Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Another moron proves my pointWhat this thug's parents have done is shown us all EXACTLY why he's growing up as a thug.They won't think it's so funny when they lose a million dollar judgement.
The only ones who will lose are his dumb ass arrogant parents.
Your keep talking about these mythical law suits like they’ve already happened and they haven’t. The legal costs of filing would be in the range of a $100,000 and the law firm will want that money up front.
You’re confusing “Chill Letters” with law suits. I can send you a chill letter saying I’m going to sue YOU for slander because you called me a moron. And you’ll laugh and throw it in the garbage.
That these lawyers did and that’s what the recipients of those ridiculous letters will do.
Get back to us when they starting filing Motions.
Only black teens like Travon Martin get to be called thugs
White Catholic Boys like Sandmann are “precocious”
The Martin boy was a thug, however, and it had nothing to do with the fact that he was an African American. He did attack someone he described as a "creepy ass-cracker", an apparent gay slur against a proud Latino man who was oozing with machismo.
Personally, I think that Trayvon got off easy, considering who he chose to pick a fight with.
People reported and commented on the information that was available at the timeAs I have already pointed out, he doesn't need to. He's not a public figure. Proving malicious intent is only required if you are a public figure.In the case of the Guardian he is probably suing in British Court, and they don't have the amendment there.
As for over here, the 1st amendment doesn't protect you from malicious slander or libel, the hard part is proving malicious intent.
We will see. It is very very hard to prove libel or slander regardless.
That is not slander
Nothing that is known now, wasn't known to the All Powerful Media on the day the event happened. The Black Congressional Israelites were very well known to Bezos' Washington Post staff.
There was initially one video of the confrontation
All stories are incomplete immediately after they happenPeople reported and commented on the information that was available at the timeAs I have already pointed out, he doesn't need to. He's not a public figure. Proving malicious intent is only required if you are a public figure.In the case of the Guardian he is probably suing in British Court, and they don't have the amendment there.
As for over here, the 1st amendment doesn't protect you from malicious slander or libel, the hard part is proving malicious intent.
We will see. It is very very hard to prove libel or slander regardless.
That is not slander
They did zero due diligence, and reported an erroneous incomplete story.
By the time the media got ahold of the story it was rampant on social media. That is how today’s news cycle works
Unless the media intentionally fabricated or altered the information, there is no case
All stories are incomplete immediately after they happenPeople reported and commented on the information that was available at the timeAs I have already pointed out, he doesn't need to. He's not a public figure. Proving malicious intent is only required if you are a public figure.In the case of the Guardian he is probably suing in British Court, and they don't have the amendment there.
As for over here, the 1st amendment doesn't protect you from malicious slander or libel, the hard part is proving malicious intent.
We will see. It is very very hard to prove libel or slander regardless.
That is not slander
They did zero due diligence, and reported an erroneous incomplete story.
By the time the media got ahold of the story it was rampant on social media. That is how today’s news cycle works
Unless the media intentionally fabricated or altered the information, there is no case
Martin got into trouble many times. His Mom and Dad pawning him off to each other as they lived a couple hundred miles away from each other. The neighborhood had crimes in it. Enough to hire a guard with a weapon. After the incident Obama got involved. The charges against the guard were maxed out. If a lesser charge was included, he would have been found guilty and put into prison doing 12 years or so as the judge was a progressive socialist.What this thug's parents have done is shown us all EXACTLY why he's growing up as a thug.They won't think it's so funny when they lose a million dollar judgement.Kathy Griffin and Jim Carrey
The only ones who will lose are his dumb ass arrogant parents.
Your keep talking about these mythical law suits like they’ve already happened and they haven’t. The legal costs of filing would be in the range of a $100,000 and the law firm will want that money up front.
You’re confusing “Chill Letters” with law suits. I can send you a chill letter saying I’m going to sue YOU for slander because you called me a moron. And you’ll laugh and throw it in the garbage.
That these lawyers did and that’s what the recipients of those ridiculous letters will do.
Get back to us when they starting filing Motions.
