QuickHitCurepon
Diamond Member
no, no, no...the jury cannot consider first degree murder, period. the prosecution has not charged him that crime. thus, premeditation is irrelevant. further, it is highly unlikely the jury would come to that conclusion on their own, given, the prosecution NEVER argued it.
please, enlighten yourself before typing.
Again, my slightest inflection is put under a microscope. LOL
I said "if not murder 1," and that really doesn't mean anything.
your comment is not a slight "inflection" (you misspelled mistake and have no clue what inflection means). it is an outright mistake.
if the prosecution does not charge a defendant with X crime, the jury CANNOT <-- pay attention, convict the person for X crime.
do you understand?
If someone were considering murder 1, it would have some meaning. But who is doing that? It was only a superfluous comment tacked onto to a very good statement. How can that be a mistake? This should be royal.