The 'Real' Black Man in Politics

[Asclepias]

Liberals, who constantly screamed 'racism' every time someone criticized any one of the President's failed policies, policies or Un-Constitution / Law - violating acts have insisted that Ben Carson is a 'token' black while Barak Obama is the 'real' black man in politics.

A Review of the facts and each man's bio proves differently:

Barak Obama was raised by an all-white mother and all-white grandparents.
Ben Carson was raised by his single mother.
EDGE: Ben Carson

Barak Obama was raised in a Hawaii suburb neighborhood and attended expensive, exclusive private schools.
Ben Carson grew up poor in inner-city Detroit where he went to Southwestern High School, a public school
EDGE: Ben Carson

Ben Carson ensures disadvantaged black students can get scholarships
Barak Obama has created no program to help blacks succeed or to improve their status, praised President LBJ - calling the man who created the DNC agenda of 'Economic Slavery' and who once declared, "I'll have these ni@@ers voting 'Democrat' the next 200 years", the black people's 'best friend'.
EDGE: Ben Carson

Ben Carson received the Spingarn Medal - the highest honor bestowed by the NAACP
Barak Obama was honored for 'Lie of the Year'
EDGE: Ben Carson

------------------------------
Ben Carson graduated high School with honors.
Barak Obama: We have no idea what kind of high school or college student Barak Obama was because he had all of his records SEALED
EDGE: Ben Carson

Ben Carson's mother and father liked the United States.
Barak Obama's parents disliked the United States.
EDGE: Ben Carson

Ben Carson's father was a Baptist Minister
Barak Obama was mentored by a racist hate-spewing Anti-American 'pastor' for decades
EDGE: Ben Carson

Ben Carson's wife has always been proud of her country.
Barak Obama's wife was only ever proud of her country after her husband won the Presidency.
EDGE: Ben Carson (and Lacrena Rustin Carson)

Ben Carson never used drugs.
Barak Obama was an admitted (almost bragging) drug user (Pot, cocaine...)
EDGE: Ben Carson

Ben Carson has always wanted to SAVE lives.
Barak Obama argued for the right to kill living, breathing babies outside the womb who had survived a failed abortion.
EDGE: Ben Carson

Ben Carson gave a speech at the national Prayer Breakfast.
President Obama CANCELLED the National Prayer Breakfast.
EDGE: Ben Carson

Ben Carson was named one of the nation's 20 foremost physicians and scientists by Time Magazine, one of 89 "Living Legends" by the Library of Congress, received the Spingarn Medal - the highest honor bestowed by the NAACP, and was awarded the Ford's Theater Lincoln Medal and the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the U.S. highest civilian honors.
Barak Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize and was awarded for the 'lie of the Year'
EDGE: Ben Carson
.
.
.
.

(Let the liberal foaming at the mouth begin.... ...)

Carson has more experience at being an uncle ruckus. Since his mom liked Black guys, I'm sure Obama learned about being Black long before he reached adulthood. Carson is not fit to be POTUS for several reasons. The most obvious being he is an uncle ruckus.

 

[Rustic]

(Let the liberal foaming at the mouth begin.... ...)

no one is foaming at the mouth but right2wingnut loons.

are we supposed to like him BECAUSE he's black. he represents the stupidest and ugliest wingnuttiest political positions. why on earth would we vote for him, freak?

The same can be said for Obama if not for political correctness, face it progressives are control freaks...

 

[Rustic]

I'm guessing Carson's race is very important to conservatives.

Tell that to the progressives, all they talk about is race...

So you're saying that the OP is a progressive?

Na, I am saying all the progressives in Washington have the same crutch... Race. If you disagree with them you have to be racist/sexist that is the card they have left. They have made those terms meaningless, it's sad being a minority myself.

Odd, in a thread about a lie Carson told in the last debate a couple of wingnuts are calling everyone a racist for pointing out said lie.

Now, I'm treated to comparing the blackness of Carson to Obama in the OP.

You guys are pathetic.

Political correctness never takes in to account for the individual, it just says you have act and say what you are told depending on your race...

Says the control freak...

 

[Ringel05]

Ben Carson is no token, but he is not qualified to be President.

