Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Anyone else notice that all the gun nuts in this thread are arguing FOR the right of this latest mass murderer,
a genuine mental case,
to legally buy any gun he wants??
So what was the direct answer to my question?
We already have background checks moron!!
Yeah, they check to see if you have a drivers license, an address and a pulse, moron.
Progressives just don't want loons like you having any impact whatsoever on what kind of country we have.
So you want to deny my ability to have an opinion, and vote on said opinion, soley due to the opinion itself? Thats basically what you are saying.
Go fuck yourself with a tire iron, you facist asshole.
Crazy people like you only exist to the detriment of this country.
So you have no problem with felons voting, or publishers selling child pornography, or pedophiles teaching kindergarten?
You're quite a sick little man.
If a felon has completed his sentence, then he should have his rights restored. Otherwise keep him locked up indefinitely just in case.
Child pornography laws don't require background checks. Try again.
Teaching is not a civil right. The employer can set whatever conditions they like on potential employees.
Actually employment is protected by non-discrimination laws.
You're flip flopping like a boated fish.
We already have background checks moron!!
So you're saying that the universal background check bill that was defeated earlier this year by frantic lobbying by the gun nuts
had no background checks in it that weren't already in place?
lol
The universal background check you're speaking of included a national registry. That it what the NRA and most American opposed.
Do try to educate yourself.
If a felon has completed his sentence, then he should have his rights restored. Otherwise keep him locked up indefinitely just in case.
Child pornography laws don't require background checks. Try again.
Teaching is not a civil right. The employer can set whatever conditions they like on potential employees.
Actually employment is protected by non-discrimination laws.
You're flip flopping like a boated fish.
No it isn't. Moron.
Only at Companies with Federal Contracts or come under Federal Jurisidiction, or have 15 or more employees or are State Governments or....
You're just too stupid for words
So you're saying that the universal background check bill that was defeated earlier this year by frantic lobbying by the gun nuts
had no background checks in it that weren't already in place?
lol
The universal background check you're speaking of included a national registry. That it what the NRA and most American opposed.
Do try to educate yourself.
You don't know what you're talking about...
...but, no surprise, here comes the history revisionism on the gun lobby killing a bill that 90% of Americans supported.
So you want to deny my ability to have an opinion, and vote on said opinion, soley due to the opinion itself? Thats basically what you are saying.
Go fuck yourself with a tire iron, you facist asshole.
Crazy people like you only exist to the detriment of this country.
Trying to defend ones rights is not crazy. Passion in the face of facism is not crazy. Opposing people like you who ignore the consitution when it suits them is not crazy.
and as always, go fuck yourself.
The universal background check you're speaking of included a national registry. That it what the NRA and most American opposed.
Do try to educate yourself.
You don't know what you're talking about...
...but, no surprise, here comes the history revisionism on the gun lobby killing a bill that 90% of Americans supported.
90 percent of the people didn't support it you lying fuck!!
Just look at the number of people on this board that are against it. That should give you a clue.
You libturds do nothing but lie and what's sad is you believe the lies Obama and the Democrat politicians feed you.
I pity idiots like you.
Anyone else notice that all the gun nuts in this thread are arguing FOR the right of this latest mass murderer,
a genuine mental case,
to legally buy any gun he wants??
Talking out of your ass again, you pathological lying sack of fucking shit?
Gimme some quotes or admit what a lying scumbag you are.
Do you support universal background checks, including background checks being required for private transactions?
You don't know what you're talking about...
...but, no surprise, here comes the history revisionism on the gun lobby killing a bill that 90% of Americans supported.
90 percent of the people didn't support it you lying fuck!!
Just look at the number of people on this board that are against it. That should give you a clue.
You libturds do nothing but lie and what's sad is you believe the lies Obama and the Democrat politicians feed you.
I pity idiots like you.
This a conservative board. Are you too stupid to realize that?
You don't know what you're talking about...
...but, no surprise, here comes the history revisionism on the gun lobby killing a bill that 90% of Americans supported.
90 percent of the people didn't support it you lying fuck!!
Just look at the number of people on this board that are against it. That should give you a clue.
You libturds do nothing but lie and what's sad is you believe the lies Obama and the Democrat politicians feed you.
