Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
so the fact that he had enough fentanyl in his system to kill him had nothing to do with his death? How can you be so fricken positive about that? Floyd was a thug and druggie, not a hero as you libs want to make him, the cop over stepped procedure, but did he kill him? sadly we will never really know.
When did those 2000 coroners examine the body?First. I’ve never denied that Floyd was a criminal. However that doesn’t change the facts of the case.
Second. There are some 2,000 Coroners in this nation. Why didn’t any of them come forward and declare it was an overdose? Why haven’t any of the million doctors in this nation come out and say it was an overdose?
I’ll give you a hint. It’s what isn’t in the autopsy report.
What the cop did was wrong. Period.so the fact that he had enough fentanyl in his system to kill him had nothing to do with his death? How can you be so fricken positive about that? Floyd was a thug and druggie, not a hero as you libs want to make him, the cop over stepped procedure, but did he kill him? sadly we will never really know.
When did those 2000 coroners examine the body?
Let's see what response you get.so the fact that he had enough fentanyl in his system to kill him had nothing to do with his death?
I smell ulterior motives in that guy.How can you be so fricken positive about that?
That's right. Particularly when race is wedged between truth and fiction.Floyd was a thug and druggie, not a hero as you libs want to make him, the cop over stepped procedure, but did he kill him? sadly we will never really know.
When did those 2000 coroners examine the body?
What is preventing you from answering Britpat9643's question? Fear? Lack of capability? Prejudice? Cat got your tongue?They can read the report.
Let's see what response you get.
I smell ulterior motives in that guy.
That's right. Particularly when race is wedged between truth and fiction.
What is preventing you from answering Britpat9643's question? Fear? Lack of capability? Prejudice? Cat got your tongue?
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
OK, let's do that.
That's impressive.
Why would they? Who is saying it was an overdose anyway ..... Tommy Tucker from Muleshoe, TX or Jack N'Black from Waynesville, Missoura?
What is your point?
Again, I'm impressed
I repeat: "Who is saying it was an overdose"?
You haven't presented the tinniest amount of "proof". Not one bit of "proof". Not a single solitary bit of "proof".
So, to answer your question about what I want: Proof that Chauvin is guilty. That's what I want.
No, I'm happy .... I'm satisfied. A million is enough.
Ahhhhhh, you're talking gibberish. I think the problem is your lack of depth in understanding. I'm pretty sure it's because you've been raised and educated in the two-plane system: Far left - Far right. Democrat - Republican. Black - White. "With us" - "Against us". Chauvin - Overdose. Maybe you're really young, eh?
You are having some very serious problems with English comprehension.Well this is interesting. A page ago you denied even thinking that Floyd died of an overdose.
Do you not understand English at all?Or have you forgotten what we discussed yesterday when you were Satisfied it wasn’t an overdose.
You are having some very serious problems with English comprehension.
Do you not understand English at all?
You don't understand English, do you. You're just whistling in the dark.Ignoring the evidence. Refusing to even consider the facts. I’m not surprised. In fact. It is what I’ve come to expect from you.
You don't understand English, do you. You're just whistling in the dark.
With the major intimidation and threats being hurled around, jurors knew they had to act in favor of the mob or else risk their livelihoods, families, etc.That trial should have never happened in Hennepin County.
The prudent action would have been a change of venue to another county outside the influence of the Twin Cities.
There was no fair trial and at a minimum Chauvin deserves another trial at a different location.
yes, I said that several times. The question is what killed the thug, the cop or the drugs in his system.What the cop did was wrong. Period.
yes, it was, I said that several times. the issue is what killed him, the cop or the drugs in his body. I don't know, you don't know, no one knows. But the cop is in jail for murder, what kind of justice is that--------------oh, I know, gettin even for slavery, right?What the cop did was wrong. Period.
you have no way of knowing that, but the jury is gettin even for slavery aren't they?Yes. It seems so. I mean. Who demands an answer when they have no intention of actually listening to it. Well besides extremists. Extremists always put passion before facts. Prejudice ahead of truth.
Well. You have your answer. It was not an Overdose that killed Floyd.
Psycho Violent Racist Democrats caused billions in damages before there was even a trial.Chavin cost tax payers $Billions. Keep him locked up. We cant afford that murder thug. Floyd was in restraints for $20 & not a danger to anyone. Chavin is a danger to lives & taxpayers money.
Yepyes, it was, I said that several times. the issue is what killed him, the cop or the drugs in his body. I don't know, you don't know, no one knows.
I’m pretty sure that’s the leftist logic here.. it’s quite simplistic and reckless, based on spite, emotion, and a desire for vengeance.But the cop is in jail for murder, what kind of justice is that--------------oh, I know, gettin even for slavery, right?
you have no way of knowing that, but the jury is gettin even for slavery aren't they?
Yep
I’m pretty sure that’s the leftist logic here.. it’s quite simplistic and reckless, based on spite, emotion, and a desire for vengeance.
Floyd was full of drugs and completely freaking out/resisting/trying to escape in the back of the car he was in.. it was shocking video to watch, and then shocking to realize the video wasn’t being displayed at all in the media, despite it giving tons of context. He was basically rabid, he had to be subdued, and the kneeling on the neck was a method that was taught in academy. The media didn’t cover this in their activism, so I don’t expect leftists to be aware of it. They were given a narrative, and they follow it with religious zeal
But the rest of us non-woke/BLM/leftist zealots can discuss the actual facts of the case, like grown ups.
Well on the contrary there wasn’t evidence that Floyd’s neck was crushed or suffocated either. There was an assumption made in the trial, no provable means of death.In cases of overdose there is physical evidence. The Edema I pointed out earlier. So why was this physical evidence missing from Floyd? That rules out Overdose. It is why no doctor or coroner would testify it was an Overdose.
New trial for sure