Who is qualified and when were those qualifications "enacted"? Were they added to the requirements laid down in the Constitution by our forefathers or have we again instilled an aristocracy of the electable who's qualifications include self and party over country? Oh wait, why am I asking that question.........

how about he knows nothing about government, nothing about the courts, and has political opinions that are bizarre. the fact that he's soft-spoken doesn't make what he says any less vile.

it's really that simple. and they're the ones running around claiming someone who was one of the top 100 attorneys in the country, was first lady, secretary of state and senator from new York has no "record of accomplishment".

so I think, perhaps, their methodology for making those assessments is a bit random.

How about the original concept that any natural born citizen who meets the criteria laid out in the constitution can become president..... But now we appear to have an aristocracy of the electable........ Or is it just partisan politics to deem someone "unqualified"?
Seems ya missed my point Jill.

 

[Asclepias]

Ben Carson is no token, but he is not qualified to be President.

Who is qualified and when were those qualifications "enacted"? Were they added to the requirements laid down in the Constitution by our forefathers or have we again instilled an aristocracy of the electable who's qualifications include self and party over country? Oh wait, why am I asking that question.........

how about he knows nothing about government, nothing about the courts, and has political opinions that are bizarre. the fact that he's soft-spoken doesn't make what he says any less vile.

it's really that simple. and they're the ones running around claiming someone who was one of the top 100 attorneys in the country, was first lady, secretary of state and senator from new York has no "record of accomplishment".

so I think, perhaps, their methodology for making those assessments is a bit random.

How about the original concept that any natural born citizen who meets the criteria laid out in the constitution can become president..... But now we appear to have an aristocracy of the electable........ Or is it just partisan politics to deem someone "unqualified"?
Seems ya missed my point Jill.

In order to become president people have to vote for you. The "unqualified" part comes in when its common knowledge there is no way that enough people are that out touch to put him in office.

 

[jillian]

Ben Carson is no token, but he is not qualified to be President.

Who is qualified and when were those qualifications "enacted"? Were they added to the requirements laid down in the Constitution by our forefathers or have we again instilled an aristocracy of the electable who's qualifications include self and party over country? Oh wait, why am I asking that question.........

how about he knows nothing about government, nothing about the courts, and has political opinions that are bizarre. the fact that he's soft-spoken doesn't make what he says any less vile.

it's really that simple. and they're the ones running around claiming someone who was one of the top 100 attorneys in the country, was first lady, secretary of state and senator from new York has no "record of accomplishment".

so I think, perhaps, their methodology for making those assessments is a bit random.

How about the original concept that any natural born citizen who meets the criteria laid out in the constitution can become president..... But now we appear to have an aristocracy of the electable........ Or is it just partisan politics to deem someone "unqualified"?
Seems ya missed my point Jill.

I think the job has gotten a bit large for that. but clearly they can run. that doesn't mean they should. and rejecting ben carson as a candidate certainly isn't "racism". that's absurd.

but I do require smart and sane. and I suspect someone who compares abortion to slavery and health coverage to the murder of eleven million people is not sane.

 

[Ringel05]

Ben Carson is no token, but he is not qualified to be President.

Who is qualified and when were those qualifications "enacted"? Were they added to the requirements laid down in the Constitution by our forefathers or have we again instilled an aristocracy of the electable who's qualifications include self and party over country? Oh wait, why am I asking that question.........

how about he knows nothing about government, nothing about the courts, and has political opinions that are bizarre. the fact that he's soft-spoken doesn't make what he says any less vile.

it's really that simple. and they're the ones running around claiming someone who was one of the top 100 attorneys in the country, was first lady, secretary of state and senator from new York has no "record of accomplishment".

so I think, perhaps, their methodology for making those assessments is a bit random.

How about the original concept that any natural born citizen who meets the criteria laid out in the constitution can become president..... But now we appear to have an aristocracy of the electable........ Or is it just partisan politics to deem someone "unqualified"?
Seems ya missed my point Jill.

In order to become president people have to vote for you. The "unqualified" part comes in when its common knowledge there is no way that enough people are that out touch to put him in office.

That's one excuse that works for you.
I'm not advocating, just making a point.........

 

[Rustic]

Ben Carson is no token, but he is not qualified to be President.

Who is qualified and when were those qualifications "enacted"? Were they added to the requirements laid down in the Constitution by our forefathers or have we again instilled an aristocracy of the electable who's qualifications include self and party over country? Oh wait, why am I asking that question.........

how about he knows nothing about government, nothing about the courts, and has political opinions that are bizarre. the fact that he's soft-spoken doesn't make what he says any less vile.

it's really that simple. and they're the ones running around claiming someone who was one of the top 100 attorneys in the country, was first lady, secretary of state and senator from new York has no "record of accomplishment".

so I think, perhaps, their methodology for making those assessments is a bit random.