I pity idiots like you.
This a conservative board. Are you too stupid to realize that?
Crazy people like you only exist to the detriment of this country.
Trying to defend ones rights is not crazy. Passion in the face of facism is not crazy. Opposing people like you who ignore the consitution when it suits them is not crazy.
and as always, go fuck yourself.
Have background checks for gun purchasers been ruled unconstitutional?
I think you're the one who's ignoring the constitution.
Anyone else notice that all the gun nuts in this thread are arguing FOR the right of this latest mass murderer,
a genuine mental case,
to legally buy any gun he wants??
Did he commit a felony, a domestic violence crime or was adjudicated to be mentally incompetent prior to this incident? If the answer is no, no background check would have mattered. There would have been no reason to deny his purchase in the first place, the same with Cho.
Sorry, but I'm not in favor of denying anyone rights based on feelings or just in case.
And it is not an insult to say I am arguing for anyone's rights, period.
You don't know what you're talking about...
...but, no surprise, here comes the history revisionism on the gun lobby killing a bill that 90% of Americans supported.
90 percent of the people didn't support it you lying fuck!!
Just look at the number of people on this board that are against it. That should give you a clue.
You libturds do nothing but lie and what's sad is you believe the lies Obama and the Democrat politicians feed you.
I pity idiots like you.
This a conservative board. Are you too stupid to realize that?
Trying to defend ones rights is not crazy. Passion in the face of facism is not crazy. Opposing people like you who ignore the consitution when it suits them is not crazy.
and as always, go fuck yourself.
Have background checks for gun purchasers been ruled unconstitutional?
I think you're the one who's ignoring the constitution.
Its not background checks that are the issue, its what you want to be a qualifier for denying a right. Some here want any shrink to be able to put you on a "no gun" list, regardless of the fact that denying a right requires a judge, and the ability to face ones accuser in a court of law.
We have background checks, and all they do is make liberal idiots feel better because getting a gun illegally is, and will always be easy, no matter how many laws are passed.
Take guns from the good people, ignore the guns of bad people.
Liberal mantra.
Trying to defend ones rights is not crazy. Passion in the face of facism is not crazy. Opposing people like you who ignore the consitution when it suits them is not crazy.
and as always, go fuck yourself.
Have background checks for gun purchasers been ruled unconstitutional?
I think you're the one who's ignoring the constitution.
Its not background checks that are the issue, its what you want to be a qualifier for denying a right. Some here want any shrink to be able to put you on a "no gun" list, regardless of the fact that denying a right requires a judge, and the ability to face ones accuser in a court of law.
We have background checks, and all they do is make liberal idiots feel better because getting a gun illegally is, and will always be easy, no matter how many laws are passed.
Attempting to make it appear as though we DON'T already have gun laws is even more stupid, as in what you're doing. You're just full of hyperbole and lies.Have background checks for gun purchasers been ruled unconstitutional?
I think you're the one who's ignoring the constitution.
Its not background checks that are the issue, its what you want to be a qualifier for denying a right. Some here want any shrink to be able to put you on a "no gun" list, regardless of the fact that denying a right requires a judge, and the ability to face ones accuser in a court of law.
We have background checks, and all they do is make liberal idiots feel better because getting a gun illegally is, and will always be easy, no matter how many laws are passed.
The argument that we shouldn't have laws because people will break the laws anyways is the dumbest argument ever.
Apply that to laws against child molesting. Let's hear your argument that we shouldn't have laws against child molesting because children get molested anyway.
Have background checks for gun purchasers been ruled unconstitutional?
I think you're the one who's ignoring the constitution.
Its not background checks that are the issue, its what you want to be a qualifier for denying a right. Some here want any shrink to be able to put you on a "no gun" list, regardless of the fact that denying a right requires a judge, and the ability to face ones accuser in a court of law.
We have background checks, and all they do is make liberal idiots feel better because getting a gun illegally is, and will always be easy, no matter how many laws are passed.
The argument that we shouldn't have laws because people will break the laws anyways is the dumbest argument ever.
Apply that to laws against child molesting. Let's hear your argument that we shouldn't have laws against child molesting because children get molested anyway.
