The religion of the left: Climate Change

[Shareprofit]

And power, mostly it's about the power.

Bull shit it's about doing someting to reduce GHG emissions you twit. No everyone have your corrupt mindset.

 

[Shareprofit]

The climate has always been changing, you ignorant buffoon. Did you think it was static?

When was the last time climate changed because of Man's emissions of GHGs.

 

[westwall]

Bull shit it's about doing someting to reduce GHG emissions you twit. No everyone have your corrupt mindset.

Buuuuuuut everyone involved in the globull warming fraud, IS!

 

[westwall]

When was the last time climate changed because of Man's emissions of GHGs.

When is the first time? There is ZERO evidence to support the claim.

Mr. So called scientist.

 

[Shareprofit]

Difference is the right is aware climate change exists, because it has for billions of years. It's you guys who lie about it so certain interests can acquire wealth.

I lost you at "The right is aware" FFS yoi clowns think Donald Trump won the 2020 election.

 

[Shareprofit]

Buuuuuuut everyone involved in the globull warming fraud, IS!

Who, name them.

 

[Shareprofit]

When is the first time? There is ZERO evidence to support the claim.

Mr. So called scientist.

Right now is the first time, Carbon isotope ratios in the atmosphere prove the extra CO2 was for fossils fuels. You are not well educated are you.

 

[2aguy]

Your data is for only 25 years here try the last 100 years.View attachment 755990

You mean after they adjusted the early data downward to pretend there was andn increase

 

[westwall]

Ther

Right now is the first time, Carbon isotope ratios in the atmosphere prove the extra CO2 was for fossils fuels. You are not well educated are you.

There is ZERO evidence to support that claim.

ZERO.

 

[westwall]

Who, name them.

I just did. Everyone engaged in the globull warming fraud.

From viner to gore, and everyone in between.

 

[WTH_Progs?]

How many times did climate change because of man's emissions of GHGs?

twoty-three?

 

[Orangecat]

When was the last time climate changed because of Man's emissions of GHGs.

That has never happened and it's not happening now. You've been duped, kid.
Also, questions end in question marks, you illiterate imbecile.

 

[Shareprofit]

You mean after they adjusted the early data downward to pretend there was andn increase

How do you know that? News for you not everyone has a corrupt mindset like you and Trumpers.

 

[Shareprofit]

That has never happened and it's not happening now. You've been duped, kid.
Also, questions end in question marks, you illiterate imbecile.

How do you know it's not happening now more you're a conservative scared of reality. You'd prefer to be told what you like to hear which is why you love Trump.

 

[2aguy]

How do you know that? News for you not everyone has a corrupt mindset like you and Trumpers.

This....


What do we mean by fraudulent? How about this: NOAA has made repeated "adjustments" to its data, for the presumed scientific reason of making the data sets more accurate.

Nothing wrong with that. Except, all their changes point to one thing — lowering previously measured temperatures to show cooler weather in the past, and raising more recent temperatures to show warming in the recent present.

This creates a data illusion of ever-rising temperatures to match the increase in CO2 in the Earth's atmosphere since the mid-1800s, which global warming advocates say is a cause-and-effect relationship. The more CO2, the more warming.
--
But the actual measured temperature record shows something different: There have been hot years and hot decades since the turn of the last century, and colder years and colder decades. But the overall measured temperature shows no clear trend over the last century, at least not one that suggests runaway warming.


That is, until the NOAA's statisticians "adjust" the data. Using complex statistical models, they change the data to reflect not reality, but their underlying theories of global warming. That's clear from a simple fact of statistics: Data generate random errors, which cancel out over time. So by averaging data, the errors mostly disappear.

That's not what NOAA does.

According to the NOAA, the errors aren't random. They're systematic. As we noted, all of their temperature adjustments lean cooler in the distant past, and warmer in the more recent past. But they're very fuzzy about why this should be.

