The liberal march towards EXTREME fascism

[bripat9643]

Unless, of course, it is different than the political spectrums taught in the colleges and universities.

That’s your favorite go-to ignorant claim. Unless you’ve attended every single university in the U.S., you couldn’t possibly know what is “taught in college and universities”. So here again we see you flat out lying.

I’ve produced multiple PhD’s and a world-renowned political scientist and Nobel prize winner who clearly, concisely, and indisputably explain how fascism is exclusively left-wing. You won’t even attempt to explain your uninformed opinion. Game over. You lose.

She is right: That is what's taught in universities, but that doesn't make it right. That's the logical fallacy known as "the appeal to authority."

 

[P@triot]

I don't think high school students should be allowed to read some of this garbage. Can one imagine a student going to school and saying fascism is left wing. Of course the ordinary college student already knows fascism is right wing.

So you continue to run your mouth like an immature progressive but you’re never able to explain how fascism could possibly be to the right of libertarianism.

Come faux “intellect” - step up and explain your work. I’ve already owned you by backing up my posts with work from PhD’s (F.A. Hayek, Dinesh D’Souza). Not only have you failed to post anything of substance, you’re afraid to even attempt to explain your position (that’s because you know you’ll be eaten alive).

I sure don't have to explain my position. Communism is left and Fascism is right. Liberals are left and Conservatives are right. One needs no PhD's to back up that take on political ideologies, Unless, of course, it is different than the political spectrums taught in the colleges and universities.

"Communism is left and Fascism is right?"

That's your argument? Yeah, you sure don't need no stinkin PHD to vomit up that piece of "logic." Even a brain damaged snowflake can understand it. You're a fucking genius!

Let's see if I can do it:

Right wingers are brilliant and leftwingers are morons. "One needs no PhD's to back up that take on political ideologies"

I did it!

You forgot to preface your comment with the absolutely brilliant “I sure don’t have to explain my position” staetemnt!

 

[bripat9643]

I don't think high school students should be allowed to read some of this garbage. Can one imagine a student going to school and saying fascism is left wing. Of course the ordinary college student already knows fascism is right wing.

So you continue to run your mouth like an immature progressive but you’re never able to explain how fascism could possibly be to the right of libertarianism.

Come faux “intellect” - step up and explain your work. I’ve already owned you by backing up my posts with work from PhD’s (F.A. Hayek, Dinesh D’Souza). Not only have you failed to post anything of substance, you’re afraid to even attempt to explain your position (that’s because you know you’ll be eaten alive).

I sure don't have to explain my position. Communism is left and Fascism is right. Liberals are left and Conservatives are right. One needs no PhD's to back up that take on political ideologies, Unless, of course, it is different than the political spectrums taught in the colleges and universities.

"Communism is left and Fascism is right?"

That's your argument? Yeah, you sure don't need no stinkin PHD to vomit up that piece of "logic." Even a brain damaged snowflake can understand it. You're a fucking genius!

Let's see if I can do it:

Right wingers are brilliant and leftwingers are morons. "One needs no PhD's to back up that take on political ideologies"

I did it!

You forgot to preface your comment with the absolutely brilliant “I sure don’t have to explain my position” staetemnt!

I hate it when that happens!

 

[danielpalos]

Everybody knows, liberal socialism is more liberal than national socialism.

 

[regent]

Must have hit a nerve or a doubtful premise, but don't be scared girls, you can still make all the political or economic definitions you want.

 

[regent]

.

I sure don't have to explain my position.

Things aren’t so because you say they are or you believe they are. You can’t explain your irrational, bat-shit crazy position because it’s 100% false. Fascism is pure totalitarianism. You cannot have right-wing totalitarianism. Totalitarianism is exclusively left-wing.

Nazi was short for national socialist. There is no such thing as right-wing socialism you freaking high school drop-out (literally). You admitted you dropped out of high school and it really shows.

After I dropped high school my next school was college, eight years of it.
I don't have to defend definitions of political ideologies because others with more expertise than we have, do a good job. Are you saying Nazism was left wing because it used the word "socialism" in its title?. Maybe you're right; would Hitler lie?






tthe totali

 

[regent]

Unless, of course, it is different than the political spectrums taught in the colleges and universities.

