The liberal march towards EXTREME fascism

[P@triot]

The left has always been fascist in nature (obviously - since fascism is a form of government oppression). But in the past few years, the left has made a rapid march towards extreme fascism.

They engage in massive speech control campaigns. If Donald Trump attempts to hold a political rally - they riot (costing a fortune in damage to public and private property). If someone attempts to merely attend a Donald Trump political rally, the left engages in violent assaults. Fascism.

They engage in massive thought control campaigns. If someone wishes to avoid homosexual acts or homosexual celebrations (whether it be for religious reasons, comfort reasons, or just plain old hate), the left attempts to turn that into a crime and advocates for the government to place a gun to the head of those individuals and force them to take part in the homosexual activities. And of course - they've advocated for and manufactured the comical "hate crime" fallacy. Fascism.

This story here is a remarkable indication of the left's embrace of extreme fascism. It revolves around the "Soldiers of Odin". A group rightfully concerned with radical islam. And yet despite being peaceful while liberals engage in violent assaults, the left wants to label these individuals as a "hate" group. So what happened when this group deployed members to a mosque in Denver? Did they brutally attack and bloody muslims like liberals do? Nope. Quite the contrary - the imam of the mosque invited the group in to sit down and talk. They had a peaceful and cordial interaction?

This "incident" is literally the shining example of America at its finest. Concerned citizens form a group of their own free will. The muslims not only continue to engage in their right to religious freedom - but they invite the concerned group into their mosque to see for themselves and to engage in dialect. Everything America was built on and intended to be. And yet the left is angry about this - desperate to falsely label the group a "hate" group and to eliminate them.

A Growing Vigilante Group Is Targeting U.S. Mosques

You don’t know what fascism is, do you.

Mussolini's Italy was a "Fascist" state where the state controlled everything. Hitler's Nazi government was socialist (National Socialist German Worker's Party) where the state controlled everything. The far-left Democrats want Socialism where the government controls everything. The Republican party wants a smaller central government with less control, thus is neither Fascist nor Socialist, but more about individual rights and freedoms.

Please stop, now your just being stupid.

You’re the one that everyone is laughing at right now, chief. There is no such thing as right-wing totalitarianism. That’s literally as idiotic as saying “small government communism”. They are completely incompatible.

 

[P@triot]

Can YOU explain how the two best known examples of fascist government were right wing Germany and Italy before WWII?

Yeah....uh....neither were “right-wing” snowflake.

Nazi is short for National Socialist. Unless you’re now going to argue that socialism is “right-wing”

You’re asserting that the NAZI party was socialistic? You’re a fucking moron.

Wait...you are “asserting” that it wasn’t?!? Wow. Just....wow. Stupid here is a typical millennial. He literally had no clue that Nazi was short for National Socialist.

 

[otto105]

You need to stop getting hung up on mere words and study meaning.

Were the Nazis Socialists?

Excerpt:

Despite continuing certain Weimar-era social welfare programs, the Nazis proceeded to restrict their availability to “racially worthy” (non-Jewish) beneficiaries. In terms of labor, worker strikes were outlawed. Trade unions were replaced by the party-controlled German Labor Front, primarily tasked with increasing productivity, not protecting workers. In lieu of the socialist ideal of an egalitarian, worker-run state, the National Socialists erected a party-run police state whose governing structure was anti-democratic, rigidly hierarchical, and militaristic in nature. As to the redistribution of wealth, the socialist ideal “From each according to his ability, to each according to his need” was rejected in favor of a credo more on the order of “Take everything that belongs to non-Aryans and keep it for the master race.”

Above all, the Nazis were German white nationalists. What they stood for was the ascendancy of the “Aryan” race and the German nation, by any means necessary. Despite co-opting the name, some of the rhetoric, and even some of the precepts of socialism, Hitler and party did so with utter cynicism, and with vastly different goals. The claim that the Nazis actually were leftists or socialists in any generally accepted sense of those terms flies in the face of historical reality.

 

[P@triot]

In terms of labor, worker strikes were outlawed.

Ok...that is pure communism/marxism/socialism. A totalitarian regime place the needs of the state (and productivity that it needs) above individual rights and liberties.

Trade unions were replaced by the party-controlled German Labor Front, primarily tasked with increasing productivity, not protecting workers.

Ok...that is pure communism/marxism/socialism. A totalitarian regime place the needs of the state (and productivity that it needs) above individual rights and liberties.

As to the redistribution of wealth, the socialist ideal “From each according to his ability, to each according to his need” was rejected in favor of a credo more on the order of “Take everything that belongs to non-Aryans and keep it for the master race.”

