The next President will be the greatest catastrophe of American governance since the Civil War...

[S.J.]

Sure, he does, S.J., and you put words in peoples' mouths in order to lower the discussion to Alt Right lunacy.

Trump will be a catastrophe. So would Clinton.

Sounds like you're resolved to Trump being the next POTUS.

Either of them will be a catastrophe.

One of them already IS. Just ask the family members of the Benghazi victims.

That is no game for you, sherlock. Johnson would be mediocre but acceptable. Both Comrade and Shillary, the one who is elected, could not be anything but disasters.

So mediocre he's never heard of Aleppo. Aside from the fact that he doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell of being elected, his ignorance of foreign policy and even current events should be enough to give second thoughts to anybody thinking about voting for the pothead. Of course, YOU are stupid enough to do it but thankfully there aren't enough idiots like you to make a difference.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Sure, he does, S.J., and you put words in peoples' mouths in order to lower the discussion to Alt Right lunacy.

Trump will be a catastrophe. So would Clinton.

Sounds like you're resolved to Trump being the next POTUS.

Either of them will be a catastrophe.

One of them already IS. Just ask the family members of the Benghazi victims.

That is no game for you, sherlock. Johnson would be mediocre but acceptable. Both Comrade and Shillary, the one who is elected, could not be anything but disasters.

So mediocre he's never heard of Aleppo. Aside from the fact that he doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell of being elected, his ignorance of foreign policy and even current events should be enough to give second thoughts to anybody thinking about voting for the pothead. Of course, YOU are stupid enough to do it but thankfully there aren't enough idiots like you to make a difference.

Says S.J., one of three most foolish board posters we have. He would bring our troops home. HRC or DJT will start WWIII.

 

[S.J.]

Sounds like you're resolved to Trump being the next POTUS.

Either of them will be a catastrophe.

One of them already IS. Just ask the family members of the Benghazi victims.

That is no game for you, sherlock. Johnson would be mediocre but acceptable. Both Comrade and Shillary, the one who is elected, could not be anything but disasters.

So mediocre he's never heard of Aleppo. Aside from the fact that he doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell of being elected, his ignorance of foreign policy and even current events should be enough to give second thoughts to anybody thinking about voting for the pothead. Of course, YOU are stupid enough to do it but thankfully there aren't enough idiots like you to make a difference.

Says S.J., one of three most foolish board posters we have. He would bring our troops home. HRC or DJT will start WWIII.

That's right, double down on your stupid.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Either of them will be a catastrophe.

One of them already IS. Just ask the family members of the Benghazi victims.

That is no game for you, sherlock. Johnson would be mediocre but acceptable. Both Comrade and Shillary, the one who is elected, could not be anything but disasters.

So mediocre he's never heard of Aleppo. Aside from the fact that he doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell of being elected, his ignorance of foreign policy and even current events should be enough to give second thoughts to anybody thinking about voting for the pothead. Of course, YOU are stupid enough to do it but thankfully there aren't enough idiots like you to make a difference.

Says S.J., one of three most foolish board posters we have. He would bring our troops home. HRC or DJT will start WWIII.

That's right, double down on your stupid.

You are that foolish, yes. Johnson would bring the troops home. The other two are quite capable of starting a World War III. Keep buying your defense stocis.

 

[bendog]

One of them already IS. Just ask the family members of the Benghazi victims.

That is no game for you, sherlock. Johnson would be mediocre but acceptable. Both Comrade and Shillary, the one who is elected, could not be anything but disasters.

So mediocre he's never heard of Aleppo. Aside from the fact that he doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell of being elected, his ignorance of foreign policy and even current events should be enough to give second thoughts to anybody thinking about voting for the pothead. Of course, YOU are stupid enough to do it but thankfully there aren't enough idiots like you to make a difference.

Says S.J., one of three most foolish board posters we have. He would bring our troops home. HRC or DJT will start WWIII.

That's right, double down on your stupid.

You are that foolish, yes. Johnson would bring the troops home. The other two are quite capable of starting a World War III. Keep buying your defense stocis.

