The Most Unconstitutional Administration

....hereby present President Obama’s top 10 constitutional violations....


"5. Expansion of the employer mandate penalty through IRS regulation.Obamacare grants tax credits to people whose employers don’t provide coverage if they buy a plan “through an Exchange established by the State”—and then fines employers for each employee receiving such a subsidy.


No tax credits are authorized for residents of states where the exchanges are established by the federal government, as an incentive for states to create exchanges themselves. Because so few (16) states did, however, the IRS issued a rule ignoring that plain text and allowed subsidies (and commensurate fines) for plans coming from “a State Exchange, regional Exchange, subsidiary Exchange, and federally-facilitated Exchange.”
Ibid.


This language was explicit in the ACA law....yet, ignored by the Supreme Court.
So much for a belief in the law being 'supreme.'
 
....hereby present President Obama’s top 10 constitutional violations....


"5. Expansion of the employer mandate penalty through IRS regulation.Obamacare grants tax credits to people whose employers don’t provide coverage if they buy a plan “through an Exchange established by the State”—and then fines employers for each employee receiving such a subsidy.


No tax credits are authorized for residents of states where the exchanges are established by the federal government, as an incentive for states to create exchanges themselves. Because so few (16) states did, however, the IRS issued a rule ignoring that plain text and allowed subsidies (and commensurate fines) for plans coming from “a State Exchange, regional Exchange, subsidiary Exchange, and federally-facilitated Exchange.”
Ibid.


This language was explicit in the ACA law....yet, ignored by the Supreme Court.
So much for a belief in the law being 'supreme.'


It's all bullshit, but trying to play along with you, wouldn't that one be an example of the Supreme Court being unconstitutional instead of Obama? Are you saying the supreme court is made up of Kenyan communists that hate America too? Oh my. That particular conspiracy is worse than I thought.
 
Obama has failed to enforce laws. Obama has made executive orders as substitute for congressional action. Obama has infringed on basic powers of Congress.
The most lawless administration in history.
 
PC is now arguing both sides of the "most unconstitutional administration" in American history and is accusing herself of lying from both sides. Amazing.

Her OP, if we were alive in 1860, might have some feet, but it would not rest on Obama's or any one else's black feet, for sure.
 
1. How many lies and fabrications did one have to swallow to vote for him in '08? Beyond the missing vetting that candidates of other parties have to contend with, the 'media' ignored all sorts of red flags, such as Frank Marshall Davis, Bill Ayers, and Reverend Wright....or, at least, smoothed the bumps in that road.


But to suggest a love of America and the Constitution....with this sort of pretense: "Sen. Obama, who has taught courses in constitutional law at the University of Chicago, has regularly referred to himself as "a constitutional law professor," most famously at a March 30, 2007, fundraiser when hesaid, "I was a constitutional law professor, which means unlike the current president I actually respect the Constitution."




Hillary Clinton’s earlier campaign picked up on this charge. In a March 27 conference call with reporters, Clinton spokesman Phil Singer claimed:
"Singer (March 27):Sen. Obama has often referred to himself as “a constitutional law professor” out on the campaign trail. He never held any such title. And I think anyone, if you ask anyone in academia the distinction between a professor who has tenure and an instructor that does not, you’ll find that there is … you’ll get quite an emotional response."
Obama a Constitutional Law Professor?




Wow! Has that come back to bit all of us!



2. "One of Barack Obama’s chief accomplishments has been to return the Constitution to a central place in our public discourse. Unfortunately, the president fomented this upswing in civic interest not by talking up the constitutional aspects of his policy agenda, but by blatantly violating the strictures of our founding document.

3. ...he’s been most frustrated with the separation of powers, which doesn’t allow him to “fundamentally transform” the country without congressional acquiescence.

But that hasn’t stopped him.... the Administration launched a “We Can’t Wait” initiative, ...explaining that “when Congress won’t act, this president will.” And earlier this year, President Obama said in announcing his new economic plans that “I will not allow gridlock, or inaction, or willful indifference to get in our way.”

4. ....hereby present President Obama’s top 10 constitutional violations....

1. Delay of Obamacare’s out-of-pocket caps.The Labor Department announced in February that it was delaying for a year the part of the healthcare law that limits how much people have to spend on their own insurance. .... changing the law requires actual legislation.

2. Delay of Obamacare’s employer mandate.The administration announced via blogpost on the eve of the July 4 holiday that it was delaying the requirement that employers of at least 50 people provide complying insurance or pay a fine. This time it did cite statutory authority, but the cited provisions allow the delay of certain reporting requirements, not of the mandate itself."
President Obama's Top 10 Constitutional Violations Of 2013

7. Outlandish Supreme Court arguments. Between January 2012 and June 2013, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected the Justice Department’s extreme positions 9 times. The cases ranged from criminal procedure to property rights, religious liberty to immigration, securities regulation to tax law. They had nothing in common other than the government’s view that federal power is virtually unlimited. As a comparison, in the entire Bush and Clinton presidencies, the government suffered 15 and 23 unanimous rulings, respectively.