How about the original concept that any natural born citizen who meets the criteria laid out in the constitution can become president..... But now we appear to have an aristocracy of the electable........ Or is it just partisan politics to deem someone "unqualified"?
Seems ya missed my point Jill.

I think the job has gotten a bit large for that. but clearly they can run. that doesn't mean they should. and rejecting ben carson as a candidate certainly isn't "racism". that's absurd.

but I do require smart and sane. and I suspect someone who compares abortion to slavery and health coverage to the murder of eleven million people is not sane.

...ya abortion is killing more people

 

[Ringel05]

Ben Carson is no token, but he is not qualified to be President.

Who is qualified and when were those qualifications "enacted"? Were they added to the requirements laid down in the Constitution by our forefathers or have we again instilled an aristocracy of the electable who's qualifications include self and party over country? Oh wait, why am I asking that question.........

how about he knows nothing about government, nothing about the courts, and has political opinions that are bizarre. the fact that he's soft-spoken doesn't make what he says any less vile.

it's really that simple. and they're the ones running around claiming someone who was one of the top 100 attorneys in the country, was first lady, secretary of state and senator from new York has no "record of accomplishment".

so I think, perhaps, their methodology for making those assessments is a bit random.

How about the original concept that any natural born citizen who meets the criteria laid out in the constitution can become president..... But now we appear to have an aristocracy of the electable........ Or is it just partisan politics to deem someone "unqualified"?
Seems ya missed my point Jill.

I think the job has gotten a bit large for that. but clearly they can run. that doesn't mean they should. and rejecting ben carson as a candidate certainly isn't "racism". that's absurd.

but I do require smart and sane. and I suspect someone who compares abortion to slavery and health coverage to the murder of eleven million people is not sane.

And there are others who would disagree strongly with that assessment.
But it sounds like what you're saying is "it's my way or the highway........"

 

[Ringel05]

Personally I believe another career politician will be elected and whichever one it is my candidate will be the one..........

 

[jillian]

Ben Carson is no token, but he is not qualified to be President.

Who is qualified and when were those qualifications "enacted"? Were they added to the requirements laid down in the Constitution by our forefathers or have we again instilled an aristocracy of the electable who's qualifications include self and party over country? Oh wait, why am I asking that question.........

how about he knows nothing about government, nothing about the courts, and has political opinions that are bizarre. the fact that he's soft-spoken doesn't make what he says any less vile.

it's really that simple. and they're the ones running around claiming someone who was one of the top 100 attorneys in the country, was first lady, secretary of state and senator from new York has no "record of accomplishment".

so I think, perhaps, their methodology for making those assessments is a bit random.

How about the original concept that any natural born citizen who meets the criteria laid out in the constitution can become president..... But now we appear to have an aristocracy of the electable........ Or is it just partisan politics to deem someone "unqualified"?
Seems ya missed my point Jill.

In order to become president people have to vote for you. The "unqualified" part comes in when its common knowledge there is no way that enough people are that out touch to put him in office.

That's one excuse that works for you.
I'm not advocating, just making a point.........

how about I disagree with everything he says. that has nothing to do with the color of his skin.

 

[jillian]

Ben Carson is no token, but he is not qualified to be President.

Who is qualified and when were those qualifications "enacted"? Were they added to the requirements laid down in the Constitution by our forefathers or have we again instilled an aristocracy of the electable who's qualifications include self and party over country? Oh wait, why am I asking that question.........

how about he knows nothing about government, nothing about the courts, and has political opinions that are bizarre. the fact that he's soft-spoken doesn't make what he says any less vile.

it's really that simple. and they're the ones running around claiming someone who was one of the top 100 attorneys in the country, was first lady, secretary of state and senator from new York has no "record of accomplishment".

so I think, perhaps, their methodology for making those assessments is a bit random.

How about the original concept that any natural born citizen who meets the criteria laid out in the constitution can become president..... But now we appear to have an aristocracy of the electable........ Or is it just partisan politics to deem someone "unqualified"?
Seems ya missed my point Jill.

