Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LOL, wow you are an idiotREally, so they should have access to all of our secrets then. they should be able to post your address then....is that what you're saying?Again, you haven't answered the question....WHY does the press need to know?No it doesn't. Releasing names of jurors is not a constitutional issue. Where is it in the constitution?
And again you never told us whey they needed them.
explaining reality to you is like teaching a door to spell ..
here ya go iotboi -
Excellent examples of cases recognizing the qualified First Amendment right of access to juror names and addresses include United States v. Wecht,[37] United States v. Doherty,[38] Commonwealth v. Long,[39] State ex rel. Beacon Journal Publ’g Co. v. Bond, [40] and People v. Mitchell.[41]
now please stfu.
IT'S - THEIR -CONSTITUTIONAL - RIGHT.
stupid ass RW's crack me up
you're a Russian - its easy to understand why you are clueless about the US Constitution - and a dumb one at that ..
Again, you haven't answered the question....WHY does the press need to know?No it doesn't. Releasing names of jurors is not a constitutional issue. Where is it in the constitution?This has nothing to do with the constitution.....why do you need the constitution ?
you're dodging the question.....WHY do they need to know their names?
it has everything to do with the constitution you moron ...
how damn dumb are you ?
And again you never told us whey they needed them.
explaining reality to you is like teaching a door to spell ..
here ya go iotboi -
Excellent examples of cases recognizing the qualified First Amendment right of access to juror names and addresses include United States v. Wecht,[37] United States v. Doherty,[38] Commonwealth v. Long,[39] State ex rel. Beacon Journal Publ’g Co. v. Bond, [40] and People v. Mitchell.[41]
now please stfu.
and who made the PRESS the watchdog of our judicial system?From your articleNo it doesn't. Releasing names of jurors is not a constitutional issue. Where is it in the constitution?This has nothing to do with the constitution.....why do you need the constitution ?
you're dodging the question.....WHY do they need to know their names?
it has everything to do with the constitution you moron ...
how damn dumb are you ?
And again you never told us whey they needed them.
explaining reality to you is like teaching a door to spell ..
here ya go iotboi -
Excellent examples of cases recognizing the qualified First Amendment right of access to juror names and addresses include United States v. Wecht,[37] United States v. Doherty,[38] Commonwealth v. Long,[39] State ex rel. Beacon Journal Publ’g Co. v. Bond, [40] and People v. Mitchell.[41]
now please stfu.
morons arguing about something they know nothing about - amazing
The use of anonymous juries undoubtedly raises important questions concerning a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial.[10] Their use, however, also raises important questions for journalists who cover the courts. Jurors in high profile cases are often a fundamental part of the story. Even though journalists, as a matter of ethics, typically refrain from interviewing jurors during a trial, journalists routinely make post-verdict requests for interviews. These interviews can enlighten the judicial process for readers and viewers, often shedding light on why a particular juror voted as he or she did.[11] Moreover, although journalists typically avoid naming jurors before and after a verdict is entered, journalists occasionally feel it is necessary to name jurors when serving as “watchdogs” of the democratic process. For instance, as the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit recently noted, a press investigation into the jury in the corruption trial of former Illinois Governor George Ryan revealed that several jurors “had lied on their questionnaires and had disqualifying convictions or otherwise might have been subject to challenge for cause.”[12]
Ah they want to serve as "watchdogs" IE.....unleash the mob on these people......and like kitty said earlier because they want to show the next jury what will happen if they don't give the correct result (guilty)
Again, you haven't answered the question....WHY does the press need to know?No it doesn't. Releasing names of jurors is not a constitutional issue. Where is it in the constitution?This has nothing to do with the constitution.....
you're dodging the question.....WHY do they need to know their names?
it has everything to do with the constitution you moron ...
how damn dumb are you ?
And again you never told us whey they needed them.
explaining reality to you is like teaching a door to spell ..
here ya go iotboi -
Excellent examples of cases recognizing the qualified First Amendment right of access to juror names and addresses include United States v. Wecht,[37] United States v. Doherty,[38] Commonwealth v. Long,[39] State ex rel. Beacon Journal Publ’g Co. v. Bond, [40] and People v. Mitchell.[41]
now please stfu.
On another site it was mentioned the press may already be in contact with a juror and need the names released as cover. With this corrupt media it wouldn't surprise me.