Seriously...

The author of this thread is arguing that it is unconstitutional to make a losing argument in front of the Supreme Court.

Hey its your clown Obama who claims to be a constitutional law professor.
 
PC you have the libs freaking out with BOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH lol Its been a while since I have seen a good old fashioned BOOOOOOOSH outburst from the left. :laugh:


Seems they have been programmed with one response when the truth about the dolt they compared to Jesus is revealed.

Religious fanatics tend to be like that.
 
This administration is "unconstitutional" because you want it to seem that way.
 
...this thread is not exclusive to the illegality related to ObamaCare....



More of President Obama’s top 10 constitutional violations....



"6. Political profiling by the IRS.After seeing a rise in the number of applications for tax-exempt status, the IRS in 2010 compiled a “be on the lookout” (“BOLO”) list to identify organizations engaged in political activities. The list included words such as “Tea Party,” “Patriots,” and “Israel”; subjects such as government spending, debt, or taxes; and activities such as criticizing the government, educating about the Constitution, or challenging Obamacare. The targeting continued ....



And this once more:

7. Outlandish Supreme Court arguments.Between January 2012 and June 2013, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected the Justice Department’s extreme positions 9 times. The cases ranged from criminal procedure to property rights, religious liberty to immigration, securities regulation to tax law. They had nothing in common other than the government’s view that federal power is virtually unlimited. As a comparison, in the entire Bush and Clinton presidencies, the government suffered 15 and 23 unanimous rulings, respectively."
President Obama's Top 10 Constitutional Violations Of 2013


This would be a fine occasion to remind all that the above charge: "They had nothing in common other than the government’s view that federal power is virtually unlimited"...

....exactly the hallmark of every totalitarian political view:
Communism, Nazism, Liberalism, socialism, Progressivism, and fascism.
 
2.gif~original


You are throwing garbage at the wrong guy................dysfunction at it's best.
 
Last edited:
This administration is "unconstitutional" because you want it to seem that way.


Of course, in your condition, you can't possibly recognize how absurd your post is.

My aim would be, as that of the Founders, a government based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

So....no, I don't wish to see an "unconstitutional" government.


Are you embarrassed that you've been hoodwinked into voting for one of these totalitarian political views:
Communism, Nazism, Liberalism, socialism, Progressivism, and fascism.

 
This administration is "unconstitutional" because you want it to seem that way.


Of course, in your condition, you can't possibly recognize how absurd your post is.

My aim would be, as that of the Founders, a government based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

So....no, I don't wish to see an "unconstitutional" government.


Are you embarrassed that you've been hoodwinked into voting for one of these totalitarian political views:
Communism, Nazism, Liberalism, socialism, Progressivism, and fascism.
Why do you consistently reference the founders and repost the same talking points over and over again.. Your claim that liberalism is totalitarian is ridiculous, and you should feel like a fucking idiot, since the most socialist countries have more freedom. LOL. Politicalderp.
 
This would be a fine occasion to remind all that the above charge: "They had nothing in common other than the government’s view that federal power is virtually unlimited"...

....exactly the hallmark of every totalitarian political view:
Communism, Nazism, Liberalism, socialism, Progressivism, and fascism.

Well, you have finally managed to convince me

Obama is a (half) black, kenyan nazi who has turned the homeland into a communist dictatorship so he can finally realize his evil, liberal ideas.

Life really sucks

:alcoholic:
 
This administration is "unconstitutional" because you want it to seem that way.


Of course, in your condition, you can't possibly recognize how absurd your post is.

My aim would be, as that of the Founders, a government based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

So....no, I don't wish to see an "unconstitutional" government.


Are you embarrassed that you've been hoodwinked into voting for one of these totalitarian political views:
Communism, Nazism, Liberalism, socialism, Progressivism, and fascism.
Why do you consistently reference the founders and repost the same talking points over and over again.. Your claim that liberalism is totalitarian is ridiculous, and you should feel like a fucking idiot, since the most socialist countries have more freedom. LOL. Politicalderp.




"Your claim that liberalism is totalitarian is ridiculous, and you should feel like a fucking idiot,..."

Time and again, when folks realize they have been skewered, their language falls to the vulgar. It's one of those hard to hide psychological tells....your anger at being bested leaks out as vulgarity.


So...you are embarrassed at having been hoodwinked into voting for one of these totalitarian political views:
Communism, Nazism, Liberalism, socialism, Progressivism, and fascism.
 
This administration is "unconstitutional" because you want it to seem that way.