Ah, but if Johnson brought the troops home, and Putin reacquired Baltic and Ukranian real estate, would we be closer to war?

 

[FA_Q2]

Sure, he does, S.J., and you put words in peoples' mouths in order to lower the discussion to Alt Right lunacy.

Trump will be a catastrophe. So would Clinton.

Sounds like you're resolved to Trump being the next POTUS.

Either of them will be a catastrophe.

One of them already IS. Just ask the family members of the Benghazi victims.

That is no game for you, sherlock. Johnson would be mediocre but acceptable. Both Comrade and Shillary, the one who is elected, could not be anything but disasters.

So mediocre he's never heard of Aleppo. Aside from the fact that he doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell of being elected, his ignorance of foreign policy and even current events should be enough to give second thoughts to anybody thinking about voting for the pothead. Of course, YOU are stupid enough to do it but thankfully there aren't enough idiots like you to make a difference.

Are you not a Trump supporter? You know, the guy that did not know Russia invaded Crimea?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Sounds like you're resolved to Trump being the next POTUS.

Either of them will be a catastrophe.

One of them already IS. Just ask the family members of the Benghazi victims.

That is no game for you, sherlock. Johnson would be mediocre but acceptable. Both Comrade and Shillary, the one who is elected, could not be anything but disasters.

So mediocre he's never heard of Aleppo. Aside from the fact that he doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell of being elected, his ignorance of foreign policy and even current events should be enough to give second thoughts to anybody thinking about voting for the pothead. Of course, YOU are stupid enough to do it but thankfully there aren't enough idiots like you to make a difference.

Are you not a Trump supporter? You know, the guy that did not know Russia invaded Crimea?

He is a neo-con, just like his Orange Messiah.

 

[S.J.]

Sounds like you're resolved to Trump being the next POTUS.

Either of them will be a catastrophe.

One of them already IS. Just ask the family members of the Benghazi victims.

That is no game for you, sherlock. Johnson would be mediocre but acceptable. Both Comrade and Shillary, the one who is elected, could not be anything but disasters.

So mediocre he's never heard of Aleppo. Aside from the fact that he doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell of being elected, his ignorance of foreign policy and even current events should be enough to give second thoughts to anybody thinking about voting for the pothead. Of course, YOU are stupid enough to do it but thankfully there aren't enough idiots like you to make a difference.

Are you not a Trump supporter? You know, the guy that did not know Russia invaded Crimea?

Personally, I don't care that much for Trump but you know what? I don't HAVE to like him personally to know that he would be infinitely better as POTUS than that sickly, lying, corrupt POS known as former First Lady Hillary Clinton. Does that satisfy your curiosity?

 

[S.J.]

Either of them will be a catastrophe.

One of them already IS. Just ask the family members of the Benghazi victims.

That is no game for you, sherlock. Johnson would be mediocre but acceptable. Both Comrade and Shillary, the one who is elected, could not be anything but disasters.

So mediocre he's never heard of Aleppo. Aside from the fact that he doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell of being elected, his ignorance of foreign policy and even current events should be enough to give second thoughts to anybody thinking about voting for the pothead. Of course, YOU are stupid enough to do it but thankfully there aren't enough idiots like you to make a difference.

Are you not a Trump supporter? You know, the guy that did not know Russia invaded Crimea?

He is a neo-con, just like his Orange Messiah.

He asked ME the question, stupid. Butt out.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Sounds like you're resolved to Trump being the next POTUS.

Either of them will be a catastrophe.

One of them already IS. Just ask the family members of the Benghazi victims.

That is no game for you, sherlock. Johnson would be mediocre but acceptable. Both Comrade and Shillary, the one who is elected, could not be anything but disasters.

So mediocre he's never heard of Aleppo. Aside from the fact that he doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell of being elected, his ignorance of foreign policy and even current events should be enough to give second thoughts to anybody thinking about voting for the pothead. Of course, YOU are stupid enough to do it but thankfully there aren't enough idiots like you to make a difference.

