The president is lying about Benghazi

Doc91678

Rookie
Nov 13, 2012
753
99
By Robin Osborne
February 9, 2013

We all remember when Bill Clinton argued that it all depends on what the meaning of 'is' is. We were all disgusted that the office of the President had become so low that we were deciphering legalistic terms and arguing about sex acts. Oh for the good ole days.

President Obama's disregard for the truth has made Bill Clinton seem like a novice. His statements are always riddled with inconsistency. Many could easily have been dissected with a curious media, but that hasn't happen. Very few people can lie as well.

Leon Panetta testified yesterday before congress that the President was only briefed once at a previously scheduled meeting around 5:00 pm on the day of the Benghazi attack. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and his staff were already under attack at that time.Were they in danger, and who defines danger?

Did the President not care about their safety specifically or did he not expect things to escalate further. No one knows.


**snip**

Continue reading: -->
Blog: The president is lying about Benghazi
 
Obabble lies about everything...people are numb to his bullshit...nothing new...but tragic for sure.
 
It's been pretty obvious since just a few weeks after the attack that the President and his staff have all been lying to cover their own asses about Benghazi.

Luckily for Democrats, no one cares when they lie about anything since its just standard operating proceedure. The shitbag liberals will support him no matter how much he lies. He carrys their agenda and that's all they care about.
 
By Robin Osborne
February 9, 2013

We all remember when Bill Clinton argued that it all depends on what the meaning of 'is' is. We were all disgusted that the office of the President had become so low that we were deciphering legalistic terms and arguing about sex acts. Oh for the good ole days.

President Obama's disregard for the truth has made Bill Clinton seem like a novice. His statements are always riddled with inconsistency. Many could easily have been dissected with a curious media, but that hasn't happen. Very few people can lie as well.

Leon Panetta testified yesterday before congress that the President was only briefed once at a previously scheduled meeting around 5:00 pm on the day of the Benghazi attack. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and his staff were already under attack at that time.Were they in danger, and who defines danger?

Did the President not care about their safety specifically or did he not expect things to escalate further. No one knows.


**snip**

Continue reading: -->
Blog: The president is lying about Benghazi


Really, enough already. We're becoming embarrassed for you.


Marineland_of_the_Pacific_Palos_Verdes_Seal_Circus.jpg
 
Obama and his people were so concerned about the POLITICAL imagery of Terrorists attacking which would put to question "Osama is dead" campaign that was to show how much Obama was affective in the "War ON Terror" they had to first figure out the political costs... to he.. with American deaths!!!
As a result we had Rice on the networks blaming the video and Hillary telling the father of one of the dead Americans..
After apologizing for his loss, Woods said Clinton told him that the U.S. would “make sure that the person who made that film is arrested and prosecuted.”
WHY did she say that if SHE knew better before???

POLITICAL expediency!!!


Panetta: Obama Absent Night of Benghazi | The Weekly Standard
 
By Robin Osborne
February 9, 2013

We all remember when Bill Clinton argued that it all depends on what the meaning of 'is' is. We were all disgusted that the office of the President had become so low that we were deciphering legalistic terms and arguing about sex acts. Oh for the good ole days.

President Obama's disregard for the truth has made Bill Clinton seem like a novice. His statements are always riddled with inconsistency. Many could easily have been dissected with a curious media, but that hasn't happen. Very few people can lie as well.

Leon Panetta testified yesterday before congress that the President was only briefed once at a previously scheduled meeting around 5:00 pm on the day of the Benghazi attack. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and his staff were already under attack at that time.Were they in danger, and who defines danger?

Did the President not care about their safety specifically or did he not expect things to escalate further. No one knows.


**snip**

Continue reading: -->
Blog: The president is lying about Benghazi


Really, enough already. We're becoming embarrassed for you.


Marineland_of_the_Pacific_Palos_Verdes_Seal_Circus.jpg


So 4 Americans killed so a President who quit work at 5:00 so he could travel the next day for campaign donations and let his people blame a video IS NOT embarrassing enough?

You Obama crap eaters are to be so pitied! People who CAN'T see what an incompetent fool Obama is remind me of those gibbering people who
admired their naked Emperor until a kid said he was naked!
YOU are like those gibbering, mindless court jesters!
 
October surprise. Obama was going to negotiate the release of the Ambassador in return for the release of the blind sheik. The urge to "Kill The Infidel" in the kidnappers overcame the "Best laid plans" Obama was supposed to use to cakewalk to re election. Something went terribly wrong and the administration was desperate to cover it up otherwise why the bald faced lie about the Mohammed Video? Why would Obama have had that Amos and Andy "Boss! I think I just sees me a ghost!" expression on his face during that joint appearance with Hilary Clinton immediately after the event? He looked like somebody had just rammed that red hot piece of rebar they used to sodomize Chris Stevens to death up his rectum.

Then there's this little tidbit:

Bombshell Book: Petraeus Taken Out In CIA ?Palace Coup?, Benghazi Attack In Response To Secret Operations John Brennan Ran In Libya | Weasel Zippers
 

Forum List

Back
Top