I think the job has gotten a bit large for that. but clearly they can run. that doesn't mean they should. and rejecting ben carson as a candidate certainly isn't "racism". that's absurd.

but I do require smart and sane. and I suspect someone who compares abortion to slavery and health coverage to the murder of eleven million people is not sane.

And there are others who would disagree strongly with that assessment.
But it sounds like what you're saying is "it's my way or the highway........"

no. I think those analogies are kind of wacky.

slavery is slavery. and having health coverage bears no rational relationship to the murder of 11 million people.

we can agree this has nothing to do with the color of his skin, right?

 

[Ringel05]

Who is qualified and when were those qualifications "enacted"? Were they added to the requirements laid down in the Constitution by our forefathers or have we again instilled an aristocracy of the electable who's qualifications include self and party over country? Oh wait, why am I asking that question.........

how about he knows nothing about government, nothing about the courts, and has political opinions that are bizarre. the fact that he's soft-spoken doesn't make what he says any less vile.

it's really that simple. and they're the ones running around claiming someone who was one of the top 100 attorneys in the country, was first lady, secretary of state and senator from new York has no "record of accomplishment".

so I think, perhaps, their methodology for making those assessments is a bit random.

How about the original concept that any natural born citizen who meets the criteria laid out in the constitution can become president..... But now we appear to have an aristocracy of the electable........ Or is it just partisan politics to deem someone "unqualified"?
Seems ya missed my point Jill.

In order to become president people have to vote for you. The "unqualified" part comes in when its common knowledge there is no way that enough people are that out touch to put him in office.

That's one excuse that works for you.
I'm not advocating, just making a point.........

how about I disagree with everything he says. that has nothing to do with the color of his skin.

Never said otherwise but you also know I'm a political agnostic, that I know both sides are so full of shit that administering an enema would constitute murder...........

 

[Ringel05]

Who is qualified and when were those qualifications "enacted"? Were they added to the requirements laid down in the Constitution by our forefathers or have we again instilled an aristocracy of the electable who's qualifications include self and party over country? Oh wait, why am I asking that question.........

how about he knows nothing about government, nothing about the courts, and has political opinions that are bizarre. the fact that he's soft-spoken doesn't make what he says any less vile.

it's really that simple. and they're the ones running around claiming someone who was one of the top 100 attorneys in the country, was first lady, secretary of state and senator from new York has no "record of accomplishment".

so I think, perhaps, their methodology for making those assessments is a bit random.

How about the original concept that any natural born citizen who meets the criteria laid out in the constitution can become president..... But now we appear to have an aristocracy of the electable........ Or is it just partisan politics to deem someone "unqualified"?
Seems ya missed my point Jill.

I think the job has gotten a bit large for that. but clearly they can run. that doesn't mean they should. and rejecting ben carson as a candidate certainly isn't "racism". that's absurd.

but I do require smart and sane. and I suspect someone who compares abortion to slavery and health coverage to the murder of eleven million people is not sane.

And there are others who would disagree strongly with that assessment.
But it sounds like what you're saying is "it's my way or the highway........"

no. I think those analogies are kind of wacky.

slavery is slavery. and having health coverage bears no rational relationship to the murder of 11 million people.

we can agree this has nothing to do with the color of his skin, right?

Not saying I don't disagree with you, again not my point. Remember I have what would be considered by some to be an outsider's perspective, I prefer to call it a fed up insider's perspective........

 

[easyt65]

Carson has more experience at being an uncle ruckus. Since his mom liked Black guys, I'm sure Obama learned about being Black long before he reached adulthood. Carson is not fit to be POTUS for several reasons. The most obvious being he is an uncle ruckus.

Wow, you are such a racist....

 

[HappyJoy]

I'm guessing Carson's race is very important to conservatives.

*yawn*

Why do people keep talking about race? Can we please stick to the issues? Can we talk some more about Ben Carson's plan to tax corporate profits at a rate of up to 45 percent?

Tell that to the progressives, all they talk about is race...

So you're saying that the OP is a progressive?

Na, I am saying all the progressives in Washington have the same crutch... Race. If you disagree with them you have to be racist/sexist that is the card they have left. They have made those terms meaningless, it's sad being a minority myself.

Odd, in a thread about a lie Carson told in the last debate a couple of wingnuts are calling everyone a racist for pointing out said lie.

Now, I'm treated to comparing the blackness of Carson to Obama in the OP.

