my business.
I guarantee you that is an incorrect observation.
would you care to give us some statistics on who lives longer?
Comparative prevalence rates of sexually tran... [Am J Epidemiol. 1980] - PubMed - NCBIThis study compared prevalence rates of most common sexually transmitted diseases (STD) in heterosexual and homosexual men who made respectively 12,201 and 5324 visits to an STD clinic over 18 months. Overall, homosexual men were significantly (p < 0.001) more likely than heterosexual men to have gonorrhea (30.31% vs. 19.83%), early syphilis (1.08% vs. 0.34%) and anal warts (2.90% vs. 0.26%) but less likely to have nongonococcal urethritis (NGU) (14.63% vs. 36.40%, p < 0.001), herpes genitalis (0.93% vs. 3.65%, p < 0.001), pediculosis pubis (4.30% vs. 5.35%, p < 0.005), scabies (0.42% vs. 0.76%, p < 0.02), and genital warts (1.68% vs. 6.69%, p < 0.001). In most cases the differences in rates remained significant (p < 0.05) when corrected for age and race. It is speculated that higher rates of gonorrhea and syphilis result from a larger mean number of sexual contacts, more potential sites of infection, and more hidden and asymptomatic disease, while the lower rates of the other STD result from a lesser susceptibility of anal mucosa to the causative agent(s) of NGU, herpes genitalis, and venereal warts or from a lack of pubic apposition (pediculosis pubis).
So if heterosexuals engage in unprotected anonymous sex does that make whatever gays do OK?
See, the question is irrelevant. Just like your posts.
Straight people engage in unprotected sex with folks they barely know, just like Gays.
How is that any of your business?
Gay people engage in it far more often than straight people and consequently suffer many more diseases. Which is a public health hazard. Which is certainly my business.
So if heterosexuals engage in unprotected anonymous sex does that make whatever gays do OK?
See, the question is irrelevant. Just like your posts.
Straight people engage in unprotected sex with folks they barely know, just like Gays.
How is that any of your business?
Gay people engage in it far more often than straight people and consequently suffer many more diseases. Which is a public health hazard. Which is certainly my business.