Only black teens like Travon Martin get to be called thugs
White Catholic Boys like Sandmann are “precocious”
What this thug's parents have done is shown us all EXACTLY why he's growing up as a thug.They won't think it's so funny when they lose a million dollar judgement.Kathy Griffin and Jim Carrey
The only ones who will lose are his dumb ass arrogant parents.
Your keep talking about these mythical law suits like they’ve already happened and they haven’t. The legal costs of filing would be in the range of a $100,000 and the law firm will want that money up front.
You’re confusing “Chill Letters” with law suits. I can send you a chill letter saying I’m going to sue YOU for slander because you called me a moron. And you’ll laugh and throw it in the garbage.
That these lawyers did and that’s what the recipients of those ridiculous letters will do.
Get back to us when they starting filing Motions.
Only black teens like Travon Martin get to be called thugs
White Catholic Boys like Sandmann are “precocious”
The Martin boy was a thug, however, and it had nothing to do with the fact that he was an African American. He did attack someone he described as a "creepy ass-cracker", an apparent gay slur against a proud Latino man who was oozing with machismo.
Personally, I think that Trayvon got off easy, considering who he chose to pick a fight with.
What this thug's parents have done is shown us all EXACTLY why he's growing up as a thug.They won't think it's so funny when they lose a million dollar judgement.
The only ones who will lose are his dumb ass arrogant parents.
Your keep talking about these mythical law suits like they’ve already happened and they haven’t. The legal costs of filing would be in the range of a $100,000 and the law firm will want that money up front.
You’re confusing “Chill Letters” with law suits. I can send you a chill letter saying I’m going to sue YOU for slander because you called me a moron. And you’ll laugh and throw it in the garbage.
That these lawyers did and that’s what the recipients of those ridiculous letters will do.
Get back to us when they starting filing Motions.
Only black teens like Travon Martin get to be called thugs
White Catholic Boys like Sandmann are “precocious”
The Martin boy was a thug, however, and it had nothing to do with the fact that he was an African American. He did attack someone he described as a "creepy ass-cracker", an apparent gay slur against a proud Latino man who was oozing with machismo.
Personally, I think that Trayvon got off easy, considering who he chose to pick a fight with.
The Martin boy was not a "thug". He had never been arrested or been in any trouble. The right demonized him, as they do all non-white victims of white violence.
He called him a "creepy-ass cracker", not an "ass-cracker". "Cracker" is southern slang for "low class white guy". Zimmerman is exactly that. A racist POS whose entire life since that night is a reflection of the piece of slime he truly is.
-------------------------------------------- we will see DragonLady !!Once again, you don't know your ass from a hole in the ground when it comes to the law.The parents and the law firm have a contingency fee arrangement. Go look that up before you continue to spout your idiocies.------------------------------------------------------- and i might be mistaken about the CONTINGENCY BASIS DragonLady . --- Sandmann family hires lawyer specializing in libel, slander --- looks like it may be a straight Hire of L.LIN. WOOD a famous lawyer specializing in LIBEL and Slander cases since about 1996 . Lawyer Wood is supposed to be a good lawyer . As regards payment for the Lawyer , the Sandman Parents may have lots of money to pay Lawyers DragonLady .
It's amazing how fast lawyers go through "lots of money", when litigation is involved. It would take an army of junior lawyers and paralegals to prepare that many Statements of Claim, and Motions, file them, have them served, prepare affidavits of service, and file them with the court, and make sure all deadlines for filing and responding to motions are met.
Then there's billing software. There's a clock attacked to your lawyer's phone. When you call, he enters your file number into the phone before he picks up and you will be billed at your lawyer's going rate from the second he picks up until the moment you hang up. Even if the conversation devolves into what are your plans for the weekend, you will be billed at the rate of $600+ per hour for that phone call. A 10 minute phone call costs you $100 at the rate of $600 per hour. The same things happen when you call the the clerks and the juniors, but their billing rates are lower. Imagine a one hour co-ordinating meeting between the clerks, juniors and senior lawyers working this file. Even an half hour meeting would be billed out at $2000 plus depending on the size of the team.