That’s your favorite go-to ignorant claim. Unless you’ve attended every single university in the U.S., you couldn’t possibly know what is “taught in college and universities”. So here again we see you flat out lying.

I’ve produced multiple PhD’s and a world-renowned political scientist and Nobel prize winner who clearly, concisely, and indisputably explain how fascism is exclusively left-wing. You won’t even attempt to explain your uninformed opinion. Game over. You lose.

She is right: That is what's taught in universities, but that doesn't make it right. That's the logical fallacy known as "the appeal to authority."

And where is it written that appeal to authority is a fallacy?

 

[P@triot]

And where is it written that appeal to authority is a fallacy?

Tell us, ignorant one, where is it written that one “sure doesn’t have to explain their position”?

Ever notice you completely fail to hold yourself to the same standard you expect out of everyone else? That is known as “ignorant partisan hack”.

 

[P@triot]

Must have hit a nerve...

Ignorance usually does!

 

[P@triot]

Are you saying Nazism was left wing because it used the word "socialism" in its title?

More importantly...they used socialism in their actions.

Maybe you're right; would Hitler lie?

Hitler would lie. That’s why you ignore what people say and look at what they do. Fascism is total government control. You cannot have right-wing totalitarianism. That is literally as absurd as saying “promiscuous abstinence”. If one is promiscuous, it is literally impossible to be abstinent. And if one is totalitarian, it is literally impossible for them to be right-wing.

 

[P@triot]

I don't have to defend definitions of political ideologies because others with more expertise than we have, do a good job.

We weren’t talking about “definitions”. You specifically said “my position”. And I specifically asked you to explain “your position”. Completely different from “definitions”.

 

[P@triot]

After I dropped high school my next school was college, eight years of it.

That’s a lot of college. Did you earn your PhD?

 

[P@triot]

Are you saying Nazism was left wing because it used the word "socialism" in its title?

So far I’ve given you a Nobel Prize winner, multiple PhD’s, common sense, logic, explanations, and more. Now I’ll add a former President of the United States as well.

 

[regent]

After I dropped high school my next school was college, eight years of it.

That’s a lot of college. Did you earn your PhD?

No, the college units beyond the BA were job requirements.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

The left has always been fascist in nature (obviously - since fascism is a form of government oppression). But in the past few years, the left has made a rapid march towards extreme fascism.

Nah, I'd just call it extreme liberalism. Identity politics. Fascism would imply a dictatorship, and I don't think either party wants that.

They engage in massive speech control campaigns. If Donald Trump attempts to hold a political rally - they riot (costing a fortune in damage to public and private property). If someone attempts to merely attend a Donald Trump political rally, the left engages in violent assaults. Fascism.

Campaigns? People protesting something/someone they don't like is a common thing in the history of this country. By the sheer amount of protests, it would seem people just flat out don't like the Orange Virus. I hate to break it to you. This probably wouldn't happen so much if he wasn't such an unlikable douche canoe, BTW.

They engage in massive thought control campaigns. If someone wishes to avoid homosexual acts or homosexual celebrations (whether it be for religious reasons, comfort reasons, or just plain old hate), the left attempts to turn that into a crime and advocates for the government to place a gun to the head of those individuals and force them to take part in the homosexual activities. And of course - they've advocated for and manufactured the comical "hate crime" fallacy. Fascism.

Now this sounds like you're just gaslighting. If heterosexual people are being forced into participating in homosexual activities at gun point, I'm right there with you in denouncing it. However, you're being overly dramatic and that isn't reality outside of one of two isolated incidents probably taken out of context. The data just doesn't support this amount of outrage and spin.

This story here is a remarkable indication of the left's embrace of extreme fascism. It revolves around the "Soldiers of Odin". A group rightfully concerned with radical islam. And yet despite being peaceful while liberals engage in violent assaults, the left wants to label these individuals as a "hate" group. So what happened when this group deployed members to a mosque in Denver? Did they brutally attack and bloody muslims like liberals do? Nope. Quite the contrary - the imam of the mosque invited the group in to sit down and talk. They had a peaceful and cordial interaction?

This "incident" is literally the shining example of America at its finest. Concerned citizens form a group of their own free will. The muslims not only continue to engage in their right to religious freedom - but they invite the concerned group into their mosque to see for themselves and to engage in dialect. Everything America was built on and intended to be. And yet the left is angry about this - desperate to falsely label the group a "hate" group and to eliminate them.

