The “Party of Democracy” has bypassed the democratic process and installed Kamala Harris without an election

[Oddball]

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

That's right mother-fuckers, Kamala is our guy! So go fuck yourselves!

I thought that Manly Michelle was your Man?

 

[Nostra]

Link?

WTF simpy


Like you care about actual facts.

I accept your admission you are full of shit.

 

[Tyrion234]

Your hatred is hilarious. So old school. But we all know what drives you nuts is Kamala's racial profile.

Biden and Harris share a racial profile? Or do they have something else in common that might possibly be why conservatives don’t want her as president?

 

[MarathonMike]

They can do that if they like. No rules or laws against any of it.

I Think you're a bit confused about how laws and rules work. We don't write down everything we're allowed to do.

Pardon me, you are correct. It's only been the process since 1832. Yeah let's just toss all that because the Democratic Party waited too long to stage their coup and now they are in a time crunch to get Kamala on state ballots.

 

[Nostra]

Hilarious

Do you not know how to Google. I will give you a chance to find a fuckup safe zone before providing you factual information.

What you want to do?

Poor fella. I almost feel bad for you. Almost

 

[Nostra]

LOL

I don’t think many people buy your spin

That clown thought the border wall was built in the middle of a river.

 

[Dragonlady]

How insane is this. This was a coup in the DNC. No Democrat voter who supports Harris’ presidency can lecture anyone on democracy.

She was installed by the DNC and donors. They literally just told Democrat voters they don’t care about their desires. The last time Harris was subjected to the democratic process, she was 5th amongst Democrat candidates.

Trump was made the GOP nominee by the will of the people. Harris has been declared the Democrat nominee by backroom think tanks and hidden decision makers

If you’re a democrat who values democracy, you ought to be rather angry that your party has decided to move forward without considering your (or any democrat) vote

Have you forgotten the thousands of delegates who voted for the Biden-Harris ticket. I would say they elected her to take over for Joe, in a landslide???

Of course you have because the Cult told you so.

 

[Dragonlady]

I'll spell it out for Democrats, Kamala Harris is an ILLEGITIMATE nominee.

Thank you for proving your ignorance and stupidty, by parotting Trump's lies.

She has well over 300 signatures to put her on the ballot. Nobody else has applied to run for the nomination.

 

[HikerGuy83]

Well, I'll never take part in a coup attempt, dimwit.

Just like nobody else did, SFB.

 

[MarathonMike]

the DNC is a private org. that can fuck their people over anyway they see fit,,

but doing what theyre doing with kamala is the opposite of the democracy that they claim to support,,

That is exactly what they are doing. Screw the delegates, screw the voters Democrats walk all over the courts and the DOJ why not the nomination process?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Pardon me, you are correct. It's only been the process since 1832. Yeah let's just toss all that because the Democratic Party waited too long to stage their coup and now they are in a time crunch to get Kamala on state ballots.

Kind of like how the republicans made up a new rule about not appointing a supreme court judge nine months before an election.

Right before then breaking the rule as soon as it was convenient to do so.

Because it's not actually a rule.

With me so far?

 

[M14 Shooter]

There is nothing there that contradicts the well documented facts...

The headlines and opening paragraphs from the major news networks paint a -very- different picture.
Were they lying?
Why would they do that?
If the Trump campaign rolls those headlines every day, it is lying?

 

[HeyNorm]

It's the prosecutor vs the convicted felon.

It’s the prostituter, vs a man’s man.

Fixed it for the simp

 

[HeyNorm]

Thank you for proving your ignorance and stupidty, by parotting Trump's lies.

She has well over 300 signatures to put her on the ballot. Nobody else has applied to run for the nomination.

WOW 300!

In bowling that’s a perfect game, in a democratic process that number of votes might get you the Dogcatchers job in Hooterville, but not much more.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

There was clearly a DNC command given to the media to repeat over and over that Kamala Harris wasn't a border czar and to insinuate she had nothing to do with border security... despite her being put in charge of the border by Biden and having the same leftist media call her the "border czar" over and over until she became the nominee.

 

[Nostra]

Thank you for proving your ignorance and stupidty, by parotting Trump's lies.

She has well over 300 signatures to put her on the ballot. Nobody else has applied to run for the nomination.

I guess our KKKanadian imbecile thinks 300 signatures should negate 14 million voters.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

How insane is this. This was a coup in the DNC. No Democrat voter who supports Harris’ presidency can lecture anyone on democracy.

She was installed by the DNC and donors. They literally just told Democrat voters they don’t care about their desires. The last time Harris was subjected to the democratic process, she was 5th amongst Democrat candidates.

Trump was made the GOP nominee by the will of the people. Harris has been declared the Democrat nominee by backroom think tanks and hidden decision makers

If you’re a democrat who values democracy, you ought to be rather angry that your party has decided to move forward without considering your (or any democrat) vote

Our Mockracy is at steak!! Medium rare!!

 

[M14 Shooter]

There was clearly a DNC command given to the media to repeat over and over that Kamala Harris wasn't a border czar and to insinuate she had nothing to do with border security... despite her being put in charge of the border by Biden and having the same leftist media call her the "border czar" over and over until she became the nominee.

Too bad all those news stories playing up her new, big, broad responsibilities for the immigration/border problem are still around.

 

[Tyrion234]

marvin martian@BluesLegend

Oh my! Preponderance of the evidence sounds so weak. LOL

It's a civil trial and not a criminal one. But liability was proven. Evidence was presented.


now:

A Federal Judge Has Gone to Great Lengths to Make Clear Trump Really Did Rape E. Jean Carroll​

Why state-level legal minutiae impacts what words are used to describe the former president’s criminal conduct.​

A federal judge has gone to great lengths to make clear Trump really did rape E. Jean Carroll

Why state-level legal minutiae impacts what words are used to describe the former president's criminal conduct.

www.motherjones.com

Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll​

“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.

He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

Kaplan said New York’s legal definition of “rape” is “far narrower” than the word is understood in “common modern parlance.”
The former requires forcible, unconsented-to penetration with one’s penis. But he said that the conduct the jury effectively found Trump liable for — forced digital penetration — meets a more common definition of rape. He cited definitions offered by the American Psychological Association and the Justice Department, which in 2012 expanded its definition of rape to include penetration “with any body part or object.”

Trump Lawsuit Against ABC Argues New York Penal Law "penile penetration vs digital penetration"

Trump Lawsuit Against ABC Argues New York Penal Law "penile penetration vs digital penetration" In a sexual assault case in May of last year, a jury found Mr. Trump had “sexually abused” E Jean Carroll. That jury found that Mr. Trump had not “raped” Ms. Carroll. Why? Because under New York...

www.usmessageboard.com

Seems to me President Trump has an easy libel cause against this judge