You guys are pathetic.

Political correctness never takes in to account for the individual, it just says you have act and say what you are told depending on your race...

You don't have to reply to my post if you don't want to. If you do, I don't know....maybe read it and then base your response on the words contained within it.

 

[Rustic]

Who is qualified and when were those qualifications "enacted"? Were they added to the requirements laid down in the Constitution by our forefathers or have we again instilled an aristocracy of the electable who's qualifications include self and party over country? Oh wait, why am I asking that question.........

how about he knows nothing about government, nothing about the courts, and has political opinions that are bizarre. the fact that he's soft-spoken doesn't make what he says any less vile.

it's really that simple. and they're the ones running around claiming someone who was one of the top 100 attorneys in the country, was first lady, secretary of state and senator from new York has no "record of accomplishment".

so I think, perhaps, their methodology for making those assessments is a bit random.

How about the original concept that any natural born citizen who meets the criteria laid out in the constitution can become president..... But now we appear to have an aristocracy of the electable........ Or is it just partisan politics to deem someone "unqualified"?
Seems ya missed my point Jill.

I think the job has gotten a bit large for that. but clearly they can run. that doesn't mean they should. and rejecting ben carson as a candidate certainly isn't "racism". that's absurd.

but I do require smart and sane. and I suspect someone who compares abortion to slavery and health coverage to the murder of eleven million people is not sane.

And there are others who would disagree strongly with that assessment.
But it sounds like what you're saying is "it's my way or the highway........"

no. I think those analogies are kind of wacky.

slavery is slavery. and having health coverage bears no rational relationship to the murder of 11 million people.

we can agree this has nothing to do with the color of his skin, right?

Except health coverage is not an right, and should never be forced on anyone.
It's a control thing you may not understand.
The Indian nations know all about forced "healthcare"(shots and other such things) look it up for yourself.

 

[Rustic]

I'm guessing Carson's race is very important to conservatives.

Tell that to the progressives, all they talk about is race...

So you're saying that the OP is a progressive?

Na, I am saying all the progressives in Washington have the same crutch... Race. If you disagree with them you have to be racist/sexist that is the card they have left. They have made those terms meaningless, it's sad being a minority myself.

Odd, in a thread about a lie Carson told in the last debate a couple of wingnuts are calling everyone a racist for pointing out said lie.

Now, I'm treated to comparing the blackness of Carson to Obama in the OP.

You guys are pathetic.

Political correctness never takes in to account for the individual, it just says you have act and say what you are told depending on your race...

You don't have to reply to my post if you don't want to. If you do, I don't know....maybe read it and then base your response on the words contained within it.

Says the politicially correct...

 

[jillian]

how about he knows nothing about government, nothing about the courts, and has political opinions that are bizarre. the fact that he's soft-spoken doesn't make what he says any less vile.

it's really that simple. and they're the ones running around claiming someone who was one of the top 100 attorneys in the country, was first lady, secretary of state and senator from new York has no "record of accomplishment".

so I think, perhaps, their methodology for making those assessments is a bit random.

How about the original concept that any natural born citizen who meets the criteria laid out in the constitution can become president..... But now we appear to have an aristocracy of the electable........ Or is it just partisan politics to deem someone "unqualified"?
Seems ya missed my point Jill.

In order to become president people have to vote for you. The "unqualified" part comes in when its common knowledge there is no way that enough people are that out touch to put him in office.

That's one excuse that works for you.
I'm not advocating, just making a point.........

how about I disagree with everything he says. that has nothing to do with the color of his skin.

Never said otherwise but you also know I'm a political agnostic, that I know both sides are so full of shit that administering an enema would constitute murder...........

the o/p seems to think if we don't vote for a rightwinger who happens to be black, it's a race issue.

and yes, they're all FOS. so i'll stick to voting for the POS's who share most of my views. I don't understand why the nutter o/p thinks we should do otherwise. I suspect he's projecting his own bigotry onto others. he is also a troll who clearly only likes carson because he thinks he ticks off the left.

heck, I think they should run him. they'll get creamed.

 

[Asclepias]

Carson has more experience at being an uncle ruckus. Since his mom liked Black guys, I'm sure Obama learned about being Black long before he reached adulthood. Carson is not fit to be POTUS for several reasons. The most obvious being he is an uncle ruckus.

Wow, you are such a racist....

Obviously you have no clue what racist means.