The Republican War On Women

I can't believe the bat sh crazy stuff the Republicans are doing....government mandated vaginal penetration ultrasounds, defunding family planning clincs that do cancer screenings, requiring women to tell their employers if they are having sex, saying contraception itself is "wrong", opposing contraception insurance coverage for women, passing bills that require doctors to lie to their patients about breast cancer, etc....

The wheels have come off the Republican Crazy Train.

Yep...Uh huh....Really.
Hey chris, pull your bottom lip over your head and swallow.
 
It's like no one notices that the white house consistently and continuously underpays women and prevents their advancement.

You mean, like the rest of the country does, but the Republicans insist it's not even true?

Ohh gee..Really boopie..Yer gonna go with that nonsense?
You'd stand a better chance running through a forest fire with gasoline soaked panties.
 
There is no Republican war on women. Anyone that believes that is a naive and gullible dumb ass.
There is a war on producers and hard workers in America. The moocher class wants more of their hard earned $$$$$.
 
Women will tell us in November if they thought there was a Republican war on women. Not all women are brain-dead Stepford wives. Many can think for themselves...
 
Women will tell us in November if they thought there was a Republican war on women. Not all women are brain-dead Stepford wives. Many can think for themselves...
Oh, paaaa-leeez. Now the racist, anti-semite, bigoted moron thinks it speaks for women, ESPECIALLY after implying that women are vaginas?

I knew you were stupid, but wow.

I bet the unprecedented 40% of single mothers in poverty under Obama are just big fans of Obama.
 
Women will tell us in November if they thought there was a Republican war on women. Not all women are brain-dead Stepford wives. Many can think for themselves...
Oh, paaaa-leeez. Now the racist, anti-semite, bigoted moron thinks it speaks for women, ESPECIALLY after implying that women are vaginas?

I knew you were stupid, but wow.

I bet the unprecedented 40% of single mothers in poverty under Obama are just big fans of Obama.

Shouldn't you be working on your GED? Or Special Olympics application?
 
Two new national polls show President Obama leading Republican challenger Mitt Romney, with one of the surveys offering an explanation: the marriage gap.

A Reuters/Ipsos poll gives Obama the edge over Romney, 49 percent to 43 percent, while a Quinnipiac University poll puts the president’s advantage at 46 percent to 43 percent.

The Quinnipiac survey shows married voters prefer Romney, 51 percent to 38 percent. But unmarried voters favor the president by 20 points, and single women support Obama 2-1 over Romney.

Unmarried voters propel President Obama to slim lead over Mitt Romney, poll shows - Political Intelligence - A national political and campaign blog from The Boston Globe - Boston.com
 
Two new national polls show President Obama leading Republican challenger Mitt Romney, with one of the surveys offering an explanation: the marriage gap.

A Reuters/Ipsos poll gives Obama the edge over Romney, 49 percent to 43 percent, while a Quinnipiac University poll puts the president’s advantage at 46 percent to 43 percent.

The Quinnipiac survey shows married voters prefer Romney, 51 percent to 38 percent. But unmarried voters favor the president by 20 points, and single women support Obama 2-1 over Romney.

Unmarried voters propel President Obama to slim lead over Mitt Romney, poll shows - Political Intelligence - A national political and campaign blog from The Boston Globe - Boston.com

Reuters oversamples Democrat 'registered voters' by about 9%.

Look it up.
 
Women will tell us in November if they thought there was a Republican war on women. Not all women are brain-dead Stepford wives. Many can think for themselves...
Oh, paaaa-leeez. Now the racist, anti-semite, bigoted moron thinks it speaks for women, ESPECIALLY after implying that women are vaginas?

I knew you were stupid, but wow.

I bet the unprecedented 40% of single mothers in poverty under Obama are just big fans of Obama.

Shouldn't you be working on your GED? Or Special Olympics application?
Nope. But your faux concern for women is noted.

No one is at war with women, but Obama certainly is still fucking them.
 
Two new national polls show President Obama leading Republican challenger Mitt Romney, with one of the surveys offering an explanation: the marriage gap.

A Reuters/Ipsos poll gives Obama the edge over Romney, 49 percent to 43 percent, while a Quinnipiac University poll puts the president’s advantage at 46 percent to 43 percent.

The Quinnipiac survey shows married voters prefer Romney, 51 percent to 38 percent. But unmarried voters favor the president by 20 points, and single women support Obama 2-1 over Romney.

Unmarried voters propel President Obama to slim lead over Mitt Romney, poll shows - Political Intelligence - A national political and campaign blog from The Boston Globe - Boston.com

Which demographic is more likely to vote in November - single women or married women?
 
Oh, paaaa-leeez. Now the racist, anti-semite, bigoted moron thinks it speaks for women, ESPECIALLY after implying that women are vaginas?

I knew you were stupid, but wow.

I bet the unprecedented 40% of single mothers in poverty under Obama are just big fans of Obama.

Shouldn't you be working on your GED? Or Special Olympics application?
Nope. But your faux concern for women is noted.

No one is at war with women, but Obama certainly is still fucking them.

Keep telling yourself that until November.