Of course, in your condition, you can't possibly recognize how absurd your post is.

My aim would be, as that of the Founders, a government based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

So....no, I don't wish to see an "unconstitutional" government.


Are you embarrassed that you've been hoodwinked into voting for one of these totalitarian political views:
Communism, Nazism, Liberalism, socialism, Progressivism, and fascism.
Why do you consistently reference the founders and repost the same talking points over and over again.. Your claim that liberalism is totalitarian is ridiculous, and you should feel like a fucking idiot, since the most socialist countries have more freedom. LOL. Politicalderp.




"Your claim that liberalism is totalitarian is ridiculous, and you should feel like a fucking idiot,..."

Time and again, when folks realize they have been skewered, their language falls to the vulgar. It's one of those hard to hide psychological tells....your anger at being bested leaks out as vulgarity.


So...you are embarrassed at having been hoodwinked into voting for one of these totalitarian political views:
Communism, Nazism, Liberalism, socialism, Progressivism, and fascism.
There's a reason I'm calling you an idiot, if you read the rest of the post, you'd see why. If the countries with the most economic freedom have socialist things like UHC, high minimum wages, strong labor unions, regulations, etc.. It refutes your idiocy. Your assertion that liberalism is totalitarian has absolutely no basis in reality, at all, apart from pulling anecdotal examples of bigots being told to stop being bigots.
 
2.gif~original


You are throwing garbage at the wrong guy................dysfunction at it's best.


1. To whom is this addressed?

2. What, exactly, are you trying to say?

3. "You're," not "Your."

Thanks for the grammer check , I just had chemo and my brain is mush today.

Why is it for the last 8 years no one took responsibility for any of the damage, life's lost , and the trillions of dollars gone and indebt from the 8 years of Bush.
Obama has helped people like me who worked my ass off all of my life only to have to give my house away to have treatment from the rip off FDA who allows the drug companies to charge $20,000 a shot. Perhaps as someone who has never needed it, do find it to be wasteful.

Once you are in the chemo rooms you can certainly see just what Obamacare is about.
Why should these dumb ass people in the senate have top notch care and try over and over to take it away from people like me.
 
This administration is "unconstitutional" because you want it to seem that way.


Of course, in your condition, you can't possibly recognize how absurd your post is.

My aim would be, as that of the Founders, a government based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

So....no, I don't wish to see an "unconstitutional" government.


Are you embarrassed that you've been hoodwinked into voting for one of these totalitarian political views:
Communism, Nazism, Liberalism, socialism, Progressivism, and fascism.
Why do you consistently reference the founders and repost the same talking points over and over again.. Your claim that liberalism is totalitarian is ridiculous, and you should feel like a fucking idiot, since the most socialist countries have more freedom. LOL. Politicalderp.




"Your claim that liberalism is totalitarian is ridiculous, and you should feel like a fucking idiot,..."

Time and again, when folks realize they have been skewered, their language falls to the vulgar. It's one of those hard to hide psychological tells....your anger at being bested leaks out as vulgarity.


So...you are embarrassed at having been hoodwinked into voting for one of these totalitarian political views:
Communism, Nazism, Liberalism, socialism, Progressivism, and fascism.
There's a reason I'm calling you an idiot, if you read the rest of the post, you'd see why. If the countries with the most economic freedom have socialist things like UHC, high minimum wages, strong labor unions, regulations, etc.. It refutes your idiocy. Your assertion that liberalism is totalitarian has absolutely no basis in reality, at all, apart from pulling anecdotal examples of bigots being told to stop being bigots.


Now, see how you've cleaned up your language!
Good boy.....you may actually be capable of learning!


"It refutes your idiocy. Your assertion that liberalism is totalitarian has absolutely no basis in reality,..."

Well....let's give you a little quiz:

Let's begin with definitions.
Nazism, communism, socialism..Liberalism, Progressivism,.and fascism....

1. Which stem from the works of Karl Marx?
2. Which is a form of command and control big government?
3. Which has no problem with genocide, actual or figurative, as an accepted procedure on its political enemies?
4. Which is based on the collective over the individual?
5. Which oppresses and/or slaughters its own citizens as pro forma (including depriving them of a living)....?
6. Which represents totalitarian governance?
7. Which believes that mandating/dictating every aspect of their citizen's lives is their prerogative?
8. Which aims for an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life



And, of course, they all are do.

Nazism

Communism

Socialism

Fascism

Progressivism

Liberalism






How about pointing out which of them are defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom, and recognize the individual as the most important element of society?
Right....none of 'em.
Only right wing philosophies...i.e., conservatism.


Now, if you convince me that you're capable of understanding it, I may provide a lesson in the Germanic background of all six of those totalitarian political views.
 

Forum List

Back
Top