Says S.J., one of three most foolish board posters we have. He would bring our troops home. HRC or DJT will start WWIII.

And you know this how?

 

[S.J.]

Either of them will be a catastrophe.

One of them already IS. Just ask the family members of the Benghazi victims.

That is no game for you, sherlock. Johnson would be mediocre but acceptable. Both Comrade and Shillary, the one who is elected, could not be anything but disasters.

So mediocre he's never heard of Aleppo. Aside from the fact that he doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell of being elected, his ignorance of foreign policy and even current events should be enough to give second thoughts to anybody thinking about voting for the pothead. Of course, YOU are stupid enough to do it but thankfully there aren't enough idiots like you to make a difference.

Says S.J., one of three most foolish board posters we have. He would bring our troops home. HRC or DJT will start WWIII.

And you know this how?

He doesn't. He doesn't know shit, he just talks out his ass constantly, thinking no one will notice he's a clueless moron.

 

[JakeStarkey]

One of them already IS. Just ask the family members of the Benghazi victims.

That is no game for you, sherlock. Johnson would be mediocre but acceptable. Both Comrade and Shillary, the one who is elected, could not be anything but disasters.

So mediocre he's never heard of Aleppo. Aside from the fact that he doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell of being elected, his ignorance of foreign policy and even current events should be enough to give second thoughts to anybody thinking about voting for the pothead. Of course, YOU are stupid enough to do it but thankfully there aren't enough idiots like you to make a difference.

Are you not a Trump supporter? You know, the guy that did not know Russia invaded Crimea?

He is a neo-con, just like his Orange Messiah.

He asked ME the question, stupid. Butt out.

 

[JakeStarkey]

One of them already IS. Just ask the family members of the Benghazi victims.

That is no game for you, sherlock. Johnson would be mediocre but acceptable. Both Comrade and Shillary, the one who is elected, could not be anything but disasters.

So mediocre he's never heard of Aleppo. Aside from the fact that he doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell of being elected, his ignorance of foreign policy and even current events should be enough to give second thoughts to anybody thinking about voting for the pothead. Of course, YOU are stupid enough to do it but thankfully there aren't enough idiots like you to make a difference.

Says S.J., one of three most foolish board posters we have. He would bring our troops home. HRC or DJT will start WWIII.

And you know this how?

He doesn't. He doesn't know shit, he just talks out his ass constantly, thinking no one will notice he's a clueless moron.

Projection.

 

[FA_Q2]

Either of them will be a catastrophe.

One of them already IS. Just ask the family members of the Benghazi victims.

That is no game for you, sherlock. Johnson would be mediocre but acceptable. Both Comrade and Shillary, the one who is elected, could not be anything but disasters.

So mediocre he's never heard of Aleppo. Aside from the fact that he doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell of being elected, his ignorance of foreign policy and even current events should be enough to give second thoughts to anybody thinking about voting for the pothead. Of course, YOU are stupid enough to do it but thankfully there aren't enough idiots like you to make a difference.

Are you not a Trump supporter? You know, the guy that did not know Russia invaded Crimea?

Personally, I don't care that much for Trump but you know what? I don't HAVE to like him personally to know that he would be infinitely better as POTUS than that sickly, lying, corrupt POS known as former First Lady Hillary Clinton. Does that satisfy your curiosity?

Not really.

I assume then that you think Johnson would be better than Clinton as well. Do you not think that Trumps ignorance of something like the events in Ukraine are worse or more 'disqualifying' then Johnson's slip here?

 

[S.J.]

One of them already IS. Just ask the family members of the Benghazi victims.

That is no game for you, sherlock. Johnson would be mediocre but acceptable. Both Comrade and Shillary, the one who is elected, could not be anything but disasters.

So mediocre he's never heard of Aleppo. Aside from the fact that he doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell of being elected, his ignorance of foreign policy and even current events should be enough to give second thoughts to anybody thinking about voting for the pothead. Of course, YOU are stupid enough to do it but thankfully there aren't enough idiots like you to make a difference.

Are you not a Trump supporter? You know, the guy that did not know Russia invaded Crimea?