Clerks are billed out at $150 per hour, Juniors at $300.00 The litigation lawyer at the small town law firm I worked at just before I retired for good, was charging $2500 for a court appearance. He's not famous nor does he have a big reputation. Each Statement of Claim has to be specific, about what you are claiming the other party did to harm you, so you can't just cut and past the information from one to another. A simple uncontested divorce, can easily run to $10,000 with meetings to negotiate settlements, dealing with child custody matters, and changing title to stocks bonds and property. A fully contested knock down drag out can run to $500,000 or more, depending on how angry and vindictive you want to be. And that's one lawsuit. There threatening to sue more than 50 individuals and corporations. At $100,000 per which is very a conservative cost for one lawsuit, that's $5,000,000.
And the whole process is about two years off your life. Is this how you want your son to spend his teenage years, being dragged from court house to court house for depositions, testimony and hearings? Really?
There is no way this family comes off looking good. They're parading this boy on news shows and all it shows is how painfully young he is, and how the teachers and the chaperones should never have let children this young get involved in any of this. They should have told them to ignore the crazy black guys yelling at them and told the driver to pick them up somewhere else.
Litigation is the failure of all other processes. What other processes have these people tried, and what are they lookiing for in terms of redress, and last but not least why? What has happened to this point is a story those kids can dine out on for years to come. If it doesn't end now, if they get used by the right to "make a point", they may well destroy their son's childhood and his future. I'm not joking.
Then there will be no lawsuits. No legal firm can afford to run 50 big money lawsuits for one client, on contingency. Look for at the costs per law suit again. Especially one where they have no case.
You go with that Skippy. I checked into who this guy has worked for in the past, and he worked for people who were actually slandered. He knows this is a loser case, but the father is a fool and a fool and his money are soon parted.
------------------------------------ you spout silly thoughts but in response . The TRUMP would be in the news and he likes being in the news eh 'english' ??They lied about his actions. That's libel. Open-and-shut case.Libel law does not protect snowflakes from people having opinions about their deplorable actionsSince when does the First Amendment make it legal to libel someone?How will he get the 1st amendment repealed?It's a long list of mostly wealthy people and companies. Sandmann is going to be a rich boy when this is all over:
Lawyers for Catholic Student Nick Sandmann Prepare to Sue for Libel
According to the Enquirer, the long list of people and outlets targeted includes:
- The Washington Post
- The New York Times
- Cable News Network, Inc. (CNN)
- The Guardian
- National Public Radio
- TMZ
- Atlantic Media Inc.
- Capitol Hill Publishing Corp.
- Diocese of Covington
- Diocese of Lexington
- Archdiocese of Louisville
- Diocese of Baltimore
- Ana Cabrera
- Sara Sidner
- Erin Burnett
- S.E. Cupp
- Elliot C. McLaughlin
- Amanda Watts
- Emanuella Grinberg
- Michelle Boorstein
- Cleve R. Wootson Jr.
- Antonio Olivo
- Joe Heim
- Michael E. Miller
- Eli Rosenberg
- Isaac Stanley-Becker
- Kristine Phillips
- Sarah Mervosh
- Emily S. Rueb
- Maggie Haberman
- David Brooks
- Shannon Doyne
- Kurt Eichenwald
- Andrea Mitchell
- Savannah Guthrie
- Joy Reid
- Chuck Todd
- Noah Berlatsky
- Elisha Fieldstadt
- Eun Kyung Kim
- HBO
- Bill Maher
- Warner Media
- Conde Nast
- GQ
- Heavy.com
- The Hill
- The Atlantic
- Bustle.com
- Ilhan Omar
- Elizabeth Warren
- Kathy Griffin
- Alyssa Milano
- Jim Carrey
Can you provide proof that these media outlets knowingly and wilfully told a lie...
If you can prove that...
Then Trump is truly screwed... He will be inundated with civil suits... Wow that would be huge... Endless lawsuit after another... Hey I hope the kid wins, Trump would go broke..