Why does the press want the names of jurors? funny how it's in this case.
Other than trying to intimidate and scare people, why do you want to know who the jurors are?
CNN, NYT And Other News Outlets Ask Manafort Judge To Release Jurors’ Names, Addresses
How is that something of the 1st amendment? Dude you wipe your ass with those fingers?
fuck the 1st amendmant huh .. figures.
Post itAgain, you haven't answered the question....WHY does the press need to know?No it doesn't. Releasing names of jurors is not a constitutional issue. Where is it in the constitution?it has everything to do with the constitution you moron ...
how damn dumb are you ?
And again you never told us whey they needed them.
explaining reality to you is like teaching a door to spell ..
here ya go iotboi -
Excellent examples of cases recognizing the qualified First Amendment right of access to juror names and addresses include United States v. Wecht,[37] United States v. Doherty,[38] Commonwealth v. Long,[39] State ex rel. Beacon Journal Publ’g Co. v. Bond, [40] and People v. Mitchell.[41]
now please stfu.
On another site it was mentioned the press may already be in contact with a juror and need the names released as cover. With this corrupt media it wouldn't surprise me.
the 1st amendment right of access escapes you too ?
even after I gave 4 court cases as references ---
```````````````````````````````````````
and the country wonders why Trump won
Well then I want access to mueller’s information he’s collected. What’s different?Again, you haven't answered the question....WHY does the press need to know?No it doesn't. Releasing names of jurors is not a constitutional issue. Where is it in the constitution?it has everything to do with the constitution you moron ...
how damn dumb are you ?
And again you never told us whey they needed them.
explaining reality to you is like teaching a door to spell ..
here ya go iotboi -
Excellent examples of cases recognizing the qualified First Amendment right of access to juror names and addresses include United States v. Wecht,[37] United States v. Doherty,[38] Commonwealth v. Long,[39] State ex rel. Beacon Journal Publ’g Co. v. Bond, [40] and People v. Mitchell.[41]
now please stfu.
On another site it was mentioned the press may already be in contact with a juror and need the names released as cover. With this corrupt media it wouldn't surprise me.
the 1st amendment right of access escapes you too ?
even after I gave 4 court cases as references ---
```````````````````````````````````````
and the country wonders why Trump won
Your title is incomplete.Why does the press want the names of jurors? funny how it's in this case.
Other than trying to intimidate and scare people, why do you want to know who the jurors are?
CNN, NYT And Other News Outlets Ask Manafort Judge To Release Jurors’ Names, Addresses
Your title is incomplete.Why does the press want the names of jurors? funny how it's in this case.
Other than trying to intimidate and scare people, why do you want to know who the jurors are?
CNN, NYT And Other News Outlets Ask Manafort Judge To Release Jurors’ Names, Addresses
The press is the enemy....
...of lies.
dOnald tRump and his loyal tRumplings tell many many many lies. They are natural enemies.
What lies are those? The reason tRump is pissed is they won't let his lies go. And they shouldn't. Neither should you.Your title is incomplete.Why does the press want the names of jurors? funny how it's in this case.
Other than trying to intimidate and scare people, why do you want to know who the jurors are?
CNN, NYT And Other News Outlets Ask Manafort Judge To Release Jurors’ Names, Addresses
The press is the enemy....
...of lies.
dOnald tRump and his loyal tRumplings tell many many many lies. They are natural enemies.
Your just mad that Trump doesn't allow the left's lies to go unchallenged.
Post itAgain, you haven't answered the question....WHY does the press need to know?No it doesn't. Releasing names of jurors is not a constitutional issue. Where is it in the constitution?
And again you never told us whey they needed them.
explaining reality to you is like teaching a door to spell ..
here ya go iotboi -
Excellent examples of cases recognizing the qualified First Amendment right of access to juror names and addresses include United States v. Wecht,[37] United States v. Doherty,[38] Commonwealth v. Long,[39] State ex rel. Beacon Journal Publ’g Co. v. Bond, [40] and People v. Mitchell.[41]
now please stfu.
On another site it was mentioned the press may already be in contact with a juror and need the names released as cover. With this corrupt media it wouldn't surprise me.
the 1st amendment right of access escapes you too ?
even after I gave 4 court cases as references ---
```````````````````````````````````````
and the country wonders why Trump won
What lies are those? The reason tRump is pissed is they won't let his lies go. And they shouldn't. Neither should you.Your title is incomplete.Why does the press want the names of jurors? funny how it's in this case.