Far from legitimately "adjusting" anything, it appears they are cooking the data to show a politically correct trend toward global warming. Not by coincidence, that has been part and parcel of the government's underlying policies for the better part of two decades.
-----
As Tony Heller at the Real Climate Science web site notes, "Pre-2000 temperatures are progressively cooled, and post-2000 temperatures are warmed. This year has been a particularly spectacular episode of data tampering by NOAA, as they introduce nearly 2.5 degrees of fake warming since 1895."

So the global warming scare is basically a hoax.

This winter, for instance, as measured by temperature in city after city and by snow-storm severity, has been one of the coldest on record in the Northeast.

But after the NOAA's wizards finished with the data, it was merely about average.

The Stunning Statistical Fraud Behind The Global Warming Scare

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration may have a boring name, but it has a very important job: It measures U.S. temperatures. Unfortunately, its data are fraudulent.

www.investors.com

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Carlson is an idiot. The left don't believe in climate change we accept it as a scientific fact. It's you denying Chumps who have to believe in what's not happening.

Tell us again how you have “consensus”

 

[Shareprofit]

I just did. Everyone engaged in the globull warming fraud.

From viner to gore, and everyone in between.

So Gore is a big part of everyone, idiot. You really are a gutless wonder that you can't face the reality of CC.

 

[Shareprofit]

Tell us again how you have “consensus”

You right wing retards are not part of the concensus. You don't know shit about anything.

 

[Stryder50]

Glaciers and Greenland are melting, sea temperatures are rising and the frequency of the severe weather events is increasing.

None of which you document or provide supporting proof for.
Greenland is a land mass island and is not "melting".
Globally, some glaciers are melting, others are growing.
FWIW, I didn't say we are going into an Ice Age, only that if not careful we could rush one upon us.

I'd suggest some historical perspective;

 

[Shareprofit]

This....


What do we mean by fraudulent? How about this: NOAA has made repeated "adjustments" to its data, for the presumed scientific reason of making the data sets more accurate.

Nothing wrong with that. Except, all their changes point to one thing — lowering previously measured temperatures to show cooler weather in the past, and raising more recent temperatures to show warming in the recent present.

This creates a data illusion of ever-rising temperatures to match the increase in CO2 in the Earth's atmosphere since the mid-1800s, which global warming advocates say is a cause-and-effect relationship. The more CO2, the more warming.
--
But the actual measured temperature record shows something different: There have been hot years and hot decades since the turn of the last century, and colder years and colder decades. But the overall measured temperature shows no clear trend over the last century, at least not one that suggests runaway warming.


That is, until the NOAA's statisticians "adjust" the data. Using complex statistical models, they change the data to reflect not reality, but their underlying theories of global warming. That's clear from a simple fact of statistics: Data generate random errors, which cancel out over time. So by averaging data, the errors mostly disappear.

That's not what NOAA does.

According to the NOAA, the errors aren't random. They're systematic. As we noted, all of their temperature adjustments lean cooler in the distant past, and warmer in the more recent past. But they're very fuzzy about why this should be.

Far from legitimately "adjusting" anything, it appears they are cooking the data to show a politically correct trend toward global warming. Not by coincidence, that has been part and parcel of the government's underlying policies for the better part of two decades.
-----
As Tony Heller at the Real Climate Science web site notes, "Pre-2000 temperatures are progressively cooled, and post-2000 temperatures are warmed. This year has been a particularly spectacular episode of data tampering by NOAA, as they introduce nearly 2.5 degrees of fake warming since 1895."

So the global warming scare is basically a hoax.

This winter, for instance, as measured by temperature in city after city and by snow-storm severity, has been one of the coldest on record in the Northeast.

But after the NOAA's wizards finished with the data, it was merely about average.

The Stunning Statistical Fraud Behind The Global Warming Scare

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration may have a boring name, but it has a very important job: It measures U.S. temperatures. Unfortunately, its data are fraudulent.

www.investors.com

Tony Heller FFS.

NASA did not create global warming by manipulating data

Scientists at NASA—as well as other groups—constantly work to ensure that the data being used to estimate global average temperatures are as accurate as possible. As time goes on, updates can lead to small changes to estimates for previous years. These changes, however, are much too small to...

climatefeedback.org