Now you are making shit upPeople reported and commented on the information that was available at the timeAs I have already pointed out, he doesn't need to. He's not a public figure. Proving malicious intent is only required if you are a public figure.
We will see. It is very very hard to prove libel or slander regardless.
That is not slander
Nothing that is known now, wasn't known to the All Powerful Media on the day the event happened. The Black Congressional Israelites were very well known to Bezos' Washington Post staff.
There was initially one video of the confrontation
The media only showed one video initially- all of the videos existed right from the start.
What this thug's parents have done is shown us all EXACTLY why he's growing up as a thug.The only ones who will lose are his dumb ass arrogant parents.
Your keep talking about these mythical law suits like they’ve already happened and they haven’t. The legal costs of filing would be in the range of a $100,000 and the law firm will want that money up front.
You’re confusing “Chill Letters” with law suits. I can send you a chill letter saying I’m going to sue YOU for slander because you called me a moron. And you’ll laugh and throw it in the garbage.
That these lawyers did and that’s what the recipients of those ridiculous letters will do.
Get back to us when they starting filing Motions.
Only black teens like Travon Martin get to be called thugs
White Catholic Boys like Sandmann are “precocious”
The Martin boy was a thug, however, and it had nothing to do with the fact that he was an African American. He did attack someone he described as a "creepy ass-cracker", an apparent gay slur against a proud Latino man who was oozing with machismo.
Personally, I think that Trayvon got off easy, considering who he chose to pick a fight with.
The Martin boy was not a "thug". He had never been arrested or been in any trouble. The right demonized him, as they do all non-white victims of white violence.
He called him a "creepy-ass cracker", not an "ass-cracker". "Cracker" is southern slang for "low class white guy". Zimmerman is exactly that. A racist POS whose entire life since that night is a reflection of the piece of slime he truly is.
Zimmerman wasn't white at all, so calling him a "cracker" would not have made sense. "Ass-cracker" is a homophobic slur, and was what was directed at the Latino gentleman, at least according to the fat chick that Martin was gabbing on the phone to.
no, they had the entire video.The original feed and produced video came from one person, not a journalist and not employed by any company.Since when does the First Amendment make it legal to libel someone?How will he get the 1st amendment repealed?It's a long list of mostly wealthy people and companies. Sandmann is going to be a rich boy when this is all over:
Lawyers for Catholic Student Nick Sandmann Prepare to Sue for Libel
According to the Enquirer, the long list of people and outlets targeted includes:
- The Washington Post
- The New York Times
- Cable News Network, Inc. (CNN)
- The Guardian
- National Public Radio
- TMZ
- Atlantic Media Inc.
- Capitol Hill Publishing Corp.
- Diocese of Covington
- Diocese of Lexington
- Archdiocese of Louisville
- Diocese of Baltimore
- Ana Cabrera
- Sara Sidner
- Erin Burnett
- S.E. Cupp
- Elliot C. McLaughlin
- Amanda Watts
- Emanuella Grinberg
- Michelle Boorstein
- Cleve R. Wootson Jr.
- Antonio Olivo
- Joe Heim
- Michael E. Miller
- Eli Rosenberg
- Isaac Stanley-Becker
- Kristine Phillips
- Sarah Mervosh
- Emily S. Rueb
- Maggie Haberman
- David Brooks
- Shannon Doyne
- Kurt Eichenwald
- Andrea Mitchell
- Savannah Guthrie
- Joy Reid
- Chuck Todd
- Noah Berlatsky
- Elisha Fieldstadt
- Eun Kyung Kim
- HBO
- Bill Maher
- Warner Media
- Conde Nast
- GQ
- Heavy.com
- The Hill
- The Atlantic
- Bustle.com
- Ilhan Omar
- Elizabeth Warren
- Kathy Griffin
- Alyssa Milano
- Jim Carrey
What this thug's parents have done is shown us all EXACTLY why he's growing up as a thug.
Only black teens like Travon Martin get to be called thugs
White Catholic Boys like Sandmann are “precocious”
The Martin boy was a thug, however, and it had nothing to do with the fact that he was an African American. He did attack someone he described as a "creepy ass-cracker", an apparent gay slur against a proud Latino man who was oozing with machismo.