Since the plan was to eliminate everyone not considered the “aryan master race”, this was vintage left-wing “from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs”.

Thank you for proving it for me. Fascism is totalitarianism. It is pure left-wing and completely incompatible with the small, limited government ideology of the right.

 

[otto105]

 

[otto105]

In terms of labor, worker strikes were outlawed.

Ok...that is pure communism/marxism/socialism. A totalitarian regime place the needs of the state (and productivity that it needs) above individual rights and liberties.

Trade unions were replaced by the party-controlled German Labor Front, primarily tasked with increasing productivity, not protecting workers.

Ok...that is pure communism/marxism/socialism. A totalitarian regime place the needs of the state (and productivity that it needs) above individual rights and liberties.

As to the redistribution of wealth, the socialist ideal “From each according to his ability, to each according to his need” was rejected in favor of a credo more on the order of “Take everything that belongs to non-Aryans and keep it for the master race.”

Since the plan was to eliminate everyone not considered the “aryan master race”, this was vintage left-wing “from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs”.

Thank you for proving it for me. Fascism is totalitarianism. It is pure left-wing and completely incompatible with the small, limited government ideology of the right.

The only that you have proven is a appalling ability to resist knowledge.

 

[007]

DEMOCRATS control much of academia, and schools and colleges are nothing more than fascist indoctrination centers.

Try and get a speaking gig at UC Berkeley if you're a conservative. It ain't happening. They will RIOT to keep you from speaking.

That's fascism in it's purest form.

 

[danielpalos]

Providing for the general welfare is in our Constitution.

So is the phrase “Congress shall make no law”. So by your very immature, very disingenuous “logic”, we can all conclude that Congress is strictly prohibited from ever making a law or otherwise passing a legislation.

Congress shall make no law

Now what? You’ve completely backed yourself into a corner playing this immature game.

Constitute

Providing for the general warfare and common offense, is not in our Constitution.

 

[danielpalos]

You insist we have a spending problem.

I don’t “insist” we have a spending problem. I only insist that you accept reality (something all progressives can’t bring themselves to do). Revenues to the government are higher than any point in history. Over $4 trillion per year under Barack Insane Obama.

If I were in charge, everything would be properly funded and we would still have $3 trillion left over. A trillion dollars is more than your simple mind can comprehend (part of the problem here).

sure, we would. all the right wing seems to know how to do is cut taxes, and spend and finance.

Would you end the drug war?

 

[danielpalos]

Can YOU explain how the two best known examples of fascist government were right wing Germany and Italy before WWII?

Yeah....uh....neither were “right-wing” snowflake.

Nazi is short for National Socialist. Unless you’re now going to argue that socialism is “right-wing”

it is relative. fascism and national socialism are to the right of liberal socialism.

 

[danielpalos]

The left has always been fascist in nature (obviously - since fascism is a form of government oppression). But in the past few years, the left has made a rapid march towards extreme fascism.

They engage in massive speech control campaigns. If Donald Trump attempts to hold a political rally - they riot (costing a fortune in damage to public and private property). If someone attempts to merely attend a Donald Trump political rally, the left engages in violent assaults. Fascism.

They engage in massive thought control campaigns. If someone wishes to avoid homosexual acts or homosexual celebrations (whether it be for religious reasons, comfort reasons, or just plain old hate), the left attempts to turn that into a crime and advocates for the government to place a gun to the head of those individuals and force them to take part in the homosexual activities. And of course - they've advocated for and manufactured the comical "hate crime" fallacy. Fascism.

This story here is a remarkable indication of the left's embrace of extreme fascism. It revolves around the "Soldiers of Odin". A group rightfully concerned with radical islam. And yet despite being peaceful while liberals engage in violent assaults, the left wants to label these individuals as a "hate" group. So what happened when this group deployed members to a mosque in Denver? Did they brutally attack and bloody muslims like liberals do? Nope. Quite the contrary - the imam of the mosque invited the group in to sit down and talk. They had a peaceful and cordial interaction?

This "incident" is literally the shining example of America at its finest. Concerned citizens form a group of their own free will. The muslims not only continue to engage in their right to religious freedom - but they invite the concerned group into their mosque to see for themselves and to engage in dialect. Everything America was built on and intended to be. And yet the left is angry about this - desperate to falsely label the group a "hate" group and to eliminate them.

A Growing Vigilante Group Is Targeting U.S. Mosques

You don’t know what fascism is, do you.

Mussolini's Italy was a "Fascist" state where the state controlled everything. Hitler's Nazi government was socialist (National Socialist German Worker's Party) where the state controlled everything. The far-left Democrats want Socialism where the government controls everything. The Republican party wants a smaller central government with less control, thus is neither Fascist nor Socialist, but more about individual rights and freedoms.