Personally, I don't care that much for Trump but you know what? I don't HAVE to like him personally to know that he would be infinitely better as POTUS than that sickly, lying, corrupt POS known as former First Lady Hillary Clinton. Does that satisfy your curiosity?

Not really.

I assume then that you think Johnson would be better than Clinton as well. Do you not think that Trumps ignorance of something like the events in Ukraine are worse or more 'disqualifying' then Johnson's slip here?

You shouldn't assume. And Johnson is irrelevant.

 

[JakeStarkey]

That is no game for you, sherlock. Johnson would be mediocre but acceptable. Both Comrade and Shillary, the one who is elected, could not be anything but disasters.

So mediocre he's never heard of Aleppo. Aside from the fact that he doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell of being elected, his ignorance of foreign policy and even current events should be enough to give second thoughts to anybody thinking about voting for the pothead. Of course, YOU are stupid enough to do it but thankfully there aren't enough idiots like you to make a difference.

Are you not a Trump supporter? You know, the guy that did not know Russia invaded Crimea?

Personally, I don't care that much for Trump but you know what? I don't HAVE to like him personally to know that he would be infinitely better as POTUS than that sickly, lying, corrupt POS known as former First Lady Hillary Clinton. Does that satisfy your curiosity?

Not really.

I assume then that you think Johnson would be better than Clinton as well. Do you not think that Trumps ignorance of something like the events in Ukraine are worse or more 'disqualifying' then Johnson's slip here?

You shouldn't assume. And Johnson is irrelevant.

Johnson does not assume and you are irrelevant.

Johnson would be better than both of them together.

 

[S.J.]

So mediocre he's never heard of Aleppo. Aside from the fact that he doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell of being elected, his ignorance of foreign policy and even current events should be enough to give second thoughts to anybody thinking about voting for the pothead. Of course, YOU are stupid enough to do it but thankfully there aren't enough idiots like you to make a difference.

Are you not a Trump supporter? You know, the guy that did not know Russia invaded Crimea?

Personally, I don't care that much for Trump but you know what? I don't HAVE to like him personally to know that he would be infinitely better as POTUS than that sickly, lying, corrupt POS known as former First Lady Hillary Clinton. Does that satisfy your curiosity?

Not really.

I assume then that you think Johnson would be better than Clinton as well. Do you not think that Trumps ignorance of something like the events in Ukraine are worse or more 'disqualifying' then Johnson's slip here?

You shouldn't assume. And Johnson is irrelevant.

Johnson does not assume and you are irrelevant.

Johnson would be better than both of them togethe.

Who said anything about Johnson "assuming", moron? Put your pipe down.

 

[bendog]

Is there any chance this means the blacks won't have the vote? (-:

 

[CowboyTed]

I agree. If Trump, SCOTUS appointments will be right of cent to left of center. If HRC, center to hard left. There is no chance of any principled conservatives being appointed the branch. If my guy, Johnson, were president, he would probably nominate Marco Rubio, for kicks.

Honestly Jake, Trump would nominate a bunch of yes men if could... He will just want more power the constitution be damned, he has shown no knowledge and no respect for it so far...

Clinton is center left, look at her VP nomination... She shows she does not pander to the hard left, It is not the Hillary way...

 

[JakeStarkey]

Are you not a Trump supporter? You know, the guy that did not know Russia invaded Crimea?

Personally, I don't care that much for Trump but you know what? I don't HAVE to like him personally to know that he would be infinitely better as POTUS than that sickly, lying, corrupt POS known as former First Lady Hillary Clinton. Does that satisfy your curiosity?

Not really.

I assume then that you think Johnson would be better than Clinton as well. Do you not think that Trumps ignorance of something like the events in Ukraine are worse or more 'disqualifying' then Johnson's slip here?

You shouldn't assume. And Johnson is irrelevant.

Johnson does not assume and you are irrelevant.

Johnson would be better than both of them togethe.

Who said anything about Johnson "assuming", moron? Put your pipe down.

Your head is hurting again today.