Personally, I think that Trayvon got off easy, considering who he chose to pick a fight with.
The Martin boy was not a "thug". He had never been arrested or been in any trouble. The right demonized him, as they do all non-white victims of white violence.
He called him a "creepy-ass cracker", not an "ass-cracker". "Cracker" is southern slang for "low class white guy". Zimmerman is exactly that. A racist POS whose entire life since that night is a reflection of the piece of slime he truly is.
Zimmerman wasn't white at all, so calling him a "cracker" would not have made sense. "Ass-cracker" is a homophobic slur, and was what was directed at the Latino gentleman, at least according to the fat chick that Martin was gabbing on the phone to.
Zimmerman was a white man to that black child. Cracker is standard southern slang for a low class white guy. I realize that slang terms have different meaning in different regions. Cracker is what a black kid in Florida would call a POS white guy.
from what i understand the famous Lawyer is taking the case with no cost to the Sandman family DragonLady . Think thats its said that the Lawyer is taking the case on a Contingency basis and will get paid if he wins for the Sandmans DragonLady .
Then it will never get to court. He's fishing for settlements.
These law firms take high profile cases for the publicity but publicity does them no good if they can't deliver the goods. This case is a loser. Without damages, there is no claim. They're high school kids. How have they been harmed in any quantifiable way? That's what slander is all about. Slander is public lies about you which causes you financial harm. What financial harm have these children suffered?
Ah, no again, you may want to look up "slander"....dumbass.
Could you clarify your condensed version of what you know you are talking about?no, they had the entire video.The original feed and produced video came from one person, not a journalist and not employed by any company.Since when does the First Amendment make it legal to libel someone?How will he get the 1st amendment repealed?It's a long list of mostly wealthy people and companies. Sandmann is going to be a rich boy when this is all over:
Lawyers for Catholic Student Nick Sandmann Prepare to Sue for Libel
According to the Enquirer, the long list of people and outlets targeted includes:
- The Washington Post
- The New York Times
- Cable News Network, Inc. (CNN)
- The Guardian
- National Public Radio
- TMZ
- Atlantic Media Inc.
- Capitol Hill Publishing Corp.
- Diocese of Covington
- Diocese of Lexington
- Archdiocese of Louisville
- Diocese of Baltimore
- Ana Cabrera
- Sara Sidner
- Erin Burnett
- S.E. Cupp
- Elliot C. McLaughlin
- Amanda Watts
- Emanuella Grinberg
- Michelle Boorstein
- Cleve R. Wootson Jr.
- Antonio Olivo
- Joe Heim
- Michael E. Miller
- Eli Rosenberg
- Isaac Stanley-Becker
- Kristine Phillips
- Sarah Mervosh
- Emily S. Rueb
- Maggie Haberman
- David Brooks
- Shannon Doyne
- Kurt Eichenwald
- Andrea Mitchell
- Savannah Guthrie
- Joy Reid
- Chuck Todd
- Noah Berlatsky
- Elisha Fieldstadt
- Eun Kyung Kim
- HBO
- Bill Maher
- Warner Media
- Conde Nast
- GQ
- Heavy.com
- The Hill
- The Atlantic
- Bustle.com
- Ilhan Omar
- Elizabeth Warren
- Kathy Griffin
- Alyssa Milano
- Jim Carrey
---------------------------- hey , i'm not arguing and i have no predictions . Story is still in the news and on this board and thats the best advertisement and argument against the 'indian' and pretend 'vietnam veteran' and those like him . Because of the videos people can see and judge for themselves . We will see what happens as time goes by DLady .from what i understand the famous Lawyer is taking the case with no cost to the Sandman family DragonLady . Think thats its said that the Lawyer is taking the case on a Contingency basis and will get paid if he wins for the Sandmans DragonLady .
Then it will never get to court. He's fishing for settlements.