A Growing Vigilante Group Is Targeting U.S. Mosques

Yeah, I'm not a big fan of vigilante groups in general, and some of these guys have ties with white supremacists. This particular interaction may have been peaceful, and that's terrific. You never know how the next one will be with people taking the law into their own hands. I'll pass.

 

[bripat9643]

Unless, of course, it is different than the political spectrums taught in the colleges and universities.

That’s your favorite go-to ignorant claim. Unless you’ve attended every single university in the U.S., you couldn’t possibly know what is “taught in college and universities”. So here again we see you flat out lying.

I’ve produced multiple PhD’s and a world-renowned political scientist and Nobel prize winner who clearly, concisely, and indisputably explain how fascism is exclusively left-wing. You won’t even attempt to explain your uninformed opinion. Game over. You lose.

She is right: That is what's taught in universities, but that doesn't make it right. That's the logical fallacy known as "the appeal to authority."

And where is it written that appeal to authority is a fallacy?

ROFL! You are dumber than I ever imagined. usually dumbasses like you tell me it's not a fallacy if you refer to a "valid authority." That only proves they don't understand why it's a fallacy. You don't understand that it is a fallacy.

 

[P@triot]

The left has always been fascist in nature (obviously - since fascism is a form of government oppression). But in the past few years, the left has made a rapid march towards extreme fascism.

Nah, I'd just call it extreme liberalism. Identity politics. Fascism would imply a dictatorship, and I don't think either party wants that.

Well then thinking is clearly not your strong point. When Barack Insane Obama was in office and held the super-majority in Congress, the Dumbocrats surrendered their entire authority. They allowed Obama to craft legislation via Executive Orders and Presidential Memorandums. A power explicitly reserved for the House. Not only did Congress do nothing, they actually squealed with glee about it.

Progressives absolutely want a dictatorship (so long as it is their dic in power). They feel that discussion is too slow and voting blocks their agenda.

 

[P@triot]

They engage in massive speech control campaigns. If Donald Trump attempts to hold a political rally - they riot (costing a fortune in damage to public and private property). If someone attempts to merely attend a Donald Trump political rally, the left engages in violent assaults. Fascism.

Campaigns? People protesting something/someone they don't like is a common thing in the history of this country. By the sheer amount of protests, it would seem people just flat out don't like the Orange Virus. I hate to break it to you. This probably wouldn't happen so much if he wasn't such an unlikable douche canoe, BTW.

Tell us something...why are you being an immature, disingenuous dick right now? Protesting is a staple of this nation. But that’s not what the left is doing. They were - and they continue to - engage in horrific acts of violence. Setting a limousine on fire is not “protesting”. Assaulting people wearing Trump merchandise is not “protesting”. Rioting to the point where the Trump rally in Chicago is shut down is not “protesting”.

If you can’t engage in an honest conversation, just go away. Nobody is interested in discussions with a disingenuous dick just looking to get a reaction from people.

 

[P@triot]

They engage in massive thought control campaigns. If someone wishes to avoid homosexual acts or homosexual celebrations (whether it be for religious reasons, comfort reasons, or just plain old hate), the left attempts to turn that into a crime and advocates for the government to place a gun to the head of those individuals and force them to take part in the homosexual activities. And of course - they've advocated for and manufactured the comical "hate crime" fallacy. Fascism.

Now this sounds like you're just gaslighting. If heterosexual people are being forced into participating in homosexual activities at gun point, I'm right there with you in denouncing it. However, you're being overly dramatic and that isn't reality outside of one of two isolated incidents probably taken out of context. The data just doesn't support this amount of outrage and spin.

Now this sounds like you’re just flat-out ignorant. The fact is, the U.S. government has placed a gun to the head of the American people and forced them to participate in homosexual activities. Farms have been forced to host homosexual weddings. Bakers have been forced to bake cakes for homosexuals weddings.

These are indisputable facts. You’re not informed enough to be discussing these issues. Perhaps a forum on Keeping Up With The Kardashian’s would be more to your liking?

 

[danielpalos]

Must have hit a nerve or a doubtful premise, but don't be scared girls, you can still make all the political or economic definitions you want.

Socialism must start with a clearly defined, social Contract.