‘Bring It’: Women’s Groups Want To Go Toe To Toe With Romney | TPM2012
 
Shouldn't you be working on your GED? Or Special Olympics application?
Nope. But your faux concern for women is noted.

No one is at war with women, but Obama certainly is still fucking them.

Keep telling yourself that until November.

‘Bring It’: Women’s Groups Want To Go Toe To Toe With Romney | TPM2012
Obama is at war with women and children.

The following are 16 shocking statistics about child poverty in America that will break your heart....

#1 Child homelessness in the United States is now 33 percent higher than it was back in 2007.

#2 According to the National Center on Family Homelessness, 1.6 million American children "were living on the street, in homeless shelters or motels, or doubled up with other families last year".

#3 The percentage of children living in poverty in the United States increased from 16.9 percent in 2006 to nearly 22 percent in 2010. In the UK and in France the child poverty rate is well under 10 percent.

#4 A higher percentage of American children is living in poverty today than was living in poverty back in 1975.

#5 The number of children living in poverty in the U.S. has risen for four years in a row.

#6 There are 10 different U.S. states where at least one out of every four babies is born to a family living in poverty.

#7 Since 2007, the number of children living in poverty in the state of California has increased by 30 percent.

#8 According to the National Center for Children in Poverty, 36.4% of all children that live in Philadelphia are living in poverty, 40.1% of all children that live in Atlanta are living in poverty, 52.6% of all children that live in Cleveland are living in poverty and 53.6% of all children that live in Detroit are living in poverty.

#9 In the United States today, more than 35 percent of all African-American children are living in poverty and more than 33 percent of all Hispanic children are living in poverty.

#10 There are seven million children in the United States today that are not covered by health insurance at all.

#11 Today, one out of every seven Americans is on food stamps and one out of every four American children is on food stamps.

#12 It is being projected that approximately 50 percent of all U.S. children will be on food stamps at some point in their lives before they reach the age of 18.

#13 In 2010, 42 percent of all single mothers in the United States were on food stamps.

#14 There are 314 counties in the United States where at least 30% of the children are facing food insecurity.

#15 In Washington D.C., the "child food insecurity rate" is 32.3%.

#16 More than 20 million U.S. children rely on school meal programs to keep from going hungry.
 
Obama's war on women

The Great Recession has left behind the largest number of long-term unemployed people since records were first
kept in 1948.

Large numbers of Americans are already poor. The official federal measure of poverty and a new “Supplemental
Measure,” which accounts for several shortcomings in the official measure, both reveal a sobering fact: poverty in America
is remarkably widespread. In 2010, about 46.2 million Americans were living in poverty according to the official measure,
or about 15.1% of the U.S. population. The rate of poverty is slightly larger (16%) using the supplemental measure.

The number of people living in poverty is increasing and is expected to increase further, despite the recovery. The
proportion of people living in poverty has increased by 27% between the year before the onset of the Great Recession (2006)
and 2010. During the same period (2006-2010), the total population of the United States grew by less than 3.3%. The official
national estimates of people in poverty have risen each year since 2006: 36.5 million (2006), 37.3 million (2007), 39.8
million (2008), 43.6 million (2009), and 46.2 million (2010). Poverty is expected to increase again in 2011 due to the slow
pace of the economic recovery, the persistently high rate of unemployment, and the long duration of spells of unemployment.

The recent increase in the rate of poverty has not been uniform across subgroups. The increase in poverty since 2006
has been greater among Hispanics and African Americans than among Whites, greater among children than among the
elderly, and greater among female-headed households than other households. More surprising, however, is the growth in
poverty among working-age adults, especially younger people between the ages of 18 and 34.

....​
 
Obama's war on women

The Great Recession has left behind the largest number of long-term unemployed people since records were first
kept in 1948.

Large numbers of Americans are already poor. The official federal measure of poverty and a new “Supplemental
Measure,” which accounts for several shortcomings in the official measure, both reveal a sobering fact: poverty in America
is remarkably widespread. In 2010, about 46.2 million Americans were living in poverty according to the official measure,
or about 15.1% of the U.S. population. The rate of poverty is slightly larger (16%) using the supplemental measure.

The number of people living in poverty is increasing and is expected to increase further, despite the recovery. The
proportion of people living in poverty has increased by 27% between the year before the onset of the Great Recession (2006)
and 2010. During the same period (2006-2010), the total population of the United States grew by less than 3.3%. The official
national estimates of people in poverty have risen each year since 2006: 36.5 million (2006), 37.3 million (2007), 39.8
million (2008), 43.6 million (2009), and 46.2 million (2010). Poverty is expected to increase again in 2011 due to the slow
pace of the economic recovery, the persistently high rate of unemployment, and the long duration of spells of unemployment.

The recent increase in the rate of poverty has not been uniform across subgroups. The increase in poverty since 2006
has been greater among Hispanics and African Americans than among Whites, greater among children than among the
elderly, and greater among female-headed households than other households. More surprising, however, is the growth in
poverty among working-age adults, especially younger people between the ages of 18 and 34.

....​

That's funny. Actually, the title to your link is At Risk: America’s Poor During and After the Great Recession
 

Forum List

Back
Top