The opinions of legal "experts" on Trumps federal case are 100% irrelevant

[SweetSue92]

I doubt the Supreme Court would hear the case. The law is crystal clear and the evidence is damning.

It's not even a criminal case, you realize. Civil at best.

 

[surada]

It's not even a criminal case, you realize. Civil at best.

It is a criminal case.

Whatâs going to happen when Donald Trump shows up for his arraignment?

The former president is facing 37 federal criminal charges – what can we expect to see on his first day in court?

www.theguardian.com

 

[Harpy Eagle]

If Trump gets a leftist leaning jury he will be found guilty. End of story.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

It's not even a criminal case, you realize. Civil at best.

You should hope it is a criminal case, the bar for finding someone guilty is far lower in a civil case

 

[surada]

You should hope it is a criminal case, the bar for finding someone guilty is far lower in a civil case

SweetSue92

Trump haphazardly stashed military secrets throughout his home, indictment says

Prosecutors charged Trump with 37 felonies, including 31 counts under the Espionage Act of “willful retention” of classified records.

www.politico.com

Trump haphazardly stashed military secrets throughout his home, indictment says

Prosecutors charged Trump with 37 felonies, including 31 counts under the Espionage Act of “willful retention” of classified records.

www.politico.com

 

[SweetSue92]

It is a criminal case.

Whatâs going to happen when Donald Trump shows up for his arraignment?

The former president is facing 37 federal criminal charges – what can we expect to see on his first day in court?

www.theguardian.com

Yes, prosecutorial misconduct--overcharging with the "espionage act". There was no espionage. The documents is a civil case. It's not criminal.

More egg on all your faces....

 

[SweetSue92]

SweetSue92

Trump haphazardly stashed military secrets throughout his home, indictment says

Prosecutors charged Trump with 37 felonies, including 31 counts under the Espionage Act of “willful retention” of classified records.

www.politico.com

Trump haphazardly stashed military secrets throughout his home, indictment says

Prosecutors charged Trump with 37 felonies, including 31 counts under the Espionage Act of “willful retention” of classified records.

www.politico.com

That's not espionage. That's prosecutorial misconduct.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

That's not espionage. That's prosecutorial misconduct.

We will find out in the trial if the jury agrees with your views

 

[SweetSue92]

We will find out in the trial if the jury agrees with your views

Might not have to. It may never go to trial.

 

[surada]

You should hope it is a criminal case, the bar for finding someone guilty is far lower in a civil case

SweetSue92

Trump haphazardly stashed military secrets throughout his home, indictment says

Prosecutors charged Trump with 37 felonies, including 31 counts under the Espionage Act of “willful retention” of classified records.

www.politico.com

Trump haphazardly stashed military secrets throughout his home, indictment says

Prosecutors charged Trump with 37 felonies, including 31 counts under the Espionage Act of “willful retention” of classified records.

www.politico.com

That's not espionage. That's prosecutorial misconduct.

I didn't know you were a lawyer.

 

[Care4all]

It's not even a criminal case, you realize. Civil at best.

You've been lied to.

This has zero to do with the presidential records act, Trump is once again, deceiving you.

 

[Stormy Daniels]

The second I see a news headline purporting to tell me what some "expert" or "experts" tell me about a given topic of interest, I take it as my cue to keep scrolling.

Right? Most of these "news" articles nowadays are opinion pieces that they are trying to package as news. They call it "analysis".

Other signs that tell me to steer clear of a news article:

• The headline includes some variation of "Here's what you need to" or "Here's why that happened"
• Headline uses the pendulum technique (ex: "She was living her best life. Then something terrible happened").
• Headline sounds/feels like something written by a 2nd grader.
• I click the link and it takes me to some "live updates" garbage.
• Headline is written in first person

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Might not have to. It may never go to trial.

True, Trump may choose to plea bargain.

 

[SweetSue92]

You've been lied to.

This has zero to do with the presidential records act, Trump is once again, deceiving you.

"Obstruction" and worse, "espionage". Sure.

I really, really hope the entire thing gets tossed and ends up like another Steele Dossier/Mueller episode for you all. This is not even close to a narrow possibility, you realize.

 

[SweetSue92]

True, Trump may choose to plea bargain.

The case could get tossed. Not a small possibility either.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

The case could get tossed. Not a small possibility either.

And you base this on your years of legal expertise?

 

[SeaMajor7]

It's amazing seeing the Democrats in all their Stalinist glory celebrating this disgusting unprecedented persecution.
I hope it FAILS in their faces!!!!

 

[AntonToo]

It's not even a criminal case, you realize. Civil at best.

...why don't you just Google such basic stuff before embarrassing yourself?

 

[Lesh]

Trump serving his 2nd term as POTUS while his appeals reach the Trump SCOTUS and get tossed...Dems will lose their minds.

He’ll be “serving that term” while under house arrest with an ankle bracelet

 

[Lesh]

It's not even a criminal case, you realize. Civil at best.

It is absolutely a criminal case you stupid a Trump Humper