Listening
Gold Member
- Aug 27, 2011
- 14,989
- 1,650
- 260
There's an 'e' in heroes, by the way.
Three posts and this is the best she can do ?
No wonder Obama is screwed.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There's an 'e' in heroes, by the way.
BY: Andrew Stiles - May 24, 2012 5:00 am
Senate Democrats pay female staffers less than male staffers
A group of Democratic female senators on Wednesday declared war on the so-called gender pay gap, urging their colleagues to pass the aptly named Paycheck Fairness Act when Congress returns from recess next month. However, a substantial gender pay gap exists in their own offices, a Washington Free Beacon analysis of Senate salary data reveals.
Of the five senators who participated in Wednesdays press conferenceBarbara Mikulski (D., Md.), Patty Murray (D., Wash.), Debbie Stabenow (D., Mich.), Dianne Feinstein (D., Calif.) and Barbara Boxer (D., Calif.)three pay their female staff members significantly less than male staffers.
Murray, who has repeatedly accused Republicans of waging a war a women, is one of the worst offenders. Female members of Murrays staff made about $21,000 less per year than male staffers in 2011, a difference of 35.2 percent.
That is well above the 23 percent gap that Democrats claim exists between male and female workers nationwide. The figure is based on a 2010 U.S. Census Bureau report, and is technically accurate. However, as CNNs Lisa Sylvester has reported, when factors such as area of employment, hours of work, and time in the workplace are taken into account, the gap shrinks to about 5 percent.
A significant gender gap exists in Feinsteins office, where women also made about $21,000 less than men in 2011, but the percentage difference41 percentwas even higher than Murrays.
Boxers female staffers made about $5,000 less, a difference of 7.3 percent.
The Free Beacon used publicly available salary data from the transparency website Legistorm to calculate the figures, and considered only current full-time staff members who were employed for the entirety of fiscal year 2011.
The employee gender pay gap among Senate Democrats was not limited to Murray, Boxer, and Feinstein. Of the 50 members of the Senate Democratic caucus examined in the analysis, 37 senators paid their female staffers less than male staffers.
Senators elected in 2010Joe Manchin, Chris Coons, and Richard Blumenthalwere not considered due to incomplete salary data.
Women working for Senate Democrats in 2011 pulled in an average salary of $60,877. Men made about $6,500 more.
While the gap is significant, it is slightly smaller than that of the White House, which pays men about $10,000, or 13 percent, more on average, according to a previous Free Beacon analysis.
The pay differential is quite striking in some cases, especially among leading Democrats. Sen. Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.), who runs the Senate Democratic messaging operation, paid men $19,454 more on average, a 36 percent difference.
Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D., Ill.) paid men $13,063 more, a difference of 23 percent.
Other notable Senators whose gender pay gap was larger than 23 percent:
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I., Vt.)47.6 percent
Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D., N.M.)40 percent
Sen. Jon Tester (D., Mont.)34.2 percent
Sen. Ben Cardin (D., Md.)31.5 percent
Sen. Tom Carper (D., Del.)30.4 percent
Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D., Minn.)29.7 percent
Sen. Kent Conrad (D., N.D.)29.2 percent
Sen. Bill Nelson (D., Fla.)26.5 percent
Sen. Ron Wyden (D., Ore)26.4 percent
Sen. Tom Harkin (D., Iowa)23.2 percent
Senate Dems Betray Lilly | Washington Free Beacon
Seriously? You're attacking me because when I started a thread on this very subject, I was ridiculed into the ground? Every RWNJ on the forum lined up to tell me I was completely clueless. But now that it's your ammo, it's reality? Getthefuckouttahere.
Pull you head out of your ass.
Many of them defended the gap.
All you did was call them the names you won't call these piss poor hypocrites.
The gap exists. It always has.
Why ? You've never been able to explain why it is there.
Others try and you just call them sexist.
Maybe you need to Get........
Am I really that stupid? Who's the ass fedora who keeps engaging me in conversation? If I'm that damn dumb, then STFU.
And maybe I need to get - what?
Little, little man. Not even a big fish in a big pond; more like a minnow.
Am I really that stupid? Who's the ass fedora who keeps engaging me in conversation? If I'm that damn dumb, then STFU.
And maybe I need to get - what?
Little, little man. Not even a big fish in a big pond; more like a minnow.
Hahahahahahaha....your posts are so revealing.
Once again.....
Many on the right did not say there was no gap...they said there was a reason for it. All you did was call them sexists for explaining it.
Now, you're faced with your heros doing the same stuff and you obfuscate the point.
Why don't you stop your electronic babbling and post something relevant.
Like why, in 40 years, they have not been able to defeat the gap despite the fact that they have tried and tried.
Another thing you losers never addressed is how you would deal with the fact that there can be quite a pay gap between two men or two women doing the same job.
I realize that requires thought.....so don't hurt yourself.
On second thought......
There's an 'e' in heroes, by the way.
Fuck this fake war on women what about obama's war on the tax payer?
Under a bill in Pennsylvania women would have to undergo an invasive, vaginal ultrasound. That prospect is drawing outrage.
The bill, proposed by Rep. Kathy Rapp, a conservative Republican from Warren County, outlines what women seeking an abortion would undergo in great detail.
The bill requires that the woman not only get an ultrasound, but that the ultrasound screen be in her line of sight. The woman can choose to look away, the legislation states, but the technician performing the ultrasound would have to note if the woman viewed the results.
Hey,
Did anyone notice that the democrats nominated a man to run in Ben Nelson's stead.
But the GOP nominated a WOMAN !
And she is going to win......BTW: she was endorsed by another high profile woman.
Who would have thunk it ?
Did anyone tell these women the GOP has declared war on them ?
Hey,
Did anyone notice that the democrats nominated a man to run in Ben Nelson's stead.
But the GOP nominated a WOMAN !
And she is going to win......BTW: she was endorsed by another high profile woman.
Who would have thunk it ?
Did anyone tell these women the GOP has declared war on them ?
Most anyone with a functioning brain. It's a very conservative district.
Arizona Republicans want to force women to reveal to their boss whether they are having sex or not....
PHOENIX Women in Arizona trying to get reimbursed for birth control drugs through their employer-provided health plan could be required to prove that they are taking it for a medical reason such as acne, rather than to prevent pregnancy.A bill nearing passage in the Republican-led Legislature allows all employers, not just religious institutions, to opt out of providing contraceptive coverage when doing so would violate their religious or moral beliefs.When a female worker uses birth control pills, which can be used to treat a number of medical conditions, the bill would allow an employer who opted out to require her to reveal what she was taking it for in order to get reimbursed.