Please stop, now your just being stupid.

You’re the one that everyone is laughing at right now, chief. There is no such thing as right-wing totalitarianism. That’s literally as idiotic as saying “small government communism”. They are completely incompatible.

View attachment 176578

now we know why the right wing's economic programs never work.

 

[danielpalos]

DEMOCRATS control much of academia, and schools and colleges are nothing more than fascist indoctrination centers.

Try and get a speaking gig at UC Berkeley if you're a conservative. It ain't happening. They will RIOT to keep you from speaking.

That's fascism in it's purest form.

They should make it about morals, instead.

If Only, the right wing could be socially moral for free, even under our form of Capitalism.

 

[P@triot]

The only that you have proven is a appalling ability to resist knowledge.

The political spectrum is not a square, you nitwit. And even if it were - fascism would be on the left. You cannot have small government totalitarianism.

 

[P@triot]

If Only, the right wing could be socially moral for free, even under our form of Capitalism.

Wait...it is your belief that literally taking by force is “socially moral”? If that’s your bat-shit crazy idea of “moral”, I’ll take immoral every time. Where I come, there is nothing “moral” about taking what doesn’t belong to you.

 

[P@triot]

Providing for the general warfare and common offense, is not in our Constitution.

But “Congress shall make no law” is...

 

[LuckyDuck]

The left has always been fascist in nature (obviously - since fascism is a form of government oppression). But in the past few years, the left has made a rapid march towards extreme fascism.

They engage in massive speech control campaigns. If Donald Trump attempts to hold a political rally - they riot (costing a fortune in damage to public and private property). If someone attempts to merely attend a Donald Trump political rally, the left engages in violent assaults. Fascism.

They engage in massive thought control campaigns. If someone wishes to avoid homosexual acts or homosexual celebrations (whether it be for religious reasons, comfort reasons, or just plain old hate), the left attempts to turn that into a crime and advocates for the government to place a gun to the head of those individuals and force them to take part in the homosexual activities. And of course - they've advocated for and manufactured the comical "hate crime" fallacy. Fascism.

This story here is a remarkable indication of the left's embrace of extreme fascism. It revolves around the "Soldiers of Odin". A group rightfully concerned with radical islam. And yet despite being peaceful while liberals engage in violent assaults, the left wants to label these individuals as a "hate" group. So what happened when this group deployed members to a mosque in Denver? Did they brutally attack and bloody muslims like liberals do? Nope. Quite the contrary - the imam of the mosque invited the group in to sit down and talk. They had a peaceful and cordial interaction?

This "incident" is literally the shining example of America at its finest. Concerned citizens form a group of their own free will. The muslims not only continue to engage in their right to religious freedom - but they invite the concerned group into their mosque to see for themselves and to engage in dialect. Everything America was built on and intended to be. And yet the left is angry about this - desperate to falsely label the group a "hate" group and to eliminate them.

A Growing Vigilante Group Is Targeting U.S. Mosques

You don’t know what fascism is, do you.

Mussolini's Italy was a "Fascist" state where the state controlled everything. Hitler's Nazi government was socialist (National Socialist German Worker's Party) where the state controlled everything. The far-left Democrats want Socialism where the government controls everything. The Republican party wants a smaller central government with less control, thus is neither Fascist nor Socialist, but more about individual rights and freedoms.

Please stop, now your just being stupid.

Socialism is so great.......just ask the Venezuelans how great they think it is, if they can take time from searching for dogs to eat.

 

[hadit]

Providing for the general welfare is in our Constitution.

So is the phrase “Congress shall make no law”. So by your very immature, very disingenuous “logic”, we can all conclude that Congress is strictly prohibited from ever making a law or otherwise passing a legislation.

Congress shall make no law

Now what? You’ve completely backed yourself into a corner playing this immature game.

Constitute

Providing for the general warfare and common offense, is not in our Constitution.

Recycled failed excuse no. 7.

 

[basquebromance]

"Socialism will mean the end of constant poverty and deprivation, which exist under capitalism simply because people need to buy what they need. By keeping the majority always desperate for money, exploitative employers can keep compelling those able to work to become wage slaves." - Crazy Bernie

 

[P@triot]

For those on the left who were duped into thinking that fascism is not left-wing...

"Fascism is the stage reached after communism has proved an illusion." - F.A. Hayek

The stage after communism. As in, the next step to the left. One cannot have right-wing totalitarianism. The further right you go, government gets smaller and weaker until it completely disappears (anarchy).

 

[P@triot]

The facists are at it again. Terrified of the free exchange of ideas and information...

Students Call Conservative Speaker ‘Fascist’