These law firms take high profile cases for the publicity but publicity does them no good if they can't deliver the goods. This case is a loser. Without damages, there is no claim. They're high school kids. How have they been harmed in any quantifiable way? That's what slander is all about. Slander is public lies about you which causes you financial harm. What financial harm have these children suffered?
Ah, no again, you may want to look up "slander"....dumbass.
Slander involves proving that someone has lied about you. Nobody lied about these kids.
I don't have the video, so I have no versions of anything. It's those bigot baiters that had the entire video and choose to ignore the facts from the video. It is now time in this loony land of human haters to finally have them reap the rewards of their effort. Lawsuit seems to be the right tool for that story.Could you clarify your condensed version of what you know you are talking about?no, they had the entire video.The original feed and produced video came from one person, not a journalist and not employed by any company.Since when does the First Amendment make it legal to libel someone?How will he get the 1st amendment repealed?It's a long list of mostly wealthy people and companies. Sandmann is going to be a rich boy when this is all over:
Lawyers for Catholic Student Nick Sandmann Prepare to Sue for Libel
According to the Enquirer, the long list of people and outlets targeted includes:
- The Washington Post
- The New York Times
- Cable News Network, Inc. (CNN)
- The Guardian
- National Public Radio
- TMZ
- Atlantic Media Inc.
- Capitol Hill Publishing Corp.
- Diocese of Covington
- Diocese of Lexington
- Archdiocese of Louisville
- Diocese of Baltimore
- Ana Cabrera
- Sara Sidner
- Erin Burnett
- S.E. Cupp
- Elliot C. McLaughlin
- Amanda Watts
- Emanuella Grinberg
- Michelle Boorstein
- Cleve R. Wootson Jr.
- Antonio Olivo
- Joe Heim
- Michael E. Miller
- Eli Rosenberg
- Isaac Stanley-Becker
- Kristine Phillips
- Sarah Mervosh
- Emily S. Rueb
- Maggie Haberman
- David Brooks
- Shannon Doyne
- Kurt Eichenwald
- Andrea Mitchell
- Savannah Guthrie
- Joy Reid
- Chuck Todd
- Noah Berlatsky
- Elisha Fieldstadt
- Eun Kyung Kim
- HBO
- Bill Maher
- Warner Media
- Conde Nast
- GQ
- Heavy.com
- The Hill
- The Atlantic
- Bustle.com
- Ilhan Omar
- Elizabeth Warren
- Kathy Griffin
- Alyssa Milano
- Jim Carrey
stupid canadian she is.---------------------------- hey , i'm not arguing and i have no predictions . Story is still in the news and on this board and thats the best advertisement and argument against the 'indian' and pretend 'veteran' and those like him . Because of the videos people can see and judge for themselves . We will see what happens as time goes by DLady .from what i understand the famous Lawyer is taking the case with no cost to the Sandman family DragonLady . Think thats its said that the Lawyer is taking the case on a Contingency basis and will get paid if he wins for the Sandmans DragonLady .
Then it will never get to court. He's fishing for settlements.
These law firms take high profile cases for the publicity but publicity does them no good if they can't deliver the goods. This case is a loser. Without damages, there is no claim. They're high school kids. How have they been harmed in any quantifiable way? That's what slander is all about. Slander is public lies about you which causes you financial harm. What financial harm have these children suffered?
Ah, no again, you may want to look up "slander"....dumbass.
Slander involves proving that someone has lied about you. Nobody lied about these kids.
from what i understand the famous Lawyer is taking the case with no cost to the Sandman family DragonLady . Think thats its said that the Lawyer is taking the case on a Contingency basis and will get paid if he wins for the Sandmans DragonLady .
Then it will never get to court. He's fishing for settlements.
These law firms take high profile cases for the publicity but publicity does them no good if they can't deliver the goods. This case is a loser. Without damages, there is no claim. They're high school kids. How have they been harmed in any quantifiable way? That's what slander is all about. Slander is public lies about you which causes you financial harm. What financial harm have these children suffered?
Ah, no again, you may want to look up "slander"....dumbass.
Slander involves proving that someone has lied about you. Nobody lied about these kids.