Other than trying to intimidate and scare people, why do you want to know who the jurors are?
CNN, NYT And Other News Outlets Ask Manafort Judge To Release Jurors’ Names, Addresses
The press is the enemy....
...of lies.
dOnald tRump and his loyal tRumplings tell many many many lies. They are natural enemies.
Your just mad that Trump doesn't allow the left's lies to go unchallenged.
To know what it is you think is in it that requires names of jurors. Got an amendment?I'll ask this again...why do they need those names?
fuck the 1st amendmant huh .. figures.
why do you need the constitution ?
No you didn’t. Post it punkPost itAgain, you haven't answered the question....WHY does the press need to know?explaining reality to you is like teaching a door to spell ..
here ya go iotboi -
Excellent examples of cases recognizing the qualified First Amendment right of access to juror names and addresses include United States v. Wecht,[37] United States v. Doherty,[38] Commonwealth v. Long,[39] State ex rel. Beacon Journal Publ’g Co. v. Bond, [40] and People v. Mitchell.[41]
now please stfu.
On another site it was mentioned the press may already be in contact with a juror and need the names released as cover. With this corrupt media it wouldn't surprise me.
the 1st amendment right of access escapes you too ?
even after I gave 4 court cases as references ---
```````````````````````````````````````
and the country wonders why Trump won
I did asshat .. keep up or drop out.
Not as dumb as you obviously.This has nothing to do with the constitution.....I'll ask this again...why do they need those names?
fuck the 1st amendmant huh .. figures.
why do you need the constitution ?
you're dodging the question.....WHY do they need to know their names?
it has everything to do with the constitution you moron ...
how damn dumb are you ?
Its more like this:What lies are those? The reason tRump is pissed is they won't let his lies go. And they shouldn't. Neither should you.Your title is incomplete.Why does the press want the names of jurors? funny how it's in this case.
Other than trying to intimidate and scare people, why do you want to know who the jurors are?
CNN, NYT And Other News Outlets Ask Manafort Judge To Release Jurors’ Names, Addresses
The press is the enemy....
...of lies.
dOnald tRump and his loyal tRumplings tell many many many lies. They are natural enemies.
Your just mad that Trump doesn't allow the left's lies to go unchallenged.
Trump has shot the liberal media propaganda machine full of holes its hilarious
No, no it isn’t.Again, you haven't answered the question....WHY does the press need to know?No it doesn't. Releasing names of jurors is not a constitutional issue. Where is it in the constitution?This has nothing to do with the constitution.....
you're dodging the question.....WHY do they need to know their names?
it has everything to do with the constitution you moron ...
how damn dumb are you ?
And again you never told us whey they needed them.
explaining reality to you is like teaching a door to spell ..
here ya go iotboi -
Excellent examples of cases recognizing the qualified First Amendment right of access to juror names and addresses include United States v. Wecht,[37] United States v. Doherty,[38] Commonwealth v. Long,[39] State ex rel. Beacon Journal Publ’g Co. v. Bond, [40] and People v. Mitchell.[41]
now please stfu.
IT'S - THEIR -CONSTITUTIONAL - RIGHT.
stupid ass RW's crack me up
None you can name!Your title is incomplete.Why does the press want the names of jurors? funny how it's in this case.
Other than trying to intimidate and scare people, why do you want to know who the jurors are?
CNN, NYT And Other News Outlets Ask Manafort Judge To Release Jurors’ Names, Addresses
The press is the enemy....
...of lies.
dOnald tRump and his loyal tRumplings tell many many many lies. They are natural enemies.
The ones unreported, like BrennanWhat lies are those? The reason tRump is pissed is they won't let his lies go. And they shouldn't. Neither should you.Your title is incomplete.Why does the press want the names of jurors? funny how it's in this case.
Other than trying to intimidate and scare people, why do you want to know who the jurors are?
CNN, NYT And Other News Outlets Ask Manafort Judge To Release Jurors’ Names, Addresses
The press is the enemy....
...of lies.
dOnald tRump and his loyal tRumplings tell many many many lies. They are natural enemies.
Your just mad that Trump doesn't allow the left's lies to go unchallenged.
